4. If the Division Chief performs his/her functions under Presidential Decree (PD) No. 988 of 1976, will it not be under Part I of the DPCRF? Part I of the DPCRF should include the division's collective commitments based on its function.
On the other hand, part II of the DPCRF should cover the Individual Commitments of the Division Chief. These commitments may be anchored from the PD or the special tasks given to him/her by the Head of Office or Cluster Head.
It is also noted that while the Division Chief may contribute to Part I of the DPCRF, part II is designed to give premium points to the supervisory function of the Division Chief. Examples of individual commitments for the Division Chief may include coaching and mentoring, the conduct of learning sessions with direct reports, and commitments that are beyond the core
Are parts I and II of the DPCRF consistent with the MC 6, s. 2012? Based on the MC 6 s. 2012, specific required forms are not stipulated. The CSC has approved the PMT's initiative to develop such forms.
If the membership of the Division Chief to the TWG is related to the mandate and function of the division, these may be reflected under the support function of the DPCRF. However, if the focal ship and membership (TWG) in different committees is beyond the mandate and function of the division, these may be reflected under part II.
To clarify, budget utilization is something that would support the objective and overall realization of the core mandate. Further, this concern shall be discussed with the PMT Secretariat.
Yes. The Contract of Service (COS) workers, regardless of their position, must use the Contractor Commitment and Review Form (CCEF) as the appropriate form to be used.
How about Director V? For the positions at the Director III level and above positions, OPCRF is the appropriate form, unless their employment status is CoS.
If the office has standard indicators for individuals, these should be developed alongside a standard rating guide. This eliminates the necessity to create individual rating guides.
If the other focalship does not contribute to the core function, we can lump it into one indicator.
For the Performance Planning and Commitment phase, the personnel is required to submit D/IPCRF or CCEF targets regardless of the service rendered during the semester. This will serve as the personnel’s guide for his/her contribution to the Division of Office.
On the other hand, for the Performance Review and Evaluation, personnel who rendered less than 3 months of service are required to submit a Certificate of Performance Assessment with an Individual Accomplishment Report.
Yes. The Director IV is required to submit OPCRF. Further, this concern shall be coordinated with the OPC Secretariat.
If in case the OPCRF target of the office is not yet approved, the office has the option of requesting for extension on the submission of the D/IPCRF and CCEF target. However, the HRMDS still encourages all HOBS to submit on or before 24 June 2024.
Since the EXECOM offices do not have a Division Chief, the highest Executive Assistant serves as the immediate supervisor of the personnel. Therefore, they are the ones to sign the “vetted by”.
Yes. The highest EA is the immediate supervisor of the employees and CoS workers under EXECOM offices.
For EXECOM Offices, the immediate supervisor who will provide performance feedback is the highest EA who will also sign part 2 of IPCRF ratings. Further, the Head of Office may also provide performance feedback to the employee.
Yes. If the Section Head is the one directly giving feedback to the employee, he/she will sign the form.
On the other hand, the Division Chief may sign the attestation part of the IPCR ratings.
For targets, there is no standard template. For the ratings, Annex P and Annex Q of the AO 18, s. 2023 is the Summary of Division/Individual Performance Ratings.
There will be no DPCRF to be crafted for that division. The individual’s target shall be cascaded directly from the OPCRF.
The Order of Succession ceases to exist because the Division Chief is already separated from the Department. The office needs to request designation to the HRMDSto that his/her performance will be credited as OIC Division Chief.
The PMT Secretariat is currently coordinating with the oversight agencies regarding this matter. As of now, the DSPMS is still in effect and further clarifications and guidance will be provided once thoroughly discussed with the PMT.
The HRMDS currently does not require the submission of hard copies of the IPCRF-Targets; instead, they request soft/scanned copies to have a view on the targets and commitments of the staff. In Phase 3, IPCRF with ratings will be submitted.
For Phase 1, if an employee is a COS worker initially and later assumes a Contractual position, they will use CCEF-Targets for the COS period and IPCRF-Targets for the Contractual period. Thus, two forms will be accomplished by the individual during Phase 1.
For Phase 1, if an employee is a COS worker initially and later assumes a Contractual position, they will use CCEF-Targets for the COS period and IPCRF-Targets for the Contractual period. Thus, two forms will be accomplished by the individual during Phase 1.
These are inherent functions or technical accomplishments of the individual. In Part 1, division targets and accomplishments are reflected. In Part 2, examples include coaching provided by the Division Chiefs or roles of the division chiefs under Presidential Decree 988. The collective tasks shall be placed under Part 1, while special assignments done by the Division Chief fall under Part 2.
The CCEF will be used by the COS worker regardless of position or designation. The template will be the same as the IPCRF template.
It is important to set targets in Part 2 of the DPCRF as it constitutes 20% of the performance ratings for the Division Chief.
Coaching and monitoring of deliverables can be included here.
The OPCRF is the form to be accomplished by the ARD.
The OPCRF is the form to be accomplished by the ARD.
The ARD should use the OPCRF, as the targets of the Division Chief are included within the OPCRF Targets.
Effective 2024, enhanced DSPMS forms will be used.
Since the employee has rendered 3 months of service, they must submit the IPCRF-Rating for the purpose of PBIS processing, if applicable.
For targets with SOP, it will fall under efficient service delivery, thus classified as a strategic priority.
The classification in the OPCRF should be cascaded down to the DPCRF and IPCRF.
In Part 2 of the IPCRF-Ratings, feedback can be provided by the Section Chief, Division Chief, and even the Head of Office. However, the supervisor who conducts the performance feedback discussion with the individual will be the one to sign Part 2 of the IPCRF.
For Phase 3, if an employee has less than 3 months of service in the semester, they are not required to submit IPCRF-Ratings but should submit a CPA with IAR instead.
It is a reminder that new hires must create IPCRF-Targets regardless of the period to set deliverables.
The Part 2 of the IPCRF and Part 3 of the DPCRF is not required to be filled out since it does not affect the performance rating. However, completing this section is highly encouraged. The form can proceed even if this part was not signed.
Using an e-signature in the absence of the RD is allowed, but the RD must sign the document in wet ink upon their return to the office.
For the IPCRF-Rating form, the Division Chief should sign under Part 1. In Part 2, the signature can be provided by the Division Chief, the Section Chief, or an equivalent position, provided they have conducted the performance feedback discussion with the individual.