The EE is marked out of 30 points. You can see how the points are distributed in the table to the right of the page.
The grade boundaries are:
A: to be updated
B:
C:
D:
E:
Explanation of grade descriptors (2027).
Together with Theory of Knowledge, the EE is worth 3 points.
These points are allocated in combination with TOK.
You can see how these two elements of the Core work together to give you 0, 1, 2 or 3 points in the matrix to the right.
Criterion A assesses the framework for the essay. This includes the research question, the methodology, and the structure of the essay. The research question should be clear, focused, and relevant to the topic. It should should encourage critical engagement and analysis and be answerable in 4000 words. The research methodology should be explained, and be suitable to the chosen pathway and subject(s). There should be evidence of how the research methodology has been applied using sufficient sources of suitable quality. The essay should follow clear structural conventions linked to academic writing in the chosen subject(s) to communicate the research. In all cases this should follow the basic structure of Introduction, Body and Conclusion. Figures and tables should be clearly labeled. Students should refer to subject-specific guidance for appropriate structural conventions.
Criterion B assesses the extent to which the student understands the subject matter that is covered in the research, including relevant terminologies and concepts. Is the subject matter relevant to the RQ and has the student shown evidence of a comprehensive understanding of the key concepts/terminologies by demonstrating an accurate and effective use of these in their writing? For an interdisciplinary EE, this would mean both subjects.
As students write their EE, they should keep in mind that everything must be relevant to the selected topic. Students should use relevant terms correctly and apply relevant concepts in a compelling manner. They must also make sure they have an appropriate number of quality research materials.
Criterion C is the analysis of the information presented in the essay, the effectiveness and relevance of what the student is arguing. The student needs to be consistently focused on their line of argument and always link points back to the research question. The student needs to be analytical about data/sources. The EE is not a report or a presentation of information. This is one main part of the essay where students develop their critical thinking skills and apply.
Criterion D of the Extended Essay serves as a crucial framework for students to assess the effectiveness of their research and arguments. This criterion specifically evaluates the discussion of findings throughout the essay, emphasizing the importance of supporting claims with robust evidence, such as primary data, relevant citations, and high-quality sources. It encourages students to critically evaluate their methodology, examining how effectively it addresses the research question (RQ).
A key aspect of this evaluation involves considering the quality of sources and citations used, as well as acknowledging counter-sources that may offer alternative viewpoints. Students are urged to reflect on uncertainties and limitations within their research, recognizing that some aspects may warrant further exploration beyond the scope of their essay. Unlike critical thinking criteria,
Criterion D provides clearer guidelines, helping students to navigate the complexities of their writing with distinct signposts for self-evaluation. A balanced perspective is essential, as discussions should be underpinned by appropriate evidence, with analysis that strengthens the overall argument.
This criterion adopts a strengths versus limitations approach, prompting students to maintain a balanced judgment throughout their assessment. By focusing on evaluating their findings, students must articulate the strengths and weaknesses of their evidence clearly, fostering a deeper understanding of the research process.
Ultimately,Criterion D guides students in structuring their evaluations coherently, ensuring that their discussions are comprehensive and reflective of a nuanced understanding of their subject matter. By adhering to these guidelines, students can enhance the clarity and effectiveness of their essays, leading to a more rigorous academic inquiry.
This criterion assesses only the reflections written in the RPF with a focus on growth and evaluation.