CLIL, formerly known as CBI, is an alternative language teaching approach of which the ultimate goal for learners is to learn both content and language at the same time. Currently, CLIL seems to have gained more territory with its popularity in Europe and Asia, but CBI is still something that language teachers can use to engage their students with a little spice in their lessons. You may be wondering about "But, what is CLIL and what is CBI? Are they different or the same?" by now. Well, that was my strategy to have your attention by triggering your curiosity in this topic. If you ask me "Why?" I would say, "I love this teaching approach ❤️, so I would like to share it with many colleagues in the world."
Are you ready?
In these short introductory videos below, Dr. David Marsh, one of the leading CLIL scholars, who coined the name of the approach, gives an overview of CLIL. He mostly talks about the integration of CLIL in higher education; however, he does so in an easy-to-understand fashion giving some examples that everyone can understand. Hopefully, these videos help you understand what CLIL is and what it can do.
What is CLIL? (Part 1) - Foreign Languages Institutional Program (Flip)
What is CLIL? (Part 2) - Foreign Languages Institutional Program (Flip)
David Marsh on CLIL - Cambridge University Press ELT
Why CLIL is Education for the 21st Century? - GLO.C.L.I.L.2 Conference
Hope you enjoyed watching those short introductory videos by Professor Marsh. During his interview, he mentions "bad teaching" and "bad teaching through another language". Well, that happens because not all instruction through a language other than the native language is CLIL. Regarding this, I would like to make distinctions among some of the terms used in the applied linguistics field that refer to a teaching approach similar to CLIL and give a little background information to help you clarify these concepts: 1) Content-Based Instruction (CBI); 2) English Medium Instruction (EMI); and finally, Content-Language Integrated Instruction (CLIL).
Now, do you feel more familiar with these concepts? In the literature, I found a pretty comprehensive list of definitions given by multiple scholars about each of these terms (Brown & Bradford, 2017). I would like to share them with you to see some commonalities within those definitions. In that manner, you will be able to form a definition of your own. My colleagues and I did the same thing in a workshop I led in 2023, which was very helpful.
The central focus is on students' content mastery and no language aims are specified (Unterberger & Wilhelmer, 2011, p. 96).
"focuses on content learning only" (Smit & Dafouz, 2012, p. 4)
"an umbrella term for academic subjects taught through English, one making no direct reference to the aim of improving students' English" (Dearden & Macaro, 2016, p. 456)
"English-taught degree programs... predominantly aim at the acquisition of subject knowledge" (Unterberger, 2014, p. 37)
"Diverse methodologies are used which lead to dual-focused education where attention is given to both topic and language" (Marsh, 2008, p. 1986).
"a dual-focused educational approach... a fusion of both subject content and language learning" (Coyle, Hood, & Marsh, 2010, p. 6)
"Parts of the curriculum are delivered through a foreign language. Learners acquire the target language naturalistically" (Coleman, 2006, p. 4).
"Learners are engaged in a joint learning practice of subject matter and foreign language " (Smit & Dafouz, 2012, p. 1).
"an integrated approach to language instruction, drawing topics, text, and tasks from content or subject matter classes, but focusing on cognitive, academic language skills" (Crandall & Tucker, 1990, p. 83)
"an effective way to engage students with content sources, while at the same time improving language abilities" (Mesureur, 2012, p. 71).
"concurrent teaching of academic subject matter and second language skills" (Brinton, Snow, & Wesche, 2003, p. 2)
"aims to develop both the students' language and their content knowledge" Butler, 2005, p. 229).
"Many language programs endores [CBI] but only use course content as a vehicle for helping students master language" (Stoller, 2002a, p, 112).
Were those definitions helpful? If not, let me show you a diagram that I created after consulting multiple sources regarding these terms. Many scholars have many different views on how they see EMI, CLIL, and CBI. Below, the diagram is how I understand each of them. So, no judging!
Some CLIL specialists say CLIL is the umbrella term for similar approaches, encompassing CBI and EMI under its wings. However, since CBI has been described as an approach that can be strongly content-driven and/or language-driven, I see CBI stretching from one extreme to the other, as shown in my diagram here. Also, from my humble understanding, CLIL aims to maintain balance to some degree between content and language for which I placed CLIL right in the middle on the continuum. Lastly, EMI, by definition focuses on the mastery of subject matter, so I see its place is on the content-driven end of the continuum.
LONG story short... Let me share what my colleagues and I really came to conclude on these three.
In EMI, you teach content (a subject area) in English, and English is not the primary language of your community or country. In CBI you teach content in a language that's not your own (it could be a second or foreign language--I will call this L2 from now on, depending on your situation), and the purpose of your teaching content is for your students to learn language through content. In CLIL you teach content in L2, and the purpose of your teaching is for your students to master content knowledge and to develop their language at the same time. The slight difference between CBI and CLIL, we determined, you will be a CBI teacher if you teach in a language program while as a CLIL teacher, you will be working in a regular program.
I see myself primarily as a CBI teacher at this moment of my life because I have been working in intensive academic language programs in the US. Will I ever be a CLIL teacher? I have all the cards to become one someday because I also have music degrees (check out the Former Career page for more information)!
Perhaps, you are one of those teachers in the world who heard of this teaching approach, but still hesitating to use it in their own teaching context. Many teachers do hesitate because they don't know how to successfully integrate content and language. Fear not! I prepared some very useful resources for you to check out. Below, you will find Dr. Do Coyle (a colleague of Dr. Marsh--the one you met earlier at the beginning of this page), another of the prominent CLIL scholars, talking about the indispensable elements for a CLIL course to thrive. Enjoy!
How do you define CLIL? -
Working CLIL Digital
What isn't CLIL? -
Working CLIL Digital
What are the principles of CLIL? - Working CLIL Digital
Additional resource:
What is the 4Cs Teaching Framework? - Centro del Professorado de Granada
Why is CLIL beneficial for teachers? -
European School Education Platform
Professor Do Coyle looks very passionate. These videos are from three different interviews (including the additional video), but in each one of them, she is enthusiastic about what she's sharing with the audience. She never mentions enthusiasm as one of the core elements, but I think it is. It would not be one of the CLIL principles, but it should be one for being a good teacher in general. In sum, the diagram below shows how the 4 Cs interact within a language learning framework.
Figure 3. The 4Cs Framework (Coyle et al. 2010, p. 41)
Content: the subject being taught
Communication: language (L2) being learned and used
Cognition: learning and thinking process
Culture: development of intercultural awareness and global citizenship
Context: the environment where learning occurs (e.g., discipline, school, etc.)
Dr. Coyle says this isn't the only way language and content can be learned at the same time; however, to integrate content and learning successfully, we need to carefully consider all these Cs in our planning, she emphasizes. To reiterate what she says about the 4Cs Framework, learners approach content and try to understand it; to do so, they need to be engaged cognitively (cognition) while trying to make sense out of their context; they need to interact (communication) with their peers as well as with their teachers during that sense-making process. While learners are actively seeking ways to make meaning, teachers need to equip them with appropriate language for them to use while learning. The whole process will help learners acquire an awareness that can be developed by noticing the commonalities or differences
(culture) discovered during the communication or interaction.
In the video "What are the principles of CLIL?", Dr. Coyle mentions several important concepts that need to be further explored. The first thing is the concept of deep learning, which cannot be understood without understanding what she calls languaging. Languaging is part of a conceptual framework called Language Triptych, which comprises language of learning, language for learning, and language through learning.
Dr. Coyle with her colleagues put strong emphasis on dialogue that takes place during the learning process. Theorists before them, including Vygotsky (sociocultural theory), Freire (critical dialogue), and Bakhtin (dialogism), have also stressed the importance of such interactions by putting them at the core of learning. Following the triptych framework, language of learning refers to vocabulary necessary to learn the content. Language for learning refers to what is needed for learners to transact things; in other words, this can be considered as "how to" language. Lastly, language through learning is what Coyle calls languaging, which is the sense-making process. Reiteration of the learning materials helps learners reason and reflect on what they have learned, leading to deeper learning. This, in turn, brings about a higher quality of learning.
Figure 1. The Language Triptych (Coyle et al, 2010, p. 36)
Whew! That was a lot to take in, right? There's just one more piece of information that I'd like to share with you before I move on to the lesson plan part. Professor Coyle very briefly mentions that all concepts need to be analyzed. This analysis helps teachers figure out what aspects of language their learners would need to successfully learn the content (subject area) being taught in L2. Also, it enables teachers to effectively engage their learners in the learning process. In the next section below, I will talk about how this analysis can help teachers in their teaching. (HINT: it has to do with Cognition of the 4Cs Framework!)
Bloom's Taxonomy (Coyle et al., 2010, p. 31)
Taxonomy is a system that allows us to classify things so it is easy to remember and easy to apply. Learners need to be engaged in the learning process to acquire knowledge, and in this regard, teachers need to keep them busy while at work. In the table, you can see different levels of cognitive process. Deep learning occurs when learners are engaged in a higher-order thinking process. This in other words means if we want our students to learn something, we musn't stop at lower-order thinking processes but help them move beyond such as creating something of their own with things we teach them.
Besides different levels of cognition, types of knowledge also matter. The table illustrates different types of knowledge that learners need to learn content and language at the same time. In this regard, teachers need to consider them at the planning stage to successfully implement CLIL in their courses.
Anderson & Krathwohl's Knowledge Dimension (Coyle et al., 2010. p. 31)
So far, I have shared the theory part of CLIL. Now, it's time for you to glimpse a little bit of a CLIL course!
In brief, the language I'll be teaching is English, and the proficiency level of my students is set to be intermediate+ because I usually work with intermediate to advanced English learners at a college level. I chose music to be my content, given my expertise. These are the context of my CLIL unit plan you will see shortly.
I found this video on YouTube. It is simple, concise, and helpful. Also, it is readily available whenever we need to refresh our memories. YouTube is a fantastic resources folder ❤️!
The video covers most of the steps necessary for lesson planning.However, I noticed that it doesn't mention Student Learning Outcomes, as known as SLOs.
SLOs are the first things to consider during the planning stage because they allow teachers to set skills and language necessary for their students to have within a given period of time. A typical SLO section starts with "By the end of the lesson/class period/unit, Students Will Be Able To" (SWBAT). With clear SWBAT statements, teachers can measure their students' learning progress. Now, if we are planning on having a CLIL lesson, we need to have two different sets of SLOs: 1) content objectives; and 2) language objectives. Below is a screenshot of my music unit plan in which I decided to teach scales.
CLIL teachers need to be meticulous planners. The green objectives are content objectives while the yellow ones are language objectives. As you can see, they are well-distinguished and do not seem to have anything in common. For example, the content that I chose, music scales, is already a challenging concept for anyone regardless of their language background. Imagine it is taught in an L2! Let's change perspectives for a moment: Be in your students' shoes. Try to consult any online learners' dictionary for the word "scale." For instance, I found 7 definitions in Merriam-Webster's Learners' Dictionary, and if you noticed, none of the definitions mentions music!
Once you have in mind what you want your students to know by the end of a given period of time, then, it's time to write your lesson plan. Here, you can follow the tips from the video above. Choose a reading or anything that your students can receive information about the content (I will call this input henceforce). This can be a short article or a video (if you choose to give your students a video, make sure you give them something they can keep for themselves, e.g., transcript, etc.). If you highlight/bold/italicize the keywords (words they have to know to understand the content) and vocabulary words (words they need to use to express their understanding of the content), you will increase the chances for your students to notice these words.
Here's an example from the reading I chose for this unit plan. The words in bold face such as intervals and semitone are content words, or keywords while the word progresses is part of general vocabulary words. Please pay attention to the italicized words such as half and whole as they contain the key information for our students to understand the content correctly.
Next, I will show the first part of my lesson plan.
Understanding is one of the lower-order thinking in Bloom's Taxonomy. As I will be introducing a new concept, namely, interval, I will need to activate my students' prior knowledge (AKA schema) so that they can grasp this new concept more easily. As you can see in the screenshot, I use many visual aids to show rather than overly explain, which in turn, may confuse my students even more (you never know if your students can understand all the words you use in your explanation or not). Then, I analyze the word by breaking it down into even smaller chunks. If you remember, in my SLOs, I had "Identify affixes" as one of my language objectives. This is exactly that. The word interval is made of two parts: inter and val. Inter is a prefix, which means between, and val represents the walkable wall in a castle. Knowing all this is very helpful for our students to make sense of what they will be learning next.
After introducing the concept of intervals, semitones, and tones, I will finally introduce music scales. This time, I decided not to tell them directly what scales are. Rather, I will have my students figure out what I want them to see. I often use this technique in my classroom because it is an excellent way to bring their attention to the lesson and stimulate their mind--just like solving a riddle! The three images above are different patterns. Patterns are everywhere in our lives. I am using this fact to help my students that music also has patterns, and scales are just one type of pattern in the world. After activating their schema with these visual aids--everyday examples, I will revisit the definition of scales in the reading. Up to this point, students would still be engaged in lower-order thinking because everything I tell them is new. Let us not overwhelm them with too many demands at once!
I, as a teacher, need to assess their comprehension before the amount of new information becomes too much. At this point, I give a task. Here, languaging starts. During this stage, students will be engaged in somewhat higher-order thinking compared to prior stages. They will be applying the information they have gathered up to this point trying to complete the task at hand. to create something of their own. Drawing is a creative and flexible way to express their thoughts when they don't have enough language to do so. This will help them feel at ease and even safe in the classroom. Then, 2. can be done either in pairs or small groups depending on the class size. Exchanging will help students use their verbal skills and interpersonal skills to deliver their understanding of the topic. Students will listen to their peers, analyze their peers' work, and evaluate their own and their peers' work during this stage. And finally, spend some time to hear from each group. The whole class sharing can be done in many ways, but the following are my favorites: 1) share your own work, or 2) share your peers'. 2) remains a little more challenging from the linguistic standpoint since it requires more metalinguistic knowledge (I vs. he/she). You can also set up a particular verb tense to use for their reports (e.g., report using past tense).
While students are sharing their own reasoning process or that of their peers, the teacher must encourage them to use the terminology learned in that lesson or unit. This will help them become knowledgeable in the content area, but also, they will be helping everybody understand what they are talking about. Lastly, receiving corrective feedback during the verbal report will allow the students to know which part of speech is appropriate in certain cases. Do not be afraid of correcting your students--they need it!
It was quite a long journey from the beginning until the end. However, I believe it was worth your time because CLIL/CBI has potential! If you have any questions or concerns about this teaching approach, please feel free to contact me. You can use the Contact Me page to share your ideas. I look forward to hearing from many of you!
References
Brown, H., & Bradford, A. (2017). EMI, CLIL, & CBI: Differing approaches and goals. In P. Clements, A. Krause, & H. Brown (Eds.), Transformation in language education (pp. 328-334).
Tokyo: JALT.
Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge University Press.