ChatGPT is a user-friendly option to help overcome writers’ block and alleviate some of the subsidiary labor of instructional design (Rahman & Watanobe, 2023). This can be used by instructional designers in a variety of ways. ChatGPT can be used to create some of the technical components of learning design that are often time consuming, thereby eliminating some of the cumbersome workload. For example, when lesson planning, an instructional designer could use specific prompts to generate lesson plans for specific topics. While the ID would still need to proofread and perfect the lesson plan generated by ChatGPT, it would eliminate much of the time spent in the initial phases of lesson planning.
ChatGPT enhances the learning experience by offering immediate, personalized feedback and support, enabling learners to grasp complex concepts and improve at their own pace. A recent article, Backtalk: ChatGPT: A powerful technology tool for writing instruction by Sarah W. Beck and Sarah R. Levine (2023), discusses the potential of ChatGPT to help rather than harm developing writers, suggesting ways teachers (and IDs) can use it to overcome writer's block and utilize strategies to guide students in critically assessing ChatGPT's output as a step into their writing process.
Additionally, by analyzing the learners' performance and preferences, ChatGPT can suggest customized learning paths, thereby making education more accessible and tailored to meet individual needs. This dual approach not only facilitates a deeper understanding of subject matter but also accommodates diverse learning styles, promoting a more inclusive and effective educational environment.
ChatGPT can also be utilized to generate evaluation tools, both for the learner and the educator. The ID could prompt ChatGPT to generate a rubric for a specific assignment, outlining performance measurements and score ranges. An ID could also utilize ChatGPT to generate activities used to measure learning, quizzes, exams, or essay prompts. These assessments can be generated at varying levels of difficulty. Assessment types can be specifically requested, for instance a True/False or Multiple Choice assessment. The educator or ID could even use ChatGPT to grade assignments and performance in activities. IDs and educators should be mindful that ChatGPT does have its limitations and therefore should not be relied on to create a perfect product. IDs should think of ChatGPT productions as an outline to be perfected and personalized.
Why Choose ChatGPT for Instructional Design?
How to implement ChatGPT and why it is relevant for Instructional Designers (Delvin Peck, 2023).
Rapid Content Creation - Accelerates the development of educational materials, saving time and resources.
Personalization - Creates personalized learning experiences and feedback for individual learner needs (Beck & Levine, 2023)
Engagement - Enhances learner engagement through interactive and immersive content creation.
Accessibility - It's easy to navigate and is made to be accessible for diverse learners, including those with disabilities and non-native speakers.
Professional Development - Offers continuous learning opportunities for educators and instructional designers to stay ahead of the latest pedagogical strategies.
Data-Driven Insights - Provides analytics and insights for informed decision-making and instructional improvements.
Collaboration Enhancement - Encourages collaboration among educators and designers through idea generation and feedback mechanisms.
Content Accuracy Concerns - May generate inaccurate or inappropriate content, requiring thorough review and verification.
Dependence Risk - Overreliance on AI for content creation might limit creativity and critical thinking skills among designers (Beck & Levine, 2023)
Ethical and Privacy Issues - Raises concerns about data privacy, consent, and the ethical use of AI-generated content.
Skill Displacement - Could potentially displace certain instructional design skills, leading to a devaluation of human expertise.
Accessibility and Bias - While it promotes accessibility, there's a risk of perpetuating biases if not carefully monitored and adjusted.