Navigation
Each page has a hyperlinked "Table of Contents" to the left. The pages are also accessible through the navigation menu in the website header. Feel free to explore these in any order you wish! This site is also responsive and thus mobile-friendly, so you can access it through your tablet or smartphone.
Embedded Media
Some pages have embedded media. You may watch the embedded videos directly on the page by clicking the "play" icon or expand them to full screen by hovering over the video and clicking the square in the lower right corner. You may watch the video in a new window entirely by hovering on the video and clicking the three vertical dots in the upper right corner.
Infographics
The infographics included in this toolkit were all created in Canva by the authors to help visualize concepts, timelines, and ideas that emerge from the toolkit or as part of the roundtable discussion. Feel free to reuse them with attribution if they are useful. [See our toolkit on creating infographics.]
What do we mean by “witnessing” in the context of this toolkit and as a humanities-informed method of public scholarship? Our approach here is informed by Deborah Wong’s assertion that “any methodology for witnessing must build in the radical determination and willingness to take in the action of others without the intent to own it. This methodology is fundamentally different from the impulse to collect information or things” (195). Witnessing should therefore not be ethnographic but rather rooted in participatory collective action with a “willingness to attend deeply to the moment, to inviting a shift in subjectivity” (abstract). Witnessing is also an Indigenous principle and a specific objective of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada (TRC), where “witnesses are called to be the keepers of history when an event of historic significance occurs” (“Honorary Witnesses”).
Sometimes naming a mass atrocity as an actual genocide and/or combatting genocide denialism can come with personal and political consequences. The TRC reminds us that we must have truth before reconciliation. Canada officially declared the residential school system a genocide in October 2022 after the discovery of multiple mass gravesites at former residential schools, and there are still deniers of Indigenous genocide. Unlike Canada, the U.S., which has an equally horrific record of abuse and death at Indian boarding and residential schools, has to this day never even issued an official apology let alone declared Native American erasure a genocide in any form. Despite vast evidence and witness testimony, there are still Holocaust deniers. Though the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia concluded in 2005 that a genocide was committed in Srebrenica, there is still rampant denialism, posing a “‘serious challenge’ to reconciliation efforts in Bosnia and Herzegovina” (Alice Wairimu Nderitu, United Nations).
At the time of writing this toolkit, the International Court of Justice has declared that we are witnessing a plausible genocide in the Gaza Strip (Summary of the Order of 26 January 2024), a place where all universities and most cultural institutions have now been damaged or destroyed, the vast majority of victims are women and children, and the existing population is now experiencing famine or “catastrophic food insecurity.” Polio, a debilitating virus that primarily affects children, is now at “high risk” of spreading through the region. A June 2024 investigation by the UN Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory determined Israel has committed war crimes and crimes against humanity.
Since the siege on Gaza began lawyers, poets, politicians, journalists, and scholars have openly stated that we are witnessing a genocide. Longstanding Black and Indigenous solidarity movements with Palestine have been rapidly organizing (See also "The surprising bonds that link Palestinian, Black and Indigenous liberation movements"). Protestors in major cities across the world have regularly taken to the streets and staged acts of protest and resistance from massive public demonstrations to blocking military shipments from delivering arms. A July 2024 report in The Lancet estimates the number of Palestinians dead at over 186,000 or about 8% of the population (Khatib et al, para 5).
Beginning late spring of 2024, there has also been a surge of organized witnessing, activism, and learning led by students, a movement sometimes called the “Student Intifada,” at universities across North America and now the world, including at UBC, where students stand with their peers in calling on university leadership to 1) divest from companies complicit in Palestinian human rights abuses, 2) publicly condemn the genocide and ethnic cleansing of Palestinians by Israel, and 3) denounce the invasion of refugee camps and protected zones in Gaza (follow updates from the UBC People’s University for Gaza here and the UBC encampment here). Various UBC academic units have released solidarity statements including the Centre for Climate Justice, Asian Canadian and Asian Migration Studies, Asian Studies, the Social Justice Institute, the Jewish Faculty Network, UBC-O’s Action Research Lab in the School of Nursing (co-signed by more than 100 professors across the two campuses), and the Transformative Memory International Network. On July 7, 2024, the students decamped from UBC but issued a statement about continued actions.
What is the role of the intellectual in witnessing genocide and what forms of public scholarship or creative work can produce meaningful acts of bearing witness?
How do we reconcile the Palestinian genocide with the ongoing call for antiracism and decolonization? How do we foster meaningful relationships and bridge the gap between decolonial and antiracist theorizing and real anticolonial, antiracist work?
What can we learn (and teach) from witnessing? What strategies can we use against institutional acts of suppression? What does pedagogy look like beyond institutional walls?
What is the role of the artist in witnessing? How can art facilitate meaningful modes of expression alongside acts of genocide, war, and trauma? What artistic frameworks and methodologies are possible in these contexts?
Khatib, Rasha et al. "Counting the dead in Gaza: difficult but essential," The Lancet 404, no. 10449 (2024): 237-238.
Wong, Deborah, 'Witnessing: A Methodology' in Beverley Diamond, and Salwa El-Shawan Castelo-Branco (eds), Transforming Ethnomusicology Volume I: Methodologies, Institutional Structures, and Policies (2021): 187-202. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197517604.003.0012.