Diagnostics
Primary Areas to Assess/
Communication Domains
Obtain relevant client history and family history information including medical and nature of disorder
Conduct orofacial examination
Evaluate functional abilities in:
Articulation/Phonation
Language: Receptive/expressive
Motor
Voice
Fluency
Literacy
Resonance
Cognition
Chewing and swallowing abilities
Hearing abilities
Shipley, K. G., & McAfee, J. G. (2016)
Standardized vs. Non-Standardized Assessment
Standardized Assessment
Empirically developed evaluation tools with established statistical reliability and validity
Norm-referenced and criterion-referenced tests are used to measure and compare an individual's score to typical performance.
Pros:
Tests are objective
Useful for comparison to similar individuals
Tests are widely recognized making it comparable with other professionals
Manual consists of clear guidelines making it easy to administer
Insurance companies and school districts prefer for coverage
Cons:
Not individualized
Uniformed unnatural tests
Tests are not linguistically or culturally diverse making it inappropriate for certain clients
Non-standardized Assessment
Informal assessment evaluation measures individual performance without standardized comparison.
Pros:
Naturalistic
Clients participate in self-evaluation/self-monitoring
Allows individualization
Cons:
Lacks objectivity
Reliability and validity not secure
Implementation requires high level of training
Insurance companies and school districts prefer standardization for coverage
WHO MODEL
International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Heath (ICF) based on the World Health Organization (WHO model)
“Health” is defined as “the complete physical, mental, and social functioning of a person and not merely the absence of disease” by WHO.
ICF is a classification framework of health and health-related conditions
Used as a component of health
Can be used in inter-professional collaborative practice or with a person-centered care approach
For children and adults
Components/Classifications:
Functioning & Disability:
Body Functions and Structures including Anatomy, Physiology and Psychology
Activity and participation of a person's functional status
Communication, interpersonal interactions, mobility, self care
Contextual Factors
Environmental factors that are out of the individuals control
Family, occupation, laws, cultural beliefs
Personal Factors
Age, race, gender, education level
Medical coding system developed by the WHO that documents diseases and diagnosis
All services provided by speech pathologists, in order to be covered by insurance must be identified by a specific CPT code
The CPT coding system provides information on how to report procedures or services and is overlooked by the American Medical Association
Each CPT code has five digits.
Most CPT codes are untimed and do not need to include a time descriptor when filed with the insurance company.
Timed codes involve a time designation in the descriptor and may be billed multiple times per day
Speech pathologists should not report physical medicine codes 9700 series.
CMS requires that GN modifier must be added to every code that identifies speech language or dysphasia treatments.
Click on the above links for further information and specific codes
Examples of Codes
Dynamic Assessment
Dynamic Assessment is an essential component of the assessment process
It is a clinical vehicle for evaluation, intervention and post treatment determination.
Dynamic Assessment can also be used to monitor change
Clinicians can use it to observe new behavior and adjust the direction of
treatment accordingly
Top down/ investigative protocol with ongoing hypothesis testing
Includes responses to the actions, questions, statements, concerns, and performance of the clients as effectively and efficiently as possible
The participant’s role is active
Get assistance
Ask questions
Receive feedback
The examiner's role is active
Provides feedback
Help clients develop strategies
This approach is most useful when:
scores on standardized tests are low,
learning is strained by mental retardation,
when there are apparent language issues,
when there are cultural differences between those that are being examined and the dominant culture.
*This approach allows for strategic experimentation that supports the development of potential to improve a patient's performance.
*Experimentation is contextualized with environmental support that is helpful in bringing about change in the behavior of others.
Prognostic Factors
**Variables that assist in predicting recovery**
Current Age
Prenatal and birth history
Age of onset
Hearing and vision; history of ear infections and hearing problems
Medical history; general health of a patient, medications, allergies, illnesses, injuries.
Feeding and Swallowing Problems
Speech-Fluency-Voice problems
Severity of the disorder
Language and Literacy
development
Social Support
Psycho-Social Traits
Inclusive Practice Considerations Working with Various Age Groups
I. Considerations for working with Young Children [Birth-3:0]
Appropriate age intervention
Development of language
Cultural interpretations of receiving services
Other physical, medical or mental health diagnosis
Demographics and access to services
Parental awareness of eligibility of assistance
(ASHA, Early intervention 2021)
II. Considerations for working with School Age
Speech and language development
SLP service delivery in public school system
Social emotional skills
Cultural interpretation of accessing services
IEP structure and governing laws
Diversity of SLP clinicians
Other physical, medical or mental health conditions
(ASHA, School-Based service delivery in speech-language pathology 2021)
III. Considerations for working with Adolescents
Other physical, medical or mental health conditions
Cultural and social interpretations of accessing services
IEP structure and governing rules
Speech and Language diagnosis resulting in emotional, social and behavior issues
(ASHA, Working with adolescents 2021)
IV. Considerations for working with Geriatric Population
Normative changes in speech, swallowing, memory and language as adults age
Communication, swallowing and cognitive difficulties as the result of stroke, dementia and Parkinson’s disease
Access to services and a supportive family unit
Cultural interpretations of receiving help
Other medical, physical or mental health diagnosis
SLP service delivery according to client’s existing skill level
(ASHA, The aging population 2021)
Inclusive Considerations Working with Various Populations
I. Considerations for working with Special Populations
Deaf and blind
Requirements for specialized treatment plans and collaboration with providers
Efforts to include visual, auditory and tactile needs
Thriving in a small group instruction or 1:1 environment
Population is overgeneralized to have all the same needs, each individual as their own set of strengths and difficulties (Foundation, Degrees of hearing loss 2021)
Importance of attention to form, content and function of their communication (ASHA, Intervention with special populations 2021)
(Foundation, Degrees of hearing loss 2021)
II. Considerations for working with the Transgender Community
Use of pronouns, tools and respectful language while working with individuals
Gearing treatment plan towards addressing things like voice, pitch, intonation and fluency as it is consistent with gender identity
(ASHA, Voice and communication services for transgender and gender diverse populations 2021)
Financial resources and access to insurance and care that matches a person’s gender identity
Cultural, medical, physical and emotional factors
Inclusive intake, insurance forms and office space
(ASHA, Voice and communication services for transgender and gender diverse populations 2021)
*Service provision will vary depending on stage and type of transition (Adler, 2007)
Inclusive Practice Considerations
Working with Individuals from Various Cultural and Linguistic Backgrounds
I. Considerations for working with various cultural and linguistic groups
The awareness and role that clinician’s intersectionality will play in service delivery (Moxely et al., Cultural Competence in Healthcare 2004)
An individual’s access to finances and transportation to attend treatment.
Not all tools and assessments will be applicable or effective to all cultural groups
Differences in dialect, primary language and fluency (ASHA, Cultural competence 2021)
Latino English (The Spanish vowel system consist of fewer vowels than of English)
AAE (African American English and Standard American English though similiar should not be considered against each other)
Asian American Dialects
www.asha.org/practice-portal/templates/
Obtaining feedback and additional tools where necessary to meet the needs of a person’s culture or background
Ensuring that service delivery does not interfere with client’s values, beliefs, religion or spirituality (ASHA, Cultural competence 2021)
Specific cultures are prone to various conditions which may impact swallowing, communication and speech disorders. (ASHA, Cultural competence 2021)
II. Dialectic Variations and Considerations
ASHA asserts that no dialect can be considered a disorder
Clinicians must use testing procedures which are not discriminatory
Symptoms of a language disorder are not attributable to dialect
There exists a wide range of language variation within each dialect
African American English, Standard English and Appalachian English are all examples of English dialects in the United States.
Standardized testing presents with limitations and testing bias for different dialects
(ASHA, American English dialects 1970)
Qualifying For Services VS Identifying A Disability
Qualify for services, IDEA and standard deviation
Per New York under the IDEA regulations, the presence of a disability or delay qualifies for services when it impacts the individual in one or more developmental domain:
·This criteria includes a delay of more than 12 months in one area
·A 33% delay in one domain or 25% delay in two domains or
·It can also result in the use of standardized testing to determine if the individual falls below 2.0 standard deviations below the mean. If no standard tests are available, the delay is determined by qualitative measurement and observation.
With specific regard to Speech and Language, a severe delay is determined when no word development is indicated by 18 months of age.
(ETCAcenter.org 2014)
Federal Laws and Regulations for the SLP
Laws Affecting Speech Language Pathology
Licensure and Scope of Practice
Healthcare and Insurance Issues
Education Legislation and Regulations
CONNECTICUT
Statutory and Regulatory Requirements (www.asha.org)
The licensed speech and language pathologist may not supervise more than three support personnel.
In-person communication between the licensed speech and language pathologist and support personnel must be available at all times.
The licensed speech and language pathologist must provide the support personnel with regularly scheduled direct observation, guidance, direction, and conferencing for not less than 30% of client contact time for the support personnel's first 90 workdays and not less than 20% of client contact time thereafter.
https://www.asha.org/advocacy/state/info/ct/connecticut-support-personnel-requirements/
CSHA -Connecticut Speech Language and Hearing Association
NEW YORK
Practice in this profession encompasses application of principles, methods and procedures of measurements, prediction, non-medical diagnosis, testing, counseling, consultation, rehabilitation and instruction related to the development and disorders of speech, voice, swallowing and language for the purpose of preventing, ameliorating or modifying such disorders in individuals (Nysed.gov, n.d.).
The practice of the profession of speech pathology in New York state requires a license or authorization falling under an article §8202
NYSSLHA- New York State Speech Language Hearing Association
References
Grigos,M.(2016).Speech Sound Disorders in children.Dynamic assessment.2 NYU
Retrieved September 11, 2021 from
https://2nyu.speech.steinhardt.nyu.edu/ap/courses/953/sec
Embry,E. (2016). Clinical Practicum 1:Overview of the diagnostic process.2 NYU. Retrieved
September 11,2021, https://2nyu.speech.steinhardt.nyu.edu/ap/courses/1026/sections
Adler, R. (2007). Peer reviewed article gender voice issues: Voice and communication therapy for transsexual/transgender clients. Voice and Speech Review, 5(1), 293–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/23268263.2007.10769774
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2021). Cultural competence. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Retrieved September 12, 2021, from https://www.asha.org/practice-portal/professional-issues/cultural-competence/#collapse_1.
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2021). The aging population. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Retrieved September 12, 2021, from https://www.asha.org/slp/clinical/aging/.
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2021). Early intervention. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Retrieved September 11, 2021, from https://www.asha.org/practice-portal/professional-issues/early-intervention/#collapse_1.
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2021). School-Based service delivery in speech-language pathology. School-Based Service Delivery in Speech-Language Pathology. Retrieved September 12, 2021, from https://www.asha.org/slp/schools/school-based-service-delivery-in-speech-language-pathology/.
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2021). The aging population. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Retrieved September 12, 2021, from https://www.asha.org/slp/clinical/aging/.
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (1970, January 1). American English dialects. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Retrieved September 12, 2021, from https://www.asha.org/policy/TR2003-00044/.
ETCAcenter.org. (2014, November 11). Retrieved September 12, 2021, from https://ectacenter.org/~pdfs/topics/earlyid/partc_elig_table.pdf.
Foundation, H. (2021). Degrees of hearing loss. Hearing Health Foundation. Retrieved September 12, 2021, from https://hearinghealthfoundation.org/degrees-of-hearing-loss/.
Moxely, A., Mahendra, N., & Vega-Barachowitz, C. (2004). Cultural Competence in Healthcare. The ASHA Leader, 9(7). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1044/leader.FTR3.09072004.6