SYSTEM-INPUTS AND PROCESSES

S.1. The curriculum provides for the development of the following professional competencies:

             S.1.1. acquisition of knowledge and theories based on the field of specialization/discipline;

             S.1.2. application of the theories to real problems in the field;

             S.1.3. demonstration of skills in applying different strategies in the actual work setting.

S.2. There is a system of validation of subjects taken from other schools.

S.3. The curriculum reflects the local, regional and national development goals as well as the institution’s vision and mission.

IMPLEMENTATION

I.1. The College/Academic Unit implements the curriculum/program of study in consonance with CMO #30,s.2004 (total units for BEEd-174 unit,BSEd-174 units)

I.1.1 BEEd

                  I.1.1.1 General Education                           63 units

                  I.1.2. Professional education                       54 units

                  I.1.3. Specialization                                     57 units

I.1.2. BSEd

I.1.2.1. General Education 63 units

I.1.2.2. Professional Education 51 units

I.1.2.3. Specialization 60 units

I.2. The subjects are logically sequenced and prerequisite courses are identified.

I.3. The curricular content is responsive to the needs of the country and recent development in the profession.

I.4. The curricular content covers the extent of the professional and technical preparation required of its graduates.

I.5. The curriculum integrates values, reflective of national customs, culture and tradition in cases where applicable.

I.6. Opportunities for participation in hands-on activities, such as immersion/practical training and field study are maintained in the curriculum.

I.7. The following activities are undertaken to ensure quality in the process of curriculum development.

I.7.1. participative planning and designing of the curriculum by the following stakeholders:       

                             I.7.1.1. administration;

                             I. 7.1.2. faculty;

                             I.7.1.3. students;

                             I.7.1.4. alumni;

                             I.7.1.5. representatives from the industry/sector; and

                             I.7.1.6. others (please specify)

               I.7.2. periodic view, assessment, updating and   approval of the curriculum by the Academic Council;

             I.7.3. confirmation of the curriculum by the Board of Regents/Trustees (BOR/BOT).

             I.7.4. others (please specify).

I.8. The program of study allows the accommodation of students with special needs and assists them to finish the degree.

OUTCOME/S

O.1. The curriculum is responsive and relevant to the demands of the times.

O.2. There is a passing average performance in the Licensure Examination of teacher (LET).

SYSTEM-INPUTS AND PROCESSES

S.1. There is an institutional outcomes-based standard format in the preparation of course syllabi.

S.2. The syllabus includes a list of suggested readings and references of print and electronic resources within the last ten (10) years.

S.3. Copies of all course syllabi during the term are available at the Dean’s office or in any other appropriate repository.

S.4. Copies of all course syllabi in previous terms are filed for reference purposes.

S.5. There is provision for remedial measures to strengthen the basic skills in Mathematics, English, and other “tool” subjects.

S.6. There is a mechanism to facilitate the teaching-learning process.

IMPLEMENTATION

I.1. The Dean or official concerned approves the updated syllabus for each subject.

I.2. The faculty prepares syllabi with comprehensive contents.

I.3. The faculty revise and enhances the syllabi preferably every two (2) years and as needed.

I.4. The faculty distributes a copy of the syllabus to each student.

I.5. Teaching strategies stimulate the development of the students’ higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) such as critical thinking, analytical thinking, creative thinking and problem solving.

Teaching Methods and Techniques

I.6. Classroom instruction is enriched through the use of the following strategies:

             I.6.1. symposia, seminars, workshops, professional lectures;

             I.6.2. educational tours/learning visits/other co-curricular activities;

             I.6.3. peer teaching/cooperative learning; and

             I.6.4. computer-assisted instruction (CAI) and computer-assisted learning (CAL).

I.7. At least three (3) of the following course requirements are used:

  I.7.1. group/individual projects;

             I.7.2. group/individual reports;

             I.7.3. group/individual term papers;

             I.7.4. performance activities;

             I.7.5. learning contact;

             I.7.6. portfolio;

             I.7.7. research study;

             I.7.8. learning modules; and

             I.7.9. others (please specify)

I.8. Instruction is enriched through the use of at least ten (10) of the following techniques/strategies (Pleas check them)

             I.8.1. film showing;

             I.8.2. projects;

             I.8.3. group dynamics;

             I.8.4. case study;

             I.8.5. workshops;

             I.8.6. simulations;

             I.8.7. dimensional question approach;

             I.8.8. brainstorming;

             I.8.9. buzz sessions;

             I.8.10. informal creative groups;

             I.8.11. interactive learning;

             I.8.12. team teaching;

             I.8.13. micro teaching;

             I.8.14. macro teaching;

             I.8.15. tandem teaching;

             I.8.16. peer teaching;

             I.8.17. multi-media/courseware/teach ware;

             I.8.18. experiments;

             I.8.19. problem-solving;

             I.8.20. type study methods;

             I.8.21. reporting;

             I.8.22. panel discussion; and

             I.8.23. others (please specify)

I.9. Instructional strategies provide for student individual needs and the development of multiple intelligence;

I.10. Instruction is enhanced through the following:

             I.10.1. submission of approved and updated syllabus for every subject/course;

             I.10.2. regular classroom observation/supervision;

             I.10.3. regular faculty meetings with the Dean/Academic Unit/Department Head;

             I.10.4. regular faculty performance evaluation;

             I.10.5. attendance/participation of faculty in in- service training;

             I.10.6. conduct of experimental classes; and

             I.10.7. adoption of alternative instructional delivery modes such as modules, e-learning and on-line study.              

I.11. Instructional materials (IMs) are reviewed and recommended by an Instructional Materials Committee (IMC).

I.12. Varied, multi-sensory materials and computer programs are utilized.

I.13. The College/Academic Unit maintains consortia and linkages with other learning institutions for academic exchange of instructional material.

I.14. The faculty are encouraged to produce their own instructional materials such as modules, software, visual aids, manuals and textbooks.

OUTCOME/S

O.1.  Course syllabi are updated and approved by concerned authorities.

O.2. Varied teaching strategies are efficiently and effectively used.

O.3. Instructional Materials produced by the faculty are copyrighted/patented.

SYSTEM-INPUTS AND PROCESSES

S.1. The program of studies has a system of evaluating students performance through a combination of the following:

             S.1.1. formative tests such as quizzes, unit tests;

             S.1.2. summative tests such as mid-term and final examinations;

             S.1.3. project and term papers;

             S.1.4. practicum and performance tests; and

             S.1.5. other course requirements.

S.2. The summative tests have the following descriptions:

             S.2.1. comprehensive enough to test the different levels of cognitive skills and knowledge of content; and

             S.2.2. based on well-designed Table of Specifications (TOS).

IMPLEMENTATION

I.1. Varied evaluation measures are used, such as:

             I.1.1. portfolio;

             I.1.2. rubric assessment;

             I.1.3. skills demonstration;

             I.1.4. paper and pencil tests;

             I.1.5. oral examinations;

             I.1.6. group/individual reports;

             I.1.7. groups/individual projects; and

             I.1.8. others (please specify)

I.2. Evaluation tools/instruments are reviewed and revised periodically.

I.3. The faculty are trained how to assess student performance properly.

I.4. The College/Academic Unit encourages and supports assessment for multiple intelligences.

I.5. Course and test requirements are returned to students after results are checked, recorded and analyzed.              

I.6. The system of student evaluation and grading is defined, understood, and disseminated to:

             I.6.1. students;

             I.6.2. faculty;

             I.6.3. academic administrators; and

             I.6.4. parents/guardians.

OUTCOME/S

O.1. The student’s academic performance is commendable.

O.2. Retention rate of students is on the average.

SYSTEM-INPUTS AND PROCESSES

S.1. There are policies on management of learning which includes the following:

             S.1.1. student’s attendance in class and other academic activities; 

             S.1.2. schedule of classes; 

             S.1.3. student’s discipline; 

             S.1.4. maintenance of cleanliness and orderliness. 

IMPLEMENTATION

I.1. The policies on management of learning re enforced. 

I.2. Student activities are well-planned and implemented. 

I.3. assignments are designed to reinforced teaching which result in student’s maximum learning. 

I.4. The maximum class size of 50 for undergraduate courses enforced. 

I.5. Classroom discipline is maintained in accordance with democratic practices. 

I.6. The class officers and assigned students assists in maintaining cleanliness of classroom, laboratories, corridors and the school campus. 

I.7. Independent work and performance are encouraged and monitored in the following activities:

             I.7.1. preparation of case studies/reports;

             I.7.2. field practice

             I.7.3. practice teaching

I.7.4. on-the-job training(OJT)

I.7.5. thesis; and

I.7.6. others (please specify)

I.8. In practicum courses (field study, OJT, practice teaching, etc.) the number of trainees supervised by each coordinator does not exceed to 50. 

OUTCOME/S

O.1. Learning is efficiently and effectively managed. 

SYSTEM-INPUTS AND PROCESSES

S.1. There is a policy on graduation requirements. 

IMPLEMENTATION

I.1. The students are regularly informed of the academic requirements of their respective courses. 

I.2. The College/Academic Unit implements a system for student returnees and transferees to meet the residence and other graduation requirements. 

I.3. Graduating students conduct research and/or undergo practicum/OJT or other activities prescribed in their respective curricula. 

I.4. The College/Department of Undergraduate Teacher Education (BSEd) assists the graduating students with academic deficiencies, disciplinary cases, and other problems which hinder issuance of clearances. 

I.5. A clearance from academic and financial accountabilities and responsibilities is required before graduation. 

OUTCOME/S

O.1. At least 60% of the students enrolled in the program are able to graduate within the regular time frame. 

SYSTEM-INPUTS AND PROCESSES

S.1. The institution has policies on:

             S.1.1. substitution or special arrangements whenever a faculty is on leave or absent;

             S.1.2. giving awards and/or recognition for faculty and students with outstanding achievements; and

             S.1.3. supervision/monitoring and evaluation of faculty performance.

IMPLEMENTATION

I.1. The institution implements rules on the attendance of the faculty in their respective classes and other academic related activities.

I.2. Dialogues are regularly conducted by the administration with the:

             I.2.1. faculty;

             I.2.2. students

I.3. Quality instruction is assured through the following strategies:

             I.3.1. conducting seminars/workshop on syllabi making;

             I.3.2. holding workshops on test construction and the corresponding table of specifications;

             I.3.3. Conducting of competencies assessment;

             I.3.4. conducting supervisory visit of classes and providing assistance if necessary;

             I.3.5. holding of regular faculty meetings;

             I.3.6. requiring consultations between students and faculty;

             I.3.7. conducting studies on academic performance of students; and

             I.3.8. providing opportunities for the participation of the faculty in in-service training activities.

I.4. Periodic faculty performance evaluation on teaching and in other functions is done by at least three of the following:

             I.4.1. the Dean/Academic Head/Department Chair;

             I.4.2. the students;

             I.4.3. the faculty member himself/herself;

             I.4.4. peers; and

             I.4.5. others (please specify)

I.5. The results of the performance evaluation are used to improve the performance/competencies of the faculty.

I.6. Students are given recognition for exemplary academic and non-academic performances.

I.7. Outstanding achievement of students is recognized and encouraged through the following:

             I.7.1 inclusion in the honor roll, Dean’s list, etc.

             I.7.2. grant of tuition scholarships;

             I.7.3. award of honor medals and merit certificate;

             I.7.4. membership in honor societies/honor class/sections, etc.;            

             I.7.5. grant of special privileges such as opportunities for leadership and others (excluding exemption for major exams on all professional business subjects);

             I.7.6. grant of awards and recognition for outstanding academic accomplishments, e.g. Best Thesis, Student Researcher of the Year, etc.

I.8. Indicators on performance of graduates are studied such as:

             I.8.1. analysis of performance of graduates in the Licensure Examination; if applicable

             I.8.2. Employability of graduates;

             I.8.3. feedback from employers regarding performance of graduates.

OUTCOME/S

O.1. The faculty and students have commendable performance as a result of administrative support.

O.2. The graduates of the program are employable.

Area I : VMGO

Area II: Faculty

Area III: Curriculum and Instruction

Area IV: Support to Students

Area V: Research

Area VI: Extension and Community Involvement

Area VII: Library

Area VIII: Physical Plant and Facilities

Area IX: Laboratories

Area X: Administration