Mathematics as Political

Schooling and mathematics education are inherently political. The goals of schooling have served a variety of competing goals of which social efficiency, social mobility, and democratic equality have had focused attention in the United States (Apple, 1992; Labaree, 1997). It has been well documented that students’ experiences of schooling vary widely with respect to race and social class (Anyon, 1980; Berry, Pinter & McClain, 2013) with students of color receiving limited opportunities to engage with tasks that extend beyond computation and procedural exercises (Berry, Pinter & McClain, 2013). Moreover, the discipline of mathematics itself is not a static, neutral, and value-free domain (Bishop, 1988; Fasheh, 2012; Joseph, 1987; Vithal & Skovsmose, 1997).

The historical and modern functions of schooling, along with the discipline of mathematics, combine to make mathematics teaching and mathematics teacher education a political act (Felton-Koestler & Koestler, 2017). One way that mathematics teaching is political is that teachers decide whose mathematics is privileged in the classroom (Gutiérrez, 2012) and how that mathematics is positioned (Gutstein & Peterson, 2006). Another way that mathematics teacher educators' (MTE) practice is political is that MTEs provide frameworks for prospective teachers to understand mathematics teaching and learning. These frameworks may perpetuate the dominant methods of mathematics instruction (Lortie, 1975) or "prepare teachers to challenge and disrupt the status quo" (Felton-Koestler & Koestler, 2017, p. 67). The later frameworks can help teachers to see how the systems of schooling affect students differently (Gutiérrez, 2013), combat deficit narratives of marginalized students and their communities, and make available ways to notice and build on marginalized students’ brilliance (Leonard & Martin, 2013) in an effort to build more socially just teaching practices.

ReferencesAguirre, J. Herbel-Eisenmann, B., Celedon-Pattichis, S., Civil, M., Wilkerson, T., Stephan, M., Pape, S., & Clements, D.H. (2017). Equity within mathematics education research as a political act: Moving from choice to intentional collective professional responsibility, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 48(2), 124-147.Apple, M. W. (1992). Do the standards go far enough? Power, policy, and practice in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23(5), 412-31.Berry III, R. Q., Pinter, H. H., & McClain, O. L. (2013). A critical review of American K-12 mathematics education, 1900-present. In D. B. Martin & J. Leonard (Eds.) The Brilliance of Black Children in Mathematics (pp. 23-54). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Bishop, A. J. (1988). Mathematical enculturation: A cultural perspective on mathematics education. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publications.Fasheh. M. J. (2012). The role of mathematics in the destruction of communities, and what we can do to reverse this process, including using mathematics. In O. Skovmose & B. Greer (Eds). Opening the cage: Critique and politics of mathematics education (pp. 93-106). The Netherlands: Sense.Felton-Koestler, M. D., & Koestler, C. (2017). Should mathematics teacher education be politically neutral?. Mathematics Teacher Educator, 6(1), 67-72.Gutiérrez, R. (2012). Embracing Nepantla: Rethinking" knowledge" and its use in mathematics teaching. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 1(1), 29-56.Gutiérrez, R. (2013). Why (urban) mathematics teachers need political knowledge. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 6(2).Gutstein, E., & Peterson, B. (Eds.). (2005). Rethinking mathematics: Teaching social justice by the numbers. Rethinking Schools.Joseph, G. G. (1987). Foundations of Eurocentrism in mathematics. Race & Class, 28(13), 13-28.Labaree, D. F. (1997). Public goods, private goods: The American struggle over educational goals. American Educational Research Journal, 34(1), 39-81.Leonard, J., & Martin, D. B. (Eds.). (2013). The brilliance of Black children in mathematics: Beyond the numbers and toward new discourse. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, Incorporated.Lortie, D. C., & Clement, D. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study (Vol. 21). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Vithal, R. & Skovsmose, O. (1997). The end of innocence: A critique of ethnomathematics, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 34, 131-158.