Professional Reasoning & Ethics in OT Practice
Terminology
Clinical Reasoning/Professional Reasoning/Therapeutic Reasoning
Types
Scientific Reasoning
Diagnostic Reasoning
Procedural Reasoning
Narrative Reasoning
Pragmatic Reasoning
Ethical Reasoning
Interactive Reasoning
Conditional Reasoning
Embodied processes
Knowing more than we can tell
Cognitive Processes
Memory, Meta-Cognition
Whole-Body Process
Occupational storytelling
Occupational story making
Therapeutic Employment
Reflective practitioners
Reflect in action
Reflect on action
Professional Reasoning Is
A process used to plan, direct, perform, & reflect on client care
How OT's think
Completed in real time
A skill that needs to be developed…
It requires meta-cognitive analysis- "thinking about thinking"
Always needs to be done
Is based on assumptions
Schell’s Ecological Model of Professional Reasoning
OT is co-constructed process between the therapist & client
What actually happens in therapy is a result of transactions among the therapist, the client, & the practice context.
There are a number of personal & practice context factors that influence professional reasoning, the client & the therapy process. Some factors are known to the participants & some are unknown.
Therapy outcomes are affected by this nexus of factors, along with the nature of the occupational performance/ participation problem, & the client’s therapy-related actions outside of therapy.
Cognitive Processes Underlying Professional Reasoning
Cognitive neurosciences suggests that people have limited space in their working (short term) memories
How can an OT process everything he/she needs to all at once?
And over time & with experience, the OT develops & utilizes strategies
Chunking
Scripts
Frames
Procedural Rules
Aspects of efficient mental frameworks
Cue acquisition: searching for helpful & targeted info through observation & questioning
Pattern recognition: noticing similarities & differences among situations
Limiting the problem space: using patterns to focus cue acquisition & knowledge application on most fruitful areas
Problem formulation: developing an explanation of what’s going on, why it’s going on & what a better situation or outcome would be
Problem solution: identifying courses of action based on the problem formulation
Creation of Frames or Scripts: Chunking
Average person can recall
7 +/- 2 bits of information
Chunking helps organize info into familiar manageable units.
e.g. digit of phone # to 3 units
978-531-6545
Relate to familiar memories
OT’s with experience organize & store info in LTM
Create ‘built-in mental rules’ to
Categorize
Detect patterns & differences in patterns
Scripts & Procedural Rules
Frames or Scripts are complex representations of simulations representing perceptions gained from our experiences.
Experienced OT’s connect information together so they don’t have to juggle all the details
Example: Client with a CVA often (not always)
Extensive prior medical history comorbidities (HTN, DM)
Patterns of effects on occupation
Patterns for L CVA vs. R CVA and CVA of different arteries
Patterns of impairments on body functions
Guide thinking (Bruning et al., 1999; Carr & Shotwell, 2007).
Organize common occurrences or events
Based upon observations & experiences over time
Help OT anticipate likely events
Together enhance processing of complex information
Professional Reasoning Develops Over Time
Strategies are individually constructed
OT students & newer OT’s may struggle to retain & effectively use therapy knowledge
Effective Reasoning: depends upon baseline knowledge/skills & it takes time and reflection and repetition of experiences and involves OT practitioners’ client factors, skills and contexts
Allows you as the OT, to target specific memories for use as therapy unfolds
How to improve be a reflective practitioner:
Reflect in action: think about your thinking when in the midst of a situation
Reflect on action: apply critical thinking after the situation is over
What went well (why), what didn’t go well (why), what are other ways that
Developmental Process
Interactive
Non-linear
In a therapeutic situation, the OT’s thought process moves between
Current situation
Information stored from prior learning experiences
Examples:
What OT role involves
Respond to referral- see client
Write findings on correct form
Interventions used with X
Communicate with team
Develop discharge plans
Implications for clients w/wo supportive families
Supportive family cares for client at home, regardless of resource
Clients with little family support likely to face institutional care
Professional Reasoning Continuum of Expertise
Clinical Reasoning Helps
Professional/clinical reasoning supports holistic problem-solving
Each directs you to attend to different aspects of situations or different cues & patterns
Consider how each type helps
Limit the problem spaces
Formulate problems
Explain what is going on &
Generate alternative solutions
Identify courses of action that might help solve the problem
Aspects of Professional Reasoning
1 Scientific Reasoning (It science)
Involves use of applied logical & scientific methods
Hypothesis testing
Pattern recognition
Theory-based decision making
Statistical evidence
Don’t stop here
It is impersonal & focuses on diagnosis/condition when guiding theory is used
Helps you anticipate what “typically” happens with clients like this, but will not tell you how your client will respond!
OT uses selected theories to identify problems & to guide decision making.
Understand condition affecting client
Decide on interventions in client's best interest.
Aka treatment planning
Types of Scientific Reasoning
Diagnostic reasoning
Procedural reasoning
2 Diagnostic Reasoning (It science)
This type of Scientific Reasoning
Starts prior to seeing client
i.e. referral
Concerned with
Clinical problem sensing
Problem definition
OT’s look primarily for occupational performance problems.
Influenced by referral information in the requests for services.
Investigative reasoning
Analyzes of causes or nature of conditions requiring OT
Uses both personal & impersonal information.
OT attempts to explain why (specific) client experiences specific problems
3 Procedural Reasoning (It science)
OT considers & uses evaluation & intervention routines for identified conditions.
Science-based & reflects habits & culture of practice setting
Characterized by therapy regimes & routines
Evidence-based practices
Practices used with clients in that setting.
Impersonal & diagnostically driven.
OT: thinks about the disease or disability
Decides which intervention activities (procedures) should be use to address client's issues
May involve
Interview
Observation of the person engaged in a task
Formal evaluations using standardized measures.
Procedural reasoning should be used, but can be a trap if it becomes an unquestioned implementation of therapy protocols & thus less scientific in nature
Routinely evaluate your ‘typical’ therapy approaches based upon data
4 Pragmatic Reasoning (It science)
Practical reasoning: Helps OT fit therapy possibilities into realities of service delivery within a particular context
Scheduling options
Payment for services
Equipment availability
Therapists' skills
Management directives
Personal situation of the therapist
Generally not focused on client/client's condition
Considers contextual factors involving OT & particular practice setting
Physical
Social
Therapist's internal sense of
What he/she is capable of
Has the time & energy to complete
5 Ethical Reasoning
Ethical reasoning asks: What should be done?
Analyzes ethical dilemmas
Generates alternative solutions & helps OT determine possible actions
Systematic approach to moral conflict.
OT attempts to determine the “right” thing to do
Sounds easy… reality is soooooo different…
6 Narrative Reasoning (I science)
Makes sense of client's circumstances
Personal: focused on client
Includes past, present, & anticipated future.
Appreciates client’s context as basis for understanding client’s story
Relates to the “so what” of condition for client’s life.
Provides OT with way to understand or contextualize client's illness experience.
What does this sound like?
Involves asking questions, attending to client & thinking in story form.
Understand the meaning that a disease, illness, or disability has for individual
Necessary for client-centered practice
Particularly important for considering how the person's life story can be constituted or reconstituted
Occupational Story-making…
The Narrative Process is Important
Humanizes clients: They are mothers, brothers, teachers, comedians… not just “the CVA in room 20”
Gives us insight into client’s perspective
Suffering, strengths, & triumphs
What is his/her worldview?
Values
Indicates range of responses to current situation…
Informs shape & implement OT intervention
Stories are “about someone trying to do something, & what happens to him/her & others as a result” (Mattingly, 1998, p. 7)
How client makes sense of experiences
Provides view of life & who client is
Links story, act, & consequence
Story Telling in OT
In health care: reaction to the dehumanization of people & “expert’ models & associated with qualitative research e.g. phenomenology…
In OT: Flemming & Mattingly Clinical Reasoning Study: ethnographic study of OT’s in a teaching hospital
Methods: Observations, interviews with OT’s & clients & videotaped sessions
Findings: OT’s have different ways of working with clients
“Chart talk” for medical establishment
“Story telling” to interpret meaning in clients’ lives
Use collaborative approaches to create new/different meaningful life for client as part of recovery process
Think prospectively to envision the effects of illness, disability, or occupational performance problems on client’s daily life
Intervention involves collaboration to co-create a new life-story with client & family
Client's Stories
OT practice provides many opportunities to
Listen to stories
Elicit stories from clients
Tell clients stories
Revise stories
Our clients' stories,
Tell us about how they perceive their experiences
Lend insight into their interpretations of experience
Help us begin to understand who they are
How they view illness or disability experience
How this shapes their daily occupations
Provide clients with opportunities to process their lives AND
Provide OT’s with opportunities to help shape meaning
Narrative as Interpretive Process
Narratives involve an interpretive process
Person selects aspects of past experience(s)
Chooses if & how to represent experiences to others in present time
Narratives evolve: Stories change in light of one’s present experiences
People attend to what is important or meaningful to them at that moment, which alters
Re-telling of the story construction & intent
Experience shapes interpretive lens
Listeners are involved as they often help interpret the story
When listening to a story, attend to
What client attends to about experience in moment
Telling of this experience
How do they tell it?
Word choices matter
Editorial processes
Does client change or omit aspects?
Affective tone
Interpretations: how does the person interpret the story?
When possible what do significant others say?
Stories are used in OT
Occupational Story-Telling
Stories are sources of motivation
Stories help person see self in particular ways
Stories as socialization
Stories can be strategy for problem-solving
Process (make sense of what happened)
Procedural: (determine how or where to go with a particular client)
Stories can persuade others (team or family) toward a particular point of view or insight about a client
Occupational Story-Making
Narratives can be used to shape (present & future) actions
OT intervention involves a prospective “therapeutic employment”
Clients & OT co-create new narratives for client’s lives so clients can envision moving from where/who they are to where/who they want to be
OT’s weave stories & occupations to rewrite, revise, & re-create life stories
7 Interactive Reasoning (I science)
Focuses on building inter-personal relationships with clients
Permits collaborative problem identification & problem solving.
OT concerned with what client likes or does not like.
Asks how can I motivate this person?
OT must gain client’s trust
“Doing with” vs. “doing to” clients
Enters the client's life world
Conscious Thoughts: e.g. Selecting which mode to use
Automatic: Type of touch
Needs to be intentional: mistakes may mean you need to rebuild therapeutic relationship.
8 Conditional Reasoning
Blends all forms of reasoning to be provide a flexible responsive approach to client & possible changes
Found with more experienced OT’s who can “see” multiple futures, based on therapists past experiences & current information.