Uh-oh
Uh-oh
So I received my first negative review on biomesight from (ST) - wants to remain anonymous. This person actually never followed the suggestions, I call them a practitioner hopper - and would not stop emailing me for a period, never paid me any money nor did I ask her to, and then convinced me to analyze her husbands tests. All during this time she provided great positive FEEDBACK and EVEN was one of the first to complete the NON ASD survey (see below).
She only created a negative review after I criticized ken lassesen's Microbiome Prescription.com for not being reliable. (over a year later this review appears since the last time I spoke with her).. You can read exactly why I'm critical of the website microbiome prescription.. in the FAQ section and you can do your own test why the literature suggestions have never been vetted and are often not correct or simply read on below.
I was told of similar issues with Microbiome Prescription by many Gut knowlegable folk... individuals in prominent Gut groups and also a specific revered practitioner whom his work is actually the basis of some of the health bounds for gut health being used on Microbiome Prescription. In this case "ST" the reviewer only provided the review (1 year after i stopped communicating) because of a recent post by Ken Lassesen in his ASD group targeting me and they happen to be quite find of KL. If you want see that post targeting me here is a snippet.
That being said you see the messages from (ST) - whom I'll leave anonymous below . Please note that even when you do free work - people get upset when you try to discontinue things (end the relationship), and that is largely what happened here as I can not work with individuals that don't follow the suggestions or are practitioner hoppers. In this Case ST simply said 75% of the things she couldn't take and was actively doing other things that I did not recommend, all while giving me positive feedback for my help see link below and continuously messaging me. ST has changed her review 3 times since posting her initial review over a year after I stopped speaking with her.. she initially claimed she worked with me for 1 year which is not true, she receive 1 suggestion from me for herself and her husband which she never followed through as intend with (partially) as mentioned above and her survey indicated she saw improvement and wanted to continue.
Reviews and emails from this person (anonymized ST)
The Moral of the story is that there are many individuals that I have to disassociate with, terminate, end my relationship because they simply are not reasonable to work with for instance practitioner hoppers, or don't follow suggestions because of preset conditions. These eat up a lot of resources and I must withdraw from suggestions. The good news is that these individuals do not pay anything and anything donated is always returned.
There are a few other individuals that have done similar things as the person above - I also have very positive feedback from those people as well, same issues, practitioner hoppers, too many things, me backing out for fear of things going wrong and inability to provide suggestions. The reason I have gone to such lengths to counter these reviews is because these individuals are not genuine - as they only post negative review when you try to discontinue the abusive or endless help relationship.
MESSAGES AND EVAL FROM Maria & R-PAR This individual has not stopped spreading mis-information about me because they are disgruntled
If you are a practitioner hopper then I can not work with you, its clearly listed in my tenants on the info page. This is a free service for most people (ASD individuals / special needs / children) and many adults whom I don't even charge (like ST), in fact there is no formal charge, some people decide to donate. If you don't like the advice- don't take it, if you provide positive reviews and feedback and then change your mind because I choose to no longer work with you, that says something about your character all along. I can not provide indefinite help to those that abuse it, I need to leverage my resources, and that limits it from people who abuse those resources. Another Parent by the name of Maria has teamed up with R- Par .... some messages of their hypocrisy and abuse are included along with their very very positive indications but only when I told them I would not longer provide suggestions because they would continuously message me endlessly in an abusive way did they turn on me.
Ken Lassesen
I'm not sure why he has stooped so low to attack me, I have never criticized him, only MP.com . Simply follow this exercise below from my FAQ page and you will see what I'm talking about. There are admins of prominent GUT GROUPS that have said the same thing to me privately. Do this same test below on many many microbes and you will find the same thing, relationships that are just not right. I was tipped off by a prominent Gut Microbiologist. Ken if you simply fix your site , there would be no criticism, the foundation is wrong and in my opinion is dangerous to build models on top of that desperate people use and ask me about almost daily.
Criticism from Ken - https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1IZEUWRx2AG1_8H8qGL5UqAdQlvlHfXc3Hv4YxtCWEec/edit?usp=sharing
Why don't you use Microbiome prescription
This requires a long answer - specifically if you look at the literature provided for many of the compound relationships, they are either incorrect, incomplete, or utilized with fuzzy logic. This inherently causes inaccuracies. Specifically try the following genus level bacteria
for instance if you login and set the level to "Nerd" this allows you to see the lterature relationships, choose tyzzerella
https://microbiomeprescription.com/library/details?taxon=1506577
You can search through each of the herbal compounds, for instance
Rosemary is shown to indicate 2 studies indicate decrease in consensus, however clicking on the link then indicates, increase / decrease.
Reading the papers provided actually make NO mention of the Tyzzerella Genus at all
This same type of behavior happens quite often for the suggestions on Microbiomeprescription
The very next herbal (Triphala) is not found in the literature provided for that suggesiton.
Similarly looking under probiotics, bacillus coagulans is indicated to change tyzzerella based on this paper
https://sci-hub.se/downloads/2019-10-08/fa/xing2019.pdf
however it is not mentioned in the text.
I urge you to check the literature provided for each suggestion and see if it even mentions the bacteria or archaea in question, In my own experiments about 50% of the time it does not.
To check this, make an account - login as "Nerd" Level and check the literature for each recommendation provided.
Do you think that for 10,000 + species, hundreds of herbs / drugs / probiotics, and likely thousands of papers and a Human read and entered this data into MP.com? IT was done by web crawling and this is why it full of errors, on top of that there is FUZZY logic that builds in data where it doesn't exist. This is not safe, this is not fair that it isn't disclosed to people who use it thinking it is gospel. Listen to what some others have said