For Scholarship Music you will submit a portfolio of work, including a critical reflective analysis.
The portfolio must contain evidence of the your work as either a performer, a composer, or a musicologist. A portfolio is an organised collection of evidence that clearly communicates the your knowledge, understanding, and skills relevant to the Scholarship Music Performance Standard in your chosen discipline.
The performance, composition, or musicology portfolio must include a written critical reflective analysis that meets the following conditions:
Length: no longer than 3000 words.
Originality: the sources of ideas other than the candidate’s own must be acknowledged.
Sources: primary and secondary sources, including references to scores, must be acknowledged using formal referencing conventions.
Presentation: appropriate conventions for clear presentation of text should be followed, e.g. headings and subheadings, paragraphs, work titles in italics – for reference, see Trevor Herbert, Music in Words: A Guide to Researching and Writing about Music (London: ABRSM Publishing, 2001).
Document format: numbered A4 pages. PDF Format
This must include:
(a) A video recording of up to 15 minutes of the you performing music from one or two of the following options:
performance as a featured soloist of a significant work or programme of works
group performance
performance on a second instrument.
If available, a copy of the score of the works performed should be supplied with the recording.
The performance must:
be a continuous and unedited recording made at a particular performance event
be no more than 15 minutes in duration (including pauses between items)
take place in front of an audience
be recorded by a stationary camera, and the sound recording should be of the highest-possible fidelity.
Note: The maximum duration of the performance is set at 15 minutes, as this is considered to be sufficient time for a candidate to demonstrate their fulfilment of the requirements for Scholarship. A performance that exceeds this time limit by a few seconds will not be penalised, but the marker will not watch the remainder of a performance that significantly exceeds this time.
(b) A critical reflective analysis of the work(s) that may involve, but is not limited to, discussion of:
choice of repertoire
programming decisions
how characteristics of the music were considered in preparing the performance (e.g. rhythmic features, tonality, tempo, dynamics)
how stylistic features of the music were considered in preparing the performance (e.g. ornamentation in Baroque music, technological effects in rock, improvisation in jazz, cultural practices)
how technical issues were considered in preparing the performance (e.g. bowing, picking, fingering, breathing, stance, diction, language, articulation)
how musicianship issues were considered in preparing the performance (e.g. balance and voice-leading).
This must include:
(a) The score and audio recording of a significant work or a selection of shorter works you have composed.
The recording:
may comprise any combination of live performance or computer realisation of the work(s) (i.e. inclusion of a live performance is not mandatory)
must be no more than 15 minutes in duration
may include one arrangement or re-composition (not more than 5 minutes in duration).
(b) A critical reflective analysis of the work(s) that may involve, but is not limited to, discussion of:
choice of instrumentation
choice of texts
how musical ideas were developed and structured
issues related to notation
how technical demands of realisation of the music in performance music were considered (e.g. bowing, fingering, breathing, language, articulation, conducting a performance)
how stylistic features were considered
how the work is representative of the developing skills, style, and/or philosophy of the composer.
This must include:
(a) A comprehensive study, along with an annotated score, of a substantial musical work. This may be in the form of an essay of no longer than 3000 words, or a video seminar (no longer than 15 minutes in duration), and must include:
an examination of FIVE musical elements deemed by the candidate to be most significant
a critical discussion outlining the musical contribution of each element in relation to the success and/or effectiveness of the work.
(b) A critical reflective analysis of the work, which may involve, but is not limited to, discussion of:
the extent to which the musical elements are typical of the period in which the work was written
the place of the work in the composer’s output
the place of the work in the development of the genre
implications of this work on future composers and their compositions
a personal reflection on the work.
Link to NZQA Scholarship Music Information
https://www2.nzqa.govt.nz/ncea/subjects/scholarship-subjects/music/
Make a copy of this doc and submit with your portfolio