LEVEL 5C TO SEX GOALS PACKAGE

Hello Greg, this is Dennis here. Today is the 28th of May 1993 and I want to take up with you this
very vexed subject of sex, and in general and in particular the 'To Sex' goals package. Let me say
at the outset that the 'To Sex' goals package is undoubtedly the most difficult goals package you
will ever come across in therapy, or a human being would ever come across in therapy. The
reason for this is twofold. 

The 'To Sex' Goals Package 

One is that games play is compulsive in the 'To Sex' goals package because the human body has
adopted gender specialization and the other is that games play in the 'To Sex' goals package, as
far as the body is concerned, is very heavily influenced by the certain considerations to do with
the genetic track of the human body particularly the ape period, mankind's immediate ancestor,
the ape. 

The combination of those two factors makes this a very difficult subject to get apart, that's why
I'm giving you the information on the subject of the 'To Sex' goals package. It's doubtful if
anyone would get the package apart without doing the research that I've done. And to save you
from having to do this research I'm giving you the data. With this data you can get the package
apart rather easily and without the data you'd have to simply sit down and, like I did, discover the
data and work out why the package is not erasing. 

Sex as a Noun and a Verb 

Now the very first thing we need to know about this subject of sex and the way we're using it in
this technology is that I'm using the word sex both as a noun and as a verb. In the English
language itself the word sex is only a noun. Sex is not a verb in the English language. But I have
verbalised the noun and am using sex as a verb, quite intentionally and quite purposefully and
for simplicities sake. 

There is no verb in the English language, which means exactly the same as the verb 'To Sex'.
There's the verb 'to copulate', the verb 'to inseminate' etcetera, there's lots and lots of these
verbs but they all mean slightly different things than 'To Sex'. The verb 'To Sex' is quite unique in
its meaning. There is a verb in the old Anglo Saxon language that means exactly the same as the
verb 'To Sex' and that is the verb 'To Fuck' but that is a dead language and the verb 'To Fuck' is a 

dirty word in the English language so we shall verbalise the noun and use the verb form of the
noun 'To Sex'. 

We shall verbalise it and call the verb 'To Sex'. Ok? Simply for convenience sake. It's quite in order
to do this in the English language, it is quite in order to verbalise nouns as long as you let people
know that you're doing it when you're doing it, otherwise it can be very confusing. 

Gender 

Now the other thing you need to know is that I'm using the word gender. We talk about the
gender of a noun, the gender of a word and so forth, it's a grammatical meaning. The word
gender is, strictly speaking, in the pure English language a grammatical term, but more and more
these days the word gender is coming into use in the language to replace the word sex. 

Strictly speaking we would say that the child is of the male sex when we mean that he's a boy.
He's a male. Well you would say he is of the male sex. But more and more these days people are
saying, and I believe correctly, that he is of the male gender. 

The word gender is coming into use in place of the word sex where the word sex is used as a
noun. The word sex is not a very good noun, it's a far better verb than it is a noun. The word
gender is the better noun as far as a human being is concerned. When talking about the sexual
nature of the person and whether the person be a male or a female the word gender is a better
word, I think, than to say that the person is of the male sex or the female sex. 

I think that sounds rather stilted but that is the correct use of English. But I'm not going to use it
that way. I'm going to use the word gender and I'm going to use the word gender in the sense
I've explained it. That when I say that a person is of the male gender I mean that he is a male. I
don't mean that the word male is a masculine word in the English language. I'm not using the
word gender in a grammatical sense. 

I'm using it in a definite life and livingness sense to do with real human beings in the real
universe. 

All Sexuality is within the 'To Sex' goals package 

Now the first thing you need to know is that the whole subject of sexuality resides within the
four legs of the 'To Sex' goals package. There's no aspect of sex, which is outside of that goals
package. 

Now that might be a very difficult thing for you to grasp immediately but I can assure you that
it's the case and as you work more and more with the 'To Sex' goals package in therapy you will
come to understand the truth of it. 

That when this 'To Sex' goals package is erased in therapy then the whole subject of sex is erased
from the human mind. Now the spiritual being can do this, can erase the subject of sex from his
psyche. But you must clearly understand that because your body is also active on the subject of
sex. 

That you share the 'To Sex' goals package in common with your body and you will not erase the
subject of sex from your body. Your body is active on the subject of sex just like it's active on the
subject of eating and so on. The 'To Sex' goals package is a bodily goals package and you share it
in common with your body. 

So when we talk about erasing the 'To Sex' goals package we mean the spiritual being can erase
this goals package out of his psyche but your body will still retain all of its sexuality. In fact, the
sexuality of your body will be enhanced after you've erased the 'To Sex' goals package. 

Erasing the 'To Sex' goals package won't influence the body at all, and you should make no
attempt to erase the sexuality of your body. You can only make your body very sick by interfering
with its gender and its sexuality and its various sexual mechanisms. Simply leave it alone, it's part
of the mock-up, you won't change the mock-up. You'll simply make it very sick if you attempt to,
but you can, and it's very beneficial to erase the subject of sex from the human psyche. 

Just in passing I can tell you at this stage that no one in the whole of the human history, to the
best of my knowledge, has ever erased the 'To Sex' goals package out of their psyche or the
subject of sex out of their psyche, apart from people who worked with this technology of mine.
Now I may be wrong in that, there may be various Indian mystics and various Chinese eastern
mystics that have done it and it's gone unrecorded so I won't be adamant on the subject but I will
say as far as I know, and my research is quite extensive on this subject, the best that people have
ever done with other psychotherapies, that I know of, is to produce a reduction, a relief and to
gain some insight into the subject of sexuality. 

Well we can go a lot further than that. We can actually erase it from the psyche and, as I say, to
the best of my knowledge it has never been done before. So when you finally succeed in erasing
the 'To Sex' goals package in therapy you can pat yourself on the back, you can give yourself a
"Well done!" pat on the back because you've done something that no one else has ever done
except the people doing this therapy. 

We're the only ones that have ever done it to the best of my knowledge. You also need to know
at the very outset that the subject of sex would erase very easily from the human psyche if the
body had not adopted compulsive games play on the subject of sex. 

Compulsive Games Play in the 'To Sex' Goals Package 

Now what do I mean by compulsive games play on the subject of sex as far as the body is
concerned? We better clear this up right from the outset. Now what do I mean? Well, I mean that
the body has adopted gender specialization.  Human bodies are either "Male and not Female" or
"Female and not Male." 

We don't find human bodies that are both male and female, nor do we find human bodies that
are neither male nor female. Now in line with our knowledge of compulsive games play in a goals
package we know that there's an identification between the postulates in the goals package. 

False Identifications in the 'To Sex' Goals Package 

In the 'To Sex' goals package it's the 'To Sex' postulate that is identical with the 'To Not be Sexed'
postulate. That is the identification, that 'To Sex' equals 'To Not be Sexed' and 'To be Sexed'
equals 'To Not Sex'. 

They are the false identifications that bring about compulsive games play in the 'To Sex' goals
package. 

Now there is another false identification that comes about here on the subject of the human
body and in the subject of sex that you should know about. Because the male operates in a male
body and he operates exclusively on the 'To Sex' postulate and the female operates exclusively
on the 'To be Sexed' postulate then there is a false identification in the genders amongst
humans at a bodily level. And the false identification is that "a male equals a non-female" and "a
female equals a non-male". 

So we have two false identifications, one that 'To Sex' equals 'To Not be Sexed' and 'To be Sexed'
equals 'To Not Sex' they're the false identifications of the postulates, and then we have the false
identification of the genders. 

We have "a male equals a non-female" and  "a female equals a non-male" and  both  those
identifications are false. They're all false identifications. But they are extant and you will find
your body subscribes to them and believes in them quite implicitly. If it weren't for this fact, if it
weren't for the fact that you are attached to a mock-up, you’re attached to a body, you’re
attached to a genetic life form that is so devoted to compulsive games play on the subject of sex
then the 'To Sex' goals package would erase rather easily in therapy. 

If you were a free spirit wandering around in the universe and you weren't attached to a body
that had adopted compulsive games play then the 'To Sex' goals package would be a very easy
one to erase. If it posed you any problem at all, even if you were interested in the subject, which
you probably wouldn't be, it certainly wouldn't pose you any problems in therapy. 

It's only because you're attached to a body that's adopted compulsive games play on the subject
of sex that you will have any difficulty erasing this subject in therapy. Most of this lecture then,
you will find, will be taken up on some of the peculiarities of the body's sexuality, which you will
need to know about in order to erase the 'To Sex' goals package in therapy. 

Sexuality and Sexual Reproduction 

So that is the "why" for this very strong stress on the body's peculiarities on the subject of
sexuality,  on  the  human  body's  peculiarities,  I  should  say.  But  before  we  discuss  these
peculiarities in detail it's an excellent idea to take a short look at the subject of sexuality
amongst life forms in the universe at large to see how this subject ever got into existence and
what it's all about. 

Asexual Reproduction 

Well sex, of course, is the subject of reproduction and how life forms reproduce themselves and
you should know that the simplest of life forms simply don't reproduce sexually at all. They
reproduce asexually and they reproduce by a system called cell splitting. 

They are usually single cell creatures like bacterium or amoeba or viruses and when they want to
reproduce the cell simply splits itself into two and the two halves go their separate ways and
become fully grown creatures in their own right. 

Cell splitting, it's asexual reproduction. Now the problem with cell splitting, as far as a life form is
concerned, is that the reproduction is a clone. In other words there's no new genetic information
in the offspring than there was in the parent. The offspring are identical genetically to their
parents and there's never any new genetic material that gets into the life form, and this is a
liability to a life form because it means that the life form cannot easily change against a changing
environment, cannot easily adapt to the environment. 

It's very difficult for organisms which reproduce asexually to change. They can but it's difficult
for them to do so. They overcome their difficulties by an enormously rapid reproduction rate,
but you can learn about this if you want to study it up, you want to study bacteriology and
virology and you learn how these little tiny creatures overcome these difficulties, but generally
speaking that is the liability there. In order to overcome this difficulty way back along the line
the creature said, "Well we'll have to do something about this." and they came up with a system,
and this system they came up with is called sex, the system was called sex. And they reproduce
sexually. 

Sexual Reproduction 

Now the way the creature reproduces sexually is it builds a specialised sex cell. It builds one or
more special sex cells which contains all of its genetic information and it's designed to fuse with
a sex cell of another creature of its own type which may have a slightly different genetic pattern. 

The two sex cells fuse and they become a separate organism and the separate organism has 50%
of its genetic information from one of its parents and 50% of its genetic information from the
other one of its parents, and the offspring thereby benefits from having the genetic information
of both of its parents and this allows it to survive better in the universe. 

And it really does. Sex is a wonderful survival mechanism in the universe. It gives the creatures
that reproduce sexually a definite edge over those that reproduce asexually. Never the less you
will still find simple creatures that reproduce asexually. 

You can see them if you go out and buy even a cheap microscope and go down and get a bit of
pond water and put a drop of it on the slide of a microscope and you sit and watch the amoeba
and the paramecia reproducing by cell splitting. 

They are doing it all the time all day long millions and millions of them in a drop of pond water.
You'll watch them there doing it, they're still doing it, they've been doing it for millions of years
and unless mankind blows the planet up they'll still be doing it in millions of years time. 

The system does work, asexual reproduction. But that doesn't concern us for we're concerned
with the sexual reproduction. 

Sex Cells 

Now about these two specialised sex cells, one is called a female cell and one is called a male
cell, the difference between the two cells is quite interesting. The male cell is the mobile cell, the
active  one,  and  it  seeks  out  the  female  cell,  the  male  cell  is  usually  very  small.  Its  main
characteristic is mobility and it's simply nothing else but a mobile mass of genetic material. It has
usually a very short life, it doesn't live very long but it's mobile. 

The female sex cell is much larger. It's also called an ovum or an egg. It contains a lot of food
material so it can live for a long while and it's not mobile. It stays put and it relies upon the male
cell to come to it, and the male cell fertilises, as we say, the female cell. 

The female cell doesn't seek the male cell, the male cell always seeks out the female cell. Now
there's the difference between those two types of sex cells. This is common for all creatures that
use sexuality. There's the male cell and the female cell and the male cell is the active one and the
female cell is the large one that stays put and it's the female cell which when fertilised becomes
the new creature. 

The little, tiny male cell disappears inside and is absorbed by the ovum. That would be another
way to put it. But it contributes half of the genetic material to the egg and then the egg goes
ahead and splits. 

Cell splitting takes place and the egg then grows into and becomes the new creature. And so on
as you can read  about in the biology textbooks. Now this subject of the sex cells is very
important to the subject of sexuality because as far as your body is concerned the whole subject
of sex is the game of the sex cells. 

That's the totality of it as far as the body is concerned. The whole of the body's sexuality is
devoted to getting its sex cells married up with the sex cells of someone of the opposite sex.
That is the whole idea. So, as far as the body is concerned, sex is the game of the sex cells, is the
sex cells game. 

Now bear that in mind, the sex cells are the be all and end all of the body's sex game, they've got
no other purpose as far as the body's concerned, the subject of these sex cells. That is it. That's
sex as far as your body is concerned, is the sex cells. 

Bisexuality 

Now there's another system of sexual reproduction. In fact, there are two well-known systems of
operation that creatures use to get their sex cells together and so forth in the universe. And the
first of these is what we call the bisexual creatures. Now this was no doubt the first system. And
a bisexual creature is also known as a hermaphrodite. 

Bisexual, hermaphrodite mean the same thing. It means that the creature contains both male
and female sex cells. It's a hermaphrodite, it's a bisexual. And the creature's male sex cells
cannot fertilise its own female sex cells, usually there's a device to prevent this happening. But
the creatures male sex cells can fertilise the female sex cells of another creature of its type and
also its own female sex cells can be fertilised by the male sex cells of another creature of the
same type. 

A good example of the hermaphrodite, the bisexual, is the earthworm. All earthworms are
bisexuals and many plants are. Many trees are bisexuals they have both male sex cells and
female sex cells. 

Now it's a very efficient system, the bisexual system is, and from a biological point of view the
only reason that's known why a creature got off the bisexual system of reproduction, is because
of increasingly compulsive games play in the 'To Sex' goals package. 

That leads to gender specialization and that is the second type of system that the creatures use. 

Unisexual 

They cease to be bisexual and they become unisexual. They become either males or females and
not both. Now some trees are like that. Some trees are masculine trees and they have feminine
trees of the same type and most so called higher mammals are of that type. They're either male
creatures or they're female creatures and they're not both. 

And certainly the ape family falls into that category and human beings fall into that category.
The male body only contains male sex cells and the female body only contains female sex cells
and  that's  what  we  call  gender  specialization.  When  we  say  gender  specialization  it's  a
phenomena of the sex cells, it's not a phenomena of anything else. It's simply a matter of a male
body is a body that only contains male sex cells and a female body is a body that only contains
female sex cells, and that's the gender specialization at a sex cell level. 

It's the only level that really means anything. Let's quickly tie up this subject of bisexuality and
unisexuality with our classes here, our logical classes. 

Bisexual Classes 

A bisexual creature because it can be both male and female can hold that class and can in any
particular sexual encounter be male and not female and in another sexual encounter it can be
female and not male. The only thing that it can't be is neither male nor female. So the bisexual
can occupy three of the four possible classes. He can be both male and female, he can be male
and not female and he can be female and not male. 

I say he but I should say he or she. So three of the four classes the bisexual can handle. 

Unisexual Classes 

But the unisexual class creature can only handle one of the classes. He can't be both male and
female, so he is either "male and not female" or "female and not male" and he can't be "neither
male nor female." So he can only be one of the classes. 

So bear that in mind, that when the creature stops being bisexual and takes up unisexuality each
individual creature drops two of the classes. The bisexual can occupy three out of the possible
four classes. The unisexual creature can only occupy one, he's either a "male and not a female" or
he's a "female and not a male," that's one out of the four classes he can occupy. 

So it's important to grasp that. It follows immediately from that, that it's very hard to conceive of
a bisexual creature having any sexual problems because he's both male and female. So there
can't be any great conflict in his mind between masculinity and femininity, can there? And that's
the base of all conceivable problems on the subject of sex, you see. 

Your bisexual doesn't have any sexual problems. If you could converse with an earthworm, the
earthworm would have great difficulty in understanding the idea of a sexual problem because
the earth worm simply doesn't have any sexual problems. He can't have, he's bisexual. You see
that? 

It's only creatures that are unisexual, that have taken up gender specialization that have sexual
problems, and I can assure you that all of them do. All animals that have taken it up have sexual
problems. Insects that have taken up gender specialization have sexual problems. They don't talk
about them because they can't talk really but if you examine them you'll see that they do have
problems. 

And mankind certainly has problems on the subject of sex because his body has taken up gender
specialization. If his human body was bisexual mankind would have no sexual problems. 

Male and Female Logical Sets 

What would the logical set look like that the male and the female are occupying? What would the
set look like? There's considerable reduction. I won't give you all the reductions and so forth that
come through from asexual beings right the way through hermaphroditism and the bisexual
down through the gender specialization. It would just take me too long to write them all down.
And I've got them written down, I've noted them but we're only interested in what the human
beings situation is. 

What the reduction is for the human being. Well this is what it looks like for a human being. The
human being is either a male or a female. Let's take the male. Well, what does he operate on?
We're talking about the male body here now, we're not talking about the male spiritual being,
we're talking about the male body. 

Well the male body operates on the 'To Sex' postulate and the 'To Not be Sexed' postulate. And
he contains male sex cells and no female sex cells. 

Now the female operates on the 'To be Sexed' postulate and the 'To Not Sex' postulate and the
creature contains female sex cells and no male sex cells. And that's the two sets, those are the
two classes. 

Those two classes constitute the universe of human sexuality at the bodily level and they are the
only postulates that are used and they are the sex cell configurations. So that's what it looks like
if you were to write it down on a bit of paper, that's what it looks like. 

But you might say to yourself, "Well, wait a minute, hold your horses Dennis, are you trying to say
Dennis that the human body, a human male body cannot go into the 'To Not Sex' mode?" That's
true, it can't. It's fixed in, 'To Sex'. 

Well, how does it move then up and down the scale? Does it ever move beyond the zero point?
No, it never does, a male body is fixed in the 'To Sex' mode, Plus 'To Sex'. It never goes over the
zero point and goes into 'To Not Sex' it's always in 'To Sex' it just simply moves up and down in
intensity. 

Goes high intensity 'To Sex', low intensity 'To Sex' but it never crosses the zero point. Similarly
with its 'To Not be Sexed' postulate. A male body goes high intensity 'To Not be Sexed', low
intensity 'To Not be Sexed' but it's always in the negative side, it never goes over the positive
line, never goes over the positive into 'To be Sexed' cause that would be the feminine postulate,
you see? You follow that, a little bit tricky until you get the hang of it. 

Similarly with the female, the female body is only in 'To be Sexed' and positive. Stays on the
positive side, never gets into 'To Not be Sexed', only into 'To be Sexed', and 'To Not Sex' stays on
the negative side of 'To Not Sex' never gets into the 'To Sex' and that's the way it looks and just
as the male moves up and down, high to low intensity of his 'Must Sex', I'll use 'Must Sex' instead
of 'To Sex' from this point onwards, I'll use the enforcement of the postulate. 

The male goes high intensity 'Must Sex' down to low intensity 'Must Sex'. Similarly the female
goes from high intensity 'Must be Sexed' down to low intensity 'Must be Sexed' and as far as the
body is concerned it responds to these relative movements just as if the postulate was moving
over the zero point. 

In other words the relative intensity of the postulate is sufficient to permit the games play to
occur. You follow that? I could write this down much easier on a piece of paper, it's not easy to
explain it verbally, but I think I can get it through so you understand it. It's simple a matter of
relative intensity, the creature is stuck on the positive side or stuck on the negative side of its
postulate and it moves up and down the positive or the negative side of its postulate and it can
still play games by moving up and down. 

It's a restricted games play. But although this is true for the body, when you're erasing the 'To
Sex'  goals  package  in  therapy  you  always,  repeat  always,  use  the  positive  and  negative
postulates. You use 'Must Sex', 'Mustn't Sex', positive-negative; 'Must be Sexed', 'Mustn't be
Sexed' positive-negative. 

You use the whole range. The spirit, the human spirit can use the whole range. The body because
of its gender specialization has got itself stuck. Well ok, that's the body's problem but you don't
have to get yourself stuck. You follow that? 

So that's what the sets look like and the body can operate on them, it's a bit limiting, but it
manages it, and you can see the sort of limitations it gets into by its obsession with compulsive
games play. It would do a lot better if the games play wasn't compulsive but the body's got itself 

stuck  with  compulsive  games  play  in  the  'To  Sex'  goals  package  so  it  has  to  suffer  the
consequences. 

So, I want you to bear with me on this material I'm giving you. I'm just playing some of it back and
it does sound very complex but there's a good reason for it. It will all start to come good, it will,
just bear with me and read it over and over until you've got it clear in your own mind. Just bear
with me at the moment. Now let's go for a little bit of light relief, you might say, we'll get off the
part about the body and we will take up what might be called ideal games play. 

The  ideal  games  play  in  the  'To  Sex'  goals  package,  the  body  does  follow  this  within  its
limitations and this is an ideal version of games play in the 'To Sex' goals package. 

The 'Must Sex' / 'Mustn't be Sexed' Game 

The game would start with the male, he's the active one, the moving one, he directs a 'Must Sex'
postulate at the female. The female, we'll talk about human beings here, would on detecting this
'Must Sex' postulate she immediately goes into her 'Mustn't be Sexed' mode and opposes the
postulate. 

Immediately sexual sensation is generated at the boundary between these opposing postulates
and both the parties enjoy the generation of the sexual sensation. And now the female must be
careful not to come on too strong with her 'Mustn't be Sexed' postulate because if she comes on
too strong with it she will overwhelm the male and drive him from 'Must Sex' into 'Mustn't Sex'. 

In other words he'll feel he's been given the cold shoulder and his postulate will change from
'Must Sex' to 'Mustn't Sex'. He will simply lose interest in the female if she comes on a bit strong.
And if this happens the female immediately notices that he's flipped from 'Must Sex' to 'Mustn't
Sex' now. 

And he's now in 'Mustn't Sex' she's in 'Mustn't be Sexed', they are now occupying complementary
postulates, there is no more sexual sensation being generated between them and the game has
ended. So to keep the game going now she has to do something about it. She knows she's come
on a bit strong so what she does now, she flips over to 'Must be Sexed', she flips over to a
positive postulate. 

She gives him the "come hither" sign. Soon as she goes into 'Must be Sexed' and he's still in
'Mustn't Sex' the postulates are again opposing each other, sexual sensation is again being
generated and which they can both sense and enjoy. But immediately this happens the male, of
course, he now sees the "come hither" signal; he regains the interest in the female. 

He  now  flips  back  to  his  positive  'Must  Sex'  postulate.  She,  of  course,  senses  this  and
immediately  she  senses  it,  in  order  to  keep  the  game  going  because  they're  now  in  a
complementary postulate situation again, in order to keep the game going she now has to flip 

over back to a negative, to a 'Mustn't be Sexed' postulate and thereby keep the sexual sensation
being generated. 

So what it amounts to is that no matter which postulate that the one player creates and directs
at the other, the other one will mock-up and generate and put out the opposing postulate and so
you'll always get the sexual sensation being generated. Now this becomes what we call a ritual
mating dance between the couple, and it just goes on and on and on. They circle round and they
get closer and closer during the game and eventually the terminals close completely. 

But the game is still being played exactly as I've mentioned it until physical sex is embarked
upon. And even at the point of physical sex we get this same postulate structure occurring at the
physiological level. The males 'Must Sex' postulate at the physical level, effort level becomes a
forward pelvic thrust, the males 'Mustn't Sex' postulate becomes a backward pelvic withdrawal.
The females 'Must be Sexed' postulate becomes a backward pelvic thrust and finally the females
'Mustn't be Sexed' postulate becomes a forward pelvic withdrawal. 

Now as you examine these physical efforts, these bodily efforts that occur during coitus, as you
examine them you are immediately struck by that fact that there's no difference physically
between the males 'Must Sex' postulate, with its forward pelvic thrust and the female's 'Mustn't
be  Sexed'  postulate  which  is  a  forward  pelvic  withdrawal.  Similarly  there's  no  difference
between the females 'Must be Sexed' postulate of a backward pelvic thrust and the males
'Mustn't Sex' postulate of a backward pelvic withdrawal. 

It's  simply  a  matter  of  a  rose  by  any  other  name  smelling  as  sweet,  you  see?  There's  no
difference  between  the  forward  pelvic  thrust  and  the  forward  pelvic  withdrawal  and  the
backward pelvic thrust and the backward pelvic withdrawal. They are the only two motions
involved. You see? And this is exactly what we would expect to occur because of the false
identification between 'Must Sex' and 'Mustn't be Sexed' and 'Must be Sexed' and 'Mustn't Sex'
in the 'To Sex' goals package at the bodily level. 

Because of this false identification we would expect these physical efforts to be identical and
they are identical. Do you see that? So when I say at the physiological level that the body is
completely addicted to this false identification that 'Must Sex' equals 'Mustn't be Sexed' and
'Must be Sexed' equals 'Mustn't Sex' I'm on very firm ground because I can prove it at an effort
level in the body. 

It shows up at the effort level during the sex act. Now looking at this tape I see that we're
getting towards the end of this tape so umm... let's just run it off to the end of the spool, Greg,
and pick it up on the other side. 

There we are, back again, side two same date. Now there's one other physiological muscular
action, which I haven't mentioned that goes with these sexual postulates. First of all we'll take

the female. The female when she's in her 'Must be Sexed' mode with the backward pelvic thrust
is a relaxation of the muscles of her vagina and also a relaxation of the sphincter muscle on her
rectum. 

When she goes into her 'Mustn't be Sexed' mode the muscles in her vagina contract closing the
vagina up, closing the tubing off, and also the sphincter muscle in her rectum contracts. Similarly
for the male, the male when he's in his 'Must Sex' mode with his forward pelvic thrust, he hasn't
got a vagina, of course, but when he's in his 'Must Sex' mode the sphincter muscle on his rectum
will  contract  and  when  he goes  into  his  backward  pelvic  withdrawal,  his  'Mustn't Sex'  the
sphincter muscle on his rectum will relax. 

Now the significance of these I'll explain later. There is some significance and that's why I'm
mentioning it. Now obviously the immediate effect of the vaginal muscle contracting in the
female 'Mustn't be Sexed' mode is to allow her to grip his penis when he's thrusting with his
forward pelvic thrust. 

As he thrusts into her vagina, she grips it and that increases the sexual sensation and when he
withdraws his penis she relaxes it, relaxes the vaginal muscle on the return action. So the effect
of this is to enhance the sexual sensation in the coital act between the partners. That's the
immediate effect there. 

Now the coitus proceeds usually at a more and more frantic rate until the point of orgasm is
reached. Now orgasm has its own definite postulate structure and it's one that you should know.
Orgasm is reached at a definite point in the cycle. 

Orgasm 

Now the male achieves orgasm when he becomes convinced that he has deprived the female of
her 'Mustn't be Sexed' postulate and has driven her from 'Mustn't be Sexed' into 'Must be Sexed'.
That is orgasm for the male. The female goes into orgasm when she becomes convinced that she
has deprived the male of his 'Mustn't Sex' postulate and has driven him into 'Must Sex'. Now
these are completely subjective considerations. 

But practised lovers can manage it so that they have their orgasms simultaneously. It's simply a
matter of conviction between them. These are entirely subjective considerations but that is what
orgasm consists of. 

At the point of orgasm, complementary postulates maintain, the male in his 'Must Sex' and the
female in her 'Must be Sexed'. Sexual sensation drops after the point of orgasm and everything
drops off to zero. But the act has been completed, the ejaculation of the sperm occurs and some
few hours later if all goes well one of the sperm will meet up with a female egg cell and fertilise 

it and the female will be inseminated and become pregnant which is the whole purpose of the
game as far as the body is concerned. 

Now when you examine these various physical efforts at the bodily level during coitus although
they do make sense during face to face coitus which is what is normally practised by mankind, by
human beings, they make a lot more sense when the male enters the female from the rear which
is the ape mode, the original mode of the ape. 

For millions and millions of years man's ancestors, the male entered the female from behind.
This so called missionary position where the couple are face to face during the sex act is a
"Johnny come lately" of the last few thousand years. So it's no surprise that the physiological
efforts at the bodily level make a lot more sense when the male enters the female from the rear. 

Well there is the sex act at the basic physical level in terms of the postulates and in terms of the
muscular actions of the human torso. 

Sexual Ionisation of Body Parts 

And next it behoves us to take up this subject of sexual ionisation of body parts because that's
an important component in our understanding of bodily sex. Now the first thing you should
understand about bodily sexual ionisation, the sexual ionisation of the human body, is that it's
fixed. 

It doesn't vary from one month to another, it's quite fixed. This is because the human beings
don't have a sexual season like animals do. The apes, cats, dogs, most mammals go into a sexual
season and they reproduce during the sexual season. When they are out of season they're not
interested in sex at all. 

But because the human being is in sexual season all year round his ionisation is permanent on his
body. If it was permanent on animal bodies they would be in season all the year round. It is this
ionisation  that  determines  whether  a  creature is  in sexual  season  or not. Now  the  sexual
ionisation, as I say, is fixed in humans and we'll now discuss what this sexual ionisation is. It starts
at birth; it's faint in birth. It increases in childhood but it's still faint. It steadily increases during
childhood and it shoots up to a maximum at puberty and stays at that level for the rest of the
person's life and fades very slowly in old age. 

But even in extreme old age the ionisation still remains much the same as it was at puberty. Ok
there's the cycle, that's what we're looking at. Ok, now which body parts are ionised and ionised
with what? 

As I give you these ionisations some of them are quite obvious but some will come as a great
surprise to you, I'm sure. 

First of all the sexual ionisations of the male body. The male penis and the male testicles have a
'Must Sex' ionisation, permanent 'Must Sex' ionisation, and the only other permanent sexual
ionisation on the male body is the male rump and the male rectum has a permanent 'Must be
Sexed' ionisation. 

Now the sexual ionisations of the female body are the area of the vagina. The vulva in the female
has a permanent 'Must be Sexed' ionisation. Also the area of the rump and the rectum have a
permanent 'Must be Sexed' ionisation and also the female is the proud possessor of a vestigial
penis called a clitoris and this vestigial penis has a residual 'Must Sex' ionisation. Also in the
mature female the breasts have a transient 'Must be Sexed' ionisation, but it's transient, it's not
permanent and I don't really consider it in this study because we're only interested in the
permanent ionisations at this stage. 

So there are the ionisations of the male and female bodies. As I say some of them are obvious
and some of them are no doubt surprising to you. We'll take up the female ionisations first. The
surprising one there is the sexual ionisation of the clitoris. That one is not immediately obvious
but it is there. There's no equivalent ionisation in the male vagina simply because the male has
no vestigial vagina so there's no equivalent ionisation there. 

But  the  female  does  have  a  vestigial  penis  and  it's  ionised  with  a  'Must  Sex'.  Now  this
phenomenon  is  upsetting  to  the  female.  You  find  she's  got  the  back  half  of  her  body
permanently ionised 'Must be Sexed' and she's got this little tiny vestigial area of the front,
which is ionised 'Must Sex'. 

Well 'Must Sex' is a male ionisation superimposed at the front of an otherwise female body with
its heavy 'Must be Sexed' ionisation of the back. Now the female, you'll find, tends to occupy the
back of her body and she tends to regard as her sexual identity the back of her body and this
little bit at the front tends to go into the class of not-self. 

Of course, you remember because of the sexual double bind the class of 'To Sex' and 'To be
Sexed' cannot both exist simultaneously in the same class so the female cannot both be in the
class of 'To be Sexed' and be in the class of 'To Sex' at the same time. So if she's in the feminine
class of 'To be Sexed' then this little bit at the front, this masculine ionisation in the clitoris must
be in the class of not-self. And she tends to put it off and dissociate herself from it. 

Lesbianism 

And you will find that this slight dissociation, and oh it can't be intense, this sexual dissociation in
the female, her femininity and this little masculine component in her clitoris, is the basis of
lesbianism in the female. If she concentrates very heavily and gets involved very heavily with sex
to do with the clitoris rather than to do with her vagina and vulva then she can easily find herself
involved in lesbian practices with other females. 

But if she concentrates exclusively on the feminine side which is the sexuality associated with
her vagina and vulva and rump etcetera then of course she escapes the lesbianism. So there is
the source of lesbianism in the female. Worth knowing if you ever want to erase it in therapy.
But bear in mind even if it doesn't show as lesbianism there's always conflict in the female
sexuality between her 'Must be Sexed' ionisation which she considers her own sexual identity of
the rear and this little bit of vestigial penis at the front which is ionised with a 'Must Sex'
postulate. 

So there's always conflict in her mind, she doesn't escape conflict at all. She doesn't escape it.
She's got her own sexual conflict in her body. All is not in harmony, because of that vestigial
penis that she's got. It upsets her. It's upsetting to her, fundamentally. I mean it upsets the
harmony of her body. 

Now over to the male. The high 'Must Sex' ionisation on the male penis and the male testicles is
quite obvious and to be expected and doesn't need any further discussion but what on earth is
the male doing with his buttocks, his rump and his rectum having a 'Must be Sexed' ionisation? 

Thereby Hangs a Tale 

Ah thereby hangs a tale and we'll have to tell you this tale so you'll understand this. This is the
source of homosexuality in males and it's a great puzzle to every male, and I have got to the
source of it. I do know where it comes from and I'll give you the data. 

Once you understand where it comes from it will stop bothering you. Now to understand it we
have to go and look back to creatures living in the wild. If you examine various creatures living in
the wild in colonies particularly herbivores, creatures like stags, kangaroos and so forth you'll
find in their mating season there is an enormous carnage or loss of young males in fights. They
get into fights. This is well known, you can read it up in any book on zoology and you can go out
into the wild and see these deer's fighting each other during the mating season. 

What happens is that the mature male deer, he's a big fella and he collects a harem. He has his
own harem of female deer and he guards them quite possessively. The young males grow up and
as they grow up to be sexually mature they cast envious eyes on the big bucks harem, you see? 

And all the time they're nosing around and trying to get a bit of sex from these female deer of
his harem, and, of course, he doesn't care for this one little bit. So they end up in fights and you
find the stags fighting. 

Well the fights are to the death amongst stags and amongst kangaroos. Kangaroos have got
exactly the same mating habits and the fights are to the death amongst the kangaroos too. And
unfortunately the young stags stand no chance against these big stags and they just simply get

slaughtered. If they are not slaughtered they're maimed and go away to die in misery and the
whole thing is very wasteful of the young male breeding stock. 

You might argue, of course, well it's ‘nature red in tooth and claw’ [ref: Alfred Tennyson], it's
survival of the fittest. Yes, yes but it's still wasteful if it can be avoided. You see a species
survives best if it reserves it's fighting for creatures which aren't of its own species. In other
words, when a species starts to fight amongst itself it's an inefficient scene because it’s fighting
its own species, you see, it's fighting itself. It survives much better, a species does, if it reserves
it's fighting for creatures that are not of its own species. You understand me? So when I say it's
wasteful, I mean exactly that, it's very wasteful and the stags and the kangaroo's have never
solved this problem, but the apes did. They solved it. 

Now the problem also exists among predators lions and tigers, they've got similar mating habits.
Now they've solved it too but their solution is quite a different solution to the ape solution. So it
doesn't concern us. 

The apes solved it and we're interested in that because the apes are mankind's immediate
ancestors. We're descended from the apes at a physical body level so we're very interested in
the ape's solution to that problem and it's very relevant to this subject of the feminine ionisation
on the rear end of the male human. 

Now there's no doubt that some millions and millions of years ago the ape too suffered this
carnage amongst their ape colonies every year in the mating season. The young adolescent apes
would come up and there'd be the big ape there with his harem and the young adolescent would
be driven by his sexual urges to fight the big fella and he would almost invariably lose. He would
lose and carnage would occur. But the apes, possibly because the apes were a little bit smarter
than many other animals, came up with a solution to it. And their solution worked. 

We can imagine a hypothetical scene, that one day some young adolescent ape was fighting to
the death with the large ape who owned the harem and it had got to the point where he realised
that he was being slaughtered and if the fight continued he was going to get killed. So he, in
desperation, said to himself, "Well what the hell, is there any way I can prevent myself from
getting killed here? This big fella's going to kill me and he's not going to relent until he's killed
me. I can't do anything about it." So in final desperation he suddenly remembered, this young
adolescent ape had watched the female apes and he realised that the male ape, the dominant
male ape, could always be appeased by a female ape. 

This is true in the ape kingdom, the female ape can always appease the angry male ape by
presenting her rump to him. Soon as she presented her rump to him, he mounts her sexually,
makes a few pelvic thrusts and dismounts and honour is satisfied, you might say, and he goes his
way, and she goes her way. 

And this adolescent ape millions and millions of years ago fighting the big ape he must have
realised this. The adolescent must have spotted this and in desperation to save his own life he
offered his own rump to the male ape, and the male ape, of course, once a rump is offered to
him he immediately assumes that this must be a female he's fighting so he did the thing his
native conditioning would cause him to do. 

He simply mounted the adolescent male ape made a few pelvic thrusts dismounted and went his
way. We can presume that the adolescent male ape must have breathed a sigh of relief, he saved
his life and more importantly his solution worked so next time he came along to the harem he
knew how to save his life. 

He had experience, he had the experiential factor here of knowing how to solve the problem. He
could fight to the point where he was losing the battle. Then he knew that he could always end
the fight by acting as a female. 

And so he no doubt used this mechanism there. But other eyes were watching him, lots and lots
of other apes were watching. As in any other animal colony, there are lots and lots of youngsters
who watch the fights with great interest. It's of great significance to them these fights are and
lots of young male apes must have been watching this adolescent ape when he presented his
rump and they learnt too, and they spotted it so when their turn came to try and become the
leader of the tribe and take on the big fella, they learnt how to save their life too. 

And, because apes are pretty smart. They were pretty quick learners, you know, for things like
that and it got into their culture and it spread. Now why would it spread through the ape colony,
through the ape culture? Well simply because those who practised it, those who practised this
system survived. 

The adolescent ape who practised this system survived and the adolescent ape who practised it,
he eventually would grow up and become a fully mature male ape and would go off and get a
harem of his own. If he didn't practice this system there's a good 80% chance that he'd get
slaughtered and he would never survive and his genes would never be passed on to posterity. 

So the ones that adopted this system had their genes passed on to posterity, the ones who
didn't survive didn't have their genes passed on. So after a few thousands of generations of apes
you would expect to find by pure Darwinian evolution that all the apes in the colonies in the area
would be practising this same system. 

This solution to the problem of how to stop the carnage. Now, you might ask, "Well it's a good
solution for the adolescent male ape but how does it benefit the big fellow? Does it help him?"
Yes, it does, as a matter of fact, it's a good solution for him cause look, as soon as the adolescent
ape whose fighting him for dominance quits the fight and offers his rump he's gone into the 

female universe. He's offering his rump up with a 'Must be Sexed' postulate on it. So he's
become feminine. 

And while the adolescent ape is in the feminine universe he can't be in the masculine universe
because of the double bind. Follow? 

So as far as the big fellow is concerned he can keep all the adolescent apes in the community in
the feminine valence, if he can keep them in the feminine valence they are not in the masculine
valence, or, let's not use valence we'll use universe, while they are in the feminine universe they
are not in the masculine universe and if there not in the masculine universe they are not
interested in his female harem. They leave his females alone. You see? So it does benefit him too. 

So it benefits both of them. The young apes get benefited, it saves their lives. The older ape gets
benefited as it stops these youngsters pestering his flock all the time. He just has to assert his
authority once or twice, they use the mechanism and after that the feminine ionisation is there
and that's it. Then he can leave them amongst his females, they won't interfere while there in
the feminine valence and their likely to stay in the feminine universe while he's present and as he
never strays very far away from his harem, just his presence keeps these adolescents in the
feminine universe, keeps them out of their masculine universe. 

So it works for all parties concerned, you see. But it's purely a male thing, it's got nothing to do
with the females, I mean, the reason that the female ape gets her rump and her rectum ionised
with a 'Must be Sexed' postulate is because of the close proximity of these body parts to her
vulva and her vagina. 

In fact in sexual play with apes she almost certainly gets her rectum entered many, many times
by sheer accident and so you quite expect the female ape would have a positive 'Must be Sexed'
ionisation on her rump and on her rectum. It would be quite natural for this to be. So it doesn't
concern the female at all. 

In other words she always did know how to appease the male, she simply presented her rump to
him. It was the young males who had to learn how to do it to save their lives. And they did learn,
and most importantly for our purposes, the purposes of human beings, is that we are related to
them. And we are the descendants of those apes and we have the same physiological ionisation. 

You see it wasn't long for these apes before they were being born with this ionisation. It can
happen by genetics. That eventually all the males in the colony by usage and by games play
would end up with a 'Must be Sexed' ionisation of the rump. Well, that could only go on for a few
thousand years, after that they'd be born with a positive ionisation, it's the way the body is. You
know? 

You can find this in any book on evolutionary theory, by simple usage the body adapts to it
eventually. And so we would expect the male apes would be born with a positive 'Must be Sexed'

on their rumps and rectums. And today male human beings are the same, they are just born with
it, born with that ionisation. 

Now the problem is, although this mechanism is of tremendous survival value to the apes in their
colonies. The feminine ionisation on the rump and rectum on the male is of no earthly use in our
society. You see that? The thing's just a complete nuisance and because nobody knows where it
comes from, you can't look it up in a book anywhere and find out about it cause all these sexual
postulates are a mystery. Nobody knows about ionisation of body parts because they're not
aware of them. The whole thing's just a complete mystery. 

We  have  a  vast  number  of  human  males  wandering  around  the  planet  believing  they  are
homosexual because they're aware of this positive ionisation on their rear end, the positive
feminine ionisation. The thing becomes a psychological nightmare. Just as the female tends to
dissociate from the front of her body we find the male tends to dissociate from the rear of his
body. 

His masculine identity tends to be at the front of his body associated with his penis and testicles
and this bit behind him, he comes to dissociate himself from. He can't be both in the class of 'To
Sex' and in the class of 'To be Sexed' the double bind says so. He can't do it, so he has to
dissociate. If he's in the class of self and the self is in the class of 'Must Sex' then the 'Must be
Sexed' component on his rear end must be in the class of not-self. There's the dissociation. 

Now we have the perfect dissociation and this is what happens with the male, and the male can
easily goes into homosexuality. Similarly with the female, she can associate with the masculine
ionisation on the clitoris and easily go into lesbianism, which is just as great a mystery to the
female as homosexuality is to the males. So by examining this subject of ionisation we have an
immediate solution to two of the greatest sexual problems that have always been with human
beings for millennia, the subjects of lesbianism and homosexuality, we see where it comes from. 

Now, you might say, if this is so, how come the zoologists haven't spotted it? I mean they have
been studying these apes intensively for the last 50 years and for the last 100, 150 years casually.
Why haven't they spotted it? 

Well, of course they're aware of the mating habits of the ape. They know all about the male apes
turning the rump to the dominant male who owns the harem. They know all about it, it's written
up in all the zoology books. But what they don't know about, and what we know about, is the
four sexual postulates of the 'To Sex' goals package. 

And we also know about this subject of body ionisation, the ionisation of body parts, that the
zoologists don't know anything about so they cannot correlate the subject of the mating habits
of the ape, they cannot correlate that with homosexuality in the male. Follow? 

There's simply no way they can do it because the missing link in the chain are the postulates of
the 'To Sex' goals package and the whole subject of the sexual ionisation of human body parts.
Once you know of the ionisation of the body parts it sticks out like a sore thumb. It's obvious
why; it's obvious where he gets his feminine ionisation of his rump from. And it's equally obvious
that he isn't going to erase it in therapy, it's a genetic thing, it's quite natural. 

There's no good him fighting it. He's born with it and he will die with it, just as the female is born
with the male ionisation on her clitoris. She's born with it and will die with it and so she might as
well learn to live with it. There's nothing odd about it, nothing odd about the males' feminine
ionisation of his rump. Now this is it. If you understand this, really got it, it would help you
enormously to take the 'To Sex' goals package apart. 

If you don't understand it or you fight it or reject it as you might well do, then I can assure you,
you simply won't get the 'To Sex' goals package apart in therapy. Now you understand me? I'm
not making this up, I'm not a writer of science fiction. I'm simply a research psychologist and this
data has popped up when I've been researching the subject of sex and you need the data. You
need the data because you will use the data in order to erase the 'To Sex' goals package in
therapy. Ok, well now we've got this absolutely clear. 

Gender Symbols 

Ok finally the last thing I want to say is about this subject of gender symbols. Now the subject of
gender symbols is very interesting to mankind. First of all, all gender symbols are gender specific
and the gender symbol is caught up in the double bind on the 'To Sex' goals package. 

Every gender symbol that you come across will follow the pattern that 'Must Sex' equals 'Mustn't
be Sexed' and 'Must be Sexed' equals 'Mustn't Sex' and it also follows the pattern of male equal
non-female and female equals non-male. 

In other words it follows the double bind of the 'To Sex' goals package as far as the body's
concerned. And because the gender symbol follows this double bind you cannot erase them in
therapy until you have erased the 'To Sex' goals package. 

Now this is dreadfully important, you could simply waste hours in therapy trying to erase gender
symbols out of the mind at Level 5C, and you simply won't do it until the 'To Sex' goals package
has been erased at Level 5B. Once you've erased the 'To Sex' goals package at Level 5B then all
the gender symbols at Level 5C will erase easily. 

Now I'm not going to say it again. I've said it once and that's it. That's the truth of the matter
that's the way it is. So don't waste time trying to erase gender symbols until you've erased the
'To Sex' goals package at Level 5B. Now let's talk a little bit about gender symbols. They're of
considerable interest to mankind particularly the subject of clothes. 

Most gender symbols are clothes. There are some that are non-clothes but the most important
ones to human beings are clothes. Now why would this be? Well it comes from this fixed positive
ionisation of the body parts in humans and the only way the human being can feel free to move
from the positive to the negative side of the postulates in the 'To Sex' goals package is to cover
up the fixed positive ionisation on his body parts. 

In other words a girl, say, with her fixed 'Must be Sexed' ionisation will wear a dress. Without the
dress on there's not much she can do, I mean, there's the body part and it's got this fixed positive
'Must be Sexed' ionisation which is visible there, but she feels that if she covers it up with a dress
she can change the ionisation of the dress from 'Must be Sexed' to 'Mustn't be Sexed' at will. You
see that? 

Even though the body part underneath still retains its fixed ionisation, the female can set out
and face the world in games play and change the ionisation of her gender symbols. You see that?
So this gives her more fluidity, more flexibility in sexual games play. 

Similarly with a male and his clothes. He likes to wear his clothes because he can change the
sexual ionisation from 'Must Sex' to 'Mustn't Sex' with his clothes. But he can't change the sexual
ionisation of his body parts cause they’re fixed. 

So you'll find that humans, in sexual games play, almost invariably prefer to wear clothes rather
than conduct sexual games play without any clothes on. Without any clothes on they are rather
limited in their sexual responses, but when they've got their clothes on they can show an almost
infinite range of sexual responses and the whole thing is done with gender symbols and most of
these gender symbols are clothes. 

Now do you see the role of the gender symbol in human sexual games play? I summarised it very
briefly. I'm running out of space on this tape but there is the absolute essence of it. You can test
the truth of what I'm saying by an examination of children and one of the great tests of
increasing sexual maturity in a child is their use of clothes. 

When they are infants and very young children they just run around, doesn't matter. Doesn't
concern them if their wearing clothes or not. As they mature as they grow older children prefer
to wear clothes simply because of the sexual ionisation on their body is increasing and they feel
less comfortable walking around without any clothes on, so they prefer to put clothes on so they
can play the little childhood sexual games that they do play. 

And they all play them, children do. The little sexual games that they play with each other, they
can play while they've got their clothes on. And that's why older children prefer to keep their
clothes on. And for younger children it doesn't bother them, you see? So there's plenty of
experimental evidence to back up what I'm saying on the subject of gender symbols in humans, 

the evidence is all there if you care to look at it. In fact every bit of data I've given you on this
tape, there's plenty of evidence to back it up. 

You'll find evidence in life and livingness to back up everything I've said. It's all there. Once you
know it you'll find the evidence to back it up. I've had to find this material out by doing this
research and finding it and digging it out. 

Once you've got the data you'll easily find the observational evidence to back up the theoretical
material I'm giving you. It's all there, you'll find it there if you care to look. Finally, how do you
approach the data on this tape? Well, try and accept the data even if it might feel strange to you,
might feel abhorrent to you. 

Even if you feel you may be repulsed by it don't reject it out of hand. Just accept it as being
provisionally true, as being possibly true. Just bear in mind that it may be provisionally true,
while your working with the 'To Sex' goals package in therapy. As you come to work with this 'To
Sex' goals package you'll find that more and more material show up and this data I've given you
will start to make sense. 

If you reject this data out of hand that I've given you on this tape you will never erase the 'To Sex'
goals package in therapy. If you reject it all out of hand I can tell you that you will still be trying
to erase the 'To Sex' goals package when you're an old man with a long white beard. 

Now on the other hand if you use this data I've given you on this tape and work with the 'To Sex'
goals package you can erase every sexual quirk that anyone has ever conceived of out of the
human mind. You can erase the lot. 

You can even erase Sigmund Freud's carpet slippers and you can't do better than that can you?
So that's it. Bye bye for now. All the best.