Yesterday, I presented my findings from my MARC project. I analyzed my results and research about the mutagenicity of sunscreen and moisturizer ingredients. Due to shelter in place, I was not able to transition to mammalian cell culture but I laid out the plans for the next MARCer to pick up where I left off!
This week I have been finishing the analysis of my previous results.
This week, I have been finishing my plans for my passion project over the next couple of weeks.
I have been doing a lot of research about the chemicals
Since MARC seniors will not be able to be at school to conduct our previously planned senior projects, we are now shifting the outcomes of our projects to something that we can accomplish at home.
Before Spring Break, my mentor, Dr. Martin, was very helpful and flexible when it came to helping me with my project. I am so grateful that I can shift my project with so many amazing people supporting me.
My current plans are to write-up my results of the Ames Tests in a scientific paper format.
04/15/20
Now that school has been changed to online learning for the rest of the year, we have had to re-think how we will be preparing for our senior projects for MARC.
I am disappointed because I would've liked to have taken my project to the next stage of mammalian cell culture. Now, I think that I will be doing a full analysis and write-up of my research up to this point and my experiments with the Ames Tests and the sunscreen chemicals.
Us MARC seniors will still be doing a final presentation of our work and research over the past two years at the MARC Wildcat Colloquium. Even though the presentation will not be as I anticipated, I am still looking forward to sharing my research and celebrating all that we senior MARCers have achieved over the past two years.
03/14/20
In my Limits of the Scientific Imagination Class, I created a creative response to the COVID-19 pandemic and its influence on almost all aspects of life and society right now.
This global pandemic is a unique moment in science history because it is one of the only times when the entire world is focused and fixated on one scientific/medical issue.
There is so much pressure on scientists and doctors to tell us how to be safe and come up with a vaccine or solutions. People feel powerless and out of control, which leads to panic, especially in countries like the U.S. where we so often feel like we are in complete control of our lives.
In reality, scientific processes cannot be rushed to the point of bypassing safety or ethical considerations, would people want a vaccine that possibly works but could possibly kill you? The world of science and medicine has never been held so publicly accountable for the lives of the entire world as now.
Globally, this pandemic has affected everyone's lives. It has raised interesting questions and dialogue between the scientific community, the media, and the public. I hope that human society emerges better and stronger from this crisis.
It's been really exciting to work with Joe and research carcinogens and mutagens in the context of mammalian cell culture.
Now, I think I will be conducting an Hypoxanthine Phosphoribosyl Transferase (HPRT) assay on CHO-K1 (Chinese hamster ovarian) cells. This assay will provide relevant and interesting data as it like an Ames Test, shows the mutagenicity of my chemicals.
I will continue my research and develop my experimental design. I am excited to see where this new avenue of my experimental question will take me!
This week, I have been working on my progress report presentation for my classmates, teachers, and other local scientists and mentors.
I want to include my results from my past two Ames Tests and also detail my new shift into cell culture.
I am in an in-between phase of my research, in which I won't have all the answers yet to the future questions, but I hope they will encourage me to consider things I hadn't yet considered as I embark on this new path of my research.
Today, I met with Dr. Joe Martin to discuss my research. He will be helping me as I begin to transition my project from bacterial based Ames Tests into mammalian cell culture. I am so excited to be collaborating with him and to learn from his knowledge of cell culturing and biology.
Now, I will be researching different cell lines, assays, and media that will be compatible with each other but also that will give me relevant and interesting results for my project.
I am excited about where my project will lead in the next couple of months!
What do scientists have to consider when testing and creating things that can change the lives of everyone? What responsibilities do scientists have to humanity? Can advancement ever be hindered?
These are some of the questions we are considering in my new interdisciplinary English and Science class!
We will be exploring the ethics of science and innovation. There is often no "right answer," but we all have to make choices in our lives based on the perceived pros and cons of situations.
I am eager to explore the tensions of progress and ethics and the motivations of innovation around the world and throughout history. Examining these events through the lens of English will also be interesting as technological advances or ethical conflicts are often reflected through art and literature.
For this experiment I changed several elements of my experimental design to get better and more accurate results:
This over the past couple of weeks I have been evaluating what went well in my last experiment and what could be altered or improved in my next ones.
I will be conducting two more Ames Tests this semester, right after thanksgiving break.
Since I am an Admissions Fellow, I had a shadow today in MARC. I wanted her to be able to see what it is like to be a MARC student, and since for my class it was an independent workday, for which I had just planned to email Dr. Donlan and plan my next Ames Test, I decided that we should sit in on the junior MARCer class.
Thankfully, Stori let us sit in because even though I was catching up on some emails with Dr. Donlan, I got to overhear some amazing conversations about the purpose of science.
They were discussing mentor-mentee relationships, how to reach out to potential mentors, and how to read scientific papers. Later, during a discussion about a paper on HIV-1 and HIV-2, I found it interesting to hear what these students thought it meant to write a scientific paper and who intended audiences are.
After many of the students and Stori admitted that this paper was extremely difficult to understand and grasp some sort of greater meaning. There was a lively debate about whether the paper should be written (the way it was written) in which only a couple of experts in the field could have read it and understood what the purpose, methodology, and implications of the experiment were or whether it should have been accessible to other scientists and the general academic public.
I was so glad that my shadow and I got to overhear this conversation because this is one of the things I am most passionate about. I think that there is a very necessary transformation that needs to take place in the scientific world, one in which people and other scientists can understand and be inspired. This would require a necessary shift in the way information is presented so that people such as policy-makers, other interested scientists, and students can grasp the implications of the science and technology that impact people's everyday lives.
Compelling Scientific Communication is especially important with things like climate change, carcinogens, and other health care issues, and has the potential to change and dictate the future.
This week everyone in my class presented our progress in our projects so far this year. We are all in different stages in our projects, but this is a great time for us to share what we have learned our struggles and our triumphs.
It was also nice to have the junior MARCers there as well because they could see what they will be doing at this point next year. I enjoyed hearing the questions my peers had for me and learning more about their projects as well.
Today, was Sunday, but thankfully Stori was at school so she took the final pictures (Thanks Stori!). Now, I have data to analyze, and markers over time to examine the progress.
*In the future I would like to take photos everyday to capture the progress and color changes more precisely, because I don't know if all the wells had turned on Day 5 (Saturday)
These are my results of my micro-plates after four days of incubation at 37ºC.
(See description of plates in previous post below)
These are my results of my micro-plates after three days of incubation at 37ºC.
X2&3: Negative Control (sterile water+bacteria+no chemical/mutagen)
X4: Positive Control (sterile water+bacteria+known mutagen)
AX1, Bx1, CX1: Blank Controls (chemicals+no bacteria)
A1-4: Dimethicone*
B1-4: Homosalate*
C1-4: Octocrylene*
*(sterile water+bacteria+chemical+different dilutions of water)
This morning, I made sure that everything was ready to conduct the experiment this afternoon.
This afternoon, Dr. Donlan came to assist me in conducting my experiment. I am so glad that she came and offered me her professional advice and expertise. Since the bacteria strain in the last experiment had died, this was my first "actual" experiment. MARC coordinator, Stori Oates, also helped with the experiment so that we could be as efficient as possible.
We noticed that since the chemicals were quite viscous, it was hard to get them into a consistency that was easy to pipette. We used the water bath, but unfortunately, the Petrolatum was too viscous and sticky to pipette, so we decided to exclude this chemical from this trial.
Recently, I have been preparing to do my first experiment for my project this year. I will be using an Ames Test to test the carcinogenicity and the potential mutagenicity of the chemicals: Octocrylene, Homosalate, Dimethicone, and Petrolatum, chemicals commonly found in sunscreens. These were the main chemical that Cate S. ('19) pinpointed as "common denominators" for her research in potentially carcinogenic sunscreens and moisturizers.
I have been preparing my dilutions using the MutaLab Ames Test kit. I am so glad to have Dr. Donlan as my mentor because she has been helping me check my calculations and lab methods. In preparation for the experiment I have also been working with a finicky water bath, but thankfully, it now holds the temperature accurately!
I look forward to conducting my experiment!
The recent wave of respiratory illnesses of those who regularly use vaping products, has shaken the global community. It is horrible to see young people so exploited by the nicotine and vaping industry to the extent that these addictions could be killing thousands across the world without them knowing.
In connection to my research previous research of the chemicals in e-cigarettes, and particularly JUUL pod fluid. Although professionals think that this is not a carcinogenic case, but rather a respiratory disease, I think that my broader research helps me understand many different aspects of this issue.
It is interesting to see how something that was marketed as a "healthier alternative to cigarettes" could have these detrimental effects which scientists have not yet pinpointed the causes.
I hope the FDA and the CDC heed of the warnings of scientists and respect the memory of those who have died, and take action to further regulate the vaping industry in order to do everything possible to ensure that young people do not continue to be subsumed by nicotine addictions.
I am building on Cate S.'s (Class of 2019) project of determining the mutagenicity of sunscreen and moisturizer using Ames Tests.
I have been reading through her lab notebook and taking photos of her notes. These notes have helped me as I design my project, as I consider what factors I will alter in her experimental set-up.
It has been an amazing experience for me to learn how to pick up the project of another scientist and try to reconstruct her experiment using her research notebook.
Cate and I collaborated a few times last year and she helped me calculate my dilutions for my Ames Test with e-cigarette fluids. Now that she is in college, I have find all of the 'pieces' of her research and fill in the gaps of her thought processes.
Reading Cate's research has helped me understand not only what I will be doing this year, as I build on her previous work, but also how I will document my research and data for students who could potentially continue my research next year.
Now that I have read Cate's research notebook, I am collaborating with Stori and Dr. Donlan to reproduce Cate's preliminary research. I believe that these Ames Tests with consumer items will yield similar results to the ones Cate conducted. From comparing these results I will know how to move forward in my research.
This week we heard from several scientists from various fields discuss their research and about their journeys in scientific research. I found it fascinating to hear about everyday troubleshooting and problem-solving. I learned that good research often raises more questions than it answers.
I spoke to my mentor Dr. Kegan Donlan, and she helped me plan out my trajectory for this year. I am excited about the potential for different methods that I can use this year to explore the carcinogenicity of consumer products.
I am excited to get back to work on my research this year. These past few weeks, I have been working with my mentor and teachers to create a plan for my research this year. I have decided to continue exploring the theme of carcinogens in daily life. I believe that this is a very compelling issue because people often trust the products they buy, but often consumers know very little about the ingredients of their products. I hope to learn more not just about the carcinogenicity of these products, but also about the impact of research and regulation related to product safety.
This summer a fellow MARCer and I attended a Rosetta Institute for Biomedical Research program. I learned about Aging and how different factors impact how people age differently. Specifically, I researched Inflammation, Gut Microbiome, and Aging (To view some of my research take a look at the slideshow on the left).
In addition to all of this interesting research, I learned how to successfully conduct Western Blots, Flow Cytometry, and PCR experiments.
Science Symposium was an amazing opportunity to share my experiment and my passion for science to my peers, teachers, and the broader community. It was exciting to learn from my classmates projects as well!
This week I conducted my Ames Test. I made my reaction mixture last Friday and stored that over the weekend in the fridge.
Cate S., a senior MARCer who has conducted many Ames Tests for her project, helped me calculate and make my dilutions of samples (Juul fluid, bacteria, water, reaction mixture, etc.). I had to make the Juul pod fluid dilute because we could not aerosolize the fluid, as had been done in many other studies conducted on this topic.
Stori Oates, the MARC program coordinator helped me micro-pipette and vortex my solutions. It was fun micro-pipetting because this year in Advanced Studies in Inorganic Chemistry, I did not get to do any Biology or have to worry about aseptic technique. We made and plated all of my dilutions on Monday and made and plated my Control microplate on Tuesday. I pipetted so much I got hand cramps and a blister! It was really fun to get back in the groove and tocontinue working on my experiment.
This week I met with Stori and Shawn about my supplies and it looks like we will not have lung epithelial cells in time for me to conduct my experiment so we brainstormed a slight shift for my project.
I had spoken earlier this year with Cate S. '19 about her project, using the Ames test to test the mutagenicity of various cosmetics. After speaking with Stori and Shawn, we decided that conducting an Ames test would be an interesting research exploration for Science Symposium. I spoke to Liz Gottlieb (Adv. Biology teacher) and there are reagents for me to work with over the next week.
I am currently researching, Ames test and Juul fluid to combine my previous Science Symposium topic with the new methodology due to the minor set-back.
I am surprised by how few research studies exist (even on science research databases) about the mutagenicity of e-cigarettes. The only research I could find was a 2016 study conducted by the British American Tobacco company R&D (which sounds like a potential conflict of interest to me). Their findings suggest that the e-cigarettes (brand not specified) they tested were non-mutagenic when tested with TA-98 and TA-100 Salmonella typhimurium strains.
This week I have been collaborating with fellow MARCer, Ilise Angel on her Advanced Biology project on C. elegans and Juul. It has been interesting to compare experimental designs using worms versus using cells, which is what I will be doing in my Science Symposium Project.
This week we have been working on presentation skills and how to keep an effective lab notebook. Last week, Dr. Carl Pabo, shared his presentation titled "Ode to the Notebook" in which he gave us tools to create a lab notebook in which we can document our research, questions, data, ideas, etc. in a way that is organized and creative.
This semester I will mainly be conducting my Science Symposium research. Science Symposium is an opportunity for us as students to conduct our own research and design our experimental plans. The end-goal is to present our research findings to the MA and broader scientific community.
I will be conducting two experiments this year, one for Advanced Studies in Inorganic Chemistry and one for the MARC program. My MARC project will be more in-depth because I have longer to build my experimental design and research. I will be using the skills I have learned from this project to apply to my overall research in the MARC program.
I am very interested in cell culture and how cells can be models for living organisms in experiments.
I hope in the future to move my projects into cell culture. I spent time researching aseptic technique and what it means to conduct cell culture.
I think that this project is compelling because it is so relevant to this generation and the tobacco industry’s re-emergence on the social and public health scene. I think that this crisis and resurgence of nicotine and tobacco popularity has left many scientists, researchers, and government officials feeling blindsided or completely unaware of how this will impact the health of the next generation. This will help my project as I am currently looking into cell culture techniques and testing chemicals found in consumer products that may cause cancer.
About 600,000 people die of cancer every year. This disease touches the lives of many around the world and causes suffering and death to thousands. This disease is so prominent for many, yet curing it remains a mystery to many medical professionals and researchers. Cells are considered cancerous when they rapidly and uncontrollably divide, a process which is known as proliferation. Although a cure for cancer is yet to be found researchers have been finding promising treatments based on the intensity of the cancer and the type of cancer. Chemotherapy has been a more mainstream treatment for many forms of cancer due to its aggressive nature in killing cancerous cells.
A promising new treatment is artemisinin and its derivatives which have been shown to inhibit tumor growth in vivo and in vitro. Artemisinin is a natural compound and a derivative of wormwood; it is the active ingredient in the Artemisia annua plant. In traditional Chinese medicine, the compound is known as “qinghao” and was believed to treat bodily sources of heat or inflammation such as fevers. In the 1970s the Chinese government invested a lot into scientific research about the antimalarial properties of artemisinin and their studies brought forth new drugs that are used to fight malaria. Artemisinin has been shown to have anti-cancer and anti-malaria properties in addition to anti-angiogenic, anti-inflammatory, anti-metastasis, and growth inhibition.
In both in vitro and in vivo studies, research has shown that artemisinin can induce ferroptosis in tumor cells. Ferroptosis is a form of cell death that is determinate on intracellular iron. In order to proliferate quickly, cancer cells contain a greater concentration of intracellular iron than normal cells and tissues. Artemisinin becomes cytotoxic in the presence of ferrous iron. Artemisinin and its derivatives have been shown to inhibit tumor cell growth and induce ferroptosis and apoptosis in various cancers. Artemisinin contains an endoperoxide moiety which can react with iron to form cytotoxic free radicals.
Artemisinin analogs are less effective in cancer treatment than artemisinin dimers, trimers, and hybrid compounds, which also produce significantly fewer side effects than chemotherapeutic agents. Research has also shown that dihydroartemisinin treatments have been more effective after cell incubation with holotransferrin, a compound that augments the ferrous iron concentration in the cancer cells.
In research, it is important to consider the impact of the study and the potential results of the study. Ethics in science and technology is vital to ensuring the integrity of the research. When examining a study, it is important to consider the authors, the source of funding, and the institution in evaluating the source and making sure that there is no conflict of interest.
We have had various speakers come to share their experiences in the scientific world. It was amazing to hear their advice for us as young researchers and to learn from their broad experiences in research.
We learned about the importance of Networking in the professional world and examined the most effective ways to reach out to people who could help us in our research.