After more than a year of planning, weeks of fieldwork, and many months of data analysis and writing, the end is in sight.After chatting again with Jeff yesterday, we've decided that it's finally time for him to start doing some of the writing. I've done the Study Area, Results, and Discussion sections all by myself (painfully), but we both decided that having me take a real shot at the Literature Review wouldn't be productive for anyone. For one, Jeff has, hilariously, written almost all of the literature we will be reviewing, so it's only natural that he will have a much easier time with the writing. Plus, from an educational standpoint, I've already written a literature review last year, so I'm familiar with the process. Moving forward, we'll talk about how we want to split up the writing of the Introduction section, but I suspect it will also end up being mostly him. He's been concurrently writing a few papers on the same topic, and we both agreed that he'll probably have a much easier time writing an intro for our work. We'll see, but either way, I'm excited to be so close to finishing. If I had to guess, we're about a month from wrapping up!When we were talking yesterday, Jeff mentioned that he asked ChatGPT to write an introduction section for our paper, just to see what would happen. Unsurprisingly, it did, but the hysterical part is that Jeff could recognize his own writing style in the bot's response, most likely because he's written so much of the material it was using for information. The idea that he's written so much of the available literature that AI chatbots begin copying HIM is hilarious to me. To combat this, instead of an AI detector for human-generated text, I propose we start using a Jeff Marion detector for AI-generated text.