Call For Abstracts

The SECOND CALL for abstracts has gone out and will be open until 17:00 MST on 12 January 2024.  

The Program Committee for the 2024 JAM invites abstracts for contributed oral presentations and posters. The program will include a plenary session, contributed papers, and a poster session  on a wide range of fisheries and wildlife-related topics. Presentations may include completed  projects and works in progress. 

We strongly encourage students to attend and are particularly interested in student presentations.  The AZ/NM Chapter of the American Fisheries Society will present a “Best Student Paper” and “Best Student Poster” award for graduate and undergraduate students presenting papers/posters  in the fisheries field. The AZ and NM Chapters of The Wildlife Society will present a “Best Student Paper” and “Best Student Poster” award for graduate and undergraduate students presenting papers/posters in the wildlife field. Fisheries and wildlife students currently attending a college/university or graduated within 12 months preceding JAM and who are first author on the research given are eligible for the fisheries “Best Student Paper” and “Best Student Poster” awards and the wildlife “Best Student Poster” award. 

See the last page of this announcement for information on applying for the best student oral presentation competition in wildlife.  

**NOTE: The format for applications for the student oral presentation competition in wildlife is different from those for wildlife poster abstracts, wildlife presentation abstracts not submitted for consideration for the “Best Student Paper” competition, and all fisheries abstracts. ** 

STUDENT FISHERIES ORAL PRESENTATIONS

Speakers will be given 20 minutes for their presentation (15-minute presentation and 5 minutes  for questions). A laptop PC and digital projector will be provided for Power Point presentations.  Please inquire about other audiovisual aids if necessary. 

Oral presentation abstract format:

List all authors using first and last names, their affiliation, addresses, and e-mail addresses. When choosing the title, be brief but descriptive and avoid using acronyms or scientific names in the  title unless the common name is not widely known. Abstracts are restricted to 250 words and should summarize the importance, methods, and findings of the research being described. Please follow the format from the example below so that program chairs can focus on processing abstracts rather than making edits. Abstracts with grammatical errors or incorrect formatting will be returned to the authors for correction prior to acceptance.

At the end of the abstract please indicate that 1) your submission is intended for an oral presentation, and 2) the lead author is a student (see example below). 

Email your abstract to zbeard@azgfd.gov no later than 17:00 (5pm) on 12 January 2024.

EXAMPLE: Student fisheries oral presentation abstract 

Authors:  

Damon M. Peterson, New Mexico State University, Department of Fish, Wildlife and Conservation Ecology, 2980 South Espiña, Knox Hall 132, Las Cruces, New Mexico 88003; dmp72@nmsu.edu.

Tulley Trantham, New Mexico State University, Department of Fish, Wildlife and Conservation Ecology, 2980 South Espiña, Knox Hall 132, Las Cruces, New Mexico 88003.

Randi Simpson, New Mexico State University, Department of Fish, Wildlife and Conservation Ecology, 2980 South Espiña, Knox Hall 132, Las Cruces, New Mexico 88003.

Colleen A. Caldwell, U.S. Geological Survey, New Mexico Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, New Mexico State University, Department of Fish Wildlife and Conservation Ecology, 2980 South Espiña, Knox Hall 132 Las Cruces, New Mexico 88033; ccaldwel@nmsu.edu. 

Title: 

Effects of Tagging with Passive Integrated Transponders versus Visual Elastomer Implants on the Small-bodied White Sands Pupfish (Cyprinodon tularosa)

Abstract:  

Despite the assumption that body size is the most common primary predictor of individual tagging effects in fish, few studies have focused on tagging effects of small bodied fishes.  To test our hypothesis that body size predicts the probability of survival among tagged small-bodied fish, we compared 8.5-mm passive integrated transponder (PIT) with visual implant elastomer (VIE) to assess tagging related mortality, tag retention, and growth (total length, TL and mass, g) among four size classes of White Sands pupfish (Cyprinodon tularosa): 15-29 mm and 0.1-0.6 g; 30-39 mm and 0.4-1.2 g; 40-49 mm and 1.0-2.2 g; 50-59 mm and 2.3-4.2 g throughout 75 d observation period.  Fish mass was a good predicator of the probability of survival across all PIT-tagged pupfish (P=0.016) where pupfish were 62 times more likely to survive tagging as mass increased by 1.0 gram.  Nor surprising, the smallest size class (15-29 mm TL) experienced the greatest mortality (72%).  VIE related mortality was marginally different from the controls  (P=0.076) compared to those with a PIT tag indicating slightly better survival in pupfish with PIT tags.  The growth rate of all tagged animals was similar to controls.  Our data indicated that White Sands pupfish can be effectively tagged using 8.5-mm PIT tags with minimal tag loss or mortality at sizes ≥37 mm and that survival was marginally better than in VIE-tagged pupfish.  This research has provided specific information needed to describe demography using mark recapture and occupancy modeling in this small-bodied southwestern fish.  

Oral Presentation; Student

STUDENT FISHERIES POSTERS

Speakers will be given 20 minutes for their presentation (15-minute presentation and 5 minutes  for questions). A laptop PC and digital projector will be provided for Power Point presentations.  Please inquire about other audiovisual aids if necessary. 

Poster size and display:

Please limit your poster size to 32"x 44". Orientation can be either portrait or landscape; each  presenter will have a 4x4 foot space for their poster, which will provide a place to hang the poster and other information such as handouts or business cards. Presenters are required to assemble and disassemble their own poster and to provide tacks or push pins to hang their poster. Poster presenters should attend the Poster Session at the meeting to answer questions. Breaks and socials will be organized around the Posters to encourage discussion between attendees and poster presenters.

Poster abstract format:

List all authors using first and last names, their affiliation, addresses, and e-mail addresses. When choosing the title, be brief but descriptive and avoid using acronyms or scientific names in the  title unless the common name is not widely known. Abstracts are restricted to 250 words and should summarize the importance, methods, and findings of the research being described. Please follow the format from the example below so that program chairs can focus on processing abstracts rather than making edits. Abstracts with grammatical errors or incorrect formatting will be returned to the authors for correction prior to acceptance.

At the end of the abstract please indicate that 1) your submission is intended for a poster, and 2) the lead author is a student (see example below). 

Email your abstract to zbeard@azgfd.gov no later than 17:00 (5pm) on 12 January 2024.

EXAMPLE: Student fisheries poster abstract 

Authors:  

Eldridge Wisely, Graduate Interdisciplinary Program in Genetics, University of Arizona, 1548 E. Drachman St. Tucson, AZ 85721; emw72@arizona.edu.

Melanie Culver, Arizona Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, U.S. Geological Survey, University of Arizona, 1064 East Lowell Street, Tucson, AZ 85721; mculver@email.arizona.edu.

Title: 

Characterizing Marine Faunal Community Composition Across the Gulf of California Using Next-Generation Sequencing of Environmental DNA

Abstract:  

Healthy oceans are vital to the survival of life on Earth.  They moderate climate, are habitat to over 50% of the species on Earth, and yet less is known about the ocean and its inhabitants than any other ecosystem.  Current biodiversity monitoring in the ocean relies on commercial fishing catch and limited small-scale observations through SCUBA or snorkeling surveys.  Effective large-scale monitoring of marine communities is needed in order to understand the effects of human activities on the ocean as a whole and on regions of interest in terms of ecosystem function instead of just presence or absence of commercially fished species.  The objectives of this study are to use environmental DNA (eDNA) to detect species presence in key marine communities in the Gulf of California with greater sensitivity than previous methods, and to develop eDNA analysis as a tool for monitoring relative abundance of key taxonomic groups in various community assemblages over a large geographic scale.  Samples of water and marine sediment will be taken from several locations in the Gulf of California and DNA will be extracted in a dedicated laboratory for ancient and degraded DNA samples at the University of Arizona.  DNA will then be processed two ways, first by PCR amplification of the barcoding regions, CO1, cytochrome b, and 16S and by developing new PCR primers specific to the Gulf of California taxa using the program ecoPrimers.  The PCR products will then be sequenced on Illumina Mi-Seq.  Secondly, a PCR-free approach will also be tested on a small subset of samples using eDNA extract, library preparation and then the Illumina Hi-Seq platform to test the viability and cost of this method for potential use in the greater study.  This project has the potential to improve marine monitoring methods in both scope and sensitivity, and to positively impact decision capability of policymakers in coastal regions. 

Poster; Student

PROFESSIONAL FISHERIES ORAL PRESENTATIONS

Speakers will be given 20 minutes for their presentation (15-minute presentation and 5 minutes  for questions). A laptop PC and digital projector will be provided for Power Point presentations.  Please inquire about other audiovisual aids if necessary. 

Oral presentation abstract format:

List all authors using first and last names, their affiliation, addresses, and e-mail addresses. When choosing the title, be brief but descriptive and avoid using acronyms or scientific names in the  title unless the common name is not widely known. Abstracts are restricted to 250 words and should summarize the importance, methods, and findings of the research being described. Please follow the format from the example below so that program chairs can focus on processing abstracts rather than making edits. Abstracts with grammatical errors or incorrect formatting will be returned to the authors for correction prior to acceptance.

At the end of the abstract please indicate that 1) your submission is intended for an oral presentation, and 2) the lead author is a professional (see example below). 

Email your abstract to zbeard@azgfd.gov no later than 17:00 (5pm) on 12 January 2024.

EXAMPLE: Professional fisheries oral presentation abstract 

Authors:  

Julie Meka Carter, Native Trout Coordinator, Arizona Game and Fish Department; 5000 W. Carefree Hwy, Phoenix, Arizona 85086; jcarter@azgfd.gov.

Jeremy Voeltz, Fisheries Biologist and Project Coordinator, US Fish and Wildlife Service, AZ Fish and Wildlife Conservation Office, P.O. Box 39, Pinetop, Arizona 85935; jeremy_voeltz@fws.gov.

Title: 

A 10-year Plan to Secure a Unique Southwest Native Trout, the Apache Trout  

Abstract:  

Apache trout recovery has been ongoing since the 1950s.  Despite aggressive recovery efforts, historical and present, there are still several ways to improve the present and future sustainability success of Apache trout that go beyond actions guided by the Apache Trout Recovery Plan.  Three of the most significant threats to natural and reestablished Apache trout populations that exist today are: non-native trout occupying historical Apache trout habitat, marginal habitat in small recovery streams, and impacts of climate change on trout streams.  A new Keystone Initiative grant from the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation addresses these threats by implementing four key strategies that if achieved, could increase Apache trout abundance by an estimated 50 percent by 2017.  In combination, actions guided by the Recovery Plan will result in recovery and a possible delisting proposal, and the Initiative will implement key actions that could reduce the effects of stochastic events, expand and improve habitat, and increase Apache trout abundance, ultimately ensuring their sustainability.  This presentation will discuss in detail the Keystone Initiative grant for Apache trout and the progress and obstacles experienced since 2008, the first year of implementation. 

Oral Presentation; Professional

PROFESSIONAL FISHERIES POSTERS

Poster size and display:

Please limit your poster size to 32"x 44". Orientation can be either portrait or landscape; each  presenter will have a 4x4 foot space for their poster, which will provide a place to hang the poster and other information such as handouts or business cards. Presenters are required to assemble and disassemble their own poster and to provide tacks or push pins to hang their poster. Poster presenters should attend the Poster Session at the meeting to answer questions. Breaks and socials will be organized around the Posters to encourage discussion between attendees and poster presenters.

Poster abstract format:

List all authors using first and last names, their affiliation, addresses, and e-mail addresses. When choosing the title, be brief but descriptive and avoid using acronyms or scientific names in the  title unless the common name is not widely known. Abstracts are restricted to 250 words and should summarize the importance, methods, and findings of the research being described. Please follow the format from the example below so that program chairs can focus on processing abstracts rather than making edits. Abstracts with grammatical errors or incorrect formatting will be returned to the authors for correction prior to acceptance.

At the end of the abstract please indicate that 1) your submission is intended for a poster, and 2) the lead author is a professional. 

Email your abstract to zbeard@azgfd.gov no later than 17:00 (5pm) on 12 January 2024.

EXAMPLE: Professional fisheries poster abstract

Authors:  

Lorraine D. Avenetti, Arizona Game and Fish Department, Research Branch, 5000 W. Carefree Hwy, Phoenix, AZ 85086; lavenetti@azgfd.gov.

William Stewart, Arizona Game and Fish Department, Research Branch, 5000 W. Carefree Hwy, Phoenix, AZ 85086; bstewart@azgfd.gov.

Jason Jones, Arizona Department of Environmental Quality, 1110 W. Washington St. Phoenix, AZ 85007; JdJ@azdeq.gov.

Megan Smart, Arizona Department of Environmental Quality, 1110 W. Washington St. Phoenix, AZ 85007; ms14@azdeq.gov.

John Woods, Arizona Department of Environmental Quality, 1110 W. Washington St. Phoenix, AZ 85007; Jow@azdeq.gov

Title: 

The National Rivers and Streams Assessment in Arizona

Abstract:  

The Environmental Protection Agency conducts the National Rivers and Streams Assessment every five years to measure the health of our waters, evaluate the effectiveness of protections and restoration efforts and to take action to prevent pollution. The Arizona Game and Fish Department along with the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality partnered to conduct a two year survey throughout the state of Arizona in 2013-2014 for the second National Assessment (the first conducted in 2008-2009). The survey was conducted to estimate the percentage of rivers and streams that are in good, fair or poor condition across the state of Arizona and will stand as a scientific report card for our nations flowing waters.  We conducted surveys on 24 sites, mostly small streams and a few large Rivers.  Four of these 24 sites were revisit within a one month period of sampling the first time.  We also, received permission to sample on the Navajo Reservation four sites.  This project was a collaborative effort with multiple agencies and land owners. No fish were collected at five sites, 10 native fish species were collected at 13 different sites and 17 non-native fish species were collected at 15 sites. Water quality parameters (dissolved oxygen, nutrient levels and turbidity), benthic macroinvertebrates, and zooplankton were also collected during our surveys.  Extensive habitat data was collected and overall condition at transect recorded. The data from this survey are currently being processed and analyzed and will eventually be put into a final national assessment report from the Environmental Protection Agency.   

Poster; Professional

STUDENT WILDLIFE ORAL PRESENTATIONS

Speakers will be given 20 minutes for their presentation (15-minute presentation and 5 minutes  for questions). A laptop PC and digital projector will be provided for Power Point presentations.  Please inquire about other audiovisual aids if necessary. 

Student wildlife oral presentation guidelines

To enter the wildlife student oral presentation competition, students must submit a written summary of their research by Friday, January 12th, 2024 5:00 pm MST. To be competitive, these should be final or near final results of the student’s research. The panel of judges will evaluate the written summary of the student’s research based on the merits of the research to determine the top 3 students from each state. These 6 finalists will compete during a special symposium of the meeting on Friday, February 2, 2024. Each student’s presentation will be 15 minutes plus 5 minutes for questions. All 6 finalists selected for the competition will receive a certificate and the top 2 students (one for AZ and one for NM) will receive a certificate and cash award at the awards banquet on February 2, 2024. Students who submit applications for the wildlife student oral presentation competition and are not selected for the competition will automatically have their research summaries sent to the TWS abstract selection committee responsible for choosing presentations for general sessions during the meeting. 

Experience presenting research at professional meetings is an important part of a student’s professional development. Consequently, we strongly encourage all students who are involved with research to submit an abstract for a poster or oral presentation, even if they do not submit it to be considered for this competition. 

Benefits:  

How to Apply:  

EXAMPLE: Student wildlife oral presentation project summary

STUDENT WILDLIFE POSTERS

Poster size and display:

Please limit your poster size to 32"x 44". Orientation can be either portrait or landscape; each  presenter will have a 4x4 foot space for their poster, which will provide a place to hang the poster and other information such as handouts or business cards. Presenters are required to assemble and disassemble their own poster and to provide tacks or push pins to hang their poster. Poster presenters should attend the Poster Session at the meeting to answer questions. Breaks and socials will be organized around the Posters to encourage discussion between attendees and poster presenters.

Poster abstract format:

List all authors using first and last names, their affiliation, addresses, and e-mail addresses. When choosing the title, be brief but descriptive and avoid using acronyms or scientific names in the  title unless the common name is not widely known. Abstracts are restricted to 250 words and should summarize the importance, methods, and findings of the research being described. Please follow the format from the example below so that program chairs can focus on processing abstracts rather than making edits. Abstracts with grammatical errors or incorrect formatting will be returned to the authors for correction prior to acceptance.

At the end of the abstract please indicate that 1) your submission is intended for a poster, and 2) the lead author is a student (see example below). 

Email your abstract to wildlifeJAMabstract@gmail.com no later than 17:00 (5pm) on 12 January 2024.

EXAMPLE: Student wildlife poster abstract

Authors:  

Sky Arnette-Romero, Central Arizona-Phoenix Long-Term Ecological Research, 3942 E. Yucca St. Phoenix, Arizona, 85028; Sky.Arnett-Romero@gmail.com

Bridget Harding, Central Arizona-Phoenix Long-Term Ecological Research, 3942 E. Yucca St. Phoenix, Arizona, 85028; brhardin@asu.edu.

Daniel Allen, College of Letters and Sciences, Wrigley Global Institute of Sustainability, Arizona State University,  6073 S Backus Mall, Mesa, AZ 85212; Daniel.c.allen@asu.edu.

Albert Ruhi, College of Letters and Sciences, Wrigley Global Institute of Sustainability, Arizona State University,  6073 S Backus Mall, Mesa, AZ 85212. Albert.Ruhi@asu.edu. 

Title:  

Drought modifies land-use effects on arthropod communities in an urban desert ecosystem  

Abstract:  

Central Arizona Phoenix Long-term Ecological Research (CAPLTER) has surveyed grounddwelling arthropod communities inhabiting different types of land-use areas throughout the greater Phoenix metropolitan area since the late 1990s.  Here we investigate arthropod pitfall traps surveyed from 2002-2014 across desert, agriculture, mesic urban, mesic/xeric mixed urban, and xeric urban areas. Effects of land use and time Abundance and species richness were explored using General Linear Mixed Models (GLMMs). We found significant land-use X time interactions for both arthropod abundance and richness, indicating that the effects of land use on arthropod communities were not consistent over time. Accordingly, we investigated variation in land-use effect sizes (as measured using Cohen’s d) might be affected by drought and time, but effects drought and time did not explain significant variation in land use effect sizes.  However, further analyses did indicate that the effects of droughts on arthropod abundance and species richness differed depending on land use type. Drought had strong effects on arthropod abundance in desert land uses, but weaker effects on arthropod abundance in agriculture and urban land uses. For arthropod richness, droughts explained more variation for mesic sites than others. Future work on this project will be to investigate the long-term effects of land use on beta diversity patterns and community structure of arthropod communities. 

Poster; Student

PROFESSIONAL WILDLIFE ORAL PRESENTATIONS

Speakers will be given 20 minutes for their presentation (15-minute presentation and 5 minutes  for questions). A laptop PC and digital projector will be provided for Power Point presentations.  Please inquire about other audiovisual aids if necessary. 

Oral presentation abstract format:

List all authors using first and last names, their affiliation, addresses, and e-mail addresses. When choosing the title, be brief but descriptive and avoid using acronyms or scientific names in the  title unless the common name is not widely known. Abstracts are restricted to 250 words and should summarize the importance, methods, and findings of the research being described. Please follow the format from the example below so that program chairs can focus on processing abstracts rather than making edits. Abstracts with grammatical errors or incorrect formatting will be returned to the authors for correction prior to acceptance.

At the end of the abstract please indicate that 1) your submission is intended for an oral presentation, and 2) the lead author is a professional (see example below). 

Email your abstract to wildlifeJAMabstract@gmail.com no later than 17:00 (5pm) on 12 January 2024.

EXAMPLE: Professional wildlife oral presentation abstract

Authors:  

Tad Theimer, Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA 86011; Tad.Theimer@nau.edu.  

Sean M. Mahoney, Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA 86011; Sean.Mahoney@nau.edu.

Kirsten E. Ironside, Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA 86011; Kirsten.Ironside@nau.edu.

Title:  

Available data support protection of the Southwestern Willow Flycatcher under the Endangered Species Act   

Abstract:  

Recently, Zink (2015) argued there was no evidence for genetic, morphological or ecological differentiation between the federally endangered Southwestern Willow Flycatcher (Empidonax traillii extimus) and other Willow Flycatcher subspecies.  Using the same data, we show there is a step-cline in both the frequency of a mtDNA haplotype and in plumage variation that is roughly concordant with the currently recognized boundary between E. t. extimus and E. t adastus, the subspecies with which it shares the longest common boundary.  The geographic pattern of plumage variation was also concordant with previous song analyses that differentiated those two subspecies, even to the extent that both identified birds in one low-latitude, but high elevation, site in Arizona as the northern subspecies.  We also demonstrate that the ecological niche modelling approach Zink (2015) used gave the same results whether it compared the two flycatcher subspecies, or E. t. extimus versus a different species (Yellow Warbler, Setophaga petechia).  As a result, any interpretation of those results as evidence for lack of ecological niche differentiation among Willow Flycatcher subspecies would also indicate no differentiation among recognized species and would therefore be an inappropriate standard for comparing subspecies.  We agree that many analytical techniques now available to examine genetic, morphological and ecological differentiation would better our understanding of the distinctness (or lack thereof) of Willow Flycatcher subspecies, but we argue current evidence does support protection of the Southwestern Willow Flycatcher under the Endangered Species Act.

Oral Presentation; Professional

PROFESSIONAL WILDLIFE POSTERS

Poster size and display:

Please limit your poster size to 32"x 44". Orientation can be either portrait or landscape; each  presenter will have a 4x4 foot space for their poster, which will provide a place to hang the poster and other information such as handouts or business cards. Presenters are required to assemble and disassemble their own poster and to provide tacks or push pins to hang their poster. Poster presenters should attend the Poster Session at the meeting to answer questions. Breaks and socials will be organized around the Posters to encourage discussion between attendees and poster presenters.

Poster abstract format:

List all authors using first and last names, their affiliation, addresses, and e-mail addresses. When choosing the title, be brief but descriptive and avoid using acronyms or scientific names in the  title unless the common name is not widely known. Abstracts are restricted to 250 words and should summarize the importance, methods, and findings of the research being described. Please follow the format from the example below so that program chairs can focus on processing abstracts rather than making edits. Abstracts with grammatical errors or incorrect formatting will be returned to the authors for correction prior to acceptance.

At the end of the abstract please indicate that 1) your submission is intended for a poster, and 2) the lead author is a professional (see example below). 

Email your abstract to wildlifeJAMabstract@gmail.com no later than 17:00 (5pm) on 12 January 2024.

EXAMPLE: Professional wildlife poster abstract

Authors:  

Steven S. Prager,  Audubon Arizona, 3131 S Central Road, Phoenix, Arizona 85040; sprager@audubon.org.

Title:  

Breeding habitat selection of the western distinct population of the yellow-billed cuckoo (Coccyzus americanus) within Audubon Arizona Important Bird Areas 

Abstract:  

In the summer of 2015, Audubon Arizona staff and permittees surveyed five Audubon Important Bird Areas (IBAs) to determine cuckoo presence/absence and to assess breeding status. Using the protocol published by the USFWS, surveyors detected cuckoos 154 times, in four of the five IBAs.  Of these sites, three supported birds that were likely breeding. One site contained habitat consistent with cuckoo natural history accounts – extensive cottonwood/willow riparian gallery forest with adjacent mesquite upland scrub and Madrean pinyon-juniper woodland.  The second site was less consistent with cuckoo habitat descriptions with most detections occurring in extensive mesquite bosque along dry, ephemeral portions of the San Pedro River. The third site was the least consistent with previous cuckoo breeding habitat descriptions. Detections at this site were made in ephemeral drainages dominated by encinal oak woodlands and adjacent semidesert grasslands. This use of what was thought to be atypical cuckoo habitat was also observed by Tucson Audubon biologists during their 2015 surveys of several oak-dominated drainages within southeastern Arizona sky island IBAs. Studies looking to determine presence/absence of cuckoos and eventual designation of critical habitat should consider these and potentially other habitat types.

Poster; Professional

   JAM Silver Sponsors