*Playtest 1 was conducted exclusively among all the team members to refine the game and ensure it was suitable for external playtesters. This internal testing allowed us to make necessary adjustments and improvements before sharing it with a wider audience.*

• Introduce Money Card: Adds a new "Money Card" for resource management and strategy.

• Remove Bonus Cards: Eliminates bonus cards to streamline gameplay and focus on strategic elements.

• Remove Solution Cards: Removes existing solution cards to allow for updated, impactful ones.

• Add More Strategy Cards: Increases strategy card variety for better tactical decision-making.

• Add More Solutions Cards: Introduces impactful solution cards designed to complement new strategy cards.

• Revise Winning Conditions: Updates winning criteria to align with new mechanics, ensuring fairness.

• Number Strategy Cards: Assigns numbers to strategy cards for easy reference and identification.

• Number Solution Cards: Numbers solution cards to enhance clarity and organization.

Summarize from Playtest 1 Data: 

The game undergoes several changes to enhance strategy and gameplay. A new "Money Card" is introduced for resource management, while bonus and existing solution cards are removed to allow for updated, more impactful options. Strategy cards are added, increasing tactical decision-making opportunities, and more solution cards complement these new strategies. The winning conditions are revised to align with these changes, ensuring fairness. Strategy and solution cards are numbered for easier reference and organization.

• Rating: The game received high ratings and positive feedback, with minor improvement suggestions.

• Enjoyment: Players appreciated the unique concept and fun gameplay, comparing it favorably to card games like Uno. Suggestions included adding more attack cards and reducing defense cards for better balance.

• Clarity: Rules were clear and easy to understand, with initial confusion resolving quickly. The game was praised for its simplicity and accessibility.

• Highlight: Players enjoyed Alex's sneaky strategies, the unique cat characters, and the challenge of protecting their cat's money, adding depth and excitement to gameplay.

• Difficulty: The game was generally fair and enjoyable, with some moments of perceived unfairness due to mismatched or imbalanced cards. Its luck-based nature, similar to Uno, added excitement.

• Impact: Attack cards were considered impactful and strategic, though their effectiveness varied for some players.

• Improvement: Suggestions included adding character abilities, enhancing lower-value Alex cards, incorporating more attack cards, and refining “+ cards.”

• Recommendation: Most players would recommend the game, noting that minor improvements could maximize its potential.

Summarize from Playtest 2 Data: 

The game received high ratings and positive feedback, with players enjoying its unique concept and fun gameplay, comparing it to card games like Uno. The rules were clear and easy to grasp, with initial confusion quickly resolving. Highlights included Alex's sneaky strategies, the unique cat characters, and the challenge of protecting the cat's money. While the game was generally fair, some players felt moments of unfairness due to mismatched cards. Attack cards were seen as impactful, though their effectiveness varied. Suggestions for improvement included adding character abilities, enhancing lower-value Alex cards, increasing attack cards, and refining “+ cards.” Despite minor adjustments, most players would recommend the game, seeing strong potential with further improvements.

• Rating: Players rated the game highly, with enthusiasm and satisfaction, including two 4-star and one 5-star rating.

• Enjoyment: The game was found fun and engaging, with players enjoying its unique concept and the challenge of making opponents go bankrupt.

• Clarity: Rules were easy to understand, with any initial confusion resolving quickly during gameplay.

• Highlight: Players enjoyed protecting their cat's money and found Alex's sneaky strategies exciting and engaging.

• Difficulty: Players suggested balancing cards based on player count, limiting attacks, and allowing trade cards without costing a turn. They also noted difficulties in obtaining solution cards, which disrupted gameplay flow.

• Impact: Players appreciated the strategic value of attack cards, including the process of analyzing protection cards and trading to improve their attacks.

• Improvement: Recommendations included balancing the number of cards in each category to improve fairness and ensure more equitable gameplay.

• Recommendation: Most players would recommend the game, though some suggested changes to enhance its overall appeal further.

Summary from Playtest 3 Data: 

Players rated the game highly, with two 4-star and one 5-star rating, reflecting their enjoyment and satisfaction. The game was engaging, with players appreciating its unique concept and the challenge of bankrupting opponents. The rules were easy to understand, and initial confusion quickly resolved. Highlights included the fun of protecting the cat’s money and Alex's sneaky strategies. Players suggested balancing the cards based on player count, limiting attacks, and allowing trade cards without counting as a turn. They also noted issues with obtaining solution cards, which disrupted gameplay. Attack cards were valued for their strategic impact, and players recommended balancing card categories for fairness. Most would recommend the game, with some minor changes to enhance its appeal further.