Once we created a project plan and understood more about the UW IHDD and pain points for visitors and patients, we began the design process. The process itself consisted of four milestones: User Research, Design, Prototype, and Evaluation.
Surveys
Interviews
Architectural Maps
Ideation
Design System
Lo-Fi & Hi-Fi
Laser Cutting
UV Printing
Implementation
Criteria
Walkthrough
Redesign
The UW Institute on Human Development and Disability (UW IHDD) hopes to create a more welcoming physical environment for patients, parents/guardians, researchers, and any professionals and academics who use their space. We define welcoming as a physical space that is calming, relaxing, and reduces feelings of stress, anxiety, and overstimulation that many feel in waiting rooms.
Through architectural mapping, user surveys, and user interviews we assessed the current state of the building to propose changes and generate solutions to the patient experience inside the building.
Since we are focusing on the interior design of the physical space, our guiding research question is:
How can we improve the wayfinding at the UW Institute on Human Development and Disability (CHDD) to be more efficient for visitors and patients?
Before we started our design process, we wanted to understand the project space further. Our background research focuses on the following domains relevant to improving waiting rooms, particularly for our target audience which includes neurodivergent children, parents, and healthcare workers. We chose four papers that fit those domains. More specifically, the first two papers focus on the stress factors and environments of healthcare facilities and the subsequent two focus on potential solutions focusing on the use of visual signage and built environment.
The most important obstacle we considered when beginning our design process was ensuring that we do not impede on the privacy of staff members, patients or parents of patients. As we are working in a medical environment, we must abide by HIPPA laws. Because of this we altered our plans in interviewing patients and opted for voluntary, non-identifying surveys. Generally, we also must consider the physical space we are taking up as the center can become extremely busy. This means practicing mindfulness when mapping our the architectural space and finding appropriate times to approach staff members.
We conducted survey, interview, and architectural mapping research over the span of 3 weeks. Due to HIPPA constraints, we were unable to talk to our target user group (patients and visitors of IHDD), so instead we pivoted to gathering secondary research from staff at the IHDD.
We had 28 survey respondents, most of which were clinicians. In our survey, we asked respondents to rate different statements from a 1 to 10 scale, where 1 represents disagree and 10 is agree. We then gave survey respondents space to elaborate on their responses.
We interviewed 9 staff members at the IHDD, including a pilot interview with our sponsor. In our interview, we asked questions around wayfinding, interior aesthetic, and patient experience.
To create an up to date map of the IHDD, our team navigated the entire facility ourselves and then photographed each space to create a map of the waiting rooms, furniture, signs, and hallways.
While there is one recommended path to navigate to the main waiting room on the second floor, there are multiple possible paths, leading to confusion for visitors.
There is a lack of confidence that visitors are at the correct clinic when arriving at the UW Institute on Human Development and Disability.
The interior of the IHDD is not easily navigable for visitors when they are self-navigating through the building.
In order to create low cost physical prototypes, our team utilized the laser cutter, UV printer, and Vinyl printer at our university's maker space. This allowed us to efficiently create and modify our physical prototypes until we reached a standard we were satisfied with.
Equipment: Roland TrueVis VG-540 vinyl cutter/printer, Paper Cutter
The IHDD already had directional posters in the locations that we wanted to place our updated versions, so to match the size of the current frames in place, we printed a 4' x 4' directional poster. we then printed 15" x 24" directories to place in the elevators.
Equipment: Roland TrueVis VG-540 vinyl cutter/printer, Paper Cutter
To reinforce the Starling branding, we printed stickers of Starling with different designs. The only difference between creating the stickers and the posters were the sizing and type of paper used.
Equipment: Epilog M2 32/40 laser cutter, Roland Verra UV LEF-300 UV printer
The prototyping process for starling consisted of 2 steps: first printing 2 versions of Starling onto the 8x10 acrylic and then laser cutting the outline of both starlings.
Equipment: Printer, sanding block
After some trial and error, we opted to print our designs on regular paper and sandwich it between 2 sheets of acrylic using glue.