Case:
Case #4- Happy to Be Alone
Questions to consider:
If the court were to accept that an elephant could be a person, what does this say about human-animal relationships (ex. owning pets, animal testing, etc.)?
What does it mean to be a person and how is that connected to sentience?
Discussion questions:
Does the 2022 New York Court ruling that Happy cannot claim habeas corpus rights (and therefore, is not a legal person) mean that she is not a morally considerable person?
What are the moral implications of regarding some or all non-human animals as persons?
Are there ways to ensure the well-being of animals other than by granting personhood status?
Links: