iPhone Summative Video

In an attempt to provide feedback that is personal and targeted, I provided a two-minute verbal evaluation on a particular assignment as opposed to traditional written feedback. A completed rubric was uploaded to Sakai in addition to the video.

Following Fang's (2019) guidelines for feedback (greeting, strengths, weaknesses, action plan, and resource sharing), I feel that this form of feedback accomplished most of Fang's objectives for using veedback (save time, increase student understanding, prompt change, and enhance student-teacher rapport). A short follow-up conversation with the student affirmed these positive qualifiers, but deeper study is needed. The advantage is the the platform is free and easily accessible.

Portion of Student Paper

She is considered advanced proficient in the target language. Her listening and reading skills are higher than her writing and speaking skills. I focused on improving her writing skills since at the end of this year, students will be writing a two-page literary analysis paper in the target language. The larger summative assessment is an important check point for students before they move on to an Advanced Placement course or onto a college course in the target language.

There many ways on how I collected data to decide how my focal student was progressing in her writing skill. I formally assessed the student by collecting all student’s writing for each major writing assignment from the end of January to the end of March. I specifically looked at Lauren’s fluidity, grammar, and organization in her writing for each writing assignment. I used the same rubric to assess each formal assessment. The rubric focused on assessing organization, comprehensibility, grammar usage, and fluidity. There were four formal assessments that I used as benchmarks for Lauren. Most occurred after a few weeks of the previous progress monitoring check-ins.