PUBLICATIONS
“Fixing the Leaky Pipeline: Affirmative Action in Local Elite Colleges and Subject Choice.” Southern Economic Journal 1–17, 2025 [Published Article]
WORKING PAPERS
Gender-based affirmative action policies in top-ranked STEM institutions aim to enhance women's representation in both higher education and the labor force. While these policies can promote diversity, they may also increase statistical discrimination in hiring practices as colleges lower admission standards to increase female enrollment. This paper examines this trade-off and investigates how expanding seats for women in premier Indian engineering colleges affects gender discrimination in hiring. I conduct a large-scale correspondence study that randomizes gender, college type, and year of entry and induces variation in policy exposure within the experimental design. The results indicate no significant male-female callback gap at top colleges before or after the policy; however, women from lower-ranked colleges face disadvantages. Specifically, the policy implementation led to a 52% drop in the female callback probability, increasing male-female callback gap by 2 percentage points in these colleges. To further shed light on actual employment outcomes, I analyze data scraped from LinkedIn profiles, revealing consistent evidence that supports my findings. I propose a model of statistical discrimination that incorporates affirmative action for women at top colleges, aligning with the observed trends in hiring practices.
Presentations:
Dutch Development Economics Workshop 2026, Nijmegen (Scheduled)
ISI Delhi 20th Annual Conference on Economic Growth and Development (ACEGD) 2025, Delhi
Midwest International Economic Development Conference (MWIEDC) 2025, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
Pacific Area Conference in Development Economics (PacDev) 2025, University of Southern California
Southern Economic Association (SEA) 2024, Washington DC
North East Universities Development Consortium (NEUDC) 2024, Northeastern University
Washington Area Development Economics Symposium (WADES) 2024, Georgetown University
Empowering to Conform: Age at Marriage, Social Norms and Violence Against Women (with Sheetal Sekhri & Pooja Khosla) (Submitted)
We deliver a theoretical model of domestic violence which proposes that delayed age of marriage aids women in complying to socially desirable behavior expected by the husband rather than challenging the dis-empowering norms. The theory predicts that delaying the age of marriage would reduce domestic violence, but individual wealth of the wife would offset this effect. We corroborate the model by leveraging two rounds of nationally representative health surveys from India and differences in societal and marriage practices among Hindus and Muslims, finding causal empirical support for our theory. Using age of menarche as an instrument, we find that one year delay in age of marriage reduces emotional violence by 18%, less severe physical violence by 26% and severe physical violence by 39%. These findings are stronger amongst Hindu women and gets muted for Muslims who typically have higher wealth at the time of marriage. Our paper highlights that fear of violence can undermine empowering policies when there is widespread acceptance of beating social norms.
When Violence Makes Headlines: Media-Reported Sexual Violence and Girls’ Educational Outcomes in India (with Sheetal Sekhri, Jalaj Pathak & Kartik Yadav)
This paper studies whether publicly observed realizations of sexual violence generate spillovers on girls’ educational outcomes through changes in perceived risk. We interpret newspaper-reported rape incidents as salient public signals that enter collective awareness and update beliefs about local safety. Combining district-level data on publicly reported rape incidents with individual-level schooling and learning outcomes from India, we estimate the effects of exposure to such signals using a gender-gap difference-in-differences design with staggered treatment timing. We find that publicly observed rape incidents lead to declines in girls’ educational outcomes relative to boys, with effects concentrated among older girls and stronger following more salient incidents. These patterns are consistent with a belief-based mechanism in which perceived risk alters household investment decisions even in the absence of direct victimization. The results indicate that sexual violence generates negative human capital externalities that extend beyond victims themselves.
WORK IN PROGRESS
Skin Color Prejudice in Pakistan (with Shan Aman-Rana & Siwan Anderson)
One Stop Centres and Crimes Against Women (with Sheetal Sekhri & Amalia Miller)
OTHER RESTING WORK
Change in Factory Laws and Female Labor Force Participation (with Sheetal Sekhri & Selim Gulesci)