Assessment of student learning plays an important new role in teaching: no longer signaling the end of instruction, it is now recognized to be an integral part of instruction. While assessment of learning has always been and will continue to be an important aspect of teaching (it’s important for teachers to know whether students have learned what teachers intend), assessment for learning has increasingly come to play an important role in classroom practice. And in order to assess student learning for the purposes of instruction, teachers must have a “finger on the pulse” of a lesson, monitoring student understanding and, where feedback is appropriate, offering it to students.
A teacher’s actions in monitoring student learning, while they may superficially look the same as those used in monitoring student behavior, have a fundamentally different purpose. When monitoring behavior, teachers are alert to students who may be passing notes or bothering their neighbors; when monitoring student learning, teachers look carefully at what students are writing, or listen carefully to the questions students ask, in order to gauge whether they require additional activity or explanation to grasp the content. In each case, the teacher may be circulating in the room, but his or her purpose in doing so is quite different in the two situations.
Similarly, on the surface, questions asked of students for the purpose of monitoring learning are fundamentally different from those used to build understanding; in the former, the questions seek to reveal students’ misconceptions, whereas in the latter, the questions are designed to explore relationships or deepen understanding. Indeed, for the purpose of monitoring, many teachers create questions specifically to elicit the extent of student understanding and use additional techniques (such as exit tickets) to determine the degree of understanding of every student in the class. Teachers at high levels of performance in this component, then, demonstrate the ability to encourage students and actually teach them the necessary skills of monitoring their own learning against clear standards.
But as important as monitoring student learning and providing feedback to students are, however, they are greatly strengthened by a teacher’s skill in making mid-course corrections when needed, seizing on a “teachable moment,” or enlisting students’ particular interests to enrich an explanation.
Danielson, C. 2013
Assessment is essential to monitor student progress. This pre-assessment provided vital data to detect the students' growth in grammar. I reflected and compared their formative/summative assessment from each lesson in the unit to their pre-assessment; this allowed me to gauge how effective my teaching was.
I teach my grammar lessons on Wednesdays, and the first-grade students take a test on Fridays called an "exit ticket"--a larger than average test that evaluates their comprehension of the language arts principles taught that week. I highlighted the grammar principles I have taught so far and 6 students that scored either high, medium, or low on the pre-assessment. This allows me to monitor the students' progress; I am also able to see how effective my teaching has been. This type of student monitoring is not necessarily performed within a lesson, but effective adjustments can (and should) be made in the course of teaching.