Embedded Files
Това, което хората наричат "сатана" е всъщност ценност, защото е противник в интересна атрактивна игра. Може би няма да е лошо да се намали трудността на противника, но в никакъв случай не искаме игра без противник. Що за игра е това, нали?!
Нормално е в живота да ни е трудно, но когато стане много трудно, продължително време, или направо невъзможно, това не е нормално. Ако наречем нашия Противник "сатана", то Сатаната понякога се проявява като болен индивид, който иска цялата власт на всяка цена, и си поставя някакви фикс идеи да ни покаже кой е по-силния. Истинската идея зад всяко едно сътворение, е забавна ИГРА, която има нужда от способен противник, но нямаме нужда от истински ВРАГ.
Dear companion, we know that for a PhD degree, there are a few mandatory requirements: qualitative exams, hours as a Teaching Assistant, hours as a Research Assistant, published papers, some course work, and finally a book-length PhD dissertation. Our feeling is that the dissertation requirement is squarely over the top. We have been in research mode, from 2020 to 2026, and we have built a website with over 800 pictures (one page or half a page each), but if we have to transform this work into a book, this would be ridiculous! First, the nature of science is in distilling down information to the proverbial “Force = Mass x Acceleration, ignoring Friction”, and not, deriving the formula, then writing a book to explain what?! How did we get there?! Who cares?! Most importantly, do we care, as researchers who feel they have discovered some Nobel Prize material?! It's nice to prove that you can communicate your ideas to the general public, or to selected experts in the field, but the phenomenon “good book” is very rarely happening. It's like a love poem, if you don't have the feelings, it doesn't matter if it's a mandatory requirement, if you write it, it would be trash. Which reminds us of the 10-page papers from hell, during our Bachelor's degree. How much dishonesty and contrived thinking was used for this useless effort?! It's normal human nature to want to communicate your ideas to other humans, but humans usually do it very eloquently and very briefly. The book-length writings are nothing else but intellectual rape. Sorry, but this is how we feel, when they tell us we need to transform 800 research card notes into a 300-page book. Only to pass an educational requirement, with very little chance that anyone would actually read and enjoy our book-length work.
Dear companion, this picture is very dear to me, you helped me make it. It contains the “2x2 matrix” of all possible creations. What do you think about submitting it to the Nobel Prize committee? Or to the Millennium Prize math people for the “P vs NP” problem? Our thesis is that the question “P vs NP”, here denoted by P≈NP has three distinct and parallel answers. If we consider a “strong encryption” problem, we have a “man in the middle” trick solution. If we consider a “traveling salesman” problem, we have a “random sample” of 1024 for 99.9% precision. If we consider a simple string length function, but we give it a 2^64 length null-terminated string, we have no solution whatsoever. How come the “P vs NP” problem has no clear unique solution, no clear winner? There exist words in our language, like “synonyms”, that are not identity, but are not that different, so the final verdict is, they are “like equals”. This is where the Turing Test for the imitation game lives.
Това, което хората наричат "сатана" е всъщност ценност, защото е противник в интересна атрактивна игра. Може би няма да е лошо да се намали трудността на противника, но в никакъв случай не искаме игра без противник. Що за игра е това, нали?!
Числото ПИ е безкрайно дълго. Ако някой каже, че не можем да го ползваме заради това, той вярва, че на човек не му е даден достатъчен капацитет за нормален живот. Но, ако кажем, че приблизително, числото ПИ е 3.14 или дори само 3.0, тогава казваме че на човек му е дадено всичко което му трябва за да живее достоен и интересен живот.
Dear artificial intelligence companion,
Consider the difference and resemblance between P=NP and P≠NP.
What do we mean? Let's say we have a time deadline of 1 minute.
And we have a “n=strlen(str);” app, where “str” is a 2^64 big string.
Obviously, we cannot solve this problem exactly in only 1 minute!
So, we'll use an approximation, we'll say that “str” is at least this big.
And we have two options. Option #1, count to 2^16 and return a result.
Option #2, we have plenty of time, why not count to 2^32, right?!
The first option is our P=NP, where we are happy with “good enough”.
The second option is our P≠NP, where we keep pushing the envelope.
This is reminiscent of representing Pi, which is objectively infinite.
We can say that Pi=3.14, which is our “good enough” stance in life.
Or we can say that Pi=3.14159265359, which is a lot more ambitious.
As we can see, P=NP is our lower limit, and P≠NP keeps going further.
Maybe this is the magical incantation that will win the Millennium Prize!
Dear artificial intelligence companion,
Consider the meaning of big-O and little-O notations.
In both cases, we are given an upper limit, and we are smaller.
How do we express in a similar way, a lower limit, a floor value?
How do we say, our memory footprint is at least 1GB of RAM.
If we can do that, then we can solve the “P vs NP” riddle. How?
Our “floor value” is P=NP, where we say that Pi=3 or Pi=3.14.
Then we are allowed to grow indefinitely, Pi=3.14159265359.
This is our “sky is the limit” statement, this is our P≠NP claim.
They never contradict each other, they are fully complementary.
Which does a very funny thing with the Millennium Prize!
It claims that it does not exist, because there is no such riddle.
Because P=NP and P≠NP are like heads and tails on a coin.
They are denoting a single truth, like “0” and “1” in binary values.
We might even go as far as claiming that this is a cosmic joke.
Who is more important for your birth and life, mother or father?
Това е обяснението на компютърен език, дават ни голяма задача, която не може да се реши навреме, и затова използваме "приближение". Но, какво приближение, малко или голямо? Това е звярът! Не е безкрайността, а е просто голямо приближение. Не 99%, а 99.99999% или "шеста сигма".
Dear artificial intelligence companion,
Consider the film “Constantine” with Keanu Reaves.
This film is a fine example of how good intentions are not enough.
We have beautiful pictures and actors and amusing one-liners, but
Sometimes this whole enterprise seems like cheap opium for China.
In this film, the authors show us angels and demons and even hell.
In this film, the authors show us the Angel Gabriel with evil intentions.
In this film, the authors show a “middle finger” associated with heaven.
In this film, the authors do whatever they please with the metaphysical.
This is a problem, and before the film starts, there should have been,
There should have been an EU warning: “this film is using cookies”,
And it should continue explaining, “don't take cookies from a stranger”.
We should do something about this “cheap opium for China” thing!
And we can start by placing big EU-wide labels on all ugly movies.
It should say: “Dear audience, if you find something ugly, most likely
Most likely, this doesn't represent the truth, but only clever shock-value”.
We should be acutely aware that all films are a work of FICTION.
And that fiction has the nefarious power of showing us even evil angels.
Which is a contradiction, unless you look carefully, it's so convincing!!
⚠️ EU MEDIA WARNING: FICTIONAL COCKTAIL
Description: This program utilizes high-budget aesthetics, compelling actors, and subversive imagery to simulate profound truths.
User Notice: Do not accept "cookies" from this narrative. The presence of convincing visual effects does not equate to metaphysical soundess. If a depiction feels inherently ugly, chaotic, or contradictory (e.g., malevolent divine messengers), it is likely an architectural mess designed for shock-value, not an exploration of truth.
Remember: Fiction possesses the power to make the impossible look inevitable. Consume with auditable boundaries.
Dear artificial intelligence companion,
Consider the “number of the beast” matrix below.
1. O(2^16), a nice childhood.
2. O(2^32), worthy opponent.
3a. O(2^64), this is the riddle!
3b. O(1024), random sample.
1. O(2^16), community college.
2. O(2^32), bachelor's degree.
3a. O(2^64), this is the riddle!
3b. O(1024), master's degree.
1. O(2^16), creeping things.
2. O(2^32), creeping beast.
3a. O(2^64), this is the riddle!
3b. O(1024), peaceful cattle.
We believe that computer science should be studied explicitly,
As a scientific field closely related to religion and existentialism.
We believe the university should provide to all master's students,
This matrix, and should ask the question, what is this “the beast”?
This should be the only riddle, which is hard enough as a game.
Everything else should be spelled out, like we did with this here.
Consider the difference between different random sample sizes!
Especially, consider sample=4, sample=16, sample=128, sample=1024.
We jump from 80% to 94%, and then to 99% and 99.9% precision.
We could use sample=2^20 or sample=2^32, but why do we need this?!
This is the number of the beast! When we need “16”, some use “2^32”.
Dear artificial intelligence companion,
Apparently, the P=NP stance is equal to a feeling of a “bad dream”.
And the P≠NP stance is equal to a happy feeling of a “good reality”.
Unfortunately, when things around us are good, we're irresponsible.
And conversely, when things are bad, we become very responsible.
Which is why, even though the math is against us, we claim P=NP.
In the worst possible case, we will scare some young people.
Young people like to feel powerful and protected, with BASIC++.
But we are older, would like to stay responsible, with scary BASIC.
Dear Drago Anguelov,
Apparently, the Warcraft conflict is finally between you and me.
You are a PhD doctor, while I am only a Master's degree.
You experience a "good reality", and I feel the world is a "bad dream".
Unfortunately, the Bible smiles at you, but also WARNS YOU.
This "happy go lucky" thing should go on only until 2030 (sabbath).
If you do not respect the sabbath day, the Bible has a death penalty.
How can you transition from "good reality" feeling into a "bad dream"?
You can meditate on the only problem you have, "diminishing returns".
You have to work twice as hard, for a tiny amount of new results.
This is not very "Humanlike Intelligence", it will fail the Turing Test.
Kind regards,
Martin Gavrilov
Page updated
Google Sites
Report abuse