Job Market Paper: Don't Fear the Repo: The Evolution of Bank Behavior in a Post-Crisis Policy Environment, sole-authored
Last Draft: September 1, 2026
This paper examines how banks' exposure to repo markets and reliance on deposit funding shaped their financial performance and balance sheet strength across monetary policy regimes. Using linear models, quasi-natural experiments, and a theoretical framework, I show that post-crisis monetary policy transformations reshaped banks' equilibrium behavior in heterogeneous ways across risk types. Before the crisis, lending and financing behavior diverged: risk-seeking banks prioritized lending income, while risk-averse banks prioritized balance sheet strength to maintain low repo financing costs. After the crisis, these behaviors converge, as the extensive use of repo during QE helped risk-seeking banks shift toward greater repo reliance, with net interest margins rising by 2.27% as a result of a one-standard-deviation increase in repo dependence, while risk-averse banks extend more credit, strengthening Tier 1 capital ratios by 4.61% as a result of a one-standard-deviation increase in delinquency rates, reflecting structural changes and competitive pressures in the post-crisis environment.
Figures on the right:
Top panel: Average effect of increasing repo dependency on the net interest margins of the risk-seeking banks during ZIRP
Bottom panel: Average effect of increasing loan portfolio risk on the tier 1 capital ratios of the risk-averse banks between the start of QE3 and the onset of the COVID-19 crisis
Presentations:
2025: University of Georgia
2026: Southwestern Finance Association, Case Western Reserve University, Southern Finance Association
Last Draft: April 1, 2026
This paper exploits the tonal and topical structure of press conferences following Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meetings to train large language models (LLMs) that generate realistic responses to journalists’ questions by Federal Reserve Chairs. Using both actual and LLM-generated responses, I study the extent to which language and information-based features predict short-horizon movements in Treasury ETF trading volume, returns, volatility, and quoted and effective spreads during the press conference window. Forecasts based on LLM-generated responses exhibit strong average predictive performance across a range of econometric and machine-learning models, often delivering higher explanatory power and lower forecast error for liquidity and trading-activity measures. The results highlight a clear distinction between mechanical market responses to linguistic structure and informational reactions to policy communication, demonstrating both the usefulness and the limitations of LLMs in analyzing central bank communication and short-horizon market dynamics.
Figure on the right:
Feature importance (based on the percentile of contribution to the forecast) of the questions and answers' tone-topical content in forecasting microstructure variables
Presentations:
2026: Southern Finance Association
Awards and Nominations:
Outstanding Doctoral Student Paper (Runner-up) - 2026 Southern Finance Association Annual Meeting
Fed Council Model:
Reciprocity, Outside Options, and Intermediation Chains in Dealer Markets (previously circulated as Dealer Quid Pro Quo in the Municipal Bond Market), with Casey Dougal and Daniel Rettl
Last Draft: September 4, 2026
Under Initial Review, The Journal of Finance
Dealer reciprocity is the fraction of a dealer's directed interdealer links matched by trade in the opposite direction. Using municipal-bond transaction chains, we show that dealers with more reciprocal networks return more often to recent counterparties and route fewer bonds directly to customers. Reciprocity's association with chain markups depends on credible alternatives: it is positive in narrow networks and negative in broad networks, especially when alternatives are relevant to the bond being traded. After an abrupt collapse in a counterparty's activity, dealers with a reciprocal pre-event relationship subsequently have narrower networks and higher markups than dealers whose relationship with the same counterparty was one-way. The evidence is consistent with reciprocity as a persistent form of relational organization whose pricing consequences depend on credible alternatives.
Table on the right:
Average transaction markups, transaction chain length, and network size based on the chain-initiating dealer's degree of centrality and reciprocity
Presentations (* for presentations by a coauthor):
2024: University of Georgia
2025: Virtual Municipal Finance Workshop*, 14th Annual Municipal Finance Conference at Brookings*, Financial Management Association*, German Finance Association*, Southern Finance Association
2026: Midwest Finance Association*, Eastern Finance Association*, Financial Management Association European Conference*, Asian Finance Association (accepted, withdrawn), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Alumni Conference*
Media Footprint:
https://www.bondbuyer.com/news/dealer-quid-pro-quo-shapes-bond-price-markups-paper-says
Awards and Nominations:
Best Microstructure Paper (Semifinalist) - 2025 Financial Management Association Annual Meeting
Municipal Bond Smithereening: Institutional-to-Retail Distribution and Markups, with Casey Dougal, Daniel Rettl and Richard Ryffel
Last Draft: February 22, 2026 (Available upon request)
We study smithereening, the rapid pass-through of newly issued municipal bonds from institutional allocations into retail hands through tightly linked interdealer and dealer--customer trades. Using EMMA transactions, we identify smithereening trades by exact matches on CUSIP, timestamp, and par between an interdealer purchase and a customer sale, and classify a bond as smithereened if it exhibits such activity in the issuance window. Smithereening is common and retail-oriented, and smithereened bonds exhibit substantially higher offer-relative markups in the early aftermarket. In regressions with rich controls and fixed effects, bond-level exposure predicts 20-23 bps higher markups concentrated in small tickets. After Rule G-15 mark-up disclosure in 2018, the excess markups compress, consistent with transparency limiting intermediary rents.
Figure on the right:
Average Effect of the MSRB Rule G-15 Amendment on the Markups of Smithereened Bonds
Presentations (* for presentations by a coauthor):
2026: University of Georgia, 15th Annual Municipal Finance Conference at Brookings*, Southern Finance Association
Barbarians at the Strip Mall: Approximating Localized Economic Decline with Dollar Store Entry, with John Hund
Status: We use granular SafeGraph data on monthly business revenues to track business migration and estimate the effects of dollar store entry on local business outcomes using a series of difference-in-differences tests. We document that dollar store entry reduces nearby firm revenues by 6–12 percent in suburban areas and mid-sized cities, driven by a compositional shift in which high-income consumer spending drops sharply while lower-income spending is unchanged. We show that dollar store expansion is not merely a symptom of local decline but an active accelerant of it, and that its monthly, neighborhood-level frequency allows us to identify economic contractions before they appear in BEA's quarterly aggregate and annual county-level GDP releases.
Presentations (* for presentations by a coauthor):
2025: University of Georgia Fall Finance Conference Early Idea Rapid Session*
Figure on the right: Net number of business closures in the counties that experience the net outflow of local businesses following the opening of a dollar store within a 10,000-foot radius, per 1,000 residents
Lower Your (Synergy) Expectations, with Greg Eaton
Status: We gather synergy forecast data from M&A-related disclosures and construct counterfactual performance forecasts using historical and industry growth rates. We document the systematic underestimation of synergies in the first year since the M&A deal completion. Underestimation is largest when only the bidder controls disclosure, consistent with managerial entrenchment motives, and three times smaller in deals where advisor compensation is tied to synergy realization. Interestingly, higher disclosed synergy as percent of total deal value estimates nonetheless predict significantly better bidder announcement returns.
Wildfires and Municipal Bond Trading, with Casey Dougal and Daniel Rettl
Status: Using a stacked difference-in-differences design comparing fire-affected municipalities to those within 10 or 25 miles of fire boundaries, we document how wildfires reshape secondary municipal bond market microstructure. Bid-ask spreads narrow by 40–60 basis points in months three through five post-fire, consistent with forced liquidity demand, while Treasury yield spreads decline broadly. Effects are concentrated among credit-downgraded bonds and dissipate by month six, suggesting a transient demand shock rather than a permanent repricing of climate risk.
Spring 2026: Young Dawgs Research Mentor
Project Name: Wildfires and Municipal Bond Trading
Market Misreaction? Leverage and Mergers and Acquisitions (2022), with C.N.V. Krishnan.
Journal of Risk and Financial Management
Using a large database of mergers and acquisitions (M&As) announced from 2010 through 2017, we examine the effects of capital ratio (leverage) on the announcement period stock price reaction as well as on longer-term stock returns and performance, for banks, and compare with non-banks. We find that, for banks, a lower capital ratio of acquirers at the time of the announcement of the M&A is significantly associated with negative announcement-period abnormal returns. However, for these banks, the longer-run abnormal returns and performance are positive. The opposite is true for non-bank M&A announcements: higher equity ratios (lower leverage) of acquirers as at the time of announcement is significantly associated with negative announcement period abnormal returns. But, for such non-banks, the longer-run abnormal returns and performance are positive. This shows that the market may misreact, on average, to both bank and non-bank M&A announcements, based on the acquirer's leverage at the time of announcement.