BC3 Members: Reach out to bc3@bc3sfbay.org if something needs updating
The May 2023 SBTi Supplier Engagement Guide lays out the supplier engagement journey as follows:
Source: May 2023 SBTi guide
For this section, we assume your team already has buy-in to set an SBT that includes Scope 3. This section will cover BC3 Practitioners’ approaches to defining supply chain targets and the pros and cons of setting and pursuing each type of target.
If you have not yet secured buy-in to set a Scope 3 target, or want more information, you can refer to the BC3 GHG inventory & Target setting basics guides.
To understand the technical guidance around how to set a credible scope 3 target, section 2 of the SBTi Guide covers how to calculate scope 3 emissions, how to determine which target is right for your organization, and which suppliers to include in your target.
To understand the breakdown of supply chain-related emissions and whether these will be a large portion of your company’s emissions, you can refer to Section 2.2 of the SBTi Supplier Engagement Guide.
In Figure 4 (Section 2.2) the SBTi Guide breaks down three target-setting methodologies:
BC3 MEMBER EXAMPLES:
BC3 Member Supply Chain Targets
Okta’s Supplier Engagement target: Ensure that 65% of Okta’s suppliers for purchased goods and services and capital goods have science-based targets by FY2027
Atlassian’s Supplier Engagement target: Encourage suppliers making up 69% of emissions to adopt SBTs of their own
Workday’s Supplier Engagement target:: Workday commits that 70% of our suppliers, by spend covering purchased goods and services and capital goods, will have SBTs by our FY26.
PG&E’s Supplier Engagement target: 100% of key emitting supplier partners establish a science-based target or a longer-term net zero goal by 2030.
Autodesk Emissions Intensity Target: Commits to reduce scope 3 GHG emissions from purchased goods and services, fuel and energy-related activities, business travel, and employee commuting 55% per dollar of gross profit over the same timeframe. Autodesk commits that 26.5% of its suppliers by emissions covering purchased goods and services and business travel, will have science-based targets by FY2027.
As you see above, several BC3 Member companies have set a supplier engagement target (versus a reduction target) possibly for one of the following reasons (as published in Section 2.2 of the May 2023 SBTi Guide):
There is limited access to primary supplier or product-specific emissions data resulting in a spend-based calculation for related categories (inhibiting the ability to track supplier - or product-level emission reduction measures)
The supply chain or product mix is extremely complex, which makes tracking supplier or product-specific emission reductions cumbersome and costly
The company does not produce physical goods, resulting in a footprint primarily driven by indirect procurement. Influence over suppliers - and therefore emissions reduction - may be limited
Specific emissions reduction levers to achieve the minimum absolute or intensity-based scope 3 targets are not yet identified or difficult to implement
Source: May 2023 SBTi guide
There are many factors to consider when evaluating which target method is right for your organization. Based on their own experiences, BC3 Practitioners have identified the following considerations for setting and pursuing each type of target:
Supplier Engagement Goals
These can be easier to get started on the process, since spend data is available and typically used to set near-term suply chain targets.
Communicating with Procurement is easier when you want suppliers to have a standard like SBT (vs building capacity on GHG accounting and reductions)
SBTi supplier engagement targets (five years to meet goal):
A key SBTi criteria for supplier engagement targets is that your suppliers must set an “SBTi-aligned” target within the five-year target timeframe. It is important to outline what you will count and what evidence you will require.
Salesforce utilizes an attestation form to encourage suppliers to set SBTi validated targets, and also defines what they accept to be a science-based target if not validated by SBTi. Salesforce provides a public example of a science-based target (SBT) attestation form that other companies can customize and deploy - i.e. insert your own company’s target info & supplier requirements on Page 1, etc.
Absolute Reduction Goals
Most direct way to show emission reductions to mitigate climate change.
Challenging as companies inherently aim to grow.
Supplier engagements could be related to reducing absolute intensity.
Questions to consider:
What is your forecasted growth and is there a way to show how that growth will manifest in the supply chain?
How would you describe that future supply chain in relation to SBTs? Need to be prepared to address whether absolute reduction means limiting (or accelerating) growth.
Emissions-based Goals
If you have emissions data from suppliers, it can more accurately reflect your supplier’s efforts to reduce emissions.
Emissions based targets tend to be more difficult as most companies have limited access to direct supplier emissions data.
Questions to consider:
What portion of your emissions data is calculated using data provided directly by your suppliers?
What portion of your suppliers is able to provide you with emissions reporting (even if they aren’t already)?
BC3 Practitioners put together a list of questions to consider when pursuing a Supplier Engagement Goal:
How will your spend and suppliers change over time?
Will your supplier list be consistent enough year over year to set a supplier engagement target? If not, are you confident that you can implement processes and policies to have incoming suppliers to have SBTs?
What portion of your emissions data is calculated using spend-based accounting?
How will your organization define SBTs for suppliers? E.g.,
How will you validate targets not validated by SBTi?
How mature are your suppliers when it comes to sustainability? What portion have already set SBTs or similar goals?
How much influence do you have over your suppliers? Are you a key customer for any of your major suppliers?
How will you manage high-emitting suppliers who are not willing to set SBTs?
How will you support small-mid size organizations who are new to sustainability?
What changes do you expect might occur with your other scope 3 emissions? This will form the “denominator” over which you’re calculating the percent of suppliers with SBTs. If other scope 3 categories are included which can’t be addressed with SBTs, and those emissions grow faster than your supplier-related emissions, an engagement goal can become impossible to achieve. It is recommended to monitor changes to the WRI GHG Protocol and how it may impact SBTs (e.g., as of early 2024, WRI is considering changes that may add emissions associated with where companies keep cash investments which would increase S3 category 15 emissions).
*Scope 3 targets must cover a minimum 67% of total scope 3 emissions, per SBTi near-term Criteria.
Something to consider as you are setting a supply chain goal is how your climate goals may impact supplier diversity goals and efforts. Smaller businesses are more likely to have diverse ownership, and smaller businesses are more likely to have fewer resources to pursue sustainability than their larger counterparts. You can consider setting up your program to ensure your sustainability expectations aren't preventing or limiting business with small and diverse suppliers. Here are some considerations that the BC3 Practitioners have identified:
Set up your program to ensure that companies have the opportunity to “come along on the journey” – focus on what companies are willing to do and what’s appropriate for their business versus what they are already doing or have achieved.
Consider whether different expectations should be applied to different suppliers or how engagements might look different between smaller and larger companies.
Evaluate whether you’ll be able to provide small and diverse suppliers with access to tools and resources that support their progress.
Make your procurement team an internal advocate for the program by connecting sustainability efforts to Supplier Diversity. Some BC3 Practitioners have developed “Holistic Responsible Sourcing” approaches on their procurement teams
Think about how you can streamline communications with suppliers, and consider that a supplier may have different people managing sustainability and diversity. Sometimes it will make sense to engage on both topics, while other times it won’t. Your procurement team may have a DEI survey to onboard all new suppliers, which can be leveraged to add sustainability questions.
In section 2.3 of the May 2023 SBTi Guide, guidance is provided on selecting the right suppliers for your target. The section below covers additional ways BC3 Practitioners have utilized to collect, organize and verify baseline supplier data to help build supplier engagement programs.
While understanding the relative spend and emissions impact of your suppliers is critical to effectively focusing your supplier engagement efforts, some BC3 Practitioners would encourage their peers to use this process for just that – defining your engagement strategy–but not for identifying specific suppliers to be in scope or out of scope of your target.
A key SBTi criteria for supplier engagement targets is that your suppliers must set an “SBTi-aligned” target within the five-year target timeframe.
Your supplier base will change over the five year period of your target (if you have set an SBTi supplier engagement target), and thus your approach to engagement and the suppliers you are targeting must be flexible and capture new suppliers while deprioritizing short-term suppliers.
Focus on who should be included in your engagement efforts, not who the target should be limited to.
That said, in order to gain internal buy-in and plan for target implementation, it will be helpful to identify a list of priority suppliers and their business status and GHG program maturity, as detailed in the SBTi guidance. It may help to segment suppliers based on climate maturity and the company’s ability to influence the supplier. In particular, what percent of your top suppliers have committed to or set SBTs already? Of those that haven’t, do you expect any to be low-hanging fruit based on the maturity of their GHG program? Also of those that haven’t, what kind of leverage do you have over them? What does your longer term relationship look like? Getting answers to these kinds of questions will involve working with your procurement team, internal teams contracting the suppliers, and conducting desktop research into your top suppliers. After segmenting suppliers, you can divide them into tiers and tailor engagement strategies for each tier. You can use this baseline data to create a profile of what you think progress towards a supplier engagement SBT might look like over five years, how easy or difficult it may be to achieve, and the level of resources required.
Before embarking on data collection, it may be helpful to get to know your procurement organization, if you haven’t already. For example, is there one centralized team or is the procurement function distributed? How is ownership of supplier relationships organized (e.g., by commodity, by region, by business unit)? What key tools and systems are used to track suppliers and spend? How big of a role do your sourcing and procurement teams play in supplier relationship management and purchasing decisions versus how much is managed by the business partners that work with those suppliers?
You can obtain this information from your finance and procurement teams so that you can begin to categorize your suppliers for better understanding of your overall supplier landscape. When creating a supply chain program strategy, it is important to understand the landscape of your suppliers.
Identify who within your procurement organization leads operations in order to collect necessary baseline data.
Tip: You may find that points of contact on your procurement team work more on the AP/Invoice side of things and have a harder time responding to ESG questions. Going through the owner of the supplier relationship could be a more effective way of requesting contacts.
BC3 PRACTITIONER GUIDANCE
Baseline Data to Consider Collecting
Supplier name
Spend with the supplier
Internal supplier relationship manager
Primary commodity(ies) provided
Direct or indirect supplier (in procurement, direct means the supplier provides inputs that are directly relevant to the product your company offers to customers whereas indirect suppliers support general business operations)
Private or public company
Company revenue
Company headcount
Primary operating region(s) - Are they a global company? Where are they headquartered?
Is the supplier also a customer of your company?
Status of supplier: is there a contract renewal coming up or other point of leverage? What kind of leverage do you have? How is the relationship? Are there any plans to end or reduce business with the supplier? What portion of their business do you represent?
Primary business partner(s) within the company (what teams within the company are using the goods or services provided by the supplier) This can be a cost center owner.
Understand the length of the contract with your suppliers.
*Tip: Investing in climate is a long haul, it is more effective with long term suppliers.
Understand the rate of supplier turnover.
BC3 PRACTITIONER GUIDANCE
How to understand where your suppliers are at in terms of their climate programs.
Search the SBTi database of companies with SBTs to evaluate who has set SBTs via SBTi, and if any have supplier engagement targets.
Determine what percent of your suppliers report to CDP and intend to set a SBT or have other targets. Look into public CDP reports for companies that are planning on setting a SBT.
Which suppliers have a non-SBT climate goal?
Which suppliers have net zero or carbon neutral goals or SBT-aligned goals?
Which suppliers have a true zero commitment, climate pledge, 1.5 degree aligned, or Race to Zero goal?
Which suppliers have leaders that are held accountable for SBTis and how so?
Whichsuppliers have supplier engagement goals vs. absolute emissions reduction goals?
Which suppliers are committed to 100% renewable energy, such as through RE100?
Are your smaller suppliers committed to net zero via the SME Climate Hub’s Climate Commitment?
Customers of your suppliers (e.g., from their website) that may also have similar sustainability interests as yours.
BC3 MEMBER EXAMPLES:
Approaches to collecting baseline data about climate goals and reporting from suppliers.
Salesforce sends an annual Sustainability Information Request to its priority suppliers to gather key data points and progress updates. Here is a representative example of the kinds of questions Salesforce asks with this request. Salesforce also uses CDP and EcoVadis to gather data on suppliers.
Atlassian informs all suppliers of their science based target, shares free resources, and uses a software solution to pull supplier's publicly reported GHG data and SBTi status if available.
Some companies create their own resources to collect data from suppliers, like this GHG Accounting checklist.
Now that you have some supplier data, You will need to establish criteria to segment and prioritize your suppliers for engagement. You can’t take the same approach with 1,000 suppliers. It's not scalable, and different companies may need a different approach.
In section 2.3 of the May 2023 SBTi Supplier Engagement Guide, you can view several considerations for selecting suppliers to include within the target, which include:
Leverage over suppliers
Strategic status of supplier (importance to business)
Sourcing/procurement trends (how will spend change with individual suppliers and across the supplier base)
Supplier GHG program maturity
Supplier category
Supplier risk level
BC3 PRACTITIONER GUIDANCE
Additional Considerations for Selecting Suppliers for Your Target
Categorize suppliers by employee size & company size.
Categorize suppliers in order of contract size/spend associated with the supplier.
Categorize suppliers by climate program maturity
Potential impact on your emissions - include suppliers that contribute a high portion of your emissions and/or spend
Enthusiasm for engagement - include suppliers that have an appetite to engage on SBT target setting or are motivated to meet your company’s expectations
Progress to date - include suppliers that already meet your targets to show quick wins for the program and capture that progress in your reporting
Potential for global impact. If your company has a relatively small amount of spend with a supplier that has a large footprint beyond your business, it may be impactful to include them in engagements.
Supplier size - Consider how to engage larger corporations vs SME enterprises.
Large corporations may already have climate programs, and collective industry pressure can be utilized to move these companies towards SBT target setting
SMEs may need more support through dedicated webinars, questions, 1:1s, resources, and guidance. Please note that SBTi has a different target setting path for SMEs here.
The SME Climate Hub is also a robust resource for SMEs. Note that the SME Climate Hub requires companies to make their pledge online prior to using their measurement tools.
Pressure from other stakeholders - capitalize on the potential momentum of a company being asked by multiple stakeholders to take action. For example, public companies may be under more pressure from investors and regulators; suppliers in certain regions (e.g. the EU) may have regulatory requirements to meet; companies in certain industries may be facing more consistent pressure from customers
Your segmentation and prioritization will need to evolve overtime as your supplier base changes. Some BC3 practitioners conduct this exercise annually. Think about how you will bring new suppliers into the segmentation process. Those that would significantly impact scope 3 emissions can be required or strongly encouraged for SBT/climate commitments from the outset of the relationship.
As you get closer to your target year, you will need to make adjustments accordingly. Work together with your procurement and sourcing team to develop a roadmap that would make it increasingly important to have new suppliers have SBTs to avoid any last minute surprises. You may need to require more rather than request over time.
BC3 MEMBER EXAMPLES:
Examples of Supplier Segmentation & Prioritization
Salesforce has a spend and emissions threshold for "priority" suppliers. If they find out that a contract with a new supplier is likely to exceed that threshold in the following year, or if a supplier is on track to exceed the threshold in the current year, they would consider starting to engage them as a priority supplier
Okta has shared this supplier tracking spreadsheet example.
Here is an example of how one BC3 Member (mid-sized tech company) has segmented it's suppliers.