Community engagement is a process where organisations work together with and listen to the communities they serve. It is a reciprocal, mutually-beneficial, and ongoing process that focuses on building long-term trust. Through community engagement processes, organisations work together with communities to achieve change. In health and care research, we may engage with communities for a number of reasons:
To ensure the research that we do meets the needs of our communities, both in terms of research priorities, and how research is designed and delivered;
To increase awareness about opportunities to take part in or inform research, and improve representation of under-served groups in the research we do;
To enable research to take place in the places it is most needed (for example, in areas or communities that are more affected by a health condition or issue).
Community is a broad term that is defined by the context we are working in, and our local population. There are a few different types of communities that will exist within the populations we work with and serve (Lancaster District Community Engagement Guidance 2020):
Community of place: A group of people who share a locality or geographical area, such as, a neighbourhood, a housing estate, or a village. This location will have physical boundaries.
Community of interest: A group of people with a shared interest or experience. A community of interest includes people who use a service, such as patients registered with a GP practice or mental health service. Other examples of communities of interest, include people with lived experience or who are affected by a health condition, library users, students at a university, people interested in improving local health services, members of a dementia support group.
Community of identity: A group of people with something in common, either how they identify themselves or how they are identified by society. This is usually by demographic characteristics, such as, age, ethnicity, faith, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, disability).
It is important to recognise that people can be part of many communities, and that communities themselves are diverse. Some people may or may not identify as belonging to a community.
As NIHR's strategy Best Research for Best Health highlights, people in regions and communities where the need is greatest are often under-served by health and care research. For example, research into long-term conditions such as mental ill-health and diabetes indicates that recruitment is disproportionately low in areas with higher prevalence (Bower et al 2020), and NIHR data suggest that the picture is similar for liver disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
For both scientific and ethical reasons, we must support researchers to extend their research into these regions and communities, which may not be adjacent or easily accessible to them.
This will help to ensure that research is:
Well-designed and relevant to those who would benefit from the research;
That results are generalisable to a broad and diverse population;
That any resulting intervention can be successfully delivered to the people who most need it.
It will also provide people and communities across the nation with earlier access to innovative treatments, facilitate an improvement in local health and social care services, and give everyone the ability to shape, participate in and benefit from research.
One of the core components that will help us to make this shift in how we do research, is building trust and long-term relationships with our communities.
Meaningful, reciprocal community engagement can benefit the research process at each stage of the journey, as outlined below.
Working with communities can help to ensure that research topics identified are those that matter to and meet the needs of our communities, and that the research will benefit these communities.
It may also help to identify new priorities and topics that we wouldn’t have thought to research or prioritise.
Working with communities can help to ensure that the research focuses on outcomes and measures that are important to that community.
People from the community can also advise on how the proposed methods would work best in order for people in that community to take part, helping to improve the rate and diversity of recruitment.
Co-designing materials can also help to make sure they are accessible and engaging for potential participants from that community.
People from the community can also co-design or advise on recruitment strategies that are more likely to be effective.
Community engagement also creates more buy-in to the research for members of that community if they have been involved in the design.
Working with community partners in the development of a grant proposal can help to address potential power imbalances in any research projects done together, by ensuring they are properly resourced in the grant application and named as co-applicants, where relevant.
It can also help to ensure that the research and proposed methods in the grant proposal are ethical, and that opportunities to involve members of the community are sufficiently incorporated into the grant proposal.
Processes such as participatory budgeting can help communities that are impacted by the research make decisions about how proposed funding is designed and allocated. This can also be used by research funding committees and organisations to hand over decision making power about which research projects are funded.
Recruitment and research methods are informed by what works for the community, making it better tailored to their needs and interests. As well as increasing the likelihood of recruitment and retention, it is also likely to help improve participants’ experience during the study, increasing the likelihood that they would consider taking part in research again in future.
Community engagement can also allow for better involvement of people from under-served groups in research delivery. For example, you could work with members of a community as co-researchers, or in an advisory capacity. By doing so, this can also improve recruitment, as the research is co-led by people from the community, improving trust in the process. This can help to redress power imbalances within research.
Community engagement can help to improve analysis and interpretation of data by improving our understanding of a community, their needs, behaviours, and interests.
This can add a richer perspective to the research data, including by involving the community in the analysis and sharing their interpretations.
Research participants often report that they do not get to hear about the results of the research they have taken part in or been involved in. By working with communities and building links with organisations/individuals who have strong networks in the community, we can avoid this.
We can work with community partners to design a strategy for disseminating the results of research that affects these communities, and do so in a way that is tailored and appropriate to that community.
It may also open up opportunities to share the findings of our research with others, for example, Local Authorities or service providers, that the community has existing links with, expanding the potential impact and reach of our research.
Community engagement increases the likelihood that results of research are implemented by adding validity to the findings, and ensuring they can be applied in practice within under-served communities.
Working with communities could help implementation in practice by developing information for new services or interventions that are engaging and tailored to the right audience.
Similarly, community partners could work with you to develop and deliver training or training manuals for health professionals, or help to influence policy makers and key agencies.
Community engagement can help with evaluating the research process from the perspective of under-served communities, helping to understand what worked, and what could be done differently to make the research more inclusive and collaborative next time.
It can also help to inform what might be needed next from research from the perspective of the community e.g priority research topics and questions.
In January 2023, the NIHR brought together a working group to inform the design of a community engagement training programme. This toolkit is designed to complement this training programme. The working group membership included staff from across NIHR centres and disciplines and Community Champions from the Research Ready Communities programme.
As part of the working group's discussion, group members established a set of values and principles that good community engagement in health and social care research should practice. These values and principles are:
Purpose-led - Our engagement will be driven by a clear and shared purpose.
Long-term - We will build and maintain relationships with our communities over time.
Reciprocal and non-tokenistic - Our engagement will be two-way and mutually beneficial, and we will keep our communities informed throughout.
Transparent - We will be open and honest with our partners and communities throughout the process.
Flexible - We will listen and adapt our ways of working to meet the needs of our communities.
Asset-based - We will recognise and build on our communities’ strengths and assets, rather than servicing perceived ‘needs’ or ‘problems’.
Brave - We are willing to try new things and ways of working with our communities.
Supported - Our engagement will be supported by peers in our organisation, including those in positions of leadership.
Community engagement processes in health and social care research should uphold these values and principles throughout and can be used to review the process on an ongoing basis, allowing for good practice and learnings for improvement to be made. They are designed to complement the UK Standards for Public Involvement.
There are a number of resources that provide further information about community engagement and how it can support better health and care research:
NIHR INCLUDE guidance - NIHR guidance and resources to improve inclusion in research.
NIHR INCLUDE Roadmap gives a strategic level overview of potential points for intervention to improve the inclusion of under-served groups across the life course of research.
NIHR Research Design Service West Midlands, Public Involvement Research Cycle - explains how the public can help throughout the research cycle.
NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, PPI Researcher Guidance Section 3 – PPI and the Research Pathway - provides an overview of the research cycle and how public involvement can be incorporated and of benefit at each stage of the research cycle.
NIHR Research Design Service South Central, Information for Researchers About Public Involvement - demonstrates how public engagement and involvement can be incorporated into each stage of the research process.
Local Government Association, Participatory Budgeting - provides an overview of participatory budgeting as a form of citizen participation.
Foot and Hopkins (2010): A Glass Half-Full - How An Asset Approach Can Improve Community Health and Well-being. Provides an overview of and rationale for taking an asset-based approach to health and wellbeing. It also provides an overview of the asset mapping process as a technique.
Nurture Development: Asset-Based Community Development. Provides an explanation of an asset-based approach and its benefits.
NIHR Research Design Service: Community Engagement Toolkit- Toolkit aimed at supporting researchers who are developing grant applications with, and for, diverse communities.