Visit IACURH's Official Website Here!
Part 1 of the bid process is making the bid, revising the bid and reviewing other submitted bids from other institutions!
Part 2 is the bid defense! This is where your institution will defend your bid to other Regional Board Representatives
Bid defense is a part of the bid process that happens during conference. During conference, the schedule will have times for the award bid sessions, if you have a bid submitted in a specific bid award category that is voted upon the Regional Board of Representatives, you and other contesting institutions will present a:
Opening Statement (30 seconds)
Answer Q & A (3 minutes per bid, can be extended 2 times with a final exhaustion of the speakers list) (If that sounds confusing, click here to review bid and voting language used!)
Pro-Con (Pro-Con stops after a third unanswered pro or con)
Discussion (10 minutes per bid, can be extended 2 times with a final exhaustion of the speakers list) (If that sounds confusing, click here to review bid and voting language used!)
Closing Statement (2 minutes per bid)
Here are some additional rules If you an institution that has submitted a bid and you're in the space:
All participants and observers including advisors must exit the space for Pro-Con for their bid
Up to three observers for the same bidding school, excluding advisors can be in the same space
If you're a school who is defending a bid in the space but not for your bid, you can stay for Pro-Con but you're not allowed to make any pro's or con's
Bidding schools can only answer questions during Q&A.
Bidding schools can stay for discussion but cannot discuss their own bid.
Advisors are not allowed to participate in any part of the bid defense.
Scroll below for a more detailed explanation on all the listed components above!
RLC Bid content is for content that happened from the previous RLC to current
For example: IACURH NCC of the Year can only have content and information that occurred from RLC 2023 - RLC 2024
RBC Bid content is for content that happened from the previous NACURH 2024
Fun fact - not all bids submitted need a bid defense! Some bids are decided and voted upon by the Regional Board of Directors while others are voted upon the Regional Board of Reps during award bid sessions during conference.
RLC have some different bid categories than RBC, but some are similar as well!
At RLC specifically here is a breakdown of RBD vs RBR decided bids!
Regional Board of Representative decided bids (requires a bid defense) AT REGIONAL LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE (RLC):
IACURH Advisor of the Year
IACURH Distinguished Service Award
IACURH Executive Board Member of the Year
IACURH Service Award
IACURH Student of the Year
IACURH Student Staff Member of the Year
IACURH NRHH Building Block
IACURH NRHH Outstanding Chapter of the Year
IACURH RHA Building Block
IACURH School of the Year
IACURH Commitment to Diversity, Social Justice, and Inclusion Award
Paula Bland Award for Professional Service
RLC Host Site Bid for the following year
Regional Board Director decided bids (the RBD votes on these bids)
IACURH NCC of the Year
IACURH RHA President of the Year
IACURH NRHH President of the Year
IACURH Program of the Year (then presented during Peak Programming)
Dan Daniels Lifetime Service Award
Election Bids for the RBD happen at RBC! These are also presented submitted and voted upon the RBR!
Regional Board of Representative decided bids (requires a bid defense) AT REGIONAL BUSINESS CONFERENCE (RBC):
IACURH Advisor of the Year
IACURH Distinguished Service Award
IACURH Executive Board Member of the Year
IACURH Service Award
IACURH Student of the Year
IACURH Student Staff Member of the Year
IACURH NRHH Building Block
IACURH NRHH Outstanding Chapter of the Year
IACURH RHA Building Block
IACURH School of the Year
IACURH Commitment to Diversity, Social Justice, and Inclusion Award
Paula Bland Award for Professional Service
RBC Host Site for the following year
Regional Board Director decided bids (the RBD votes on these bids)
NACURH NCC of the Year
NACURH RHA President of the Year
NACURH NRHH President of the Year
University of Summit and Steggie University have both submitted bids for IACURH Student of the year for RLC 2024. Here's how the bid session would look like.
The chair of the space, would introduce the bid space and read off some rules, reminders and a statement before the bid process starts including that the space is closed boardroom - which means once or if you need to leave the space, you cannot re-enter until the bid session is concluded.
The chair will introduce University of Summit to start the session, beginning with a 30 second opening statement
After the opening statement, the chair will entertain an initial speaker's list - here schools can raise their own placard and be put on a list to ask the defender presenting University of Summit's bid a question about their bid. Steggie University is able to ask questions.
The defender presenting the bid will answer Q&A in a three minute session, extendable twice (aka 9 minutes) and exhaustion of the speakers list, other individuals from the University of Summit who're in the space can stay and observe. Other students from that bidding school can also observe, but not participate whatsoever in speaking. They can communicate with the presenter via writing. Advisors can observe but have no writing or speaking rights.
After Q&A is concluded, a Pro-Con session will occur. At this time all observes and the representative presenting University of Summit's bid will leave the room, representatives from Steggie University can stay in the room but are not allowed to make pro's or con's about the bid.
Pro-Con concludes after the third unanswered Pro or Con, at this time steps 2 through 5 will repeat, only this time it will be Steggie University's turn to present their bid, answer Q&A and leave when pro-con occurs.
After both schools have finished Pro-Con, all reps and observers can stay for discussion, 10 minutes, extendable twice with a final exhaustion of the speakers list - however they are not allowed to discuss their own bid during the time.
After discussion, both schools have the opportunity now to make a closing statement, up to 2 minutes. The defenders and bidding school observers cannot be in the space during each other's closing statements.
After closing statements, voting will occur, usually a form is sent to each institution present in the space. Each institution will get only ONE vote, either for one for the University of Summit or Steggie University. The institution can also vote no confidence if they don't want to vote for either, or abstain if they feel like have a personal or any other kind of bias that may affect the voting outcome in an effort to be fair.
An opening statement is a 30 second presentation, usually summarizing the nominee or the highlights of the bid as well as the bid defender acknowledging that they're prepped for any questions the Regional Board of Representatives may have about the bid.
30 seconds goes by fast! The most helpful tip is to time yourself and focus in on what your school really wants the introduction to your bid defense to be!
Q&A is the most important time in a bid defense (in my opinion!!) This is a 3 minute session, and can be extended twice with a final exhaustion of the speakers list. Meaning Q&A can run up to 9 minutes and by whomever is still on the speakers list.
This is a time where representatives will ask questions about your bid and for you to answer them. Remember this is the only time you can answer questions, please do not ask them before the session or during a session that is not Q&A!
The most helpful tip is to make mock questions! Have a team or another individual ask questions themselves as well so you can get a feel of what questions to expect during boardroom bid sessions. This also helps you practice and rehearse your answers so you can be confident when presenting.
What I have seen that makes a great Q&A session:
DETAIL: The more details, the more examples you can give aids in giving the reps a chance to really feel the impact of your bid as well as emphasize the defender's knowledge of it.
CONFIDENCE: While it can be scary speaking publicy (which is totally valid) being confident in even the little details or if you make a mistake, still provides a sense of stride in your work and your defending skills
REFERENCE YOUR BID: Your bid has page numbers, titles, sections and pictures - if you point them out in your answer lots of reps will be able to not only look over the bid again but have the opportunity to see you're supplementing your answer with details you have included.
DON'T WORRY ABOUT TIME: it may seem like time is an enemy, but if you do your best you can answer questions and provide detail for questions people may have never even thought about! This can be stressful so like I mentioned before - practice, practice, practice!
Also note that you can only questions to things pertaining in the bid, nothing additional which is why my extra tip includes making your bid VERY detail based so you have much to refer and discuss upon!
At this point, all observes and participants from the bidding school must leave the space for Pro-Con. Here institutions say pro's and con's about the bids in a few words. For example -
Pro: Lots of Experience (note: experience cannot be used as a con, as it messes with equity purposes)
Pro: Very regionally involved
Pro: Inclusive Programs
Con: Vague description of programs
Con: Goals Unclear
The chair of the space will usually ask for a pro then a con, the third unanswered pro/con will conclude this part of the award bid/bid defense process
Discussion comes after this, bidding schools can be in the space but are not allowed to discuss their own bid. Discussion is 10 minutes and can be extendable 2 times with a final exhaustion of the speaker's list. Meaning discussion can run up to 30 minutes and by whomever is still on the speaker's list.
This is a time where representatives will discuss their thoughts on the bids, usually applauding the hard work all bidding schools have done on the bids, and then also discuss what bid they are leaning to vote for.
Ex: "Steggie University appreciates both bids presented by ____ and ____. We recognize the hard work and effort contributed by _____ especially in their involvement on campus, however we are leaning more towards ________ for the _______ award."
VOTING!!
Simply, one vote per institution!
Vote for one of the bids
Vote of No Confidence (Don't believe anyone is confident for your vote)
Abstain to Vote (personal biases might influence the vote unfairly!)