UDL is not a special ed thing or even a general ed thing. It’s just an ed thing.
When information is inaccessible, it is both inaccessible in the moment and in the future, because relevant information goes unnoticed and unprocessed. As a result, teachers devote considerable effort to recruiting learner attention and engagement. But learners differ significantly in what attracts their attention and engages their interest. Even the same learner will differ over time and circumstance; their “interests” change as they develop and gain new knowledge and skills, as their biological environments change, and as they develop into self-determined adolescents and adults. It is, therefore, important to have alternative ways to recruit learner interest, ways that reflect the important inter- and intra-individual differences amongst learners.
Empower learners to take charge of their own learning.
In an instructional setting, it is often inappropriate to provide choice of the learning objective itself, but it is often appropriate to offer choices in how that objective can be reached, in the context for achieving the objective, in the tools or supports available, and so forth. Offering learners choices can develop self-determination, pride in accomplishment, and increase the degree to which they feel connected to their learning. However, it is important to note that individuals differ in how much and what kind of choices they prefer to have. It is therefore not enough to simply provide choice. The right kind of choice and level of independence must be optimized to ensure engagement.
Things to Think About or Try:
Provide learners with as much discretion and autonomy as possible by providing choices in such things as:
The level of perceived challenge
The type of rewards or recognition available
The context or content used for practicing and assessing skills
The tools used for information gathering or production
The color, design, or graphics of layouts, etc.
The sequence or timing for completion of subcomponents of tasks
Allow learners to participate in the design of classroom activities and academic tasks
Involve learners, where and whenever possible, in setting their own personal academic and behavioral goals
Connect learning to experiences that are meaningful and valuable.
Individuals are engaged by information and activities that are relevant and valuable to their interests and goals. This does not necessarily mean that the situation has to be equivalent to real life, as fiction can be just as engaging to learners as non-fiction, but it does have to be relevant and authentic to learners’ individual goals and the instructional goals. Individuals are rarely interested in information and activities that have no relevance or value. In an educational setting, one of the most important ways that teachers recruit interest is to highlight the utility and relevance, of learning and to demonstrate that relevance through authentic, meaningful activities. It is a mistake, of course, to assume that all learners will find the same activities or information equally relevant or valuable to their goals. To recruit all learners equally, it is critical to provide options that optimize what is relevant, valuable, and meaningful to the learner.
Things to Think About or Try:
Vary activities and sources of information so that they can be:
Personalized and contextualized to learners’ lives
Culturally relevant and responsive
Socially relevant
Age and ability appropriate
Appropriate for different racial, cultural, ethnic, and gender groups
Design activities so that learning outcomes are authentic, communicate to real audiences, and reflect a purpose that is clear to the participants
Provide tasks that allow for active participation, exploration and experimentation
Invite personal response, evaluation and self-reflection to content and activities
Include activities that foster the use of imagination to solve novel and relevant problems, or make sense of complex ideas in creative ways
Foster a safe space to learn and take risks.
One of the most important things a teacher can do is to create a safe space for learners. To do this, teachers need to reduce potential threats and distractions in the learning environment. When learners have to focus their attention on having basic needs met or avoiding a negative experience they cannot concentrate on the learning process. While the physical safety of a learning environment is of course necessary, subtler types of threats and distractions must be attended to as well; what is threatening or potentially distracting depends on learners’ individual needs and background. An English Language Learner might find language experimentation threatening, while some learners might find too much sensory stimulation distracting. The optimal instructional environment offers options that reduce threats and negative distractions for everyone to create a safe space in which learning can occur.
Things to Think About or Try:
Create an accepting and supportive classroom climate
Vary the level of novelty or risk
Charts, calendars, schedules, visible timers, cues, etc. that can increase the predictability of daily activities and transitions
Creation of class routines
Alerts and previews that can help learners anticipate and prepare for changes in activities, schedules, and novel events
Options that can, in contrast to the above, maximize the unexpected, surprising, or novel in highly routinized activities
Vary the level of sensory stimulation
Variation in the presence of background noise or visual stimulation, noise buffers, number of features or items presented at a time
Variation in pace of work, length of work sessions, availability of breaks or time-outs, or timing or sequence of activities
Vary the social demands required for learning or performance, the perceived level of support and protection and the requirements for public display and evaluation
Involve all participants in whole class discussions
Many kinds of learning, particularly the learning of skills and strategies, require sustained attention and effort. When motivated to do so, many learners can regulate their attention and affect in order to sustain the effort and concentration that such learning will require. However, learners differ considerably in their ability to self-regulate in this way. Their differences reflect disparities in their initial motivation, their capacity and skills for self-regulation, their susceptibility to contextual interference, and so forth. A key instructional goal is to build the individual skills in self-regulation and self-determination that will equalize such learning opportunities. In the meantime, the external environment must provide options that can equalize accessibility by supporting learners who differ in initial motivation, self-regulation skills, etc.
While it is important to design the extrinsic environment so that it can support motivation and engagement, it is also important to develop learners’ intrinsic abilities to regulate their own emotions and motivations. The ability to self-regulate—to strategically modulate one’s emotional reactions or states in order to be more effective at coping and engaging with the environment—is a critical aspect of human development. While many individuals develop self-regulatory skills on their own, either by trial and error or by observing successful adults, many others have significant difficulties in developing these skills. Unfortunately some classrooms do not address these skills explicitly, leaving them as part of the “implicit” curriculum that is often inaccessible or invisible to many. Those teachers and settings that address self-regulation explicitly will be most successful in applying the UDL principles through modeling and prompting in a variety of methods. As in other kinds of learning, individual differences are more likely than uniformity. A successful approach requires providing sufficient alternatives to support learners with very different aptitudes and prior experience to effectively manage their own engagement and affect.