Barn Finds

This project was designed to participate as a theme entry for InDIYana 2023. The Barn Finds took 2nd place in the competition! I lost 1st to an excellent design by David @ a4e audio.  I'm sure he'll post a write-up soon - be sure to check it out!

The announcement for the 2023 theme and rules are excerpted below. 

This was my first time at this DIY event, and I'm so glad I went! The format was more inviting and casual than others I've been to. Thanks very much to our hosts, Ben and Chuck!

If you don't know, InDIYana is one of the long-standing DIY speaker building get-togethers in the country. See InDIYana website for more details. You can also find out more about it and other DIY Speaker gatherings on Parts Express Tech Talk forum, Midwest Audio Club forum, DIYAudio forum, and Facebook DIY Loudspeaker Project Pad (among many other resources). 

InDIYana 2023 Theme: Tweeter Yoga

To whet appetites of the curious, greet the penny pinchers with allowance, and deal with distribution issues of the current day and age; 2023 criteria/rules will be considerably lax from previous years.

Using one of the 'acceptable flaw' models of a previous event theme poll that was also well approved and highly voted for, "Tweeter Yoga" will be the next theme! Make sure those domes have watched their fair share of '80s Jane Fonda videos, done their calisthenics, become accomplished at Tai-Chi, been through boot camp, or had Pilates class with a contortionist. Their flexibility will be tested in the design/demo phases for sure.

Minor rules include:


Driver Selection

Intrigued by the theme challenge, I hoped to attend 2023’s competition, and began searching online for possible unique combinations. There were many questions in attempt to find loop holes. It was a fun and interesting theme to me. Given that I live nearly 1000 miles away, the likelihood I’d be able to make it to the competition with an entry was definitely "iffy." Therefore, I decided that if I did build something, I needed to use drivers and as many parts and materials that I had on hand as possible. That way, if I wasn't able to make it, at least my investment in the project was relatively low. In addition to being a more frugal choice, this decision also catered to my frustration in not finding many options as I investigated (buying) drivers to support this build. Those that I did want to purchase would have been a significant investment. 

Woofer

The Seas L22RN4X/P 4Ω (H1208-04) woofers were a prize I had won from another DIY speaker competition several years ago, donated by Madisound. (Note: the pic below is the normal 8Ω variant)

Due to the aluminum cone breakup (see the crossover design section for raw response), I always imagined using them in some sort of a 3-way, but an opportunity hadn’t risen. I’ve heard the 10” L26 variant as well as W26 Excel series and was, unfortunately, unimpressed. As a result of these factors, they were stuffed in a box, went through a move, and became forgotten. I rediscovered them during the search through my inventory. They met the criteria, modeled well in a reasonably small box, and they were free. Fine. Let’s give them a shot. I had some 10” Scan Speaks laying around as well, but I wanted to try to make an 8” work first (generally better control of power response).

These 4Ω variants appear to be some sort of a special, limited sample run from Seas, which may be why Madisound donated them to the DIY competition as a prize. When I pulled them out, I thought, “At least they’re 4Ω, so that’ll be a nice boost in sensitivity to work better in a two way.” I would later be disappointed to find out that there is actually no sensitivity improvement compared to the 8Ω (OK, they're maybe 0.5 dB better). They run about 83 dB @ 2.83V. Yeah, that sucks. That was really frustrating news. It turns out that the 4Ω variant has a bit more Mms than the 8Ω (48 g vs 40 g), which seems to have counteracted the improved current flow. 

The significant inductance of the L22 did not inspire confidence in the L22 motor design or in a result with low distortion, but alas, they were free 😊, and every decision is a balancing act of pros and cons. The 8Ω variant is spec’d at 3.76 mH on the data sheet; the -04 preliminary data sheet I found didn’t have inductance specified. Based on matching curve in the Response Modeler tool, it looks to be about 2.90 mH for the 4Ω variant. 

Tweeter

The North D28-06S tweeters (from now defunct North Creek Music Systems) were purchased used from a friend that was cleaning out his closet for a big move. I had forgotten about these in my closet as well and was pretty excited to find them! I really like these tweeters. They have an excellent motor design, with a unique damped rear chamber, sporting a 1mm Xmax. These are some personal favorites and perform way above their price point (used to sell for $156 – for a matched pair).

During experimentation phase, I had tried to shoehorn several other tweeters with the L22, including Morel MDT30, Peerless DX25BG, Scan Speak 9500, SB Acoustics SB26STCN, Dayton RS28, and more. The preliminary modeling that I had done with these other tweeters made for a difficult pairing with the L22. The L22 was the problem - the response falls off very early. Elegance was not on the horizon. Things finally came together when I found the D28s in the back of the closet. They had ever so slightly more low end in their response to work with the L22. 

The D28 also happens to have a silver faceplate, which resulted in a serendipitous match to the look of the L22. 


Crossover 

The short version: the crossover is more or less a 4th order Bessel @ 1370/1350 Hz in the sum/notch. I believe that I took the spirit of the competition seriously :) .  The theme test tracks for the event were excellent and demanding of tweeters in this situation. The North Creek D28 performed admirably. 

The crossover was created using Jeff Bagby’s Passive Crossover Designer v8 in a standard 2-way parallel configuration. 

The driver measurements were processed to account for baffle diffraction (including baffle step), then merged/blended to get realistic acoustic representations for real-world expectations. The FRD files of the drivers were merged with simulated low frequency data and diffraction effects losses using FRD Response Blender 2.0, courtesy of Jeff Babgy and Charlie Laub. 

The Woofer box model impedance for the L22 was generated and exported using Jeff’s Response Modeler 3.01 tool to include the box tuning and vent impacts to the impedance curve. 

Luckily the upper frequency diffraction effects with the tweeter placement on the baffle were pretty minimal. 

The raw driver responses and impedances are shown below - check out the L22's break-up and drop off at 1k!

Woofer Network

The LP target shown below is 1400 Hz Bessel 4nd order. The response clearly doesn't really fit that. The beginning of the knee most closely resembles a 4th order LR until the strange break at ~2 kHz. So, it's a bit of a mess. I really wanted to keep a Bessel target for the tweeter, to give it a softer kneee and easier time in the low end extension. So, I just tweaked the woofer network in the result until the driver phases lined up pretty well with a nice notch. And this is where things ended up. 

The LP filter presents as an electrical 3rd order. An L-R contour is used up front to conquer the baffle step dilemma. It ends up being a 3rd order electrical filter with some damping on the shunt capacitor to soften the knee of the curve a bit. To match the curve, more would have been necessary, but following the target exactly didn't result in as good of an overall response.  The “Zobel” isn’t exactly that – it’s overly large with a higher-than-normal damper on it (8 Ω) rather than typical target of "nominal" impedance (4 Ω in this case). The value of this compensation along with the actual filter was a bit of a dance to get things to play nicely with the intention of trying not to present a terribly uncomfortable overall system load to the amplifier. The end result of the system impedance stays above 4 Ω the entire time, save the small dip to ~3.5 Ω around 90 Hz from the woofer’s raw impedance.

To keep series resistance as low as practical, I used 18 awg laminated iron core inductors. On the second series inductor, I unwound a 1.0 mH iron core inductor and ended up with half the DCR of a 0.51 mH 14 awg air core inductor at 30% the cost of the large air core. Since I already had one iron core in place, my midrange distortion was already going to take a hit. This was an all or nothing decision. 

The capacitors in the woofer circuit are all NPE type, save the 1% precision 6.8 uF in the notch filter to ensure correct placement of the narrow notch. The series 4 Ω resistor in the contour filter is two 8 Ω 10W resistors in parallel for a combined 20W rating. More probably would be better. All these resistors are standard 10W sand cast low-inductance wire wound type. 

Tweeter Network

The target tweeter response is 4th order Bessel @ 1400 Hz. This low of a target is a bit overzealous for the D28 (or any standard dome tweeter for that matter), but this theme challenge didn’t exactly expect tweeters to be lounging around. North Creek recommended at least 1500 Hz @ 12dB/ova slope. The softer knee of the Bessel (compared to BW4 or even LR4) also helps reduce output of the tweeter. 

The tweeter crossover is generally a 2nd order electrical network with the addition of a small inductor out in front to be able to tame the rising top end startign at ~8 kHz a bit. I included an oversized “Zobel” network to damp the resonance peak and get it the response to cooperate a bit better. This was cheaper and less complicated than a full series notch damper, and it still accomplishes enough damping of the peak to do what was needed. An L-pad approach may have also worked (parallel resistor can soften the resonance bump quite a bit), but I got a bit more control this way and an NPE type cap here is rather cheap.

For those that are concerned about such things, the series resistor was a 12W Mills metal oxide type. The main filter cap I used was a Clarity Cap CSA series 250V. Inductors are standard bargain 20 awg air cores. As with the woofer circuit, the resistor in the “Zobel” compensation circuit is a 10W sand cast type. The cap in the “Zobel” is NPE type. 

Summed Response and Load

Summed and driver responses with driver phases, typical listening distance of 2 m. The two curves meet @ ~1370 Hz. 

OOP notch and filter – offscreen it bottoms out @1350 Hz @ 33 dB (~45 dB notch):

Summed response with simulated power response and overall phase:

Filter transfer functions and overall system impedance:

Crossover Board

Here’s a pic of the assembled crossover. I adopted this method of peg-boarding with ring terminals and brass fasteners from George at North Creek, which is a nice tie in. 

Note: Yes, I’m aware that the inductor layout is not ideal for the two in bottom left. This was the "let's get this thing assembled" stage and wasn't being critical enough at layout. Troels shows some measurement impacts here to inductance with coils in various positions. Turning the 0.5 mH coil on the on end was the eventual resolution after I noticed it in the cabinet, but no pics available. 

Enclosure

My initial plan was to take advantage of some Dayton TW-0.75 prefab cabinets (0.75 ft3) I had on hand (unfortunately, Parts Express no longer sells these). They’re currently in use as midbass cabinets in my ongoing 4-way project, constantly revolving drivers as I try to find the combination I like best. Reassigning the cabinets to this purpose was intended to motivate me to build the a better cabinet for the 4-way project. 

Baffle

I created a baffle based on the dimensions of the TW-0.75 cabinet to just drop it in, taking advantage of the BREX system (baffle replacement) of their prefab cabinets. I love this feature to be able to repurpose the cabinets and try different things out. 

See the file below for more detail. 

Barn Finds Baffle.pdf

I came across some leftover pieces of recovered 140-year-old barn shiplap siding (that’s what the selling claimed, anyway) that I had used to build an authentic barn door for our office. It was severely weathered pine, had some remnants of red paint (before going through the planer), and surely looked the part. I found a couple scraps of ¾” plywood and glued that to the back of the barn wood to stiffen things up. While beautiful, this old barn wood is very soft and heavily weathered. The plywood added a lot of needed strength. I didn’t want plywood edges exposed (the rabbet on the TW-0.75 cabinets is only 15/32” deep), so I made the plywood doubler on the back 1 inch smaller on each side and wrapped a boarder of the barn wood around the plywood. 

Below is the glue-up for the baffle. Each baffle was two pieces butted together, seem vertically down the middle. I intentionally left some of the weathered look to come through and feature in the end.

Then I ran the glued-up baffles through the planer one more time to get the joined pieces at the same thickness (random scraps didn’t quite match). 

After routing the holes and rabbet, I used a reverse 45 deg router bit (thanks Javad!) to provide some relief around the woofer cutout.

Main Cabinet

After building the above baffle, about a month slipped by. Ambition was low. While intentions were good to make some progress on the 4-way project, I decided to focus on completing one project at a time. Working on the 4-ways would have delayed this project for several more months, and that would have made a tight timeframe for the competition in April. So, I ended up building a complete cabinet from scratch for the Barn Finds rather than just putting a custom baffle on the Dayton pre-fab boxes. Since I was making my own cabinet, I took the opportunity to enlarge the internal volume to a full 1.0 ft3, a preference to get even more low end out of these drivers since I had plenty of margin under the 1.5 ft3 limit for the competition. 

In keeping with the limited cost impact goal, the box is made from standard, low-grade, void laden, 5-ply ¾” plywood… because I a sheet laying around in the garage from another project. 

The walls of the cabinet are single panel thickness, save the front baffle. Externally, it comes out to 10” W x 17” H x 15” D, 1.0 ft3 internal, fb tuning @ 30 Hz, f3 models around 33 Hz using a 2” ID port @ 8 1/8” long.  

Reinforcement gussets were added to the corners to have material to screw the baffle down to. Since I was no longer tied to the TW-0.75 cabinets, I added an extra brace across the middle to screw the baffle down and better compress the foam gasket. An additional brace was added in the middle of the side panels for extra rigidity. Pocket holes helped facilitate faster assembly than having to wait for glue to dry. Clamping 45 deg corners is also challenging.

Damping and Assembly

The crossover boards were screwed to the bottom of the box. F-26N ¼” wool felt damping material was staple-gunned to the sides, top, and back walls; the back piece is draped down across the top of the crossover for good measure. 

What's in a Name?

As I rummaged through wood scraps in the garage, I came across some leftover pieces of recovered 140 year old barn siding. I had enough pieces to glue up for two baffles, and thought, “That’d be kinda’ cool.” Then it clicked. Nearly everything I have used in the project was old things that were in the closet or storage, long since forgotten about. Thus, I decided to name this project, Barn Finds, akin to the discovery of classic cars hidden away for decades in an old barn, pseudo-preserved gems. And now I even had authentic, weathered barn siding to add some character and tie it all together.