This appraisal is for SIGN patient issues strategy
This appraisal was prepared by Louise Foster
A. Information
A.1 State the author's objective
None stated – retrieval of patient issue studies.
A.2 State the focus of the search
[ ] Sensitivity-maximising
[ ] Precision-maximising
[ ] Specificity-maximising
[ ] Balance of sensitivity and specificity / precision
[ ] Other
Not stated
A.3. Database(s) and search interface(s).
CINAHL (Ovid)
Embase (Ovid)
MEDLINE (Ovid)
PsycINFO (Ovid)
A.4.Describe the methodological focus of the filter (e.g. RCTs).
Not stated
A.5 Describe any other topic that forms an additional focus of the filter (e.g. clinical topics such as breast cancer, geographic location such as Asia or population grouping such as paediatrics).
Patient issues
A.6 Other obervations
None
B. Identification of a gold standard (GS) of known relevant records
B. 1 Did the authors identify one or more gold standards (GSs)?nown relevant records
0
B.2 How did the authors identify the records in each GS? wn relevant records
N/A
B.3 Report the dates of the records in each GS. wn relevant records
N/A
B.4 What are the inclusion criteria for each GS? relevant records
N/A
B.5 Describe the size of each GS and the authors’ justification, if provided (for example the size of the gold standard may have been determined by a power calculation) antcords
N/A
B.6 Are there limitations to the gold standard(s)? ntcords
Yes
N/A
B.7 How was each gold standard used? cords
[ ] to identify potential search terms
[ ] to derive potential strategies (groups of terms)
[ ] to test internal validity
[ ] to test external validity
[ ] other, please specify
N/A – no gold standard was reported.
B.8 Other observations. cords
None
C. How did the researchers identify the search terms in their filter(s) (select all that apply)?
C.1 Adapted a published search strategy.
Unclear
C.2 Asked experts for suggestions of relevant terms.
Unclear
C.3 Used a database thesaurus.
Unclear
C.4 Statistical analysis of terms in a gold standard set of records (see B above).
No
No gold standard was identified.
C.5 Extracted terms from the gold standard set of records (see B above).
No
No gold standard was identified.
C.6 Extracted terms from some relevant records (but not a gold standard).
Unclear
C.7 Tick all types of search terms tested.
[x] subject headings
[x] text words (e.g. in title, abstract)
[ ] publication types
[ ] subheadings
[ ] check tags
[ ] other, please specify
C.8 Include the citation of any adapted strategies.
N/A
C.9 How were the (final) combination(s) of search terms selected?
Not reported.
C.10 Were the search terms combined (using Boolean logic) in a way that is likely to retrieve the studies of interest?
Yes
Many terms to capture the concept of patients are combined (using AND) with concepts capturing emotions, experience and other issues.
C.11 Other observations.
None
D. Internal validity testing (This type of testing is possible when the search filter terms were developed from a known gold standard set of records).
D.1 How many filters were tested for internal validity? cords).
Unclear
D.2 Was the performance of the search filter tested on the gold standard from which it was derived?ds).
Unclear
D.3 Report sensitivity data (a single value, a range, ‘Unclear’* or ‘not reported’, as appropriate). *Please describe. ds).
None reported
D.4 Report precision data (a single value, a range, ‘Unclear’* or ‘not reported’ as appropriate). *Please describe. ).
None reported
D.5 Report specificity data (a single value, a range, ‘Unclear’* or ‘not reported’ as appropriate). *Please describe. ).
None reported
D.6 Other performance measures reported.
None reported
D.7 Other observations.
None
E. External validity testing (This section relates to testing the search filter on records that are different from the records used to identify the search terms).
E.1 How many filters were tested for external validity on records different from those used to identify the search terms?
Unclear
E.2 Describe the validation set(s) of records, including the interface.
None reported
For each filter report the following information.
E.3 On which validation set(s) was the filter tested?
E.4 Report sensitivity data for each validation set (a single value, a range or ‘Unclear’ or ‘not reported’, as appropriate).
E.5 Report precision data for each validation set (report a single value, a range or ‘Unclear’ or ‘not reported’, as appropriate).
E.6 Report specificity data for each validation set (a single value, a range or ‘Unclear’ or ‘not reported’, as appropriate).
E.7 Other performance measures reported.
E.8 Other observations
None
F. Limitations and Comparisons
F.1 Did the authors discuss any limitations to their research?
No
F.2 Are there other potential limitations to this research that you have noticed?
No
F.3 Report any comparisons of the performance of the filter against other relevant published filters (sensitivity, precision, specificity or other measures).
N/A
F.4 Include the citations of any compared filters.
None reported
F.5 Other observations and / or comments.
None
G. Other comments. This section can be used to provide any other comments. Selected prompts for issues to bear in mind are given below.
G.1 Have you noticed any errors in the document that might impact on the usability of the filter?
No
G.2 Are there any published errata or comments (for example in the MEDLINE record)?
No
G.3 Is there public access to pre-publication history and / or correspondence?
No
G.4 Are further data available on a linked site or from the authors?
The author’s contact details are provided.
G.5 Include references to related papers and/or other relevant material.
None
G.6. Other comments
None