Map of St. Croix, 1767.
From 1631 to 1917, St. Croix was colonized by European powers like England, France, and Denmark, who used the land to harvest cash crops like coffee, indigo, tobacco, cotton, and sugarcane. Under Danish occupation, St. Croix became a prominent sugar producer and exporter whose economy relied solely upon the enslaved laborers forced to cultivate the island's former dry forests. Colonial business operations transformed original St. Croix landscapes by burning island forests, shrinking St. Croix's until 54% of the island was designated for sugar cultivation. This has present-day ramifications that can be measured to quantify the ecological legacy of plantations on forest growth and regeneration. One way we can begin measuring plantation intensity is to look to historical archives to inform us of past plantation activity and historical maps for GIS reference. Our major archive search starting point was to look for historical maps of St. Croix to reference for spatial analysis and future mapmaking. We found several accurate historical maps of St. Croix and plantation boundaries during the Dutch colonization of the island.
Swipe through to see some of the historical maps found and referenced throughout our research and some of our final deliverables made by our Spatial Analysis team that reference historical maps with the digitized boundaries of present-day St. Croix. These maps were found through the Danish National Archives and on the immensely helpful website Windmills of St. Croix.
Scroll through a few pages of the very valuable St. Croix estate property statistics document to see the raw data and archived information that would eventually be visualized by our team.
To see the final figures created by our team, check out the Figures Tab
"and Huck closed his watch and retired to bed in an empty sugar hogshead about twelve."
The Adventures of Tom Sawyer, Mark Twain, 1835
Our team was encouraged to utilize tax logs from Danish government archives to help us learn more about the productivity of individual plantations and estates of St. Croix. Our goal was to find documents recording information such as total populations of enslaved laborers, sugar exports, plantation ownership, and acreage. After a few weeks of web digging, the team found an immensely helpful document: STATISTICS regarding landed properties on the Island of St. Croix. This two-hundred-year-old document consists of information about plantations and estates present on the island from 1816 to 1857, with a table showing the quantity of sugar shipped from 1835 to 1840 and from 1850 to 1857. By utilizing this, we produced figures illustrating varying sugar production of certain St. Croix estates that played a key role in the sugar industry at the time. Most calculations were readily available to be recorded in pounds, with a few exceptions needing to be converted into lbs. from hogsheads, a large cask, or a barrel weighing from 1,000 to 1,500 pounds/63 gallons/238 liters. This was calculated by multiplying the number of hogsheads (Hhds) by 1500 according to a label on the source document, bringing us an estimate of the total produced pounds. This conversion allowed our team to establish sugar produced per the time segment for each estate for 1857, 1862-1889, and 1890-1902. This also detailed estate sugar production by lbs/acre and the acreage dedicated to cultivating sugar cane on each estate. This helps make an analysis of plantation intensity, which can be done using these calculations in consultation with the lab team’s molecular soil analysis. We can compare plantation output and size with present-day ecosystem health and disturbance ramifications.
Another, unfortunately, dark aspect of our archival research to help inform and construct our Plantation Intensity Index was looking through Slave Plantation and Town Head Tax Log records for each quarter of St. Croix. This record, which we found on Anscestry.com (thank u, Rhona), contains extensive records and logs of all enslaved individuals' names for each plantation, recorded by each estate's owner. In these logs, enslaved populations were often categorized by Male ("Able"), Female ("Able"), "Half-Grown," meaning adolescent children over the age of 12, and Children or Boys/Girls. These logs were also often sub-categorized by the occupation of the enslaved individual (i.e., Tradesmen, Field [workers]) and occasionally recorded Births and Deaths for the populations. Larger estates were also seen to record the population of White Persons on the plantations, listing their names. At the top of the bottom of the documents could be seen the name of the estate in cursive, often very difficult to read, as well as their signature and the number of the estate; examples of such can be seen in the 8th archival map posted above. The years of recorded tax logs vary per quarter and estate, with there being many inconsistencies in estate records and data availability, as follows: 1772 - 1821, with records broken up by different ranges of years such as 1772 - 1795, 1795 - 1811 & 1818, and 1818 - 1821. Below are some examples of the tax logs our archival research team spent days and weeks searching for, transcribing/deciphering, and recording/documenting. We encourage you to view with caution, as these records reflect a real-time in which people were seen as something to be owned and recorded, indicating a disgusting time in history. Through our research, our team hopes to honor these victims of slavery and these enslaved individuals and honor the legacy of their descendants as well by providing insight into the present-day ramifications of settler colonialism in the form of slavery.
Estate Tax Records
Here are Tax records for 1781 sourced from Anscestry.com for the Prince's Quarter of St. Croix, listing total acreage of estates, rum production, and other illegible catagories or recorded things.
Estate Enslaved Population Records
Here are Tax records for 1781 sourced from Anscestry.com for the Prince's Quarter of St. Croix. They list the total enslaved populations and other details for the estates Jealousy and The Hope, better known today as Betty's Hope.
Utilizing this database, each team member was assigned to a decade between 1772 and 1818, with allotted time segmented by five-year periods. These assigned five-year segments included 1772-1777, 1782-1787, 1792-1797, 1802-1807, and 1812-1817. With data availability being a constraint in our data collection, each team member was required to record data for at least 2 years within these segments regarding enslaved population statistics per estate. The Tax Head lists for each respective year between 1772 and 1818 ranged from lengths of 100-800 pages, with some years not being recorded/uploaded digitally for all or only some estates. At first, we aimed to record data for 15 estates across all the island's quarters; however, given time constraints and inconsistent data availability, we found the data for 7 - 11 estates to help inform our Plantation Intensity Index.
The tax document analysis returned data on the enslaved population with categories for able men, able women, other enslaved populations, and finally, the total enslaved population for each estate. The average enslaved population from 1772 to 1817 was approximately 130, ranging from 24 to 368. Betty’s Hope and Bethlehem Old Works had the largest average enslaved population, with Bethlehem Old Works having the largest number of enslaved people (368) in 1780, while Adventure and Great Pond had the smallest average. The total average enslaved population across all analyzed estates peaked in 1782 and was at its lowest in 1817, the last year of our data set.
Figure 2: Average enslaved population across 1772-1817 for selected estates
When quantifying sugar production in tax records, there were discrepancies in the units used. For 1889-1902, some estates lacked data in pounds and instead had several hogsheads, a large cask typically for liquids, usually alcoholic beverages. This was notable since sugar is not typically measured by volume, raising questions about the reasons behind this method and suggesting they might have found it more resourceful to use barrels for storing and counting sugar.
Hogsheads were each supposed to be 1,500 pounds, but this calculation was not exact in some cases where both pounds and hogsheads were provided. Multiplying the number of hogsheads by 1,500 would return a number close but not exact to the number of pounds. For example, Estate Betty’s Hope in 1890 recorded 333 Hhds. but 500,170 lbs. of sugar. Multiplying 333 Hhds. by 1,500 returns a value of 499,500 lbs., a discrepancy of 670 lbs. or around 0.1%. Therefore, for the estates with no data in pounds, like Estates Cane Garden and Concordia East, this calculated estimation from the number of hogsheads was used but with the understanding that there would be slightly less accuracy than with other estates. Once all conversions were completed, the GIS team could use the data to visually present the varying levels of sugar production across the island of St. Croix.
The largest challenge faced by the archival team was the lack of consistent data on the enslaved population per estate available for analysis. Some years in the archived tax data files contained over 800 pages of information, while others had only four. The inaccessibility of information creates gaps in the data, making it difficult to accurately assess the impact of our variables on the island's soil chemistry. These knowledge gaps stem from various factors, including inadequate record-keeping by plantation owners, lack of thorough verification by government officials, absence of digital scans for many records, and issues of legibility and file degradation, resulting in missing pages with complete details for each estate. Many numbers in our diagrams are rough estimates intended to provide an approximate understanding of these variables over time and in comparison to one another when presented on a map.
For our project, we were researching data dating back to the early 18th century and sometimes even into the 17th century. At the time, English and Danish were heavily utilized on the island due to the settler colonialism on St. Croix. Many of the documents our team sought to analyze (especially the ones regarding windmills) at the beginning of our research endeavors were written in Danish, making it extremely difficult for our team to decipher their meaning; we did not have the time to translate the documents. Many documents held in the Royal Danish Archives, which may have held important information, were unavailable to us for research as a result. Additionally, the complex and often unintelligible handwriting found on 18th and 19th-century historical documents was difficult for our team to read, especially when taking data from many pages of records.