AUTHORS' GUIDE

I. Submission Checklist

As part of the submission process, authors must ensure their submission complies with all the following requirements. Submissions that do not meet these guidelines may be returned to the authors for revision.

The submission has not been previously published and is not being considered by another journal.
The submission file is in Microsoft Word format.
URLs for references are included where available.
The text is single-spaced, uses a 12-point font, employs italics instead of underlining (except for URLs), and places all illustrations, figures, and tables within the text at the appropriate points.
The text follows the stylistic and bibliographic standards outlined in the Author Guidelines.

II. Research Article Format

1. Title Page:

Title of the manuscript

2. Abstract:

Heading (Abstract)
Concise summary of the study's objectives, methods, results, and conclusions
Length from 100 to 150 words
Keywords (3 to 6 keywords that capture the main topics of the manuscript)

3. Introduction:

Heading (Introduction)

The introduction of a research article serves as the foundation for the study, outlining the research problem, its significance, and the context in which it is situated. It begins by presenting the broader field of study and identifying the specific gap or issue that the research seeks to address. The introduction also reviews relevant literature to establish what is already known about the topic and highlights the need for further investigation. By clearly stating the research objectives and questions, the introduction sets the stage for the study, explaining why it is important and how it contributes to existing knowledge. This section aims to engage the reader by providing a compelling rationale for the research, leading to the formulation of hypotheses or research aims that guide the rest of the article.

4. Review of Relevant Theory, Studies and Literature

Heading (Literature)

The review of relevant theory and literature provides a critical foundation for understanding the context of the study. It systematically examines existing research, theories, and frameworks related to the topic, highlighting significant findings and methodologies from previous studies. This section identifies key themes, trends, and gaps in the literature, demonstrating the evolution of thought in the field. By synthesizing diverse perspectives, the review establishes the theoretical underpinnings that inform the current research. It also critiques previous work, noting any limitations or biases that may have influenced findings. Ultimately, this review situates the study within the broader academic discourse, justifying its relevance and necessity, and helping to articulate the research questions and objectives that the study aims to address. Through this comprehensive analysis, the review not only informs the reader but also guides the research design and methodology employed in the study

5. Methodology:

Heading (Methods)

The methods section provides a comprehensive description of the study design, materials, and methods employed in the research endeavor. It outlines the procedures for data collection, including details on sample selection and data analysis techniques utilized. Additionally, this section addresses any ethical considerations involved in the study, along with the approvals obtained from relevant ethical review boards or institutions. With a focus on transparency and reproducibility, the methods section offers sufficient detail to enable other researchers to replicate the study's procedures and validate its findings.

6. Results and Discussion

Heading (Results and Discussion): bold, size 12

The results section presents the findings of the study in a clear and logical manner, ensuring that the reader can easily grasp the key outcomes. It utilizes tables, figures, and charts to visually illustrate the main results, enhancing comprehension and facilitating data interpretation. However, it refrains from offering any interpretation or discussion of the results within this section, focusing solely on the presentation of empirical findings. This approach maintains the integrity of the data and allows for a separate analysis and interpretation in the subsequent discussion section.

In the discussion section, the results are interpreted within the framework of the study's objectives, shedding light on their implications and significance. This involves comparing the findings to previous research, identifying similarities, differences, or trends that contribute to the existing body of knowledge. Moreover, the discussion addresses any unexpected or contradictory results, offering possible explanations or avenues for further investigation. Ultimately, the section highlights the broader implications of the findings, emphasizing their relevance and potential impact on the field of study.

7. Conclusion:

Heading (Conclusion)

The conclusion section encapsulates the main findings of the study, providing a concise summary that highlights the key results and outcomes. Following the summary, the discussion delves into the study's contributions to the field, acknowledging its strengths while also addressing any limitations encountered during the research process. Furthermore, the discussion section offers valuable insights and suggestions for future research directions or practical applications, aiming to guide future investigations and foster continued advancement in the field.

8. References:

- Heading (References)
- List of all sources cited in the manuscript
- Follow a consistent citation style (APA 7th edition)

III. Review Process

The review process is a critical component of academic publishing, ensuring that submitted manuscripts meet rigorous standards of quality, originality, and relevance. This structured evaluation involves multiple stages, including initial checks, peer reviews, and editorial decisions, all aimed at enhancing the integrity and credibility of published research. The entire process is anticipated to take three months.

IV. Lunday Research Journal Review Process

Submission. The author submits the manuscript to the Editor-in-Chief (EIC).
Initial Review. The EIC forwards the manuscript to two qualified peer reviewers for evaluation.
Review Consolidation. Once the reviewers have submitted their evaluations, the EIC forwards them to the Associate Editor for summarization and finalization of review comments.
Review Finalization. The Associate Editor returns the finalized review summary to the EIC.
Author Notification. The EIC communicates the results of the peer review to the author.
Revision. The author revises the manuscript based on the reviewers’ feedback and submits the revised manuscript along with a matrix of corrections.
Final Evaluation. The EIC forwards the revised manuscript and the matrix of corrections to the Associate Editor for final evaluation. The Associate Editor may either recommend acceptance or request further revision from the author.
Editing and Formatting. Once the manuscript is accepted, it is sent to the Layout Editor and Language Editor for formatting and language refinement.
Galley Proof. The EIC sends the galley proof to the author for final review and approval.
Pre-Publication Review. After the author approves the galley proof, the EIC submits the article to the Managing Editor for final verification of publication readiness.
Publication. Upon the Managing Editor's approval, the EIC officially publishes the article in the Lunday Research Journal.

V. Article Publication Charges (APC)

Article Processing Fee (APC) of Php 2,000.00 is required to the Lunday Research Journal to support the journal's annual subscription and sustainability.

VI. Copyright of the Journal

The Lunday Research Journal applies copyright to its content to protect the intellectual property rights of its authors and contributors. This ensures that unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or modification of the published material is prohibited without permission. By depositing copies of its issues with the National Library, the journal fulfills its legal obligation to contribute to the national archive while also providing wider access to its content for research and educational purposes. This collaboration with the National Library facilitates the preservation, dissemination, and future accessibility of the journal's scholarly work, supporting the advancement of knowledge within the academic community.

VII. Templates for Download

Page updated

Report abuse