Having now read the first half of the novel, you spend this lesson digging deeper and engaging in close critical analysis; the focus will be on the symbolic meaning of the main characters and learning to back up claims, while also critiquing one’s own assumptions.
Step 1: Read
As you read, complete the corresponding pages for this chapter in your student workbook.
Step 2: Review
Review these key events in the chapter and answer the questions in your notes.
The animals work like slaves even though they rebelled so that they would be free.
>> Isn’t this ironic? Although, is it different when you are working for yourselves rather than for someone else to benefit?
Napoleon hires Mr. Whymper the solicitor.
>> What do readers learn about Napoleon as a result of this action?
Squealer carries on blatantly lying to the other animals.
>> How is it possible they keep believing his lies?
The windmill is blown down…and Snowball is blamed.
>> What was the purpose of blaming Snowball? What type of persuasive technique is used?
Level up CHALLENGE 1: What's In a Name?
Working with a partner, complete the "What's In a Name" worksheet by explaining how the character links with the symbolism of their name.
Once finished, you can compare your responses to the self-check sheet on the whiteboard.
Level up CHALLENGE 2: Claim, Support, Question
The essentials part of the process of literary analysis are the ability to make a unique claim (based on inferences and a close reading); then the ability to back up and explain that claim with evidence from the text; and finally the ability to question one’s own assumptions, see things from a different perspective, and explore possible implications.
Complete the "Claim, Support, Question" worksheet and complete these based on the events of Chapter 5.
Details:
»» There are no *right* answers; this is purely personal observation and thought.
»» CLAIMS: These need to be debatable points, not obvious facts.
»» SUPPORT: This can be in the form of direct quotations or a reference to an event in the text. You should also briefly explain how this substantiates your claim.
»» QUESTION: Here you must question your own claim and place it under the microscope: you should propose explanations or counterarguments, or identify holes in your argument.