““The more extensive a person's knowledge of what has been done, the greater will be their power of knowing what to do.” – Benjamin Disraeli
This lesson does not have any pre-requisites.
Evidence reviews inform our research design. Evidence reviews are broader than literature reviews in that they include policy & project reports, partner documents, and other "gray literature" outside of peer-reviewed journals.
Systematic reviews are structured, comprehensive reviews of the literature on a topic, often supplemented with meta-analysis.
Narrative reviews are more ad-hoc and seek to capture the 'big ideas' in a strand of literature. Narrative reviews are usually sufficient when the purpose of the evidence review is to inform an evaluation design.
Google Scholar and Zotero are useful tools for searching and managing references.
Assess a study's relevance, contribution, and methodology to determine whether & how to include it in your evidence review.
Consider using "GRADE" scoring and other external metrics of a study's quality.
Banner photo: Anscombe's quartet, showing how data with the same summary statistics can represent very different relationships between two variables. Accessed from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anscombe%27s_quartet#/media/File:Anscombe's_quartet_3.svg.