Policy Debate, sometimes referred to as CX debate, is a two-person team event that asks students to debate a resolution for the entire school year. For example, this year's resolution states, "Resolved: The United States federal government should significantly strengthen its protection of domestic intellectual property rights in copyrights, patents, and/or trademarks". Each team is assigned before the round to either affirm or negate the resolution. On the affirmative, students will prove the resolution true by proposing a policy to implement and presenting its advantages. For example, on this year's topic a team could propose reducing requirements to obtain a patent. On the negative, students will respond by pointing out the disadvantages of the affirmative team's policy proposal.
Policy debate sets itself apart from other events as it is longer and more fast-paced. Additionally, policy debate is the most comprehensive form, exploring topics ranging from the economic impacts of nuclear war, all the way to discussing settler colonialism and the ethicality of our government.
Here are additional links!
Here's links to two videos. I've included a beginner and advanced.
Also, here are some equity platforms for specifically policy/debate
womenandgenderminoritiesinpolicydebatecollective
Captain's Info:
Delicia Liao - 25LIADEL@hawken.edu
Jack Kampine - 25KAMJAC@hawken.edu
Coach's Info:
Kate Mozynski - katemozynski@gmail.com
Resolved: The United States federal government should substantially reduce Direct Commercial Sales and/or Foreign Military Sales of arms from the United States.
Resolved: The United States federal government should enact substantial criminal justice reform in the United States in one or more of the following: forensic science, policing, and sentencing.
Resolved: The United States federal government should substantially increase its protection of water resources in the United States.