There are a few different reasons why databases are better than google for research. Here are the most important reasons:
Someone else has already done the hard work of verifying the accuracy of the information - if you research on Google, you have to put a lot of extra time into verifying that the source Google has provided you is accurate. This means that the databases are generally pretty reliable - the school pays money to access them. (Note: this does not mean that ALL the content in ALL the databases is always reliable and without bias - depending on the format (for example, if it is an op-ed or an article that is not peer reviewed), some of the content may have lots of bias, or be outdated or incorrect - in general, though, you have to do less work to verify accuracy than if you are just free searching on Google).
The algorithms Google uses for finding information are NOT transparent and do NOT verify accuracy.
As a matter of fact, studies have shown that the Google algorithms are biased and distorted - here is an article that delves into the idea a bit racism in certain Google search results.
Results from databases are really easy to filter for certain criteria (like if you only want certain publications and time periods), once you know how. Filtering is simple - if you've every done any online shopping, you already know how to use filters and keywords.
Databases require slightly different search strategies than Google - for example, you can't just type a full sentence question into a database search bar and come up with relevant results. To search in a database, you need to use precise keywords and boolean operators! Don't type your inquiry out as a question - this will reduce your chance of finding what you're looking for.
Essentially, keywords are the words that most closely define your topic, and will produce the most relevant results when you enter them into a database. Figuring out what the keywords you should be using is a trial and error process. Here are a few tips:
Look at your chosen topic. Brainstorm a list of closely related words, or related words you came across in your text.
You can't use Wikipedia as a source in your paper, but you can read Wikipedia for background information, and look at the terms that are hyperlinked to new Wikipedia articles. These are often excellent keywords
Scan several articles on the same topic, and highlight words, names, or events that show up frequently.
For more information on keywords, see Walden University Library's guide.
Boolean operators are a simple language that is used in database search boxes that uses modifers such as OR, quotation marks, + and *. These operators essentially work as filters for your topic.
For example, f you are searching for a multi-word term like human trafficking or food justice, you must put the term inside of quotation marks. If you want to search for a specific aspect of that term, add a plus sign, like this: "human trafficking"+statistics. If you can't find what you're looking for, try searching for alternate terms or words that mean the same thing.
Using quotation marks and + are just the simplest and most common ways to filter information. Use this guide to get started on more advanced searches.
Make sure the source you’re looking at is from a reputable news agency, university or organization
Always follow the “link backs” to verify the original information source. If an article does not have any link backs, and it’s not clear where the information came from, disregard the source - it is likely not reputable.
If it's a news article, you can double check for accuracy or bias through All Sides, Politifact, Factcheck.org and Snopes
Follow the suggestions in this Google Rules of Thumb document
Use this document to evaluate websites and this document to evaluate news stories
DON’T use sources such as:
✖ News Aggregators (websites that repackage the news into listicles, etc)
✖ Blogs (unless you can verify that the person or entity writing the blog is an expert)
✖ Websites that don’t have a clear and trustworthy “about” section
Tutorial Videos
Searching to exclude terms (minus)
Site Search (Limit results to those from one specific site)
In high school and college, most instructors will not accept Wikipedia as a valid research source for a paper. This is because the information on Wikipedia is “crowd sources” - anyone can make a wikipedia account at any time and edit or update any Wikipedia entry. For this reason, Wikipedia has gained a reputation as providing unreliable information.
However, Wikipedia has continued to build in a lot of checks and balances to their system, and studies have shown that their information is about as accurate as other encyclopedias such as Brittanica, so Wikipedia can be a great place to start when you’re just beginning your research and trying to find out basic facts, so that you can develop questions or ideas about a research topic. Even though Wikipedia has built in a lot of checks and balances and is usually very reliable, people still occasionally update the entries with false information, and it can take a while to get corrected - this, along with the bad reputation Wikipedia had before, is why you can’t use it as a reference in your project or paper. In fact, here’s a great Wikipedia entry about Wikipedia hoaxes!
Wikipedia can also point you to some sources that may be valid research sources, because Wikipedia entries cite, and often link to, their references at the bottom of each entry (see example below).