Artificial Consensus: AI and Survey Measurement (Single-Author)
Central banks, governments, industry, and investors use surveys to measure economic conditions that are otherwise difficult to observe. AI can distort survey measurement at three stages: by replacing respondents, assisting them, or analyzing the resulting data. I study all three channels by fielding an online survey based on the Survey of Consumer Expectations (SCE), benchmarking answers from fifteen AI models, and analyzing SCE microdata. A browser-side answer-origin measure distinguishes between AI-assisted humans, agentic tools, and autonomous bots, revealing that the dominant respondent-side problem is assistance rather than substitution. Among 1,294 respondents, 31.4% leave evidence of AI involvement, 4.8% disclose it, and only 0.4% are autonomous bots. AI-generated answers reproduce a plausible normal-times center of inflation expectations but collapse their dispersion, while AI-led cleaning disproportionately removes genuine upper-tail SCE responses. With independent respondents, tighter answer distributions generally signal more convergent beliefs; with a shared algorithmic source, the same pattern can arise without belief convergence. AI-induced homogenization can make surveys appear more precise while biasing inference.