Mini Assignment 2: Objectives
The student will be able to:
- Compare and contrast the ACRL Standards vs. ISTE Standards.
- Synthesize ACRL Standards and virtual literacy constructs into meaningful applications within the classroom or workplace.
- Compare your current career-based materials and tools (i.e., teaching materials, books, etc.) within the area of bias, use of images, and interpretations of images for viewers/students.
Background & Reading
Visual Literacy is a subject that should not be foreign to you, as you've read multiple articles, investigated your understanding, and started to think about how visual literacy plays an important role in the classroom (your sector/career) and the learning process. At this point, you are starting to build an understanding and think about how the components of visual literacy might fit into digital literacy.
As discussed in the last module, there are National and State accrediting bodies to which schools subscribe and align with to remain accredited in their State. Accrediting bodies set the standards and adhere to a research-based, subscribed set of rubrics or indicators that stay "this" or "that" is considered proficient concerning its content or design. Schools then use assessment data to demonstrate how their students meet the standards to accreditation bodies. Oh, accreditation is SO fun!
In a classroom, we would say that a student is proficient or meets the standard(s) based on a rubric based on a standardized assessment, a reading scale, a classroom-based assessment, or a blend of assessments. For example, as a College of Education, we geared up for national accreditation in Spring 2024; however, we started to prepare in Fall 2022, as we were going to be assessed under a newer (to us) accrediting body called CAEP. Regardless of countless acronyms (Yes, Education is really good at this...) and the standards, they are there and must be known/assessed. More importantly, FHSU wants an accredited Teacher Education Program and Advanced Programs, such as a Masters in Reading, SPED, Building Leadership, etc., so State and National accreditation is not optional if we want accredited programs.
Regardless of your role, some standards must be met for you to prove a level of quality, knowledge, or completion. Within a classroom, for instance, we can look to our state content standards and more focused standards like the ISTE Standards. Although we can admit the area of standards seems to be in constant flux in each state, at every level, we know that standards frame our course objectives that lead to our daily/weekly learning objectives. The objectives also aligned with our instructional materials, strategies and activities, learner interactions, and, most importantly, our assessments. If you work in design or other sectors of the market, there are also important industry standards that guide our design of courses, course delivery, etc. Regardless of their use, all of these standards have an origin typically based on theory, research, and general know-how or common sense by industry leaders or experts.
Concerning visual literacy, in terms of media, some standards have been set forth for designers and curriculum developers to follow to ensure that the learning is seamless and effective for all learners. The standards ensure student learning (consumer growth/learning) and continuous improvement through constructive, substantive, measurable, and specific measurement. The Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL) developed or updated the information literacy standards (2022) that address information literacy standards specifically focused on higher education. In 2022, ACRL developed a companion document regarding visual literacy. Note that although this primarily focuses on higher education, the rationale and standards address P12 and the ongoing focus on 21st Century Learning Skills. After reading through the ACRL webpage and the standards*, it's important to research and understand what educators, education experts, and business leaders identify as 21st Century Learning Skills. Of course, there are lists of skills, but the P21 Website offers insight, resources, and research concerning the framework they've developed. It is an interesting idea to take the ACRL Visual Literacy Standards. Then, the P21 Framework (specifically Outcome or Standard 3 addresses Information, Media, and Technology Skills) to see where there are overlaps and consensus on how one might see great overlap in the learning outcomes. If you begin researching P21, you will see that they link back to the American Library Association (ALA), and ACRL is a subsidiary of ALA. It's comforting to see the overlap in mindset and information.
(*Please note that there are a lot of terminologies when it comes to Standards. I see Standards as an overarching skill(s) to be met. One level down, there are Performance Indicators or Module/Lesson Objectives that ultimately lead to Individual Learning Outcomes or Objectives. As you look at your own content or industry standards, I am sure they have their own set of terms (e.g., Standards, Competencies, Objectives, Benchmarks, Outcomes, Indicators, etc.), but regardless of terminology, I believe it is more important to know the Standards, understand how they build on one another and how you will meet them to show student learning/growth. Don't stress about knowing "all the things!")
Now, open the ALA/ACRL webpage concerning the Visual Literacy Standards for Higher Education (yes, these are very applicable for P12), scroll down, and follow along...take it slow, and think about how we build student learning around a Standard, but more importantly, the value of the Standard(s) whether they be the ACRL Standards or your content standards for fourth-grade Math.
For instance, look at the ACRL Standards, then locate Standards Three: The visually literate student interprets and analyzes the meanings of images and visual media. This would be an overall course objective or standard that must be met for the student to pass the course. There are traditionally 4-6 overarching Standards (broad) for the course. However, this can vary depending on the subject matter. Next, see the four performance indicators below the Standard Three listing. These are module or lesson objectives that would be embedded in daily/weekly lesson plans as a way to show the student is meeting Standard Three. Lastly, look at the Learning Outcomes listed. For instance, under Standard Three, Performance Indicator 1, there is a Learning Outcome (c.) that identifies the subject of an image. This would be an item to be taught and measured on an assessment (multiple times) to show proficiency in meeting the Indicators, and this eventually the greater Standard.
For those who are not in education, or even if you are, this task can seem a bit overwhelming or new. For those of us who have been or are currently classroom teachers, I apologize (we can all use a refresher when using a new set of standards). I know we are constantly bombarded with "how are you meeting the standard(s), and how does that standard help the student meet the needs of the standardized assessment(s)?" However, for most of you, the ACRL Standards are new. I personally believe they play a very important role in all facets of education, whether you are an educator, tech coach, instructional designer, etc., because they open our eyes and minds to a new way of presenting material(s) in our current digital age.
References
Association of College and Research Libraries. (2015). Information literacy standards for higher education. Washington, DC: Author.
https://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/issues/infolit/framework1.pdf
Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL). (2022). The Framework for visual literacy in higher education. American Library Association.
https://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/standards/Framework_Companion_Visual_Literacy.pdf
Chen, X., Dipinto, V., & Newman, M. (2017). Teachers’ Visual Literacy Practices in Middle and High School Science Classrooms: NCE Research Residencies. Digital
Commons. https://digitalcommons.nl.edu/nce_residencies/10
International Society for Technology in Education. (2017). ISTE Standards: Educators. ISTE. https://www.iste.org/standards/iste-standards-for-teachers
P21.org. (2015). Media Literacy - The Partnership for 21st Century Skills. [online] Available at: http://www.p21.org/about-us/p21-framework/349 [Accessed 6 Dec. 2017].
REMEMBER: You must make sure that your document is accessible in Google and is set to "can comment" so that I can get in and comment on your work before posting in the Community! The ability to "Comment" is not the default and must be manually changed for each assignment/posting.
Mini #2 Assignment
Part 1: In a Google Document, Compare and Contrast ACRL v. ISTE
Review the Association of College and Research Libraries standards for Visual Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education (2022). (ALA Website) Instead of only recognizing ISTE Standards, we will explore and broaden our horizons. (Do a little "poking around" and exploring on the ACRL website. Who is the ACRL/ALA? How are these standards different from the ISTE Standards?)
Justifying and Locating Images
Okay, back to the Standards... Read the background and intro, then specifically note ACRL Standard One, Performance Indicator #1, which focuses on the learner's ability to define and articulate the need for an image. This aligns fairly well with the first Mini Assignment you completed, in which you chose an image, analyzed, reworked, and discussed.
NOW, look at ACRL Performance Indicator #2, which discusses the importance of identifying a variety of image sources, materials, and types. Please read each Learning Outcome and put them into a context that makes sense to you.
_______________________
HINT:
There are four parts to this module, thus, label your Google Doc as such (e.g., Introduction, then Part 1: ACRL v. ISTE Standards, Part 2: ...,etc.).
Part 2: Utilizing Images & Tools
Within Performance Indicator #2, Outcome "b" asks the learner to be able to: "Investigate the scope, content, and potential usefulness of a range of image sources and formats (e.g., digital, print, subscription databases, open web, books, or articles, repositories, personal creations)."
Please consider what sources (and tools) and instructional formats you rely on daily for your classroom or job setting. For instance, I rely significantly on articles (.pdf) on the Tebo Library site or Google Scholar, and Gen AI tools such as Perplexity. I also rely greatly on the personal creation of materials/images, colleagues' materials, and quality, royalty-free images. As a side note, from a technical standpoint, I could only function with my FHSU access/Blackboard, plus Gmail, Outlook, and Engage Communities, which do encompass various aspects of images/visuals.
The list ACRL provides in the Learning Outcome is an example of various image formats, but my question is twofold: What image sources and/or formats are you currently relying on? How do you professionally know they are precisely what you should be utilizing in your setting (classroom, etc.)? Do you know if the images you are using are biased? Do you know if they are "universal?" Are there other sources for images that could be better? Did you choose this source(s) because a colleague told you, "This is what we have always used," or perhaps your school has image banks for use?
In this section, generate a list of all (not just image sources) sources you rely on to get your job done in one day*. From the minute you enter until the minute you lock the door, who and what do you rely on to get the job done? Journal your day by jotting a few words about all the tools you use/how you use them... (This may be in the form of a concept map/brainstorm; this might be a list...you choose.)
*Wow! Look at all the things you do and what you rely on in a day's work...
Part 3: Integrating Images and Tools
Now, from the list you generated, pinpoint the areas where you rely on images of any sort - these aren't just digital; these could be worksheets/ workbooks/textbooks, etc. For instance, this website which you access for class, would be on my list within my brainstorming list surrounding FHSU and Google as my day-to-day activity.
Another example may be my undergraduate course, where I held a book study, and we watched various video segments and utilized graphical organizers to discuss empowerment and education. Graphic organizers and infographics would be visuals/images for learning.
Choose at least one area on your list that has made you think about your materials where images are involved, and discuss (directions below). For instance, I might choose graphical organizers and research the range of images available for use or re-creation, looking at different formats and different sources to self-generate or "steal" graphical organizers from - of course, citing these materials. How does your idea play into the ACRL Standard(s)? ISTE Standards for Educators?
Directions: (to recap)
Part 1. ) In an APA 7 Formatted Google Document, write an initial Introduction for your reader, then create a new paragraph/section and discuss the background and benefits of the ACRL and ISTE Standards - essentially, compare and contrast.
Part 2.) Discuss ACRL and why you find it essential to establish standards as a guide for your work/student work, such as ACRL Standard #2:
Part 3. ) From the comprehensive list you generated regarding your everyday dependency on tools (in Part 2), list all of them, but also pinpoint 1-2 areas in which you rely on images to function. This could be images that a manufacturer provides (textbook/workbooks), images you create yourself, images contained on the Internet - whatever it might be. Finalize by wrapping up the importance of visual literacy and using quality materials for teaching and learning.
To begin your document tips/checklist:
(Re-read ACRL Performance Indicator #2 in column #1, then)
Create an introduction to position the reader,
Compare and contrast the two sets of standards (ACRL/ISTE), then the generation of your list and the contents of your list in general,
Tell us why you chose one or two items to discuss for this assignment. Why did they stand out to you?
Analyze the visuals/image(s) you are using and ask if the source being used is credible. Is it/Are they unbiased? Could it (they) be better? If you could re-create your own, would you and why?
Explain where you would research more credible/better images or examples. Who might you depend on for guidance? How do you know these newer image sources are more credible/better? More useful to and/or students?
Share an example of an image or visual you use (that you didn't care for) and what you selected as a potential replacement (using citations).
Comment on another person's post and share a source(s) in which they could also find images or resources. Tell them how you came to use the source and how you use it, if at all.
Lastly, the assignment is very abstract and very broad. Please move through this assignment from your perspective and your current role - feel free to meet the standard in your way within your context. I am all about framing the assignment to fit your needs as a learner and within your needs/your content area/around your learners.
Mini #2 Assessment/Points
Google Document in APA 7 format - 40 points (including Peer interaction/discussion - 5 points)
Sharing an example of a graphic/media/tool (embedded in the document) - 35 points
General MIT 813 Project or Assignment Rubric is found on the first tab.