As we read Resilience Thinking: Sustaining ecosystems and people in a changing world by Brian Walker and David Salt (2006, Island Press), our first priority is to take notes on the concepts underpinning resiliency theory and how the theory conceptualizes systems and processes of change.
The example cases are not in developing countries and are only important for this course insomuch as they help us to understand the concepts.
Resources:
Human management of socio-ecological systems tends to be unsustainable because...
Population growth and poverty put too much pressure on resources.
Humans have an innate problem: excessive production and consumption.
We have a poor understanding of the socio-ecological systems that we are trying to manage.
Expanding upon point number three, we could improve our ability to manage socio-ecological systems sustainably by applying resilience thinking to rectifying three major misunderstood assumptions about socio-ecological systems...
Socio-ecological systems are primarily determined and characterized by their extremes, not their average conditions. Therefore, optimizing systems for average conditions will make the them vulnerable to extreme conditions.
In socio-ecological systems, there is tradeoff between efficiency and optimization on one hand, and resiliency and adaptive capacity on the other hand. Therefore, optimizing production of selected system components will make the whole ecological-system more vulnerable.
Socio-ecological systems constantly undergo change with processes operating at different time-scales. Therefore, managing systems under assumptions of equilibrium will make them vulnerable to changing conditions.
social-ecological systems
system state
nonlinearity & nonstationarity
emergent behavior
changing context
interconnections
redundancy
diversity
functional
response
modules / modularity
feedbacks
adaptability / adaptive capacity
resilience
shocks or disturbances
cross-scale linkages
controlling variables
slow variables
hysteresis
managing for optimization / efficiency
basin of attraction
thresholds
regimes
transformation
Adaptive Cycles
Fore loop
r : rapid growth
K : conservation
Back loop
Omega: release
Alpha: reorganization
window of opportunity
panarchy: a hierarchy of interconnected nested systems
spatial scales
temporal scales
transformability
"Resilience thinking representation of social-ecological system dynamics. (A) Ball and cup heuristic of the stability landscape. (B) Panarchy model of adaptive and resilient change (adapted from Gunderson and Holling 2002)."
Figure and caption are from: Ollivier, G., D. Magda, A. Mazé, G. Plumecocq, and C. Lamine. 2018. Agroecological transitions: What can sustainability transition frameworks teach us? An ontological and empirical analysis. Ecology and Society 23(2):5. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09952-230205