Tatsuhiko Koyama's Homepage
In the long run my observations have convinced me that some men, reasoning preposterously, first establish some conclusion in their minds which, either because of its being their own or because of their having received it from some person who has their entire confidence, impresses them so deeply that one finds it impossible ever to get it out of their heads. Such arguments in support of their fixed idea as they hit upon themselves or hear set forth by others, no matter how simple and stupid these may be, gain their instant acceptance and applause. On the other hand whatever is brought forward against it, however ingenious and conclusive, they receive with disdain or with hot rage—if indeed it does not make them ill. Beside themselves with passion, some of them would not be backward even about scheming to suppress and silence their adversaries.
Galileo Galilei (1632) in Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems
...what is a good citizen? Simply one who never says, does or thinks anything that is unusual.
H. L. Menken
NEW ZEALAND SCAM
The clandestine publicly funded criminal enterprise of New Zealand
THE FACT HAS BEEN COMPLETELY ESTABLISHED WITHOUT ANY DISPUTE FROM ANYONE OR ANY ORGANISATION!
KIWI COURT: a sinister version of kangaroo court where no law, fact, common sense is relevant; no judge will hear the cases; court decisions are forged without having any actual hearing, or heard by an imposter; false information is disseminated by the Court, Government, and Media of New Zealand, ensuring the continual viability of the publicly funded criminal operations in the secrecy of New Zealand Courts.
New Zealand Judiciary is the total institution of New Zealand, providing all the Courts of New Zealand, from the District Court to the Supreme Court of New Zealand, as the means and covers for the organised criminal syndicates to commit all kinds of crimes with impunity, supported, protected, and concealed by New Zealand Government (the clandestine state-sponsored organised crimes of New Zealand).
NORMALISATION OF CRIMINAL USE OF PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS IN NEW ZEALAND
The normalisation of systemic organised crimes in public institutions, including all New Zealand Courts, must be part of the national culture of New Zealand, which consists of twin subparts: (1) the culture of impunity and (2) nationwide indifference, allowing the atrocity of state-sponsored organised crimes and making the clandestine publicly funded criminal operations viable in New Zealand.
A UK medical professional wrote, "With the privy council now gone, this [certain systematic organised crime in New Zealand] needs to be exposed by the media of another country. I am a medical doctor, with 3 medical science books published internationally. I am also an authority on Narcissistic Personality Disorder, sociopathy and psychopathy - and the people we are dealing with are extreme examples of this trait. However, the problem in NZ is the apathy, timidity and cognitive dissonance of the people. We have built up conclusive evidence - all in the public domain. Are there any university professors of law who have the integrity to join our fight?"
A US lawyer wrote, "I think the courts are really the most fundamental and important part of government. If you cannot get justice, none of your rights exist," "Life liberty and property cease to exist," "I think the word you're looking for [the criminals using the Courts for systematic organised crimes] is psychopathy," "Group psychopathy," "If you can reform the New Zealand courts with the support of New Zealand people, that will be a miracle."
A US-educated New Zealand lawyer wrote, "I have been following with great interest the numerous communications that you have sent to the PM and other members of the Establishment, without knowing whether you have managed to achieve any satisfactory resolution of the issues you have mentioned. Like you, I too have been battling the very evident pathologies in the New Zealand 'Justice' system, so far without any success to speak of, despite my being active in it for the past 17 years since my enrolment in the High Court."
A US lawyer wrote, "Mr Koyama has become such an expert on court integrity, instead of him knocking on the window from the outside, he should be invited to act in the capacity of an inspector of courts. After seeing years of his work and exceptional diligence and persistence, taking advantage of his skills officially seems the only logical outcome."
This is not normal: The politics of everyday expectations (2021), Cass R. Sustein
“...the problem of faction was likely to be most, not least, severe in a small republic. In a small republic, a self-interested private group could easily seize political power and distribute wealth or opportunities in its favor. In the view of the federalists, this is precisely what happened in the years since the Revolution. Factions had usurped the processes of state government, putting both liberty and property at risk.” (p. 73)
"If people are surrounded by conduct that is morally abominable, or seeing a lot of it, they will not disapprove of, and may even be fine with, conduct that is morally bad (but not abominable). That is the power of the normal: our moral judgments are often a product of what else we see, and when what we see is very, very bad, we might not disapprove of the bad, or even the very bad. We might see it as fine, or even as good." (p. 21)
New Zealand has the very insidious culture of impunity: (1) national courts are non-existent or unable to function [all New Zealand Courts, from the District Court to the Supreme Court of New Zealand, are being used the means and covers for organised crimes], and (2) national authorities have been unwilling or unable to carry out a genuine investigation [the clandestine publicly funded criminal operations are made possible and continued to be viable in New Zealand because of the protection, support, and concealment provided by the law enforcement and regulatory agencies of New Zealand Government].
When the international community allows New Zealand to sponsor, protect, support, and conceal the clandestine publicly funded organised crimes in public institutions of New Zealand, the state-sponsored organised crimes will continue unabated in the secrecy of the Court and Government of New Zealand.
You must see the evidence of the systemic corruption and the completely verified and without any dispute from anyone on the systemic organised crimes in public institutions of New Zealand.
CONFIRMED FALSE COURT DOCUMENTS OF NEW ZEALAND
https://sites.google.com/site/tatsuhikokoyama/forgery-in-new-zealand-courts
CONFIRMED INSURANCE FRAUD ON CANTERBURY EARTHQUAKE
https://sites.google.com/site/tatsuhikokoyama/canterbury-earthquake-insurance-dipsute
CONFIRMED BANKRUPTCY FRAUD IN NEW ZEALAND
https://sites.google.com/site/tatsuhikokoyama/law-practice-reform
CONFIRMED NEW ZEALAND SCAM
https://sites.google.com/site/tatsuhikokoyama/new-zealand-scam
CONFIRMED "FAKE" HEARING IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND (3 March 2016)
* Associate Judge Matthews was NOT at the hearing; someone impersonated the judge at the hearing.
FAKE SUMMONS AND USING JUDGE'S NAME FOR FRAUD
https://sites.google.com/site/tatsuhikokoyama/fake-summons-and-using-judge-s-name-for-fraud
NZ Has World's Most Corrupt Judiciary, interviewed by Vinny Eastwood (31 May 2017)
Because it has been covered up by the law enforcement and regulatory agencies of New Zealand Government, the systemic organised crimes in public institutions are normalised, entrenched, and widespread in New Zealand where the sponsored organised crimes, the clandestine publicly funded organised crimes in public institutions, are the norm, rather than an exception.
WARNING - "Independent" authorities in New Zealand exist for covering up corruption, misconducts, and organised crimes, committed in public institutions of New Zealand.
---------------------------------------------------------------
Undisputed fact of the criminal conspiracy of New Zealand Law Society and its involvement in the systemic organised crimes
25 September 2022
Ms Kelly Dennett
Sunday Star-times News Director
cc: Rt Hon Helen Winkelmann, Chief Justice of New Zealand; Rt Hon Jacinda Ardern, Prime Minister of New Zealand; Mr Christopher Luxon, leader of the opposition
Dear Kelly
I understand that you are interested in investigating how injustice or justice is done in New Zealand.
What is uninvestigated and unreported is the systemic problems in the justice system of New Zealand where the organised criminal syndicates are using New Zealand Courts (all of them without any exception, including the Supreme Court of New Zealand).
This fact has not been disputed by anyone for a very long time.
It is not controversial.
The state-sponsored organised crimes in which public institutions, including all New Zealand Courts, are flagrantly used by the organised crimes to commit all kinds of crimes with impunity, clandestine publicly funded criminal operations in the secrecy of the Court and Government, must be investigated and reported by the media.
Without dealing this fundamental problems, New Zealand justice (and its justice system) will continue to have all kinds of problems, which will inevitably cause all kinds of problems in the society and nation of New Zealand.
The continous suppression and cover-up of this fundamental problem must end in New Zealand.
It is my wish that you investigate and report this matter.
Yours sincerely
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
Submission to Independent Review - Undisputed fact of the criminal conspiracy of New Zealand Law Society and its involvement in the systemic organised crimes
23 August 2022
Independent Review
New Zealand Law Society
cc: TVNZ
Dear Sir/Madam
I am an enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand.
Attached, please find information on the undisputed systemic corruption and organised crimes, committed in New Zealand Courts by New Zealand Law Society and New Zealand lawyers, which are protected, supported, and concealed by the law enforcement and regulatory agencies of New Zealand Government.
This matter has been referred by New Zealand Police Minister to New Zealand Police (please see the attached relevant email).
Furthermore, this matter is under investigated by American Bar Association (please see the attached relevant email).
For your information, recently, I received an email from Mr Chris Penk MP of the National Party on 19 August 2022, attached.
This matter requires your urgent attention.
If you require more information on this matter, please feel free to contact me.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
Subject: RE: New Zealand Media must report on the criminal conspiracy of New Zealand Law Society and its involvement in the systemic organised crimes
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2022 23:32:27 +0000
From: Casey Miller
To: Tatsuhiko Koyama
Good morning
Thank you for your email.
If you wish to correspond with Ms Epati in relation to her role as President of the New Zealand Law Society, please send your email to President@lawsociety.org.nz
Wainui Chambers and Rishworth Wall & Mathieson have no role in matters relating to the operation of Law Society matters or Ms Epati’s position as President.
Thank you
Casey
Registered Legal Executive
Rishworth Wall & Mathieson
Mr Chris Penk MP, National’s spokeperson for Courts, responded on the undisputed systemic corruption and organised crimes committed in New Zealand Courts
19 August 2022
Mr Jack Tame
Q + A with Jack Tame
TVNZ
cc: Rt Hon Jacinda Ardern, Prime Minister; Hon Chris Hipkins, Police Minister; Hon Kiri Allan, Justice Minister; Hon Dr David Clark, MP for Dunedin; and others
Dear Jack
Thank you very much for your continuous interest on the undisputed systemic corruption and organised crimes committed in New Zealand Courts and other public institutions of New Zealand.
Today, I received an email from Mr Chris Penk MP, National’s spokeperson for Courts, in response on this matter, attached below.
He wrote, "the National party, when we are next elected into Government, will take any necessary action to safeguard a transparent and fair legal system in New Zealand."
It is my wish that you investigate and report this matter on air so that both the current government and the opposition will be able to discuss this matter in open public.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
Response from Mr Chris Penk MP, spokeperson for Courts of the National Party, responded (19 August 2022)
Dear Tatsuhiko
On behalf of Chris Penk, National’s spokeperson for Courts, thank you for bringing these matters to National’s attention.
You can be assured that the National party, when we are next elected into Government, will take any necessary action to safeguard a transparent and fair legal system in New Zealand.
Kind regards
Jo Irain | Communications, Research and Policy Advisor| Office of Chris Penk
MP for Kaipara-ki-Mahurangi
Spokesperson for Courts │ Associate for Justice | Senior Whip
Parliament House | Parliament Buildings | Wellington | New Zealand
T: +64-4 817 6913 | E: joanne.irain@parliament.govt.nz
Response from the leader of opposition on the undisputed systemic corruption and organised crimes committed in the secrecy of the Court and Government of New Zealand
18 August 2022
Breakfast
TVNZ
cc: Rt Hon Jacinda Ardern, Prime Minister; Hon Kiri Allan, Justice Minister; and others
Dear Sir/Madam
I appreciate for your continuing interested on the undisputed fact of systemic corruption and organised crimes committed in the secrecy of New Zealand Courts and agencies of New Zealand Government.
Mr Christopher Luxon, leader of oppositon, has responded on this matter.
Please see his email of yesterday, attached below.
There is no dispute on the fact from anyone, and there is no controversy on this matter.
It is about the time for TVNZ to investigate and report this matter for the benefit of the public.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
Subject: RE: Prime Minister of New Zealand must be asked on the undisputed systemic organised crimes committed in the Court and Government of New Zealand
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2022 00:43:38 +0000
From: Christopher Luxon <Christopher.Luxon@parliament.govt.nz>
To: 'tatsuhiko.koyama@gmail.com' <tatsuhiko.koyama@gmail.com>
CC: Chris Penk EA <ChrisPenk.EA@parliament.govt.nz>
Kia ora Tatsuhiko,
Thank you for reaching out to Christopher Luxon. He appreciates people taking the time to share their feedback, concerns and ideas.
As Leader of the Opposition, Christopher relies on his colleagues to respond on his behalf to specific matters relating to their portfolios. As such, I have forwarded on your correspondence to National’s spokesperson for Courts, Chris Penk and his team, for their response.
Thank you once again for taking the time to write; it is very much appreciated.
Ngā mihi nui
Sonya Ford
Correspondence Unit
National Leader’s Office
Parliament Buildings, Wellington 6160, New Zealand
national.org.nz
Response from the leader of the opposition (Christopher Luxon)
17 August 2022
Kia ora Tatsuhiko,
Thank you for reaching out to Christopher Luxon. He appreciates people taking the time to share their feedback, concerns and ideas.
As Leader of the Opposition, Christopher relies on his colleagues to respond on his behalf to specific matters relating to their portfolios. As such, I have forwarded on your correspondence to National’s spokesperson for Courts, Chris Penk and his team, for their response.
Thank you once again for taking the time to write; it is very much appreciated.
Ngā mihi nui
Sonya Ford
Correspondence Unit
National Leader’s Office
Parliament Buildings, Wellington 6160, New Zealand
national.org.nz
From: Tatsuhiko Koyama <tatsuhiko.koyama@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, 1 August 2022 9:03 AM
To: Christopher Luxon <Christopher.Luxon@parliament.govt.nz>; Botany <Botany@parliament.govt.nz>; National Leader's Office <NLO@parliament.govt.nz>
Cc: breakfast@tvnz.co.nz; qanda@tvnz.co.nz; J Ardern (MIN) <j.ardern@ministers.govt.nz>; Rt Hon Jacinda Ardern <Jacinda.Ardern@parliament.govt.nz>; information@dpmc.govt.nz; D Clark (MIN) <D.Clark@ministers.govt.nz>; Hon Dr David Clark <David.Clark@parliament.govt.nz>; Dunedin <dunedin@parliament.govt.nz>; Hon Michael Woodhouse <Michael.Woodhouse@parliament.govt.nz>; service@americanbar.org; memberservices@isba.org; mrc@nysba.org; memberservices@dcbar.org
Subject: Fwd: Prime Minister of New Zealand must be asked on the undisputed systemic organised crimes committed in the Court and Government of New Zealand
1 August 2022
Mr Christopher Luxon MP
Leader of the opposition; Leader of the National Party
cc: TVNZ; Rt Hon Jacinda Ardern, Prime Minister of New Zealand; Hon Dr David Clark MP; Hon Michael Woodhouse MP; American Bar Association; and others
Dear Mr Luxon
I am an enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand (please see the attached certificates for this evidence).
Attached, also, please see the analysis on forgery of several court documents issued by an expert in handwriting.
I published the evidence of systemic corruption and organised crimes committed in public institutions, including all New Zealand Courts and several government agencies, and New Zealand Law Society, the sole and exclusive regulator of the legal profession of New Zealand.
The fact is totally undisputed by anyone, and the evidence is published for anyone to see.
https://sites.google.com/view/tatsuhiko-koyama/confirmed-false-court-documents-of-new-zealand
https://sites.google.com/view/tatsuhiko-koyama/confirmed-bankruptcy-fraud-in-new-zealand
New Zealand has extremely serious problems in the basic governance of the country.
All New Zealand Courts are used as the means and covers for the organised criminal syndicates to commit all kinds of crimes with impunity in violation of the laws of New Zealand and international treaties for which the state of New Zealand is a signatory.
American Bar Association is aware of this matter as this matter has been referred to the Rule of Law Initiative of the bar association.
New Zealand must not continue to sponsor organised crimes and protect, support, and conceal clandestine, publicly-funded systemic organised crimes, committed in public institutions of New Zealand.
The corruption is very much entrenched and widespread due to the state-sponsorship of clandestine criminal activities.
There is no dispute whatsoever on the fact by anyone; it is about the time for you as the leader of the opposition to put pressure on the prime Minister of New Zealand on this matter.
The prime minister must be asked what she will do on the undisputed fact of clandestine systemic corruption and organised crimes committed in the secrecy of the Court and Government of New Zealand.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
Green Party of New Zealand must put pressure on the Prime Minister to deal with the undisputed, endemic, systemic corruption in public institutions of New Zealand
14 August 2022
Green Party
Dear Sir/Madam
I am an enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand; please see the attached "certificate of character" and "order of admission."
What is undisputed by anyone must be admitted as the fact.
If you have any doubt, please take a close look at the evidence attached.
If not satisfied, please go to the following websites so that you can witness the evidence of endemic, systemic corruption in public institutions of New Zealand.
https://sites.google.com/view/tatsuhiko-koyama/confirmed-false-court-documents-of-new-zealand
https://sites.google.com/view/tatsuhiko-koyama/confirmed-bankruptcy-fraud-in-new-zealand
New Zealand has very serious problems in the governance, as the organised criminal syndicates are using all New Zealand Courts as the means and covers to commit all kinds of crimes with impunity, in violation of the laws of New Zealand and several international treaties for which the state of New Zealand is a signatory.
Green Party as a partner in the coalition of the current government of New Zealand must step up and put pressure on the prime minister to deal with the undisputed, endemic, systemic corruption in public institutions of New Zealand.
There is no controversy on the fact, and there should not be any political hesitancy to act on this matter.
This matter requires your urgent action.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
17 Radnor Street, North East Valley, Dunedin 9010
International community must be warned of the undisputed systemic organised crimes committed in the secrecy of New Zealand Courts and Government
8 August 2022
Rt Hon Jacinda Ardern
Prime Minister of New Zealand
Dear Prime Minister
I am an enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand.
The undisputed fact clearly shows the very serious nature of systemic corruption and clandestine publicly funded organised crimes in public institutions of New Zealand.
You must act immediately and warn the international community on the violation of the international law in continuing to sponsor state-sponsored organised crimes.
The corruption is endemic and widespread, and all New Zealand Courts are used as the means and covers for the organised criminal syndicates to commit all kinds of crimes with impunity, and there is nothing anyone can do about the insidious situation in New Zealand.
The situation in New Zealand calls for the international community to intervene as the state machinery and public institutions are used as the illegal criminal activities in violation of the laws of New Zealand, which are protected, supported, and concealed by the law enforcement and regulatory agencies of New Zealand Government.
You must act on this matter, especially when the fact is totally undisputed by anyone.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
Prime Minister of New Zealand must be asked on the undisputed systemic organised crimes committed in the Court and Government of New Zealand
1 August 2022
Mr Christopher Luxon MP
Leader of the opposition; Leader of the National Party
cc: TVNZ; Rt Hon Jacinda Ardern, Prime Minister of New Zealand; Hon Dr David Clark MP; Hon Michael Woodhouse MP; American Bar Association; and others
Dear Mr Luxon
I am an enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand (please see the attached certificates for this evidence).
Attached, also, please see the analysis on forgery of several court documents issued by an expert in handwriting.
I published the evidence of systemic corruption and organised crimes committed in public institutions, including all New Zealand Courts and several government agencies, and New Zealand Law Society, the sole and exclusive regulator of the legal profession of New Zealand.
The fact is totally undisputed by anyone, and the evidence is published for anyone to see.
https://sites.google.com/view/tatsuhiko-koyama/confirmed-false-court-documents-of-new-zealand
https://sites.google.com/view/tatsuhiko-koyama/confirmed-bankruptcy-fraud-in-new-zealand
New Zealand has extremely serious problems in the basic governance of the country.
All New Zealand Courts are used as the means and covers for the organised criminal syndicates to commit all kinds of crimes with impunity in violation of the laws of New Zealand and international treaties for which the state of New Zealand is a signatory.
American Bar Association is aware of this matter as this matter has been referred to the Rule of Law Initiative of the bar association.
New Zealand must not continue to sponsor organised crimes and protect, support, and conceal clandestine, publicly-funded systemic organised crimes, committed in public institutions of New Zealand.
The corruption is very much entrenched and widespread due to the state-sponsorship of clandestine criminal activities.
There is no dispute whatsoever on the fact by anyone; it is about the time for you as the leader of the opposition to put pressure on the prime Minister of New Zealand on this matter.
The prime minister must be asked what she will do on the undisputed fact of clandestine systemic corruption and organised crimes committed in the secrecy of the Court and Government of New Zealand.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
Prime Minister of New Zealand must be asked on the undisputed systemic organised crimes committed in the Court and Government of New Zealand
25 July 2022
Breakfast
TVNZ
Dear Sir/Madam
Thank you very much for continuous attention and interested on the undisputed systemic organised crimes committed in the Court and Government of New Zealand.
The fact is UNDISPUTED, and the evidence is published in the internet for anyone to see.
https://sites.google.com/view/tatsuhiko-koyama/confirmed-false-court-documents-of-new-zealand
https://sites.google.com/view/tatsuhiko-koyama/confirmed-bankruptcy-fraud-in-new-zealand
The Prime Minister of New Zealand must act on this matter immediately, if not already.
It is the time for TVNZ to investigate and report this matter on air so that the people of New Zealand will have their chance to discuss this matter in public.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
The undisputed systemic organised crimes committed in the Court and Government of New Zealand must be investigated and reported by TVNZ
11 July 2022
Mr Jack Tame
Q + A with Jack Tame
TVNZ
cc: Rt Hon Jacinda Ardern, Prime Minister; Hon Chris Hipkins, Police Minister; Hon Kiri Allan, Justice Minister; Hon Dr David Clark, MP for Dunedin; and others
Dear Jack
Thank you for continuous interest on the undisputed systemic organised crimes committed in the Court and Government of New Zealand.
The fact is totally undisputed by anyone, and the evidence on the systemic nature of corruption and organised crimes in public institutions of New Zealand is published in the internet for anyone to see.
https://sites.google.com/view/tatsuhiko-koyama/confirmed-false-court-documents-of-new-zealand
https://sites.google.com/view/tatsuhiko-koyama/confirmed-bankruptcy-fraud-in-new-zealand
Attached, please find four documents of your interest: (1) expert opinion on forgery documents of New Zealand Courts, (2) response from American Bar Association, (3) response of Police Minister, and (4) lastest email to Prime Minister on this matter.
We must accept the fact and objectively verifiable evidence which can clearly establish the commission of systemic organised crimes committed in New Zealand Courts and other public institutions of New Zealand.
The corruption is systemic, entrenched, and everywhere; the evidence is clear, and continuous concealment of this matter only makes things worse.
There is no controversy on this matter, and it is the time for you as a journalist to put this undisputed natter on air, so that people of New Zealand will have their chance to discuss this matter openly in public.
Obviously, if democracy were functioning as it should, the problems that you see on this matter will not happen.
International perspectives on this matter should be considered if you look at this matter.
A UK medical professional wrote, "With the privy council now gone, this [certain systematic organised crime in New Zealand] needs to be exposed by the media of another country. I am a medical doctor, with 3 medical science books published internationally. I am also an authority on Narcissistic Personality Disorder, sociopathy and psychopathy - and the people we are dealing with are extreme examples of this trait. However, the problem in NZ is the apathy, timidity and cognitive dissonance of the people. We have built up conclusive evidence - all in the public domain. Are there any university professors of law who have the integrity to join our fight?"
A US lawyer wrote, "I think the courts are really the most fundamental and important part of government. If you cannot get justice, none of your rights exist," "Life liberty and property cease to exist," "I think the word you're looking for [the criminals using the Courts for systematic organised crimes] is psychopathy," "Group psychopathy," "If you can reform the New Zealand courts with the support of New Zealand people, that will be a miracle."
A US-educated New Zealand lawyer wrote, "I have been following with great interest the numerous communications that you have sent to the PM and other members of the Establishment, without knowing whether you have managed to achieve any satisfactory resolution of the issues you have mentioned. Like you, I too have been battling the very evident pathologies in the New Zealand 'Justice' system, so far without any success to speak of, despite my being active in it for the past 17 years since my enrolment in the High Court."
Needless to say, New Zealand has very serious problems in the governance, and systemic corruption in the Judiciary and other public institutions have left New Zealand without effective means to protect Human Rights and other rights.
New Zealand is basically LEGAL BLACKHOLE.
This serious matter must be investigated and reported by TVNZ, and you should ask the people of New Zealand what they think about this grave situation in New Zealand.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
Australia must put pressure on the UNDISPUTED STATE-SPONSORED ORGANISED CRIMES OF NEW ZEALAND
The Hon Anthony Albanese MP
Prime Minister
Dear Prime Minister
Attached, please find the undisputed evidence of the state-sponsored organised crimes of New Zealand.
Australia must act on this matter and put pressure on Rt Hon Jacinda Ardern, Prime Minister of New Zealand, to act.
Please read some perspectives on this matter.
A UK medical professional wrote, "With the privy council now gone, this [certain systematic organised crime in New Zealand] needs to be exposed by the media of another country. I am a medical doctor, with 3 medical science books published internationally. I am also an authority on Narcissistic Personality Disorder, sociopathy and psychopathy - and the people we are dealing with are extreme examples of this trait. However, the problem in NZ is the apathy, timidity and cognitive dissonance of the people. We have built up conclusive evidence - all in the public domain. Are there any university professors of law who have the integrity to join our fight?"
A US lawyer wrote, "I think the courts are really the most fundamental and important part of government. If you cannot get justice, none of your rights exist," "Life liberty and property cease to exist," "I think the word you're looking for [the criminals using the Courts for systematic organised crimes] is psychopathy," "Group psychopathy," "If you can reform the New Zealand courts with the support of New Zealand people, that will be a miracle."
A US-educated New Zealand lawyer wrote, "I have been following with great interest the numerous communications that you have sent to the PM and other members of the Establishment, without knowing whether you have managed to achieve any satisfactory resolution of the issues you have mentioned. Like you, I too have been battling the very evident pathologies in the New Zealand 'Justice' system, so far without any success to speak of, despite my being active in it for the past 17 years since my enrolment in the High Court."
New Zealand is LEGAL BLACKHOLE, and the corruption is endemic and widespread; all New Zealand Courts are used as the means and covers for committing all kinds of crimes with impunity.
The fact is totally undisputed, and there is no political controversy to intervene.
The international community must unite on intervening the rogue state, committing clandestine organised crimes, using state power for criminal purposes, in the secrecy of the Court and Government, in violation of the international law.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
Australia must put pressure on the UNDISPUTED STATE-SPONSORED ORGANISED CRIMES OF NEW ZEALAND
5 July 2022
Lord Mayor Sally Capp
Mayor of the City of Melborne
Dear Mayor
I understand that Rt Hon Jacinda Ardern, Prime Minister of New Zealand, is visiting the city of Melborne today.
Could you make that the Prime Minister knows that the international community is fully aware of the undisputed state-sponsored organised crimes of New Zealand?
It is my wish that Australia will put pressure on New Zealand to actually deal with the clandestine publicly funded organised crimes committed in public institutions of New Zealand which in violation of the international law, along with the laws of New Zealand, including the Crimes Act 1961.
No one disputes the fact, and there is no political controversy for your involvement on this matter.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
International community MUST ACT on the UNDISPUTED STATE-SPONSORED ORGANISED CRIMES OF NEW ZEALAND
1 July 2022
Rt Hon Jacinda Ardern
Prime Minister of New Zealand
Dear Prime Minister
Objectively verifiable (and scientific) facts must be our guide to the common sense and the rule of law.
You, Prime Minister of New Zealand, must accept that the state of New Zealand is a rogue state, sponsoring organised crimes in violation of the laws of New Zealand and several international treaties for which the state of New Zealand is a signatory.
Rather than consciously ignoring the facts, you must personally witness the atrocity of the clandestine publicly funded organised crimes, committed in public institutions of New Zealand, including ALL NEW ZEALAND COURTS, without any exception.
https://sites.google.com/view/tatsuhiko-koyama/confirmed-false-court-documents-of-new-zealand
https://sites.google.com/view/tatsuhiko-koyama/confirmed-bankruptcy-fraud-in-new-zealand
This matter must be reported to the international community so that there will be proper intervention and oversight provided by the international community, ensuring New Zealand comply with the international law and stop sponsoring organised crimes within the jurisdiction.
It is about for you to act, rather than suppressing or otherwise letting the criminals suppress their organised crimes, committed in the public institutions.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
Should the new Police Minister of New Zealand continue to allow the clandestine publicly funded organised crimes committed in public institutions of New Zealand?
Hon Chris Hipkins
Police Minister of New Zealand
Dear Police Minister
Should the new Police Minister of New Zealand continue to allow the clandestine publicly funded organised crimes committed in public institutions of New Zealand?
The undisputed fact shows that the organised criminal syndicates are using New Zealand Courts and other public institutions to commit all kinds of crimes with impunity in violation of the laws of New Zealand.
The situation is dire in New Zealand, due to the systemic corruption in all public institutions, protected, supported, and concealed by the law enforcement and regulatory agencies of New Zealand Government.
This matter is being reviewed by American Bar Association because New Zealand is clearly in breach of the international law by sponsoring organised crimes within the jurisdiction.
American Bar Association wrote, "Your email has been forwarded to the Rule of Law Initiative, and the appropriate staff person will respond to you shortly. Your patience is appreciated."
Obviously, it is not good enough for Police Minister to simply write, "The information you have raised in your correspondence is believed to be more closely connected with the functions of The New Zealand Police. We have transferred your matter onto Police National Headquarters to consider."
You, as new Police Minister of New Zealand, must see the undisputed evidence for yourself and see what is really going on in the secrecy of New Zealand Courts and other public institutions of New Zealand.
https://sites.google.com/view/tatsuhiko-koyama/confirmed-false-court-documents-of-new-zealand
https://sites.google.com/view/tatsuhiko-koyama/confirmed-bankruptcy-fraud-in-new-zealand
When the fact is undisputed by anyone, it is the time for you to act on this undisputed urgent matter.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
Should the Prime Minister of New Zealand continue to allow the clandestine publicly funded organised crimes committed in public institutions of New Zealand?
7 June 2022
Rt Hon Jacinda Ardern
Prime Minister of New Zealand
cc: Hon Jan Tinetti, Internal Affairs Minister; and others
Dear Prime Minister
Should you continue to allow the clandestine publicly funded organised crimes committed in public institutions of New Zealand?
It is known, and it is accepted by everyone without any dispute, then, you must act on the undisputed fact.
You as the leader of the nation must take leadership on the undisputed fact of state-sponsored organised crimes of New Zealand.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
What would the government-led by the National Party do on the undisputed systemic corruption and organised crimes committed in public institutions of New Zealand
31 May 2022
Christopher Luxon MP
Leader of the opposition
Dear Mr Luxton
What would the government-led by the National Party do on the undisputed systemic corruption and organised crimes committed in public institutions of New Zealand?
The fact is totally undisputed by anyone, and leadership must be called for the grave situation of New Zealand and its state-sponsored organised crimes, committed in the secrecy of the Court and Government.
If the Labour-led government continues to suppress the clandestine publicly funded organised crimes committed in public institutions of New Zealand, are you willing to expose the systemic corruption and deal with the grave deficit in the governance of New Zealand?
If you are not, what will you do?
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
The Prime Minister of New Zealand must act on the undisputed state-sponsored organised crimes of New Zealand
31 May 2022
Rt Hon Jacinda Ardern
Prime Minister of New Zealand
Dear Prime Minister
You, as the leader of the nation, must not wilfully blind yourself to the undisputed fact of systemic corruption and organised crimes, committed in the secrecy of the Court and Government of New Zealand, in violation of the laws of New Zealand and several international treaties for which the state of New Zealand is a signatory.
The evidence of the undisputed systemic organised crimes committed in public institutions of New Zealand is published for anyone who wants to see.
https://sites.google.com/view/tatsuhiko-koyama/confirmed-false-court-documents-of-new-zealand
https://sites.google.com/view/tatsuhiko-koyama/confirmed-bankruptcy-fraud-in-new-zealand
This matter is known to American Bar Association which responded by writing "Your email has been forwarded to the Rule of Law Initiative, and the appropriate staff person will respond to you shortly. Your patience is appreciated."
New Zealand must not allow the veil of jurisdiction to safeguard the clandestine criminal operations in public institutions of New Zealand in violation of the international law.
A US-educated New Zealand lawyer wrote, "I have been following with great interest the numerous communications that you have sent to the PM and other members of the Establishment, without knowing whether you have managed to achieve any satisfactory resolution of the issues you have mentioned. Like you, I too have been battling the very evident pathologies in the New Zealand 'Justice' system, so far without any success to speak of, despite my being active in it for the past 17 years since my enrolment in the High Court."
A US lawyer wrote, "Mr Koyama has become such an expert on court integrity, instead of him knocking on the window from the outside, he should be invited to act in the capacity of an inspector of courts. After seeing years of his work and exceptional diligence and persistence, taking advantage of his skills officially seems the only logical outcome."
You cannot shy away from the undisputed fact of the systemic corruption and organised crimes committed in the secrecy of the Court and Government, especially when no one disputes the fact.
It is the time for you to act and show your leadership on the entrenched and widespread problems of New Zealand.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
The Prime Minister of New Zealand must act on the undisputed state-sponsored organised crimes of New Zealand and stop public disinformation and duplicitous propaganda of New Zealand
20 May 2022
Rt Hon Jacinda Ardern
Prime Minister of New Zealand
Dear Prime Minister
You, as the leader of the nation, have certain responsibility.
You must realise that your messages set tone of the collective voice of Kiwis and strongly influence the official policies of New Zealand.
You must accept that the undisputed fact: New Zealand is committing organised crimes in violation of the law.
The clandestine publicly funded organised crimes in committed in the secrecy of the Court and Government of New Zealand are crimes, using state power and public institutions, in violation of the international law.
You must think that these publicly funded organised crimes, even though they may be completely and thoroughly concealed and hidden, will have long-term consequences.
Normalisation of fabrication of facts by public officials, forgery of public documents, public disinformation by state institutions, political spins and propaganda, indoctrination, are undoubtedly the symptoms of wider problems of New Zealand.
It is ABNORMAL to have ALL COURTS, without any exception, as the means and covers for the organised criminal syndicates to commit all kinds of crimes with impunity, because they are protected, supported, and concealed by the law enforcement and regulatory agencies of New Zealand Government.
You must take time to read some perspectives on New Zealand from those who have personally witnessed this atrocity.
A UK medical professional wrote, "With the privy council now gone, this [certain systematic organised crime in New Zealand] needs to be exposed by the media of another country. I am a medical doctor, with 3 medical science books published internationally. I am also an authority on Narcissistic Personality Disorder, sociopathy and psychopathy - and the people we are dealing with are extreme examples of this trait. However, the problem in NZ is the apathy, timidity and cognitive dissonance of the people. We have built up conclusive evidence - all in the public domain. Are there any university professors of law who have the integrity to join our fight?"
A US lawyer wrote, "I think the courts are really the most fundamental and important part of government. If you cannot get justice, none of your rights exist," "Life liberty and property cease to exist," "I think the word you're looking for [the criminals using the Courts for systematic organised crimes] is psychopathy," "Group psychopathy," "If you can reform the New Zealand courts with the support of New Zealand people, that will be a miracle."
This extremely insidious situation continues because you as a leader of nation continue to look other ways, not facing the fact, and ensure the continuance of the extremely lucrative publicly funded organised crimes, using state power and state institutions for criminal purposes, in violation of the laws of New Zealand and several international treaties for which the state of New Zealand is a signatory.
I hope that graduates of Harvard University will not be exposed to the duplicitous propaganda of New Zealand at the commencement at their start of their careers or whatever they will do after their richly rewarding educational experience at Harvard University.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
Should the commencement at Harvard University be used as a platform of New Zealand propaganda?
17 May 2022
Mr Jack Tame
Q + A with Jack Tame
TVNZ
cc: Rt Hon Jacinda Ardern, Prime Minister of New Zealand; Hon Grant Robertson, Deputy Prime Minister of New Zealand; and others
Dear Jack
Thank you very much for your continuous interest in the matter of the undisputed state-sponsored organised crimes of New Zealand.
I understand that the Prime Minister of New Zealand is invited to speak at the commencement at Harvard University.
Should the commencement at Harvard University be used as a platform of New Zealand propaganda?
The fact is totally undisputed that New Zealand is sponsoring organised crimes in violation of the international law, and New Zealand continues to conceal the of the clandestine publicly funded organised crimes in public institutions committed in New Zealand.
What must be confronted by Harvard University and its students is the fact, undisputed by anyone.
You must put this matter on air so that the people of New Zealand will be able to give their opinion on the use of the commencement speech as a platform of New Zealand propaganda while continuing the clandestine criminal operations in public institutions of New Zealand in violation of the laws of New Zealand.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
Undisputed fact of state-sponsored organised crimes of New Zealand must be considered by student organisations of Harvard University
13 May 2022
Student organisations
Harvard University
cc: Breakfast, Q + A with Jack Time, Seven Sharp, TVNZ
Dear Sir/Madam
I am an enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand.
Attached, please find information on the undisputed state-sponsored organised crimes of New Zealand.
Students of Harvard University must consider whether it is appropriate for Harvard University to invite the Prime Minister of New Zealand which is flagrantly violating the international law to sponsor crimes.
It is totally undisputed by anyone that all New Zealand Courts are used as the instruments of organised crimes, and all sorts of crimes are committed in the secrecy of the Court and Government, due to the protection, support, and concealment provided the law enforcement and regulatory agencies of New Zealand Government.
The systemic organised crimes in public institutions are normalised and entrenched, which means that the publicly funded clandestine criminal operations have been going for many years.
This matter must be acted upon by students of Harvard University, unless President of Harvard University acts on this matter.
Yours sincerely
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
Undisputed fact of state-sponsored organised crimes of New Zealand must be considered by President of Harvard University
10 May 2022
Mr Lawrence Bacow
President
Harvard University
Massachusetts Hall
Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
cc: Professor Cass R. Sunstein, Harvard Law School; Rt Hon Jacinda Ardern, Prime Minister of New Zealand; Hon Grant Robertson, Deputy Prime Minister of New Zealand; Breakfast, Q + A with Jack Time, Seven Sharp, TVNZ
Dear Mr Bacow
I am an enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand.
I write this email so that you will consider the undisputed fact of state-sponsored organised crimes of New Zealand when you invite the Prime Minister of New Zealand to speak at Harvard University.
It is undisputed by anyone that New Zealand is sponsoring organised crimes in public institutions, and publicly funded clandestine criminal operations in public institutions of New Zealand are proven; they are systemic, entrenched, everywhere in New Zealand.
New Zealand is legal blackhole; all New Zealand Courts, without any exception, are used as the means and covers for the organised criminal syndicates to commit all kinds of crimes with impunity, in the secrecy of the Court and Government, because of the protection, support, and concealment provided by the law enforcement and regulatory agencies of New Zealand Government.
Fabrication of public documents, publicly funded public disinformation campaign, extensive surveillance and indoctrination are hallmarks of a repressive totalitarian regime, and this must be acknowledged by the Prime Minister of New Zealand if there is any chance of making progress in New Zealand.
It is my wish that you, President of Harvard University, to take time to read the attached emails and witness the atrocity of the normalisation of systemic organised crimes committed in public institutions of New Zealand, totally and comprehensively concealed by the Government and Media of New Zealand.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
TV ONE should contact Hon Dr David Clark, MP for Dunedin, for not responding on the referral from another MP (former MP Louisa Wall)
8 May 2022
Q+A With Jack Tame
TV ONE
cc: Breakfast, Seven Sharp TV ONE; Hon Dr David Clark MP
Dear Jack
Thank you very much for your continuous interest on the systemic corruption and undisputed systemic organised crimes committed in public institutions of New Zealand.
Now, I am wondering if you could contact Hon Dr David Clark, MP for Dunedin, for not responding to the referral from another member of Parliament (former MP Louisa Wall).
I am sure that there are some reasons for suppressing the systemic corruption and systemic organised crimes, committed in public institutions of New Zealand, and the people of New Zealand must know what are the reasons for concealing the clandestine criminal operations conducted in the secrecy of the Court and Government in New Zealand.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
What must the internal affairs minister do on the undisputed systemic corruption and organised crimes in public institutions of New Zealand?
2 May 2022
Hon Jan Tinetti
Minister of Internal Affairs
cc: Department of internal affairs; and others
Dear Internal Affairs Minister
What must the internal affaris minister do on the undisputed systemic corruption and organised crimes in public institutions of New Zealand?
Should the clandestine criminal operations in the secrecy of the Court and Government of New Zealand be part of the official policy of New Zealand?
Should the state of New Zealand continue to sponsor organised crimes and allow the state power and public institutions to be used for criminal purposes in violation of the laws of New Zealand and international law?
It is about the time for the people of New Zealand to know what is really going on in the secrecy of the Court and Government of New Zealand.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
Contacting Rt Hon Jacinda Ardern, Prime Minister of New Zealand, on the undisputed state-sponsored organised crimes of New Zealand
24 April 2022
Rt Hon Jacinda Ardern
Prime Minister of New Zealand
Dear Prime Minister
New Zealand is sponsoring organised crimes in violation of the laws of New Zealand and several international treaties for which the state of New Zealand is a signatory.
This situation is clearly in violation of the international law.
You must take leadership on this matter, rather than protecting, supporting and concealing the clandestine criminal operations in public institutions, using or otherwise allowing state power and machinery for criminal use.
Absence of your action clearly sends the message of New Zealand's policy of clandestine criminal operations in the secrecy of the Court and Government of New Zealand.
Your prompt action on this matter is urgently needed.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
Contacting Hon Grant Robertson, Deputy Prime Minister of New Zealand on the undisputed state-sponsored organised crimes of New Zealand
19 April 2022
Hon Grant Robertson
Deputy Prime Minister of New Zealand
Dear Deputy Prime Minister
I understand that New Zealand is sponsoring organised crimes in violation of the laws of New Zealand and international law, and this fact has not been disputed by anyone for a long time.
I also understand that Hon Dr David Clark, MP for Dunedin, will contact me on this matter, but he hasn't.
I wonder if you could respond to this matter as a person who acts on behalf of the Prime Minister who is absent from New Zealand.
For your information, staff working for TV ONE are aware of this matter.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
Subject: RE: MP of Parliament of New Zealand is referring the undisputed state-sponsored organised crimes of New Zealand
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 23:09:27 +0000
From: Louisa Wall <Louisa.Wall@parliament.govt.nz>
To: Tatsuhiko Koyama
We’ve received your information. Thank you. David will reply accordingly.
Kia pai to ra.
Louisa
Response from MP of New Zealand Parliament (12 April 2022)
We’ve received your information. Thank you. David will reply accordingly.
Kia pai to ra.
Louisa
MP of Parliament of New Zealand is referring the undisputed state-sponsored organised crimes of New Zealand
12 April 2022
Rt Hon Jacinda Ardern
Prime Minister of New Zealand
Dear Prime Minister
The undisputed state-sponsored organised crimes, committed in the secrecy of the Court and Government, is now being referred by a member of Parliament of New Zealand.
It is a public matter for which the international community is deeply concerned, and this must be a serious concern for the people of New Zealand where the organised criminal syndicates are flagrantly using state power and public institutions for their crimes with impunity, because of the protection, support, and concealment provided by New Zealand Courts, New Zealand Law Society, law enforcement and regulatory agencies of New Zealand Government.
No one disputes this fact: New Zealand is sponsoring organised crimes in violation of the laws of New Zealand and several international treaties for which the state of New Zealand is signatory.
You, Prime Minister of New Zealand, must act on the undisputed state-organised crimes of New Zealand, NOW!
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
The international community must act on the undisputed fact of New Zealand's state-sponsored organised crimes
11 April 2022
To whom it may concern
The fact is undisputed by anyone, and New Zealand is sponsoring organised crimes in violation of the laws of New Zealand and several international treaties for which the state of New Zealand is signatory.
The time is now, and the international community must act on the undisputed fact of New Zealand's state-sponsored organised rimes.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
MP of Parliament of New Zealand is referring the undisputed state-sponsored organised crimes of New Zealand
11 April 2022
Hon Dr David Clark
MP for Dunedin
cc: Louisa Wall MP, List MP based in South Auckland; Breakfast, Seven Sharp, Q+A With Jack Tame, TV ONE
Dear Hon Dr David Clark
I have been referred by Louisa Wall MP on the undisputed state-sponsored organised crimes of New Zealand.
I live in Dunedin electorate, and it is your duty and responsibility to raise the issue of the undisputed clandestine organised crimes committed in the secrecy of the Court and Government of New Zealand in public.
I am sure that if you are willing, TV ONE will finally be able to report this matter on air.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
On 11/04/22 10:17 pm, Louisa Wall wrote:
> My last in day in Parliament is this Thursday Tatsuhiko.
> I suggest you contact Dr Clark as your MP.
> Louisa
New Zealand Media must ask the people of New Zealand what they think of the clandestine criminal operations in public institutions of New Zealand
6 April 2022
Breakfast
TV ONE
cc: Q+A With Jack Tame, TV ONE; Seven Sharp, TV ONE: Rt Hon Jacinda Ardern, Prime Minister of New Zealand; Hon Poto Williams, Minister of Police; Mr Andrew Coster, Police Commissioner, New Zealand Police; Hon Kris Faafoi, Minister of Justice; Ministry of Justice; American Bar Association; and others
Dear Sir/Madam
Thank you very much for your continuous interest on the systemic corruption and organised crimes committed in public institutions of New Zealand.
The fact has not been disputed for a long time, and numerous evidence is published in the internet for anyone to see.
What is holding TV ONE, the state broadcaster, from reporting this undisputed fact of the clandestine criminal operations, committed in the secrecy of the Court and Government of New Zealand?
Should the people of New Zealand know about the undisputed fact of the publicly funded organised crimes committed in public institutions of New Zealand?
Now, the role of New Zealand Media should be question on the state-sponsored organised crimes of New Zealand.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
New Zealand Media must report on the criminal conspiracy of New Zealand Law Society and its involvement in the systemic organised crimes
25 March 2022
Breakfast
TV ONE
cc: Q+A With Jack Tame, TV ONE; Hon Poto Williams, Minister of Police; Mr Andrew Coster, Police Commissioner, New Zealand Police; Hon Kris Faafoi, Minister of Justice; Ministry of Justice; Dunedin High Court; Ms Tiana Epati, President, New Zealand Law Society; American Bar Association; and others
Dear Sir/Madam
Thank you very much for your continuous interest on the systemic corruption and organised crimes committed in public institutions of New Zealand.
In New Zealand, New Zealand Law Society enjoys its statutory monopoly to regulate the legal profession.
A. Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008
Rules of conduct and client care for lawyers
Chapter 2 Rule of law and administration of justice
2 A lawyer is obliged to uphold the rule of law and to facilitate the administration of justice.
2.1 The overriding duty of a lawyer is as an officer of the court.
2.2 A lawyer must not attempt to obstruct, prevent, pervert, or defeat the course of justice.
Proper purpose
2.3 A lawyer must use legal processes only for proper purposes. A lawyer must not use, or knowingly assist in using, the law or legal processes for the purpose of causing unnecessary embarrassment, distress, or inconvenience to another person’s reputation, interests, or occupation.
Assisting in fraud or crime
2.4 A lawyer must not advise a client to engage in conduct that the lawyer knows to be fraudulent or criminal, nor assist any person in an activity that the lawyer knows is fraudulent or criminal. A lawyer must not knowingly assist in the concealment of fraud or crime.
2.4.1 A lawyer may assist a client in seeking to avoid or minimise any penalty or adverse effects that flow from fraud or crime.
Certificates
2.5 A lawyer must not certify the truth of any matter to any person unless he or she believes on reasonable grounds that the matter certified is true after having taken appropriate steps to ensure the accuracy of the certification.
2.6 If a lawyer subsequently discovers that a certificate given by the lawyer was or has become inaccurate or incomplete to a material extent, the lawyer must immediately take reasonable steps to correct the certificate.
Threats
2.7
A lawyer must not threaten, expressly or by implication, to make any accusation against a person or to disclose something about any person for any improper purpose.
Reporting misconduct
2.8 Subject to the obligation on a lawyer to protect privileged communications, a lawyer who has reasonable grounds to suspect that another lawyer may have engaged in misconduct must make a confidential report2 to the Law Society at the earliest opportunity.
2.8.1 This rule applies despite the lawyer’s duty to protect confidential non-privileged information.
2.8.2 If a report by a lawyer to the Law Society may breach the lawyer’s duty to protect confidential non-privileged information, the lawyer should also advise the lawyer’s client of the report.
2.8.3 A report submitted in accordance with rules 2.8 and 2.9 must--
(a) be in written form; and
(b) identify--
(i) the person making the report; and
(ii) the person or persons to whom the report relates; and
(c) specify details of the alleged conduct; and
(d) be supported by any appropriate documentation held by or available to the person making the report.
2.8.4
This rule does not apply to--
(a) a lawyer who has received information in the course of providing confidential advice, guidance, or support to another lawyer, including a member of a panel under a “friend” system, unless disclosure of the information is necessary to—
(i) prevent the anticipated or proposed commission of a crime or fraud; or
(ii) prevent a serious risk to the health or safety of any person; or
(b) a lawyer who is a victim of the suspected misconduct; or
(c) circumstances where a lawyer reasonably believes the disclosure would pose a serious risk to the health (including mental health) or safety of a victim.
2.9 Subject to the obligation on a lawyer to protect privileged communications, a lawyer who has reasonable grounds to suspect that another lawyer may have engaged in unsatisfactory conduct may make a confidential report to the Law Society.
2.9.1 This rule applies despite the lawyer’s duty to protect confidential non-privileged information.
https://www.legislation.govt.nz/regulation/public/2008/0214/latest/whole.html#DLM1437811
B. Criminal conspiracy of New Zealand Law Society and its involvement in the undisputed systemic organised crimes
You must witness the criminal conspiracy of New Zealand Law Society and its involvement in the undisputed systemic organised crimes committed in the secrecy of the Court and Government.
1. Tina Chiles, Executive Assistant - Regulatory, New Zealand Law Society, sent an email, dated 16 October 2014, extorting $37,157.98, using undisputed false, forged documents (her email, dated 16 October 2014, is attached).
2. Mitch Singh, Associate, Glaister Ennor, used the false, forged, document, dated 28 May 2014, using the name of Clifford J for fraud, extorting $12,738.00.
3. Mary Ollivier, General Manager Regulatory, New Zealand Law Society, made a false affidavit in the undisputed bankruptcy fraud committed in the High Court of New Zealand: "Affidavit of Mary Elizabeth Olliver in support of interlocutory application without notice for substituted service on judgement debtor SWORN 9 SEPTEMBER 2015" (this document, dated 9 September 2015, is attached)
This is a false document and was created on 2 October 2015, NOT on 9 September 2015, in her effort to conceal the non-existent hearing in Dunedin High Court on 18 September 2015.
This false affidavit was sent by Brian Sceats, Deputy Registrar, Dunedin High Court, on 2 October 2015 (his emails, dated 2 October 2015, are attached).
There is a false, forged, document, dated 18 September 2015, on this matter: "Judgment of Associate Judge Osborne as to substituted service of bankruptcy notice" with an digital image of the signature of Associate Judge Osborne on the document,
* There is NO practice in the High Court of New Zealand to file a document as the original without actual signature of the person who created the document; it is forgery per se.
4. Mitch Singh, Associate, Glaister Ennor, added several more false, forged documents and increased the extorted amount to $46,310.48.
5. FAKE HEARING IN DUNEDIN HIGH COURT on 3 March 2016
6. Hayley McKee, Senior Associate, Glaister Ennor, sent "Order adjudicating debtor bankrupt dated 3 March 2016," signed and sealed by D. McMillan, Deputy Registrar, New Zealand High Court, extorting $7,003.75.
7. New Zealand Law Society made the claim of $51,326.23, using various false, forged, documents for the organised crimes (the claim, dated 6 April 2016, sent by Rob McDonald, Deputy Assignee, Insolvency and Trustee Service, Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment, is attached).
8. Hamish McNeilly, Dunedin Bureau Chief, Stuff, attended the FAKE HEARING and published FAKE NEWS with false information which was not available to him nor could not be found anywhere in the public (fed false information), on 18 March 2016: “Decade-long legal stoush ends with lawyer declared bankrupt.”
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/77939021/decadelong-legal-stoush-ends-with-lawyer-declared-bankrupt
WHO FED THE FALSE INFORMATION?
* It is highly likely that New Zealand Law Society fed the false information to Hamish McNeilly to spread public disinformation on the bankruptcy fraud committed in the High Court of New Zealand, perhaps being feared that the recording of the FAKE HEARING was published in YouTube.
* New Zealand Police must contact Hamish McNeilly and find out who fed the false information on the FAKE NEWS.
9. There was a concerted effort to remove the incriminating evidence of the FAKE HEARING published in YouTube.
"MINUTE OF DAVIDSON J (following memorandum of counsel for judgment creditor dated 9 March 2016 in relation to alleged recording of hearing by judgment debtor)," dated 12 April 2016, a false, forged document, using the name of Davidson J of Christchurch High Court for fraud, was sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court.
This false, forged document states, "Mr Koyama is given the opportunity to respond to the memorandum of counsel dated 9 March 2016. He should respond given that he is said to be in breach of the Court's order that the hearing not be recorded. His response may be made by memorandum in the first instance, or otherwise as he considers appropriate by way of a proceeding in this Court. If so, it should be filed within 10 working days of this minute i.e. Wednesday 27 April 2016 at 5.00pm..."
* The fact proves itself; the recording of the FAKE HEARING still exists in the public domain.
10. Grant Slevin, Senior Investigating Solicitor, Insolvency and Trustee Service, Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment, in his email, dated 12 December 2016, wrote, "Please find attached by way of filing and service a memorandum of counsel for the Assignee and an affidavit of service. I will file the originals by post today. I would be grateful if you could refer it to Associate Judge Osborne and let me know in due course if my appearance on Thursday 15 December is excused."
Grant Slevin, Solicitor for the Official Assignee, in his memorandum, dated 12 December 2016, wrote, "...counsel submits the hearing scheduled for 15 December should be vacated and a date in January 2017 allocated for a determination on the papers, or if the need arises, a case management conference by way of telephone conference. Counsel requests that his appearance on 15 December 2016 be excused."
11. "JUDGMENT OF ASSOCIATE JUDGE OSBORNE annulling adjudication," dated 13 December 2016, was sent twice by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, unsigned on 13 December 2016, one with a digital image of Associate Judge Osborne on 4 January 2017.
* There is NO practice in the High Court of New Zealand to file a document as the original without actual signature of the person who created the document; it is forgery per se.
12. Grant Slevin, Senior Investigating Solicitor, Insolvency and Trustee Service, Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment, in his email, dated 23 December 2016, wrote, "If what you say is true you have committed an offence under s 433(f) Insolvency Act 2006 by leaving New Zealand without the Assignee’s consent. A person who commits this offence is liable on summary conviction to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 12 months or a fine not exceeding $5,000, or both."
13. Neil Mallon, General Manager Regulatory, New Zealand Law Society, in his letter, dated 26 February 2018, wrote, "your previous complaints against Mr Collins, Mr Singh, Ms McKee and Mr Slevin...the Lawyers Complaints Service is not able to review or reconsider decisions that have been issued by a Standards Committee. Nor is it able to reopen the complaints the decisions related to" (his letter, dated 26 February 2018, is attached).
14. Malcolm Ellis, Deputy Manager, Complaints Service, New Zealand Law Society, in his email, dated 30 June 2020, wrote, "We have noted your advice that the information you have presented in your 3 emails has been referred to the NZ Police. Please let us know when the NZ Police has concluded its investigation and the result of that investigation" (his email, dated 30 June 2020, is attached).
15. Malcolm Ellis, Complaints Service, New Zealand Law Society, in his email, dated 2 December 2020, wrote, "We need to know the outcome of any police investigations" (his email, dated 2 December 2020, is attached).
* Is there any need for New Zealand Law Society to know about the police investigation?
* Is this the evidence of New Zealand Law Society trying to obstruct, prevent, pervert, or defeat the course of justice?
16. Nikki De La Mare, National Complaints Manager, New Zealand Law Society, in her letter, dated 9 July 2021, wrote, "The NZ Law Society has nothing to respond to as we consider the matter is closed. As per our previous advice, we will deal with the Police directly should they contact us for information or evidence" (her letter, dated 9 July 2021, is attached).
17. Nikki De La Mare, National Complaints Manager, New Zealand Law Society, in her letter, dated 10 February 2022, wrote, "The Law Society considers it has addressed your complaints which are closed, and it has addressed your queries. We have informed you we would deal with the Police directly should they contact us. We are not able to require other lawyers to deal with the Police. That is for them to decide" (her letter, dated 10 February 2022, is attached).
C. Total regulatory failure of New Zealand Law Society as the statutory regulator of the legal profession in New Zealand
New Zealand Law Society, the sole and exclusive regulator of the legal profession of New Zealand, represents the total regulatory failure in the legal profession in New Zealand.
This statutory monopoly, tasked to regulate the legal profession in New Zealand, actively commits crimes and protects the clandestine criminal scheme in which the organised criminal syndicates commit all kinds of crimes with impunity in the secrecy of the Court and Government, using state machinery and power for illicit purposes in violation of the laws of New Zealand.
The people of New Zealand must know the criminal conspiracy of New Zealand and its involvement in the systemic organised crimes committed in public institutions of New Zealand.
New Zealand Media must report this matter so that the people of New Zealand will become aware of what New Zealand Law Society is doing and its part in the systemic corruption and organised crimes in New Zealand Judiciary.
As stated in my email, dated 13 March 2022, attached below, "chances are that these undisputed systemic organised crimes will continue to be suppressed by the authorities, regardless of the veracity of the facts, unless the media report this matter, pressuring the government to actually investigate the systemic organised crimes rather than covering them up, ensuring the clandestine criminal operations in public institutions of New Zealand."
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
New Zealand Media must report the collusive nature of the systemic organised crimes committed in New Zealand Courts
24 March 2022
Breakfast
TV ONE
cc: Q+A With Jack Tame, TV ONE; Hon Poto Williams, Minister of Police; Mr Andrew Coster, Police Commissioner, New Zealand Police; Hon Kris Faafoi, Minister of Justice; Ministry of Justice; Wellington High Court; Rt Hon Dame Winkelmann, Chief Justice of New Zealand; Ms Tiana Epati, President, New Zealand Law Society, American Bar Association; and others
Dear Sir/Madam
Thank you very much for your continuous interest on the systemic corruption and organised crimes committed in public institutions of New Zealand.
This email provides you with the clear picture of the collusive nature of the systemic organised crimes committed in Wellington High Court.
This is probably the hallmark of the entrenched, widespread corruption in the judiciary of New Zealand.
The following evidence should be considered with other evidence of the systemic organised crimes committed in the High Court, Court of Appeal, and Supreme Court of New Zealand, explained in the previous emails.
A. Order of the Court (Costs) dated 4/6/2013
“Order of the Court (Costs) dated 4/6/2013" was closed in the letter of Paul Collins, Barrister, Shortland Chambers, dated 2 December 2013.
Paul Collins, in his letter, dated 2 December 2013, stated, "I enclose a sealed duplicate original of the costs order made by the Court on 4 June 2013, which I received in the mail on Friday, 29 November, from the High Court Registry. You will see that costs have been ordered in the sum of $9,210 and disbursements of $1,439.88."
“Order of the Court (Costs) dated 4/6/2013" is another false, forged, document, used by Paul Collins for his criminal purpose of extortion.
FACTS
1. There was NO hearing in Wellington High Court on 4 June 2013, and there was NO application submitted to Wellington High Court on or around 4 June 2013 in this case.
* This FAKE decision came out of nowhere.
2. On 2 December 2013, when Paul Collins wrote his letter, Carolyn Pritchett, Deputy Registrar, High Court, Wellington, wrote, "This email is to remind you that this file is scheduled for a call in the Judges Chambers List on Monday, 9 December 2013 at 10.00 am. Appearances are required for the List" (her email, dated 2 December 2013, is attached).
Paul Collins FAILED to appear in the case management conference (CIV-2013-485-6873) in Wellington High Court on 9 December 2013.
For your information, CIV-2010-486-001493 and CIV-2013-485-6873 dealt the same subject matter, and New Zealand Law Society was sued for Human Rights and Privacy violations; at this point, the fraud in the Court was not yet discovered, which is obviously much more serious in terms of violation of the laws of New Zealand.
3. Jay Fealofani, Civil Caseflow Manager, High Court Wellington, who signed and sealed "Order of the Court (Costs) dated 4/6/2013," did not know who made the decision.
He, in his email, dated 16 January 2014, wrote, "I will need to pull the file out to confirm my previous email as I was just going off the information contained in the order. I'll check the file to confirm and get back to you" (his email, dated 16 January 2014, is attached).
Jay Fealofani NEVER got back on this matter, and the question was NEVER answered.
* Nobody knows who made the decision on 4 June 2013.
4. Greg Thomas, Convenor, Wellington Standards Committee 4, New Zealand Law Society, FALSELY stated, “On 4 June 2013, the New Zealand Law Society, represented by Mr Collins, applied for and was awarded costs…” (the letter of New Zealand Law Society, dated 10 February 2014, is attached).
Jane Penney, Registrar and Court Manager, High Court Wellington, in her email, dated 9 January 2017, wrote, "This is correct. This matter was dealt with on the papers," denying that there was any hearing on 4 June 2013 in Wellington High Court, responding to the question: "I understand that there was NO hearing on 4 June 2013. Does it mean that no one appeared in Wellington High Court on 4 June 2013 to make submissions (application on the costs)?" (her email, dated 9 January 2017, is attached).
5. Carolyn Pritchett, Deputy Registrar, Wellington High Court, in her email, dated 26 September 2014, FALSELY stated, “It might be at the hearing or a Conference date that was when an oral application instead was made on 4 June 2013.”
Jane Penney who already denied any hearing on this matter in her email, dated 9 January 2017, wrote, in her email, dated 3 February 2017, "I am unable to comment on Ms Pritchett's email," "we will not enter into further communication on this matter" (her email, dated 3 February 2017, is attached)
6. There is NO mention on the costs decision, supposedly made on 4 June 2013, in the letter of Wellington High Court, dated 4 October 2013, when the case was accepted for an appeal (the letter of Wellington High Court, dated 4 October 2013, is attached).
These above facts clearly indicate that Paul Collins forged the document, dated 4 June 2013, likely in late November 2013 (he wrote, "I received in the mail on Friday, 29 November, from the High Court Registry"), and asked the registrar to put the date of 4 June 2013 on the document, making sure that this order would not be challenged by the Appellant (Tatsuhiko Koyama) due to the expiry of the appealing period.
The appellant (Tatsuhiko Koyama) was NEVER served with the application for the costs by Paul Collins, representing New Zealand Law Society, nor was he informed of the hearing on this matter which NEVER HAPPENED.
The false, forged, document, dated 4 June 2013, is one of the several false, forged, documents, used later in the bankruptcy fraud in the High Court, resulted in the bank robbery committed by Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment, as explained in my earlier emails, attached below.
B. RESERVED JUDGMENT OF DOBSON J, dated 17 July 2012
"RESERVED JUDGMENT OF DOBSON J," dated 17 July 2012, was sent twice; one without any signature on 17 July 2012 by Sheena Piers, Team Leader (Civil), Ministry of Justice (her email, dated 17 July 2012, is attached), and one with a signature on 3 May 2017 by Official Correspondence, Ministry of Justice (the email of Ministry of Justice, dated 3 May 2017, is attached).
FACTS
(1) Wellington High Court cannot produce a transcript of the hearing on 11 July 2012 in CIV 2010-485-1493 (apparently, there is no recording in the case exists from which to produce a transcrpt).
The document, dated 17 July 2012, does not reflect what went on during the hearing in Wellington High Court on 11 July 2012, and some information contained in the document was not submitted to the Court by any party, clearly indicating that the document is complete fabrication.
(2) Justice Robert Robson signed a letter on 16 August 2012, which was about a month after the date of 17 July 2012 (the date of the document) (his letter, dated 16 August 2012, is attached).
(3) There is stark difference in the signatures between the document, dated 17 July 2012, and the letter of Dobson J, dated 16 August 2012, (comparison of signatures attached).
C. Undisputed systemic organised crimes committed in New Zealand Courts must be investigated by New Zealand Police
New Zealand Police must conduct forensic document examination on the document, dated 17 July 2012, along with other forged documents which were used in the organised crimes.
Crimes Act 1961
66 Parties to offences
(1) Every one is a party to and guilty of an offence who—
(a) actually commits the offence; or
(b) does or omits an act for the purpose of aiding any person to commit the offence; or
(c) abets any person in the commission of the offence; or
(d) incites, counsels, or procures any person to commit the offence.
(2) Where 2 or more persons form a common intention to prosecute any unlawful purpose, and to assist each other therein, each of them is a party to every offence committed by any one of them in the prosecution of the common purpose if the commission of that offence was known to be a probable consequence of the prosecution of the common purpose.
71 Accessory after the fact
(1) An accessory after the fact to an offence is one who, knowing any person to have been a party to the offence, receives, comforts, or assists that person or tampers with or actively suppresses any evidence against him or her, in order to enable him or her to escape after arrest or to avoid arrest or conviction.
116 Conspiring to defeat justice
Every one is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 7 years who conspires to obstruct, prevent, pervert, or defeat the course of justice in New Zealand or the course of justice in an overseas jurisdiction.
256 Forgery
(1) Every one is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 10 years who makes a false document with the intention of using it to obtain any property, privilege, service, pecuniary advantage, benefit, or valuable consideration.
(2) Every one is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 3 years who makes a false document, knowing it to be false, with the intent that it in any way be used or acted upon, whether in New Zealand or elsewhere, as genuine.
(3) Forgery is complete as soon as the document is made with the intent described in subsection (1) or with the knowledge and intent described in subsection (2).
(4) Forgery is complete even though the false document may be incomplete, or may not purport to be such a document as would be binding or sufficient in law, if it is so made and is such as to indicate that it was intended to be acted upon as genuine.
(5) Every person is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 3 years who, without reasonable excuse, sells, transfers, or otherwise makes available any false document knowing it to be false and to have been made with the intention that it be used or acted on (in New Zealand or elsewhere) as genuine.
257 Using forged documents
(1) Every one is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 10 years who, knowing a document to be forged,--
(a) uses the document to obtain any property, privilege, service, pecuniary advantage, benefit, or valuable consideration; or
(b) uses, deals with, or acts upon the document as if it were genuine; or
(c) causes any other person to use, deal with, or act upon it as if it were genuine.
(2) For the purposes of this section, a document made or altered outside New Zealand in a manner that would have amounted to forgery if the making or alteration had been done in New Zealand is to be regarded as a forged document.
https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1961/0043/latest/whole.html#DLM327382
D. Conclusion
These organised crimes committed in Wellington High Court are just another examples of the systemic nature of corruption in the judiciary of New Zealand which provides all New Zealand Courts, without any exception, for the organised crime syndicates to commit all kinds of crimes with impunity.
The clandestine criminal operations in the secrecy of the Court and Government exist because of the protection, support, and concealment provided by judges, court registrars, New Zealand Law Society, the sole and exclusive regulator of the legal profession in New Zealand, public officials, police officers, and others.
A UK medical practitioner wrote, "With the privy council now gone, this [certain systematic organised crime in New Zealand] needs to be exposed by the media of another country. I am a medical doctor, with 3 medical science books published internationally. I am also an authority on Narcissistic Personality Disorder, sociopathy and psychopathy - and the people we are dealing with are extreme examples of this trait. However, the problem in NZ is the apathy, timidity and cognitive dissonance of the people. We have built up conclusive evidence - all in the public domain. Are there any university professors of law who have the integrity to join our fight?"
New Zealand Media must report this matter so that the people of New Zealand will be informed on the systemic corruption in public institutions of New Zealand.
As stated in my email, dated 13 March 2022, attached below, "chances are that these undisputed systemic organised crimes will continue to be suppressed by the authorities, regardless of the veracity of the facts, unless the media report this matter, pressuring the government to actually investigate the systemic organised crimes rather than covering them up, ensuring the clandestine criminal operations in public institutions of New Zealand."
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
New Zealand Media must report the systemic organised crimes committed in the Court of Appeal of New Zealand
23 March 2022
Breakfast
TV ONE
cc: Q+A With Jack Tame, TV ONE; Hon Poto Williams, Minister of Police; Mr Andrew Coster, Police Commissioner, New Zealand Police; Hon Kris Faafoi, Minister of Justice; Ministry of Justice; Court of Appeal; Hon David Parker, Attorney-General; Crown Law; and others
Dear Sir/Madam
Thank you very much for your continuous interest on the systemic corruption and organised crimes committed in public institutions of New Zealand.
You have witnessed the fraud in the High Court (Wellington, Christchurch, Dunedin), and Supreme Court of New Zealand.
Now, you must witness the organised crimes committed in the Court of Appeal of New Zealand.
Two sets of fraud were committed in the Court of Appeal in two separate legal proceedings on two different legal matters.
A. "Judgment of the Court Dated: 8 November 2013"
"Judgment of the Court Dated: 8 November 2013" was closed in the letter of Paul Collins, Barrister, Shortland Chambers, dated 12 November 2013.
This document falsely states, "At 3:00pm on 17 April 2013, the Court of Appeal of New Zealand…delivered a judgment… The Court of Appeal determined:…The applicant must pay the respondent costs for a standard application on a band A basis and disbursements. With reference to Order C, the Court of Appeal orders the applicant to pay costs to the respondent in the sum of $3,383.00 and disbursements in the sum of $635.10…"
The following facts clearly establish this is a false statement.
(1) Paul Collins submitted four documents on the costs application, which was LATER than 17 April 2013, increasing the costs from $2,386.90 to $4,018.10 (these documents are attached).
a. Document, dated 24 April 2013: $2,386.90 ($1,782.00 + $604.90)
b. Document, dated 26 April 2013: $2,848.90 ($2,244.00 + $604.90)
c. Document, dated 22 May 2013: $2,879.10 ($2,244.00 + $635.10)
d. Document, dated 6 November 2013: $4,018.10 ($3,383.00 + $635.10)
(2) Clare O’Brien, Registrar, Court of Appeal, in her email, dated 8 November 2013, wrote, "the Orders were sealed and returned to Mr Collins on the day they were received in this office" (her email, dated 8 November 2013, is attached).
The fact, undisputed by anyone, is that the Court of Appeal (O’Regan P, Wild and White JJ) did not make the seal order, dated 8 November 2013, at 3:00 pm on 17 April 2013, as stated in the document, dated 8 November 2013.
The false, forged, document, dated 8 November 2013, is one of the several false, forged, documents, used later in the bankruptcy fraud in the High Court, resulted in the bank robbery committed by Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment, as explained in my earlier emails, attached below.
B. "MINUTE OF WHITE J," dated 16 June 2015
DLA Piper (Grant Macdonald, Misha Henaghan, Sacha Thom), represending Southern Response, committed the fraud in the Court, following the undisputed insurance fraud committed by Southern Response (see the emails attached below).
"Minute of White J," dated 16 June 2015, was sent by Justine Bird, Court Registry Officer, Court of Appeal on 16 June 2015, attached.
The follow facts clearly indicate the document, dated 16 June 2015, is a false, forged, document.
(1) Grant Macdonald, in his email, dated 20 May 2015, wrote, "We confirm that we were not served with your application to dispense with security. Your application was forwarded to us by the Registrar, who asked us to provide any comments to her" (his email, dated 20 May 2015, is attached).
(2) The Court of Appeal did not have the jurisdiction to hear the case as the appellant was not in New Zealand on 16 July 2015.
(3) Jan A Flood, Registrar, University of Otago, in her email, dated 7 August 2015, wrote, "...Clare O'Brien, Court Manager/Registrar of the Court of Appeal. Her communication regarding the appropriateness of the Library allowing you to see the documents involved was: 'No you can't. No judgment or any documents get issued for public release with judge's signatures on them" (her email, dated 7 August 2015, is attached).
(4) The signature of the document, dated 16 June 2015, is significantly different from the signature of Douglas White QC in his letter, dated 29 July 2009 (the link to his letter, dated 29 July 2009, is below).
"Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Income Sharing with Patent Attorneys) Regulations," dated 29 July 2009, Douglas White QC
Please see the comparision of the signatures, attached.
New Zealand Police must conduct forensic document examination on the document, dated 16 June 2015.
How easy is it for New Zealand Police to contact Mr Douglas White and inquire about the forgery committed in the Court of Appeal in which his name was used for fraud?
Grant Macdonald later sent “Judgment for sealing,” dated 6 November 2015, signed and sealed by Justice Bird, Deputy Registar, Court of Appeal,
enclosed in his letter, dated 17 November 2015, attached, using the names of Ellen France P, Wild and Cooper JJ of the Court of Appeal for extortion.
For your information, Southern Response, along with New Zealand Law Society and Crown Law Office, participated in the bankruptucy fraud and bank robbery while committing insurance fraud, as explained in my previous emails attached below.
C. Conclusion
A US-educated New Zealand lawyer wrote, "I have been following with great interest the numerous communications that you have sent to the PM and other members of the Establishment, without knowing whether you have managed to achieve any satisfactory resolution of the issues you have mentioned. Like you, I too have been battling the very evident pathologies in the New Zealand 'Justice' system, so far without any success to speak of, despite my being active in it for the past 17 years since my enrolment in the High Court."
The Court of Appeal of New Zealand is just another instrument for the organised criminal syndicates to commit all kinds of crimes with impunity.
The multiple layers in the justice system and multiple judges in judicial proceedings have NO impact whatsoever on the systemic corruption in New Zealand Judiciary which provides ALL New Zealand Courts, without any exception, as the means and covers for the organised criminal syndicates to commit all kinds of crimes with impunity.
The insidious situation is created and maintained by the law enforcement and regulatory agencies of New Zealand Government which provide protection, support, and concealment for the organised criminal sydicates which are using state power and machinery to commit crimes in violation of the laws of New Zealand.
The people of New Zealand must be informed of the clandestine organised crimes committed in public institutions of New Zealand.
As stated in my email, dated 13 March 2022, attached below, "chances are that these undisputed systemic organised crimes will continue to be suppressed by the authorities, regardless of the veracity of the facts, unless the media report this matter, pressuring the government to actually investigate the systemic organised crimes rather than covering them up, ensuring the clandestine criminal operations in public institutions of New Zealand."
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
New Zealand Media must report the systemic organised crimes committed in the Supreme Court of New Zealand
22 March 2022
Breakfast
TV ONE
cc: Q+A With Jack Tame, TV ONE; Hon Poto Williams, Minister of Police; Mr Andrew Coster, Police Commissioner, New Zealand Police; Hon Kris Faafoi, Minister of Justice; Ministry of Justice; Rt Hon Dame Helen Winkelmann, Chief Justice of New Zealand; Supreme Court of New Zealand; Hon David Parker, Attorney-General; Crown Law; Transparency International, and others
Dear Sir/Madam
Thank you very much for your continuous interest on the systemic corruption and organised crimes committed in the secrecy of the Court and Government of New Zealand.
You have witnessed the systemic organised crimes committed in the High Court of New Zealand, including Wellington, Christchurch, and Dunedin High Court (please see the emails attached below).
All New Zealand Courts are being used as the instruments for the organised criminal syndicates to commit all kinds of crimes with impunity in violation of the laws of New Zealand.
Unfortunately, the Supreme Court of New Zealand, the highest court in New Zealand, is just another such instrument for the organised criminal syndicates to commit organised crimes in New Zealand, leaving New Zealand as the biggest LEGAL BLACKHOLE in the Pacific.
As in the undisputed fraud in Wellington High Court in the cases of CIV-2013-485-006873 and CIV-2014-485-002343 (please see the emails attached below), there was NO hearing in the Supreme Court of New Zealand in the case of SC 83/2014.
As in the Wellington High Court fraud, there are several false, forged, documents, issued by the Supreme Court of New Zealand.
A. "Judgment of the Court Dated: 20 October 2014"
"Judgment of the Court Dated: 20 October 2014" was enclosed in the letter of Paul Collins, Barrister, Shortland Chambers, dated dated 28 October 2014, extorting $2,550, attached.
This is a false, forged document, along with other false, forged documents, used later in the bankruptcy fraud in the High Court of New Zealand, resulted in the bank robbery, by Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment, as explained in my earlier emails, attached below.
For your information, on 20 October 2014, Ani Chan, Case Officer, Supreme Court, wrote, "The Court has received both your application for recall (dated 12 October 2014) and your application for leave to appeal (dated 15 October 2014)" (a copy of this letter is attached).
B. "JUDGMENT OF THE COURT," dated 10 October 2014
This is a false, forged document of the Supreme Court of New Zealand, sent by Gordon Thatcher, Registrar, Supreme Court, on 13 October 2014.
For your information, I received "Notice of result of application for leave to appeal," dated and sealed by Gordon Thatcher, Registrar of the Supreme Court of New Zealand, on 10 October 2014, attached.
C. Forgery confirmed by the expert
The signature of Arnold J in the document, dated 10 October 2014, was examined by a handwritten expert.
Mr Andrew Straw, a US lawyer and public notary, was provided with four documents with the signatures of Mr Terence Arnold, Solicitor-General and Chief Executive, Crown Law Office, dated 30 June 2004, 30 May 2005, and 30 June 2007, attached.
In "Analysis of signatures for detection of forgery," dated 6 May 2016, attached, he wrote, "...the letter A in Arnold is more angular and narrow in the true signatures than the one above. There appears to be no letter r in the first name in signature above, while the r in the true signatures is quite pronounced and consistent even over the course of 3 years. I believe there is a strong chance that a different person wrote the above signature, given the many differences."
D. Forensic document examination
New Zealand Police on its website, states, "The Document Examination Section is based in Wellington. It provides forensic investigation of documents associated with crime and other matters, for police and private clients. This includes using a range of scientific techniques to determine the authenticity and/or origin of documents and examining hand writing and signatures to determine authorship."
https://www.police.govt.nz/about-us/structure/teams-units/forensics
For your information, the signature of Sir Terence Arnold is also found in "Report of the Government Inquiry into Operation Burnham and related matters," published in July 2020.
The forged document, dated 10 October 2014, must be examined by the document examination section of New Zealand Police.
How easy is it for New Zealand Police simply to contact Sir Terence Arnold and inquire about the forgery committed in the Supreme Court of New Zealand in which his name was used in the fraud?
E. Conclusion
The patterns of the criminality is very similar in all New Zealand Courts (please see the attached emails on the systemic organised crimes committed in New Zealand Courts).
All New Zealand Courts, without any exception, are used as the means and covers for the organised criminal syndicates to commit all kinds of crimes with impunity in the secrecy of the Court and Government.
These clandestine organised crimes are publicly funded criminal operations in public institutions of New Zealand, protected, supported, and concealed by the law enforcement and regulatory agencies of New Zealand Government.
Normalisation of the systemic organised crimes in public institutions must be investigated by competent authorities with responsible oversight.
The people of New Zealand must be informed about this matter and provided with an opportunity to discuss about this matter openly in public.
As stated in my email, dated 13 March 2022, attached below, "chances are that these undisputed systemic organised crimes will continue to be suppressed by the authorities, regardless of the veracity of the facts, unless the media report this matter, pressuring the government to actually investigate the systemic organised crimes rather than covering them up, ensuring the clandestine criminal operations in public institutions of New Zealand."
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
New Zealand Media must report the collusive and interconnecting nature of the systemic organised crimes of New Zealand
20 March 2022
Q+A With Jack Tame
TV ONE
cc: Breakfast, TV ONE; Hon Poto Williams, Police Minister; Mr Andrew Coster, Police Commissioner, New Zealand Police; Hon Kris Faafoi, Minister of Justice, Minister of Broadcasting & Media; Ministry of Justice; Hon David Parker, Attorney-General; Crown Law; and others
Dear Jack
Thank you for your continuing interest on the systemic corruption in public institutions of New Zealand.
The corruption in New Zealand is collusive and interconnecting, and this may be the reason why the systemic corruption and organised crimes in public institutions are very much entrenched and widespread in New Zealand.
As explained in my previous email to Breakfast, TV ONE, dated 18 March 2022, attached below, there are FAKE transcripts in the cases of CIV-2013-485-006873 and CIV-2014-485-002343, and there were NO hearings in Wellington High Court in these cases on 16 April 2014 and 20 August 2014.
Now, you have to witness the collusive and interconnecting nature of the organised crimes in New Zealand.
A. "Judgment Dated: 28 May 2014"
"Judgment Dated: 28 May 2014" was enclosed in the letter of Paul Collins, Barrister, Shortland Chambers, dated dated 9 June 2014, attached.
FACTS
(1) There was NO hearing in Wellington High Court on 16 April 2014 in the case of CIV-2013-485-006873.
(2) On 3 June 2014, Paul Collins emailed to Michaela Stack, Deputy Registrar, Wellington High Court, on 3 June 2014, four documents [letter, dated 3 June 2014; memorandum, dated 3 June 2014; "Judgment Dated: June 2014"; "Order of the Court (costs) Dated: June 2014"] (the email of Paul Collins, dated 3 June 2014, is attached).
(3) The date of submission of the four documents is 3 June 2014 which was later than 28 May 2014, the date when Anna Smith, Deputy Registrar, the High Court of New Zealand, supposedly signed and sealed.
(4) "Judgment Dated: 28 May 2014" falsely states, "This proceeding was heard on 16 April 2014 at Wellington before the Honourable Justice Clifford, who, having heard from Paul Collins...gives judgement..."
B. "Judgment dated 14 October 2014"
"Judgment dated dated 14 October 2014" was enclosed in the letter of Paul Collins, dated dated 21 November 2014, attached.
FACTS
(1) There was NO hearing in Wellington High Court on 20 August 2014 in the case of the case of CIV-2014-485-002343.
(2) The High Court of New Zealand did not have the jurisdiction to hear the case on 20 August 2014, since the Supreme Court of New Zealand had the jurisdiction on the case since 15 August 2014 (the letter of the Supreme Court, dated 15 August 2014, is attached).
(3) The draft of "Judgment dated November 2014" was apparently received by Wellington High Court on 19 November 2014 which was later than 14 October 2014, the date when Anna Smith, Deputy Registrar, the High Court of New Zealand, supposedly signed and sealed.
(4) Helen Carrad, Crown Counsel, Crown Law, in her letter, dated 24 December 2014, attached, falsely states, "Following the judgment of Justice Collins [dated 14 October 2014, NOT 20 August 2014], counsel for the NZLS and counsel for the Attorney-General filed costs schedules in the High Court which set out the costs incurred by each party..."; there was NO submissions by the parties on the costs and Wellington High Court cannot produce copies of the costs submissions by the parties in the case.
(5) "Judgment dated 14 October 2014" falsely states, "This proceeding was heard on 20 August 2014 at Wellington before the Honourable Justice Collins, who, having heard from Paul Collins, counsel for the first respondent, and Helen Carrad, counsel for the second respondent, gives judgment that...The first respondent is entitled to scale 2B costs in the sum of $7,064.50 and disbursement of $50, set out in Schedule 1; The second respondent is entitled to scale 2B costs in the sum of $1,840.75, set out in Schedule 2."
RELEVANT NEW ZEALAND LAW
Crimes Act 1961
66 Parties to offences
(1) Every one is a party to and guilty of an offence who--
(a) actually commits the offence; or
(b) does or omits an act for the purpose of aiding any person to commit the offence; or
(c) abets any person in the commission of the offence; or
(d) incites, counsels, or procures any person to commit the offence.
(2) Where 2 or more persons form a common intention to prosecute any unlawful purpose, and to assist each other therein, each of them is a party to every offence committed by any one of them in the prosecution of the common purpose if the commission of that offence was known to be a probable consequence of the prosecution of the common purpose.
https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1961/0043/latest/DLM328506.html
C. Collusive and interconnecting nature of the systemic organised crimes of New Zealand
Just for this example, the organised crimes were committed by several parties, including several lawyers of New Zealand, New Zealand Law Society, Crown Law, Wellington High Court, and Supreme Court of New Zealand.
Corruption in New Zealand is systemic, entrenched, and widespread, and its nature is collusive, interconnecting, and very corrosive.
A US lawyer wrote, "I think the courts are really the most fundamental and important part of government. If you cannot get justice, none of your rights exist," "Life liberty and property cease to exist," "I think the word you're looking for [the criminals using the Courts for systematic organised crimes] is psychopathy," "Group psychopathy," "If you can reform the New Zealand courts with the support of New Zealand people, that will be a miracle."
New Zealand Media must report this matter so that the people of New Zealand will be informed about the serious problems in the public administration of New Zealand.
As stated in my email, dated 13 March 2022, attached below, "chances are that these undisputed systemic organised crimes will continue to be suppressed by the authorities, regardless of the veracity of the facts, unless the media report this matter, pressuring the government to actually investigate the systemic organised crimes rather than covering them up, ensuring the clandestine criminal operations in public institutions of New Zealand."
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
New Zealand Media must report the undisputed systemic corruption and organised crimes committed in public institutions of New Zealand
18 March 2022
Breakfast
TV ONE
cc: Q+A With Jack Tame, TV ONE; Hon Poto Williams, Minister of Police; Mr Andrew Coster, Police Commissioner, New Zealand Police; Hon Kris Faafoi, Minister of Justice, Ministry of Justice; Wellington High Court; and others
Dear Sir/Madam
Thank you very much for your continuous interest on the systemic corruption and organised crimes committed in public institutions of New Zealand.
Attached, please find the undisputed evidence of systemic corruption and organised crimes committed in Wellington High Court.
A. FAKE TRANSCRIPTS
These FAKE transcripts, attached, were issued by Michaela Stack, Deputy Registrar, Wellington High Court, on 8 September 2014.
These false documents were created and used for some criminal purposes, and the names of Justices Clifford and Collins of the High Court of New Zealand were used for fictitious (non-existent, sham) hearings in Wellington High Court as part of the systemic organised crimes committed in the Court.
A transcript must be made by someone transcribing a recording of something, and for a transcript to exist, there must be the applicable recording from which to transcribe.
These fake transcripts have NO applicable recordings; they are FAKE, beyond any reasonable doubt.
1. You must contact Wellington High Court and Ministry of Justice to ask about the cases of (a) CIV-2013-485-006873 and (b) CIV-2014-485-002343, and ask them why these FAKE transcripts exist even though there was NO hearing in the cases in Wellington High Court.
2. You must also contact Justices Clifford and Collins and ask them about the fraud in which their names were used.
B. EXTORTION LETTERS WITH FALSE, FORGED DOCUMENTS
This fraud was followed by extortion by Paul Collins, Barrister, Shortland Chambers, representing New Zealand Law Society.
Attached, please also find the letters of Paul Collins, dated 9 June 2014, extorting $11,990.00 using a false, forged document, and 21 November 2014, extorting $8,955.25, using another false, forged document.
The false, forged, document, dated 28 May 2014, enclosed in the letter of Paul Collins, dated 9 June 2014, attached, falsely states, "This proceeding was heard on 16 April 2014 at Wellington before the Honourable Justice Clifford, who, having heard from Paul Collins...gives judgement..."
The other false, forged, document, dated 14 October 2014, enclosed in the letter of Paul Collins, dated 21 November 2014, attached, falsely states, "This proceeding was heard on 20 August 2014 at Wellington before the Honourable Justice Collins, who, having heard from Paul Collins, counsel for the first respondent, and Helen Carrad, counsel for the second respondent, gives judgment that...The first respondent is entitled to scale 2B costs in the sum of $7,064.50 and disbursement of $50, set out in Schedule 1; The second respondent is entitled to scale 2B costs in the sum of $1,840.75, set out in Schedule 2."
These are some of the several false, forged documents, used later in the bankruptcy fraud in the High Court of New Zealand, resulted in the bank robbery, by Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment, as explained in my earlier emails, attached below.
C. SYSTEMIC CORRUPTION AND ORGANISED CRIMES COMMITTED IN PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS OF NEW ZEALAND
The undisputed fact clearly shows that the systemic corruption and organised crimes committed in the secrecy of the Court and Government are very much entrenched and widespread in New Zealand.
The organised criminal syndicates are flagrantly committing all kinds of crimes with impunity, in violation of the laws of New Zealand and international law, knowing that their crimes will never investigated by the law enforcement and regulatory agencies of New Zealand.
The systemic corruption and organised crimes committed in the secrecy of the Court and Government exist, entrenched and widespread, because no media nor journalist investigates and reports this matter, denying the chance for the people of New Zealand discuss about this matter openly in public.
New Zealand Media must investigate and report the undisputed systemic corruption and organised crimes committed in public institutions of New Zealand, alerting the people of New Zealand and international community on this matter.
As stated in my email, dated 13 March 2022, attached below, "chances are that these undisputed systemic organised crimes will continue to be suppressed by the authorities, regardless of the veracity of the facts, unless the media report this matter, pressuring the government to actually investigate the systemic organised crimes rather than covering them up, ensuring the clandestine criminal operations in public institutions of New Zealand."
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
New Zealand Media Council complicit in the systemic organised crimes committed in public institutions of New Zealand
15 March 2022
Breakfast
TV ONE
cc: Q+A With Jack Tame, TV ONE; Hon Poto Williams, Minister of Police; Mr Andrew Coster, Police Commissioner, New Zealand Police; Hon Kris Faafoi, Minister of Justice, Minister of Broadcasting & Media; New Zealand Media Council; and others
Dear Sir/Madam
Thank you very much for your continuous interest on the undisputed systemic organised crimes committed in public institutions of New Zealand.
This email follows my email, dated 13 March 2022, attached below, "FAKE NEWS by New Zealand Media on the undisputed FAKE HEARING in the High Court of New Zealand."
The undisputed facts are (1) Stuff published the FAKE NEWS on 18 March 2016 on the undisputed FAKE HEARING in the High Court of New Zealand on 3 March 2016, and (2) New Zealand Media Council covered it up.
For your information, last year I received two emails, dated 9 June 2021, from New Zealand Media Council on this matter, attached.
The evidence clearly shows that New Zealand Media Council has been complicit in the undisputed systemic organised crimes, and this must be something that New Zealand Media need to report.
As stated in my email, dated 13 March 2022, attached below, "chances are that these undisputed systemic organised crimes will continue to be suppressed by the authorities, regardless of the veracity of the facts, unless the media report this matter, pressuring the government to actually investigate the systemic organised crimes rather than covering them up, ensuring the clandestine criminal operations in public institutions of New Zealand."
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
FAKE NEWS by New Zealand Media on the undisputed FAKE HEARING in the High Court of New Zealand
13 March 2022
Q+A With Jack Tame
TV ONE
cc: Breakfast, TV ONE; Stuff; New Zealand Media Council; Hon Poto Williams, Police Minister; Mr Andrew Coster, Police Commissioner, New Zealand Police; Hon Kris Faafoi, Minister of Justice, Minister of Broadcasting & Media
Dear Jack
I received an email, dated 8 March 2022, from Office of Hon Poto Williams, informing me that the information on the systemic organised crimes committed in public institutions of New Zealand was referred to Police National Headquarters, which was in response to my email to you, dated 6 March 2022, attached.
But, chances are that these undisputed systemic organised crimes will continue to be suppressed by the authorities, regardless of the veracity of the facts, unless the media report this matter, pressuring the government to actually investigate the systemic organised crimes rather than covering them up, ensuring the clandestine criminal operations in public institutions of New Zealand.
As stated in my email, dated 7 March 2022, attached below, the clear pattern of criminality of systemic organised crimes exist in New Zealand where all New Zealand Courts, including the Supreme Court of New Zealand, are used as the means and covers for the organised criminal syndicates to commit all kinds of crimes with impunity, protected, supported, and concealed by the law enforcement and regulatory agencies of New Zealand Government, in violation of the laws of New Zealand and international law.
https://sites.google.com/view/tatsuhiko-koyama/confirmed-false-court-documents-of-new-zealand
FAKE NEWS BY NEW ZEALAND MEDIA
Now, as explained in my email, dated 7 March 2022, attached below, the FAKE HEARING took place in the High Court of New Zealand on 3 March 2016.
You must listen to the FAKE HEARING in the High Court of New Zealand in which someone impersonated Associate Judge John Matthews.
Several police officers have been informed on this matter, but nothing has been done, except they covered it up, allowing the organised criminal syndicates to continue committing crimes in the secrecy of the Court and Government, resulting in the bank robbery, aided and abetted by Insolvency and Trustee Service of Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment while Southern Response and EQC committing insurance fraud.
Hamish McNeilly, Dunedin Bureau Chief, Stuff, attended the FAKE HEARING and published FAKE NEWS with false information which was not available to him nor could not be found anywhere in the public (fed false information), on 18 March 2016: “Decade-long legal stoush ends with lawyer declared bankrupt” (the evidence of this FAKE NEWS is attached to this email).
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/77939021/decadelong-legal-stoush-ends-with-lawyer-declared-bankrupt
The complaint on the FAKE NEWS, published by Hamish McNeilly, was not investigated by Press Council (New Zealand Media Council); Mary Major, Executive Director, Press Council, covered it up (please see the email of Mary Major, dated 8 Mary 2017, attached).
Will Hamish McNeilly and Mary Major be contacted by New Zealand Police as part of the criminal investigation?
RELEVANT NEW ZEALAND LAW
Crimes Act 1961
71 Accessory after the fact
(1) An accessory after the fact to an offence is one who, knowing any person to have been a party to the offence, receives, comforts, or assists that person or tampers with or actively suppresses any evidence against him or her, in order to enable him or her to escape after arrest or to avoid arrest or conviction.
https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1961/0043/latest/DLM328515.html
NEW ZEALAND PUBLIC MUST BE INFORMED ON THE UNDISPUTED SYSTEMIC CORRUPTION AND ORGANISED CRIMES
The facts have not been undisputed by anyone for a long time, but the systemic organised crimes committed in the secrecy of the Court and Government have been covered up by the law enforcement and regulatory agencies of New Zealand Government.
Should the systemic organised crimes committed in the secrecy of the Court and Government continue to be normalised as part of the governance of New Zealand?
The media in New Zealand must report this matter so that the people of New Zealand will have a chance to debate on this very important matter of the governance of New Zealand openly in public.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
Prime Minister must fight against the undisputed systemic corruption and organised crimes committed in public institutions of New Zealand
11 March 2022
Rt Hon Jacinda Ardern
Prime Minister of New Zealand
cc: Breakfast, Q+A With Jack Tame, TV ONE; Hon Kris Faafoi, Minister of Justice, Minister of Broadcasting & Media; Transparency International; Mr Christopher Luxon MP, Leader of the opposition
Dear Prime Minister
New Zealand has very serious problems in the governance.
The problems must have existed for a very long time.
New Zealand has twin problems of significance: (1) national courts are non-existent or unable to function, and (2) national authorities have been unwilling or unable to carry out a genuine investigation.
Compounding the problems, no journalist nor media will investigate nor report this matter, making sure the viability of systemic organised crimes committed in the secrecy of the Court and Government.
This matter is not unnoticed by organisations and people overseas.
On 30 October 2021, I received an email from American Bar Association, stating, "Your email [International oversight must be placed on New Zealand Judiciary on the proven systemic corruption in all New Zealand Courts] has been forward to the Rule of Law Initiative, and the appropriate staff person will respond to you shortly," attached.
A UK medical practitioner wrote, "With the privy council now gone, this [certain systematic organised crime in New Zealand] needs to be exposed by the media of another country. I am a medical doctor, with 3 medical science books published internationally. I am also an authority on Narcissistic Personality Disorder, sociopathy and psychopathy - and the people we are dealing with are extreme examples of this trait. However, the problem in NZ is the apathy, timidity and cognitive dissonance of the people. We have built up conclusive evidence - all in the public domain. Are there any university professors of law who have the integrity to join our fight?"
A US-educated New Zealand lawyer wrote, "I have been following with great interest the numerous communications that you have sent to the PM and other members of the Establishment, without knowing whether you have managed to achieve any satisfactory resolution of the issues you have mentioned. Like you, I too have been battling the very evident pathologies in the New Zealand 'Justice' system, so far without any success to speak of, despite my being active in it for the past 17 years since my enrolment in the High Court."
Criminals in New Zealand have created and are maintaining collusive and interconnected networks in which they work in tandem to commit all kinds of crimes with impunity, knowing that their crimes are protected, supported, and concealed by law enforcement and regulatory agencies of New Zealand Government.
The clandestine criminal operations in public institutions of New Zealand are made viable by multiple factors in and out of public institutions.
Particular to New Zealand, two monopoly organisations exist to protect the clandestine organised crimes committed in public institutions of New Zealand.
(1) New Zealand Law Society, the exclusive regulator of the legal profession in New Zealand, exists to commit organised crimes by itself and protect criminals who use New Zealand Courts as the means and covers for the clandestine criminal operations in the secrecy of the Court and Government.
(2) New Zealand Media Council, the exclusive regulator of the media in New Zealand, exists to protect journalists who publish fake news and legitimatise public disinformation disseminated by New Zealand Courts and other public institutions of New Zealand.
The national culture is nurtured by the combination of public disinformation, indoctrination, and state-propaganda, and, cloaked within this culture, the insidious culture of impunity exists, pervading the mind of judges, lawyers, public officials, police officers, journalists, and others who no longer see anything wrong with what is normalised in New Zealand.
This matter requires your leadership as Prime Minister of New Zealand.
When the fact of the systemic corruption and organised crimes in public institutions of New Zealand is undisputed by anyone, it is not your option not to do anything.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
TV ONE must report the systemic organised crimes committed in the secrecy of the Court and Government of New Zealand
9 March 2022
Breakfast
TV ONE
cc: Q+A With Jack Tame, TV ONE; Transparency International
Dear Sir/Madam
Thank you very much for your continuous interest on the undisputed systemic corruption and organised crimes, committed in public institutions of New Zealand.
Attached, please find copies of the emails from Hon Poto Williams as Minister responsible for Serious Fraud Office and Police Minister, dated 19 October 2021 and 8 March 2022.
The fact of systemic organised crimes committed in the Court and Government of New Zealand is undisputed entirely without any dispute, with numerous evidence to prove the clandestine publicly funded organised crimes in public institutions of New Zealand.
The people of New Zealand must know the clandestine criminal operations in the secrecy of the Court and Government of New Zealand.
There is no controversy on this matter.
It is the time for TV ONE to report this matter on air so that the people of New Zealand will have a chance to discuss about this matter openly in public.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
Response from Hon Poto Williams, Police Minister of New Zealand (8 March 2022)
Kia ora Tatsuhiko
On behalf of the Minister of Police, Hon Poto Williams I acknowledge your email of 6 March 2022, concerning the issues you raise below.
The information you have raised in your correspondence is believed to be more closely connected with the functions of The New Zealand Police. We have transferred your matter onto Police National Headquarters to consider.
Thank you for taking the time to contact the Minister of Police.
Ngā mihi,
Office of Hon Poto Williams
Minister for Building and Construction | Minister of Police
Associate Minister for Children | Associate Minister of Housing (Public Housing)
Website: www.Beehive,govt.nz
Private Bag 18041, Parliament Buildings, Wellington 6160, New Zealand
New Zealand Media must report the undisputed state-sponsored organised crimes of New Zealand
7 March 2022
TV ONE
cc: Mr John Matthews, Canterbury Chambers; Hon Kris Faafoi, Minister of Justice, Minister of Broadcasting & Media; Ministry of Justice; Rt Hon Dame Helen Winkelmann, Chief Justice of New Zealand; Supreme Court of New Zealand; Justice Susan Thomas, Chief High Court Judge; Christchurch High Court; Dunedin High Court; Hon Poto Williams, Minister of Police, Minister responsible for Serious Fraud Office; Mr Andrew Coster, Police Commissioner, New Zealand Police; Serious Fraud Office; Hon Dr David Clark, MP for Dunedin; Transparency International; American Bar Association, New Zealand Media, and others
Dear Sir/Madam
Thank you very much for your continuous interest on the undisputed systemic corruption and organised crimes, committed in public institutions of New Zealand.
You must listen to the undisputed evidence of the FAKE HEARING in the High Court of New Zealand.
At this FAKE HEARING, someone impersonated Associate Judge John Matthews in the FAKE HEARING in Dunedin High Court on 3 March 2016.
This recording of the FAKE HEARING has been preserved, fortunately, even though some criminals attempted to remove the evidence of the organised crimes, committed in the High Court of New Zealand, from the public domain.
After the FAKE HEARING, on 15 March 2016, I received a letter of Hayley McKee, Senior Associate, Glaister Ennor, dated 9 March 2016, enclosed with "Order Adjudicating Debtor Bankrupt," certified and issued by D. McMillan, Deputy Registrar, High Court, New Zealand, dated 3 March 2016.
On 12 April 2016, I received "MINUTE OF DAVIDSON J (following memorandum of counsel for judgment creditor dated 9 March 2016 in relation to alleged recording of hearing by judgment debtor)," dated 12 April 2016, a false, forged document, using the name of Davidson J of Christchurch High Court for fraud, from Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court.
This false, forged document states, "Mr Koyama is given the opportunity to respond to the memorandum of counsel dated 9 March 2016. He should respond given that he is said to be in breach of the Court's order that the hearing not be recorded. His response may be made by memorandum in the first instance, or otherwise as he considers appropriate by way of a proceeding in this Court. If so, it should be filed within 10 working days of this minute i.e. Wednesday 27 April 2016 at 5.00pm..."
Prior to the FAKE HEARING, I received two letters of extortion from Mitch Singh, Associate, Glaister Ennor, using several false, forged documents.
On 29 September 2015, I received the letter of extortion, dated 25 September 2015, and a false, forged document, using the name of Justice Clifford of the High Court of New Zealand for fraud, extorting $12,738.
Enclosed in this letter, there was another false, forged document: “Order of Associate Judge Osborne as to substituted service of a bankruptcy notice,” dated 18 September 2015, signed by B D Sceats on 22 September 2015; there was no decision by Associate Judge Osborne on or around 18 September 2015 in this case.
On 5 February 2016, I received another letter of extortion, dated 28 January 2016, from Mitch Singh, using several judges of New Zealand Courts for fraud, extorting $46,310.48.
Regarding the false, forged documents used in the organised crimes, please read "Analysis of signatures for detection of forgery," by Mr Andrew Straw, handwritten expert.
The series of organised crimes committed in the secrecy of the Court and Government resulted in the bank robbery, aided by Insolvency and Trustee Service of Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment, stealing $114,222.03, while Southern Response and EQC of public institutions, committing insurance fraud.
Last year, on 19 October 2021, I received an email from Mr Matthew McCallum, Private Secretary (Serious Fraud Office), Office of Hon Poto Williams, stating, "...I understand that the SFO is also in receipt of your complaint," attached.
RELEVANT NEW ZEALAND LAW
Crimes Act 1961
257 Using forged documents
(1) Every one is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 10 years who, knowing a document to be forged,--
(a) uses the document to obtain any property, privilege, service, pecuniary advantage, benefit, or valuable consideration; or
(b) uses, deals with, or acts upon the document as if it were genuine; or
(c) causes any other person to use, deal with, or act upon it as if it were genuine.
234 Robbery
(1) Robbery is theft accompanied by violence or threats of violence, to any person or property, used to extort the property stolen or to prevent or overcome resistance to its being stolen.
(2) Every one who commits robbery is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 10 years.
http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1961/0043/latest/DLM327382.html
INTERNATIONAL SCRUTINY
On 30 October 2021, I received an email from American Bar Association, stating, "Your email [International oversight must be placed on New Zealand Judiciary on the proven systemic corruption in all New Zealand Courts] has been forward to the Rule of Law Initiative, and the appropriate staff person will respond to you shortly," attached.
STATE-SPONSORED ORGANISED CRIMES OF NEW ZEALAND
The clear pattern of criminality in public institutions of New Zealand exists.
The systemic organised crimes are committed in the secrecy of the Court and Government, protected, supported, and concealed by the law enforcement and regulatory agencies of New Zealand Government.
All New Zealand Courts, including the Supreme Court of New Zealand, are used as the means and covers for the organised criminal syndicates to commit all kinds of crimes with impunity, in violation of the laws of New Zealand and international law.
https://sites.google.com/view/tatsuhiko-koyama/confirmed-false-court-documents-of-new-zealand
THE ROLE OF NEW ZEALAND MEDIA
New Zealand Media must investigate and report the clandestine publicly funded criminal operations in public institutions of New Zealand, using state power for illicit purposes in violation of the laws of New Zealand (state-sponsored organised crimes of New Zealand).
The fact is undisputed by anyone, and thre is no reason for TV ONE, the state broadcaster, not to investigate and report the undisputed systemic corruption and organised crimes committed in public institutions of New Zealand.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
The people of New Zealand must be informed on the undisputed state-sponsored organised crimes of New Zealand
6 March 2022
Q+A With Jack Tame
TV ONE
cc: Hon Poto Williams, Minister of Police, Minister responsible for Serious Fraud Office
Dear Jack
The fact is undisputed, and the dominant criminal syndicates operate in the secrecy of the Court of Government in New Zealand.
The mode of clandestine criminal operations seems very much entrenched and widespread in public institutions of New Zealand.
The state protection and concealment of organised crimes in public institutions of New Zealand must be investigated and reported by the media.
Without the media making this matter to the public, the Court and Government of New Zealand will continue to suppress the clandestine publicly funded criminal operations in New Zealand.
This matter requires public and international scrutiny, as it is the violation of the laws of New Zealand and international law.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
TV ONE, the state broadcaster of New Zealand, must report the undisputed state-sponsored organised crimes of New Zealand
4 March 2022
TV ONE
Dear Sir/Madam
Thank you very much for your continuous interest on the UNDISPUTED systemic corruption and organised crimes committed in New Zealand Courts, including the Supreme Court of New Zealand, in violation of the laws of New Zealand and international law.
These crimes are protected, supported, and concealed by the law enforcement and regulatory agencies of New Zealand Government, and that makes the crimes as state-sponsored organised crimes of New Zealand.
It is the public interest to know the systemic corruption in public institutions of New Zealand and taxpayer financed organised crimes, committed in the secrecy of the Court and Government of New Zealand.
TV ONE, the state broadcaster of New Zealand, must report the undisputed state-sponsored organised crimes of New Zealand.
Do the people of New Zealand actually support the state-sponsored organised crimes, the clandestine criminal operations in the secrecy of the Court and Government of New Zealand?
When no one disputes it, it is the time for the state broadcaster to report the systemic corruption and organised crimes, committed in public institutions of New Zealand, and give a chance for the people of New Zealand and international community to discuss this matter openly in public.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
What can American Bar Association do on New Zealand, especially its malfunctioning judiciary?
3 March 2022
Breakfast
TV ONE
cc: American Bar Association; Rt Hon Jacinda Ardern, Prime Minister of New Zealand; and others
Dear Sir/Madam
Thank you very much for your continuous interest on the undisputed systemic corruption in public institutions of New Zealand.
The corruption is very much entrenched and widespread among judges, lawyers, court registry staff, public servants, and police officers.
The problem in New Zealand is extremely severe: (1) national courts are non-existent or unable to function, and (2) national authorities have been unwilling or unable to carry out a genuine investigation.
New Zealand cannot solve its problems which include the undisputed clandestine publicly funded organised crimes in the secrecy of the Court and Government.
The corruption is too severe: the capture of state institutions by the organised criminal syndicates which have been using the Court and other public institutions to commit all kinds of crimes with impunity, being protected, supported, and concealed by the law enforcement and regulatory agencies of New Zealand Government.
New Zealand definitely requires international intervention.
Only the international intervention can fix the entrenched and widespread corruption in public institutions of New Zealand and fight against the collusive and interconnecting criminal syndicates which have been using public institutions, including all New Zealand Courts, to commit all kinds of crimes with impunity in violation of the laws of New Zealand and international treaties.
It is the time for TV ONE, state broadcaster, to ask what may have been unthinkable.
What can American Bar Association do on New Zealand, especially its malfunctioning judiciary?
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
On 30/10/2021 8:46 am, ABA Member Service wrote:
>
> Dear Tatsuhiko,
>
> Thank you for contacting the American Bar Association.
>
> Your email has been forwarded to the Rule of Law Initiative, and the appropriate staff person will respond to you shortly. Your patience is appreciated.
>
> Visit our website at www.americanbar.org or contact us at www.americanbar.org/contactus. For immediate assistance, please call the ABA Service Center at 800-285-2221 or 312-988-5522 Monday-Friday between 9:00 AM and 6:00 PM ET.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> American Bar Association
> 321 North Clark Street
> Chicago, IL 60654
> T: 800-285-2221
> F: 312-988-5850
> service@americanbar.org
> http://www.americanbar.org
Undisputed state-sponsored organised crimes of New Zealand must be reported by the media in New Zealand
1 March 2022
Breakfast
TV ONE
cc: Rt Hon Jacinda Ardern, Prime Minister of New Zealand; and others
Dear Sir/Madam
Thank you very much for your continuous interest on the matter of the undisputed state-sponsored organised crimes of New Zealand.
This fact, undisputed by anyone, must be investigated and reported by the media in New Zealand.
New Zealand is a rogue state, sponsoring organised crimes and using or otherwise allowing state power for committing all kinds of crimes with impunity in violation of the laws of New Zealand and international law.
The rogue state of New Zealand and its clandestine publicly funded organised crimes, committed in the secrecy of the Court and Government, must be exposed by the media in New Zealand.
It is the duty of the media in New Zealand to investigate and report the undisputed state-sponsored organised crimes of New Zealand.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
It is the role of the media in New Zealand to investigate and report the undisputed state-sponsored organised crimes of New Zealand
Date: 28 February 2022 at 11:10:23 AM NZDT
To: briefing@newsroom.co.nz, contact@newsroom.co.nz, tim.murphy@newsroom.co.nz, mark.jennings@newsroom.co.nz, jonathan.milne@newsroom.co.nz, rnz@rnz.co.nz, aucklandnewsroom@fairfaxmedia.co.nz, newsroom@stuff.co.nz, patrick.crewdson@stuff.co.nz, janine.fenwick@stuff.co.nz, mark.stevens@stuff.co.nz, bernadette.courtney@stuff.co.nz, geoff.collett@stuff.co.nz, natalie.crockett@stuff.co.nz, letters@dompost.co.nz, letters@press.co.nz, letters@nzherald.co.nz
Cc: Christopher.Luxon@parliament.govt.nz, Botany@parliament.govt.nz, Chris.Baillie@parliament.govt.nz, Mark.Cameron@parliament.govt.nz, Karen.Chhour@parliament.govt.nz, Simon.Court@parliament.govt.nz, James.McDowall@parliament.govt.nz, Nicole.McKee@parliament.govt.nz, Toni.Severin@parliament.govt.nz, David.Seymour@parliament.govt.nz, Damien.Smith@parliament.govt.nz, Brooke.Vanvelden@parliament.govt.nz, NLO@parliament.govt.nz
28 February 2022
New Zealand Media
Dear Sir/Madam
When politicians are in complicit in the state-sponsored organised crimes, suppressing the clandestine publicly funded organised crimes, committed in public institutions of New Zealand, it is the role of the media in New Zealand to investigate and report the undisputed state-sponsored organised crimes of New Zealand.
The fact is undisputed, and it is the time for the media to report this matter so that there will be public pressure on New Zealand Government to deal with its clandestine criminal operations in the secrecy of the Court and Government of New Zealand.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
What should the international community do on New Zealand which is allowing the "undisputed" state-sponsored organised crimes in violation of the international law?
28 February 2022
To Whom It May Concern:
What should the international community do on New Zealand which is allowing the "undisputed" state-sponsored organised crimes in violation of the international law?
When the fact is undisputed, it is the time for the international community to intervene on New Zealand and its clandestine publicly funded organised crimes, using state power for illicit purposes in violation of the international law.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
What should TV ONE (Breakfast) do on the Prime Minister of New Zealand who is allowing the "undisputed" state-sponsored organised crimes of New Zealand?
28 February 2022
Breakfast
TV ONE
cc: Rt Hon Jacinda Ardern, Prime Minister of New Zealand
Dear Sir/Madam
What should TV ONE (Breakfast) do on the Prime Minister of New Zealand who is allowing the “undisputed" state-sponsored organised crimes of New Zealand?
The state protection and concealment of organised crimes in public institutions of New Zealand must be investigated and reported by the media.
Without the media making this matter public, the Court and Government will continue to suppress the clandestine publicly funded criminal operations in New Zealand.
The Prime Minister of New Zealand must be accountable for the “undisputed” state-sponsored organised crimes of New Zealand (the clandestine publicly funded organised crimes in public institutions of New Zealand), committed in violation of the laws of New Zealand and international law.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
What should TV ONE (Q + A) do on the undisputed state-sponsored organised crimes of New Zealand?
27 February 2022
Q + A
TV ONE
cc: Rt Hon Jacinda Ardern, Prime Minister of New Zealand
Dear Sir/Madam
Thank you very much for paying attention on the undisputed state-sponsored organised crimes of New Zealand.
But I think what should be done is to actually investigate and report this matter on air, which will put pressure on the Prime Minister to act while the international community becoming aware of what is really going on in New Zealand.
The fact is totally undisputed by anyone, and all New Zealand Courts are being used as the means and covers to commit clandestine organised crimes.
The publicly funded organised crimes in public institutions are state-sponsored organised crimes, using state power for illicit purposes in violation of the laws of New Zealand and international law.
New Zealand is a rogue state, and this fact must be accepted by the people of New Zealand who should feel shame for the state-sponsored organised crimes in violation of the international law.
It is the time for the state broadcaster to do the right thing.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
Undisputed fact of clandestine systemic organised crimes in public institutions of New Zealand - what should the leader of the opposition do?
22 February 2022
Mr Christopher Luxon MP
Leader of the Opposition; National Party
cc: Breakfast, TV ONE; Rt Hon Jacinda Ardern, Prime Minister of New Zealand
Dear Mr Luxon
What should the leader of the opposition do on the undisputed fact of clandestine organised crimes in public institutions of New Zealand?
The fact is totally and completely undisputed by anyone and known around the world.
The evidence is published for anyone to see.
All New Zealand Courts, including the Supreme Court of New Zealand, are being used as the means and covers to commit all kinds of crimes with impunity, due to the protection, support, and concealment provided by the law enforcement and regulatory agencies of New Zealand Government.
https://sites.google.com/view/tatsuhiko-koyama/confirmed-false-court-documents-of-new-zealand
New Zealand is legal blackhole.
It is the time for you to make the Prime Minister accountable for her actions on the undisputed fact.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
P.S.
I thank Breakfast, TV ONE, for the continuous interest on this matter.
Undisputed fact of clandestine systemic organised crimes in public institutions is known around the world - what should Prime Minister of New Zealand do?
21 February 2022
Rt Hon Jacinda Ardern
Prime Minister
cc: Breakfast, TV ONE; Q + A, TV ONE
Dear Prime Minister
The undisputed fact of the clandestine systemic organised crimes, committed in public institutions of New Zealand, is known around the world.
What should you, Prime Minister of New Zealand, do on the undisputed systemic corruption in public institutions of New Zealand?
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
Harvard University must not take part in the state propaganda of New Zealand
18 February 2022
Mr Lawrence Bacow
President
Harvard University
Massachusetts Hall
Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
Dear Mr Bacow
I am an enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand.
I understand that Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern of New Zealand will be the principal speaker at Harvard on 26 May 2022.
Harvard University must not take part in the state propaganda of New Zealand.
New Zealand is secretly sponsoring organised crimes and using state power for illicit purposes in violation of the international law.
This "undisputed" fact is hidden from the view of the international community by the propaganda and public disinformation, disseminated by New Zealand.
Now, the fact is undisputed by anyone, and this must be considered by Harvard University.
Please take a time to read the attached emails.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
What should the international community do on the "undisputed" clandestine criminal operations in the secrecy of the Court and Government of New Zealand?
18 February 2022
To Whom It May Concern:
The international community has the duty to act on a state which is sponsoring organised crimes in violation of the international law.
The fact of the state-sponsored organised crimes of New Zealand is totally and completely established without any dispute.
No one disputes it, but no one does anything on the undisputed fact.
The problem in New Zealand is extremely severe: (1) national courts are non-existent or unable to function, and (2) national authorities have been unwilling or unable to carry out a genuine investigation.
New Zealand requires international intervention.
The international community must unite and intervene on the state-sponsored organised crimes of New Zealand.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
What should Justice Minister of New Zealand do on the “undisputed” organised crimes committed by DLA Piper New Zealand?
18 February 2022
Hon Kris Faafoi
Minister of Justice
Minister of Broadcasting & Media
cc: Breakfast, TV ONE; Hon Paul Goldsmith, National party spokesperson for justice; Dr Duncan Webb, MP for Christchurch Central; Ingrid Leary, MP for Taieri; Rachel Brooking, Labour party list MP in Dunedin; Ms Melissa Lee, National Party spokesperson for broadcasting & media; and others
Dear Justice Minister
What should Justice Minister of New Zealand do on the “undisputed” organised crimes committed by DLA Piper?
To do nothing means you, as Justice Minister of New Zealand, become complicit in the "undisputed" systemic organised crimes, committed by lawyers of DLA Piper New Zealand.
You must act on the undisputed evidence which are attached to this email.
The problem in New Zealand is extremely severe.
All New Zealand Courts, including the Supreme Court of New Zealand, are being used as the means and covers to commit all kinds of crimes with impunity, due to the protection, support, and concealment provided by the law enforcement and regulatory agencies of New Zealand Government.
https://sites.google.com/view/tatsuhiko-koyama/confirmed-false-court-documents-of-new-zealand
New Zealand is LEGAL BLACKHOLE.
In New Zealand, (1) national courts are non-existent or unable to function, and (2) national authorities have been unwilling or unable to carry out a genuine investigation.
Culture of impunity exists in New Zealand because of the state protection of the clandestine criminal operations committed in the secrecy of the Court and Government.
It is the time for New Zealand to change the direction.
You, as Minister of Justice of New Zealand, must take leadership in fighting against the organised criminal syndicates which are using all New Zealand Courts as their instruments to commit all kinds of crimes with impunity.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
P.S.
Thank you TV ONE for continuous interest on this matter. I am sure that the justice minister will feel pressure to act.
What should DLA Piper New Zealand do on the “undisputed” organised crimes in which your firm participated?
17 February 2022
Ms Laura Scampion
Managing Partner, New Zealand
DLP Piper
Dear Madam
The undisputed fact shows that DLA Piper New Zealand participated in the organised crimes in violation of the Crimes Act 1961.
The undisputed evidence shows that Grant MacDonald, Misha Henaghan, Sacha Thom of your firm participated in the organised crimes, committed in Dunedin District Court, Christchurch High Court, and the Court of Appeal.
The series of their organised crimes were followed by another series of organised crimes, committed by New Zealand Law Society and Ministry of Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment, resulting in the bank robbery in the bankruptcy fraud in the High Court of New Zealand.
I attached some of the evidence of the organised crimes, committed by your firm.
If you have time, please read the appendix which explains the undisputed crimes, along with the evidence published in the internet, accessible by anyone who wants to witness the the crimes.
I understand that this matter is being investigated by Serious Fraud Office.
On 10 February 2022, Nikki De La Mare, National Complaints Manager, Lawyers Complaints Service, New Zealand Law Society, wrote, “…we would deal with the Police directly should they contact us. We are not able to require other lawyers to deal with the Police. That is for them to decide.”
What should DLA Piper New Zealand do on the “undisputed” organised crimes in which your firm participated?
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
What should TV ONE do on the "undisputed" systemic corruption in New Zealand Judiciary?
17 February 2022
Breakfast
TV ONE
cc: Rt Hon Jacinda Ardern, Prime Minister of New Zealand
Dear Sir/Madam
Thank you very much for your continuous interest on this matter.
New Zealand has very serious problems, and the fact is totally and completely undisputed.
All New Zealand Courts, including the Supreme Court of New Zealand, are being used as the means and covers to commit all kinds of crimes with impunity, due to the protection, support, and concealment provided by the law enforcement and regulatory agencies of New Zealand Government.
https://sites.google.com/view/tatsuhiko-koyama/confirmed-false-court-documents-of-new-zealand
New Zealand is LEGAL BLACKHOLE.
In New Zealand, (1) national courts are non-existent or unable to function, and (2) national authorities have been unwilling or unable to carry out a genuine investigation.
What we find in New Zealand is culture of impunity, and you will not find that culture in other developed countries.
So, the problem is very severe.
This matter requires public scrutiny.
When no one disputes the fact, there is no controversy for TV ONE to investigate and report this matter.
It is my wish that you do this soon.
Best regards
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
What should DLA Piper do on the UNDISPUTED organised crimes, committed by DLA Piper New Zealand?
16 February 2022
Global Leadership
DLA Piper
Dear Sir/Madam
It is undisputed by anyone.
The undisputed fact shows that DLA Piper New Zealand participated in some organised crimes, using the Court for fraud, in violation of the Crimes Act 1961.
This matter requires your immediate action.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
Asking Chief Justice of New Zealand what she do on the "undisputed" systemic corruption in New Zealand Judiciary
16 February 2022
Breakfast
TV ONE
cc: Rt Hon Jacinda Ardern, Prime Minister of New Zealand; Rt Hon Dame Helen Winkelmann, Chief Justice of New Zealand; Supreme Court of New Zealand
Dear Sir/Madam
Could you ask Rt Hon Dame Helen Winkelmann, Chief Justice of New Zealand what she should do the undisputed systemic corruption in New Zealand Judiciary?
She must be responsible for the very corrupt state of New Zealand Judiciary.
Best regards
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
Subject: What should Chief Justice of New Zealand do on the "undisputed" systemic corruption in New Zealand Judiciary?
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 12:01:51 +1300
From: Tatsuhiko Koyama
To: officeofthechiefjustice@justice.govt.nz, contactus@justice.govt.nz, Justice.winkelmann@courts.govt.nz, info@justice.govt.nz, supremecourt@justice.govt.nz
CC: iba@int-bar.org, service@americanbar.org, memberservices@isba.org, mrc@nysba.org, memberservices@dcbar.org, k.faafoi@ministers.govt.nz, kris.faafoi@parliament.govt.nz
15 February 2022
Rt Hon Dame Helen Winkelmann
Chief Justice of New Zealand
Dear Chief Justice
What should Chief Justice of New Zealand do on the "undisputed" systemic corruption in New Zealand Judiciary?
Please read the attached emails and documents on the undisputed systemic corruption and organised crimes in New Zealand Judiciary.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
What should international bar association do on the "undisputed" systemic corruption in New Zealand Judiciary?
15 February 2022
International Bar Association
5 Chancery Lane
London
WC2A 1LG
United Kingdom
cc: Rt Hon Jacinda Ardern, Prime Minister of New Zealand
Dear Sir/Madam
We have very serious problems in New Zealand.
It is totally undisputed and there is no controversy on the fact.
All New Zealand Courts, including the Supreme Court of New Zealand, are being used as the means and covers to commit all kinds of crimes in the secrecy of the Court and Government, protected, supported, and concealed by the law enforcement and regulatory agencies of New Zealand Government.
https://sites.google.com/view/tatsuhiko-koyama/confirmed-false-court-documents-of-new-zealand
NEW ZEALAND IS LEGAL BLACKHOLE and culture of impunity exists in the jurisdiction.
In New Zealand, (1) national courts are non-existent or unable to function, and (2) national authorities have been unwilling or unable to carry out a genuine investigation.
New Zealand Courts and government agencies disseminate false information; apparently, public disinformation by the Court and Government is normalised in New Zealand.
New Zealand Media publish fake news in concert with the public disinformation campaign conducted by New Zealand Government, making the clandestine publicly funded organised crimes of New Zealand continuously viable.
The international community must intervene on New Zealand, and stop the state-sponsored organised crimes, committed in public institutions of New Zealand, in violation of the international law.
This matter requires your urgent attention and immediate action.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
Subject: What should Prime Minister of New Zealand do on the “undisputed” organised crimes committed New Zealand Courts?
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 08:07:40 +1300
From: Tatsuhiko Koyama
To: j.ardern@ministers.govt.nz <j.ardern@ministers.govt.nz>, Rt Hon Jacinda Ardern <jacinda.ardern@parliament.govt.nz>, information@dpmc.govt.nz <information@dpmc.govt.nz>
CC: breakfast@tvnz.co.nz, Christopher.Luxon@parliament.govt.nz, botany@parliament.govt.nz, nlo@parliament.govt.nz
14 February 2022
Rt Hon Jacinda Ardern
Prime Minister
cc: Breakfast, TV ONE; Mr Christopher Luxon MP, Leader of the Opposition, National Party
Dear Prime Minister
New Zealand has very serious problems.
New Zealand is legal blackhole.
All New Zealand Courts are used as the means and covers for organised crimes in violation of the laws of New Zealand.
The fact is undisputed by anyone, and the evidence is published.
https://sites.google.com/view/tatsuhiko-koyama/confirmed-false-court-documents-of-new-zealand
What should you, Prime Minister of New Zealand, do on the "undisputed" organised crimes, committed in New Zealand Courts?
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
What should DLA Piper New Zealand do on the “undisputed” organised crimes in which your firm participated?
14 February 2022
DLA Piper New Zealand
cc: Breakfast, TV ONE; New Zealand Police; Serious Fraud Office; Hon Poto Williams, Minister of Police and responsible for SFO; Hon Mark Mitchell, National party spokesperson for police and SFO; Hon Kris Faafoi, Minister of Justice; Ministry of Justice; Christchurch High Court; Court of Appeal; Hon Paul Goldsmith, National party spokesperson for justice; Hon Dr David Clark, Minister responsible for EQC; Mr Stuart Smith, National party spokesperson for EQC; Hon David Parker, Attorney General; Mr Chris Penk, shadow attorney general, National party; American Bar Association; Transparency International; DLA Piper Global; and others
Dear Sirs/Madams
The undisputed fact shows that DLA Piper New Zealand participated in the organised crimes in violation of the Crimes Act 1961.
The undisputed evidence shows that Grant MacDonald, Misha Henaghan, Sacha Thom of your firm participated in the organised crimes, committed in Dunedin District Court, Christchurch High Court, and the Court of Appeal.
The series of their organised crimes were followed by another series of organised crimes, committed by New Zealand Law Society and Ministry of Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment, resulting in the bank robbery in the bankruptcy fraud in the High Court of New Zealand.
I attached some of the evidence of the organised crimes, committed by your firm.
If you have time, please read the appendix which explains the undisputed crimes, along with the evidence published in the internet, accessible by anyone who wants to witness the the crimes.
I understand that this matter is being investigated by Serious Fraud Office.
On 10 February 2022, Nikki De La Mare, National Complaints Manager, Lawyers Complaints Service, New Zealand Law Society, wrote, “…we would deal with the Police directly should they contact us. We are not able to require other lawyers to deal with the Police. That is for them to decide.”
What should DLA Piper New Zealand do on the “undisputed” organised crimes in which your firm participated?
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
APPENDIX
A. INSURANCE FRAUD
(a-1) On or around 27 August 2012, Arrow International, on behalf of Southern Response, issued a full, detailed assessment report (dated 24 February 2012, revised 27 August 2012) on the earthquake damage on the property, located at 15 Bounty Street, Bryndwr, Christchurch, estimating the total amount of the repair of $228,846.55 ($218,519.55 + $10,127.00).
(a-2) On 11 December 2013, I received a letter from Emma Brown, Southern Response, sending me a computer printout sheet, dated 19 August 2013, for their refusal to settle the insurance claim on the property.
* On 5 February 2018, I received an email from Leanne Stewart, Senior Investigator, Office of the Ombudsman, stating, "I have made some enquires of EQC regarding your complaint about access to the name of the person who generated the settlement recommendation dated 12 February 2014," "EQC has confirmed that the names of the EQC staff members who had completed assessment reports following onsite scoping visits at the property have been disclosed to you.”
* On 2 December 2013, I called Emma Brown, Southern Response, regarding the insurance claim, and she talked about alleged paper-based assessment on the claim by EQC.
This was more than more than 3 months prior to 12 February 2014 when the settlement recommendation was supposedly generated by EQC. this conversation was recorded.
* On 13 February 2014, I received a phone call from EQC in Dunedin, and staff at EQC did not mention any onsite scoping visits by EQC on the property in Christchurch; this conversation was recorded.
(a-3) On 11 August 2014, I received "Response by defendant," dated 22 May 2014, stating, "On 26 August 2013, EQC sent the defendant a batch of reassessed claims which included a file note relating to the plaintiffs' claim," "EQC had completed a further, paper-based, review of the damage to the House on 29 March 2012...(Second EQC Assessment)," during the District Court proceeding (CIV-2014-012-186).
(a-4) On 16 December 2014, I received an email from Sacha Thom, Solicitor, representing Southern Response, stating, "...Southern Response provide copies of:
1. The communication between Southern Response and EQC on 26 August 2013.
2. EQC’s second assessment completed on 29 March 2012.
We attach three documents and note that:
· On 26 August 2013, EQC physically handed to Southern Response these three documents as part of a weekly collection of a batch of documents relating to various claims.
· The first attachment is addressed to Southern Response employee Kate Legg because she was the person at Southern Response who requested the documents from EQC in relation to your claim.
· Southern Response understands that EQC inserted Southern Response’s logo at the top of the document in order to identify which insurer the document needed to be provided to.
· The attached scope of works is the only document relating to EQC’s amended assessment that was provided to Southern Response.
--------------------
The facts above clearly establish that Southern Response and EQC committed insurance fraud.
(1) There was NO onsite scoping visits by EQC at the property in Christchurch for the settlement recommendation, dated 12 February 2014, as alleged by EQC, as I was in Dunedin on that day. Furthermore, on 13 February 2014, I actually received a phone call in Dunedin from EQC staff and there was NO mention of the onsite visit in Christchurch on 12 February 2014, a day before.
(2) Southern Response repeatedly stated that the EQC assessment on the property was paper-based (NOT onsite scoping visit as alleged by EQC), and the date of the computer printout was 19 August 2013, which was about 6 months earlier than 12 February 2014 on which the settlement recommendation was supposedly generated by EQC.
(3) EQC cannot provide the name of the staff who did the alleged assessment, dated 12 February 2014.
(4) There is NO evidence that EQC actually conducted any assessment on the property on 29 March 2012; since in or around August 2011, about 7 months prior to March 2011, the handling of the claim was shifted from EQC to AMI Insurance after EQC settled the claim by paying the maximum liability of EQC under the Earthquake Commission Act1993 and was no longer handling the claim on that day.
(5) The full, detailed assessment report, professionally done by Arrow International, on behalf of Southern Response (dated 24 February 2012, revised 27 August 2012), unequivocally establishes the total damage of $228,846.55.
(6) The computer printout sheet, dated 19 August 2013, is a false, forged document which was used for the insurance fraud, committed by Southern Response.
--------------------
B. ORGANISED CRIMES IN THE COURT
(b-1) FALSE DOCUMENT - “MINUTE OF MANDER J,” dated 26 February 2015, (sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 27 February 2015)
(b-2) FALSE DOCUMENT - Signed, “MINUTE OF MANDER J,” dated 26 February 2015, (sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 24 August 2015)
(b-3) FALSE DOCUMENT - Handwritten minute of Mander J, dated 27 February 2015, (retrieved from the official court file found in Dunedin High Court on 19 February 2016)
(b-4) FALSE DOCUMENT - “MINUTE OF MANDER J,” dated 5 March 2015, (sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 5 March 2015)
(b-5) FALSE DOCUMENT - Signed, “MINUTE OF MANDER J,” dated 5 March 2015, (sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 13 March 2015)
(b-6) FALSE DOCUMENT - Unless order of Mander J, dated 12 March 2015, (sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 12 March 2015)
(b-7) FALSE DOCUMENT - Handwritten minute of Mander J, dated 12 March 2015, (sent by sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 13 March 2015)
(b-8) FALSE DOCUMENT - Signed, “MINUTE OF MANDER J,” dated 13 March 2015, (sent by sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 13 March 2015)
* There is NO signed minute of Mander J, dated 13 March 2015, in the official court file.
(b-9) FALSE DOCUMENT - “MINUTE OF MANDER J,” dated 13 March 2015, (sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 16 March 2015)
(b-10) FALSE DOCUMENT - “MINUTE OF MANDER J,” dated 17 March 2015, (sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 17 March 2015)
(b-11) FALSE DOCUMENT - Signed, “MINUTE OF MANDER J,” dated 17 March 2015, (sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 17 March 2015)
* There is NO signed minute of Mander J, dated 17 March 2015, in the official court file.
(b-12) FALSE DOCUMENT - Email of Mander J, dated 20 March 2015 (at 12:11 pm), (sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 10 August 2015)
“Friday, 20 March 2015 12:11 p.m.”
"Amelia, I record a brief note of my decision. I don’t think I can wait any longer for the respondent’s response in order to give the appellants’ time to comply with the order.
The appellants’ application for an extension is declined.
The appellants cite Rule 12.7(1) HCRs as providing a time requirement for service, however this rule concerns summary judgment applications and does not apply for the present situation.
The appellants appeal remains extant notwithstanding the operation of the unless order.
I also note for completeness that a hearing of the respondent’s application was attempted to convened however the appellants declined to make themselves available despite repeated efforts by the registry. The matter was dealt with by way of memorandum.
The appellants have still not provided reasons for their non-compliance.
Mander J"
(b-13) FALSE DOCUMENT - Email of Mander J, dated 20 March 2015 (at 12:18 pm), (sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 12 August 2015)
“Friday, 20 March 2015 12:18:41 p.m.”
“Amelia,
Our emails passed. I have read the respondent’s submissions. My ruling stands and may be notified to the parties without modification.
Many thanks
Mander J”
(b-14) FALSE DOCUMENT - Order of Mander J, dated 20 March 2015 (at 12:26 pm), (sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 20 March 2015)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Nicholson, Amelia" <Amelia.Nicholson@justice.govt.nz>
Date: Thursday, 19 March 2015 at 2:13 PM
To: Tatsuhiko Koyama <tatsuhiko.koyama@gmail.com>
Cc: "Henaghan, Misha" <Misha.Henaghan@dlapf.com>, "Macdonald, Grant" <grant.macdonald@dlapiper.co.nz>, "Thom, Sacha" <sacha.thom@dlapiper.co.nz>
Subject: RE: Appellant's submissions - Koyama v Southern Response (CIV-2014-412-0202)
Dear Tatsuhiko,
Many thanks for your email. All our Christchurch Judges are in Wellington today and Friday attending a conference but as the Unless Order is for close of business tomorrow I will forward this application and any other relevant documents on to the Honourable Justice Mander to deal with as soon as he has the opportunity.
If counsel for the respondent wishes to reply to this application could they please let me know as soon as possible.
Kind regards,
Amelia
From: "Nicholson, Amelia" <Amelia.Nicholson@justice.govt.nz>
Date: Friday, 20 March 2015 at 8:26 AM
To: "tatsuhiko.koyama@gmail.com" <tatsuhiko.koyama@gmail.com>, "Macdonald, Grant" <grant.macdonald@dlapiper.co.nz>, "Henaghan, Misha" <misha.henaghan@dlapiper.co.nz>, "Thom, Sacha" <sacha.thom@dlapiper.co.nz>
Subject: CIV-2014-412-000202 - Koyama v Southern Response Earthquake Services Limited
Dear Counsel and Mr and Ms Koyama,
Following the receipt of the appellants application for an extension of the unless order and the respondents memorandum in reply, the Honourable Justice Mander has minuted the above named matter as follows:
"The appellants' application for an extension is declined.
The appellants cite Rule 12.7(1) HCRs as providing a time requirement for service, however this rule concerns summary judgment applications and does not apply to the present situation.
The appellants appeal remains extant notwithstanding the operation of the unless order.
I also note for completeness that a hearing of the respondent's application was attempted to be convened however the appellants declined to make themselves available despite repeated efforts by the Registry. The matter was dealt with by way of memorandum.
The appellants have still not provided reasons for their non-compliance.”
Kind regards,
Amelia
Amelia Nicholson
Deputy Registrar | Christchurch High Court
DDI: +64 3 962 4273 | Ext 54273
www.courtsofnz.govt.nz
From: "Nicholson, Amelia" <Amelia.Nicholson@justice.govt.nz>
Date: Monday, 10 August 2015 at 10:23 AM
To: Tatsuhiko Koyama <tatsuhiko.koyama@gmail.com>
Subject: RE: Request for a copy of the handwritten minute of Mander J, dated 20 March 2015
Dear Mr Koyama,
I do not have a hand written copy of this minute as the Honourable Justice Mander was in Auckland for a conference. This minute was given to me by way of email which I have attached a copy of now.
Kind regards,
Amelia
* Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, was involved with Grant Macdonald, Misha Henaghan, and Sacha Thom of DLA Piper New Zealand in the confirmed insurance fraud, causing loss by deception, forgery, using false document for pecuniary advantage, in violation of the Crimes Act 1961.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(b-15) FALSE DOCUMENT - “JUDGMENT OF MANDER J,” dated 23 March 2015, (sent by Rebecca Fahey, Civil Caseflow Manager, Christchurch High Court, on 23 March 2015, on the same day when a telephone case management conference was held and before the scheduled hearing on 5 April 2015)
(b-16) FALSE DOCUMENT - Signed, “JUDGMENT OF MANDER J,” dated 23 March 2015, (sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 24 March 2015)
(b-17) FALSE DOCUMENT - “JUDGMENT OF MANDER J,’ dated 26 May 2015, (sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 26 May 2015)
(b-18) FALSE DOCUMENT - Signed, “JUDGMENT OF MANDER J,’ dated 26 May 2015, (sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 5 August 2015)
* There is NO signed judgement of Mander J, dated 26 May 2015, in the official court file.
(b-19) FALSE DOCUMENT - Minute of Mander J, date 5 June 2016, (sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 5 June 2015)
(b-20) FALSE DOCUMENT - Handwritten minute of Mander J, dated 5 June 2015, (sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 14 July 2015)
(b-21) FALSE DOCUMENT - “Order for Costs,” dated 12 June 2015, (sent by Grant Macdonald on or around 15 July 2015) - THIS DOCUMENT WAS SENT "AFTER" THE CASE WAS APPEALED TO THE COURT OF APPEAL, where the continuous stream of false, forged documents were made and used for fraud in the Court, conspiring to defeat justice, in violation of the Crimes Act 1961.
(b-22) FALSE DOCUMENT - “MINUTE OF WHITE J,” dated 16 June 2015, (sent by Justine Bird, Court Registry Officer, Court of Appeal, on 16 June 2015)
* The Court of Appeal of New Zealand did NOT have the jurisdiction on the matter; Tatsuhiko Koyama was NOT in New Zealand on or around 16 June 2015.
* The signature on the document, dated 16 June 2015, is significantly different the true signature of Mr Douglas White QC.
* Jan A Flood, Registrar, University of Otago, in her email, dated 7 August 2015, wrote, "...Clare O'Brien, Court Manager/Registrar of the Court of Appeal. Her communication regarding the appropriateness of the Library allowing you to see the documents involved was: 'No you can't. No judgment or any documents get issued for public release with judge's signatures on them."
(b-23) FALSE DOCUMENT - “MINUTE AND DIRECTIONS OF WILD J,” dated 14 August 2015, (sent by Fiona McDonald, Fixtures Manager/Deputy Registrar, Court of Appeal, on 14 August 2015)
* There is NO signed original document in the official case file.
(b-24) FALSE DOCUMENT - “MINUTE AND DIRECTIONS OF THE COURT,” dated 29 September 2015, (Ellen France P, Wild and Cooper JJ), (sent by Fiona McDonald, Fixtures Manager/Deputy Registrar, Court of Appeal, on 29 September 2015)
* There is NO signed original document in the official case file.
(b-25) FALSE DOCUMENT - “JUDGMENT OF THE COURT,” dated 5 October 2015, (Ellen France P, Wild and Cooper JJ), (sent by Justine Bird, Court Registry Officer, Court of Appeal, on 5 October 2015)
* There is NO signed original document in the official case file.
(b-26) FALSE DOCUMENT - “Judgment for sealing,” dated 6 November 2015, (Ellen France P, Wild and Cooper JJ), (sent by Grant MacDonald on or around 17 November 2015)
New Zealand Law Society and New Zealand lawyers will cooperate on the police investigation on the "undisputed" organised crimes, committed in New Zealand Courts and other public institutions of New Zealand
13 February 2022
Rt Hon Jacinda Ardern
Prime Minister
cc: Mr Christopher Luxon MP, Leader of the Opposition, National Party
Dear Prime Minister
We must accept facts which are undisputed by anyone.
You, as Prime Minister of New Zealand, must take leadership on this matter, because New Zealand has very serious problems.
NEW ZEALAND IS LEGAL BLACKHOLE.
What we have in New Zealand is culture of impunity.
Two factors that contribute culture impunity are (1) national courts are non-existent or unable to function (all New Zealand Courts are being used as the means and covers for organised crimes), and (2) national authorities have been unwilling or unable to carry out a genuine investigation (the clandestine criminal operations in the secrecy of the Court and Government are protected, supported, and concealed by the law enforcement and regulatory agencies of New Zealand Government).
New Zealand media and journalists will not investigate nor report this matter, ensuring the continuous viability of the clandestine publicly funded organised crimes in public institutions of New Zealand.
Normalisation of publicly funded organised crimes in the secrecy of the Court and Government must end.
The systemic corruption and organised crimes in public institutions must not be the norm of New Zealand.
It is the time for you to show your leadership.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
11 February 2022
Hon David Parker
Attorney General
cc: Mr Chris Penk, shadow attorney general, National party
Dear Attorney General
The fact must be accepted, especially if the fact is undisputed by anyone and extremely serious as the systemic corruption and organised organised crimes, committed in all New Zealand Courts, including the Supreme Court of New Zealand, and other public institutions of New Zealand.
This matter requires your immediate attention and action.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
11 February 2022
Hon Kris Faafoi
Minister of Justice
cc: Hon Paul Goldsmith, National party spokesperson for justice; Dr Duncan Webb, MP for Christchurch Central; Ingrid Leary, MP for Taieri; Rachel Brooking, Labour party list MP in Dunedin
Dear Justice Minister
I write this email because the fact of the systemic corruption and organised crimes, committed in New Zealand Courts, are totally verified and accepted without any dispute.
I do this because the organised criminal syndicates are very collusive and interconnected to commit all kinds of crimes in the secrecy of the Court, and New Zealand Law Society is an integral part of the clandestine criminal operations in public institutions of New Zealand.
You, as Justice Minister, must get involved and make sure that all judges whose names were used in the systemic organised crimes be contacted so that they can give information and evidence to the police.
Needless to say, all staff at New Zealand Courts, including the Supreme Court of New Zealand, must be contacted so that they can also give information and evidence to the police.
The fact of the systemic organised crimes is undisputed, and this matter is not controversial for you to get directly involved.
Your leadership on this matter is very much expected.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
New Zealand Law Society and New Zealand lawyers will cooperate on the police investigation on the "undisputed" organised crimes, committed in New Zealand Courts and other public institutions of New Zealand
11 February 2022
Hon Poto Williams; Police Minister; Minister responsible for Serious Fraud Office
Mr Andrew Coster, Police Commissioner, New Zealand Police
Cc: Serious Fraud Office; Hon Mark Mitchell, National party spokesperson for police; Breakfast, TV ONE; American Bar Association; Transparency International
Dear Police Minister and Police Commissioner
Yesterday, I received a letter from Ms Nikki De La Mare, National Complaints Manager, New Zealand Law Society, attached.
Apparently, this is a response to my enquiry to Ms Tiana Epati, President, New Zealand Law Society, after being referred by Ms Casey Miller, Registered Legal Executive, Rishworth Wall & Mathieson, on 8 February 2022.
In this letter, dated 10 February 2022, Ms De La Mare wrote, “…we would deal with the Police directly should they contact us. We are not able to require other lawyers to deal with the Police. That is for them to decide.”
I understand that this matter is being investigated by Serious Fraud Office.
I attached an email from Mr Matthew McCallum, Private Secretary (Serious Fraud Office), Office of Hon Poto Williams, dated 19 October 20210, for your information.
The systemic organised crimes are made possible by the collusive and interconnecting organised criminal syndicates which are using all New Zealand Courts as the means and covers to commit all kinds of crimes with impunity, in the secrecy of the Court, being protected, supported, and concealed by the law enforcement and regulatory agencies of New Zealand Government.
The systemic organised crimes are in violation of the laws of New Zealand, and the state-sponsored organised crimes are in violation of several international treaties for which the state of New Zealand has ratified and norms of the international community of which New Zealand is taking active part.
The fact of the systemic organised crimes, committed in New Zealand Courts and other public institutions of New Zealand, undisputed by anyone, and the evidence is published for anyone to see.
There is no controversy, political or otherwise, for the Police to contact those who were involved in the undisputed organised crimes, including judges whose names were used in the crimes and lawyers, court registrars, staff at New Zealand Law Society who were directly involved in the commission of the systemic organised crimes, as part of the police investigation.
I believe that you will ensure that the police will do very thorough and professional investigation on the undisputed systemic organised crimes, committed in New Zealand Courts and other public institutions of New Zealand.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
Should a journalist in New Zealand investigate and report clandestine publicly funded organised crimes, committed in the secrecy of the Court and Government?
10 February 2022
Ms Alexia Russell
Producer, the Detail
Hon Kris Faafoi, Minister of Broadcasting and Media, Minister of Justice
Dear Ms Russell
Should a journalist in New Zealand investigate and report clandestine publicly funded organised crimes, committed in the secrecy of the Court and Government?
Does it matter that no one disputes the fact?
It is very easy, just to contact any of the judges whose names were used in the systemic organised crimes in New Zealand Courts.
https://sites.google.com/view/tatsuhiko-koyama/confirmed-false-court-documents-of-new-zealand
Please read the attached emails and find out about the state-sponsored organised crimes of New Zealand.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
What should Present of New Zealand Law Society do on the "undisputed" systemic organised crimes, committed in New Zealand Courts?
9 February 2022
Breakfast
TV ONE
cc: Ms Tiana Epati, President of New Zealand Law Society; Hon Kris Faafoi, Minister of Justice; Hon Paul Goldsmith, National party spokesperson for justice
Dear Sir/Madam
I am very much appreciative of your continuous interest on this matter.
Undisputed fact is not controversial, because one dispute it.
We must accept the undisputed fact: all New Zealand Courts, without any exception, are being used as the means and covers to committed all kinds of crimes with impunity in violation of the laws of New Zealand.
https://sites.google.com/view/tatsuhiko-koyama/confirmed-false-court-documents-of-new-zealand
Basically, national courts are non-existent or unable to function in New Zealand.
This situation is created by the national authorities have been unwilling or unable to carry out a genuine investigation.
State sponsorship of organised crimes will not make the clandestine criminal operations in the secrecy of the Court and Government legal under the international law; crimes committed in public institutions are crimes, simply indicating corruption in the public institutions.
Normalisation of organised crimes, committed in the secrecy of the Court and Government, is an extreme form of corruption.
What has become normalised, entrenched, and widespread in New Zealand, must change, if New Zealand wants to be part of the community of nations trying to establish and maintain civil orders in the international community.
What should Present of New Zealand Law Society do on the "undisputed" systemic organised crimes, committed in New Zealand Courts?
It will be a very good idea for you to ask her the question on air.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
Subject: Re: What should Justice Osborne of Christchurch High Court do on the false, forged documents in which his name was used for fraud?
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2022 09:11:04 +1300
From: Tatsuhiko Koyama
To: Casey Miller
CC: President@lawsociety.org.nz
Dear Casey
Thank you for your response on this matter.
It is my wish that Ms Epati, President of the New Zealand Law Society, act on this matter promptly.
Best regards
Tatsuhiko Koyama
On 8/02/2022 9:03 am, Casey Miller wrote:
Good morning
Thank you for your email.
If you wish to correspond with Ms Epati in relation to her role as President of the New Zealand Law Society, please send your email to President@lawsociety.org.nz
Wainui Chambers and Rishworth Wall & Mathieson have no role in matters relating to the operation of Law Society matters or Ms Epati’s position as President.
Thank you
Casey
Registered Legal Executive
Rishworth Wall & Mathieson
TV ONE, state broadcaster, must do the right thing for New Zealand and the international community
8 February 2022
Breakfast
Dear Sir/Madam
I am very much appreciative of your continuous interest on this matter.
You witnessed the fact and evidence.
It is the time for you to accept the reality of New Zealand.
All New Zealand Courts, without any exception, are being used as the means and covers to committed all kinds of crimes with impunity.
https://sites.google.com/view/tatsuhiko-koyama/confirmed-false-court-documents-of-new-zealand
The present day New Zealand is LEGAL BLACKHOLE.
New Zealand has the very insidious culture of impunity.
What you have witness is what is normal in New Zealand: (1) national courts are non-existent or unable to function, and (2) national authorities have been unwilling or unable to carry out a genuine investigation.
You need to alert the public and international community on the systemic corruption and organised crimes in public institutions of New Zealand and end of the clandestine publicly funded organised crimes, committed in the secrecy of the Court and Government, subverting the law, using state power for illicit purposes, in violation of the law.
You, TV ONE, state broadcaster, must do the right thing for New Zealand and the international community.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
What should Justice Osborne of Christchurch High Court do on the false, forged documents in which his name was used for fraud?
6 February 2022
Hon Justice Osborne
Christchurch High Court
cc: New Zealand Law Society, Canterbury-Westland Branch; Hon Kris Faafoi, Minister of justice; Mayor Lianne Dalziel, Christchurch mayor; Mr Mark Zarifeh, Crown Solicitor based in Christchurch; Hon Poto Williams, MP for Christchurch East; Ms Sarah Pallett, MP for Ilam; Dr Duncan Webb MP, MP for Christchurch Central; Hon Gerry Brownlee; National Party List MP in Christchurch; Faculty of Law, University of Canterbury; and others
Dear Justice Osborne
What should you do on the false, forged documents in which your name was used in fraud?
You must personally witness the evidence of the systemic organised crimes in which your name was used for fraud in violation of the Crimes Act 1961.
(1) FORGED DOCUMENT - “JUDGMENT OF ASSOCIATE JUDGE OSBORNE as to substituted service of Bankruptcy Notice,” dated 18 September 2015, (sent by Dunedin High Court on 1 October 2015)
* The signature on the document, dated 18 September 2015, is a computer-generated image, pasted on the document. There is NO practice in the High Court of New Zealand to put an digital image on the original court document. It is forgery per se.
(2) FORGED DOCUMENT - Handwritten minute of Associate Judge Osborne, dated 26 January 2016, (sent by Rebecca Fahey, Civil Caseflow Manager, Christchurch High Court, on 18 February 2016)
(3) FORGED DOCUMENT - “JUDGMENT OF ASSOCIATE JUDGE OSBORNE upon review of Deputy Registrar’s decision,” dated 1 March 2016, (sent by Keroli Smith, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 1 March 2016)
* There are two distinctly different signatures, clearly indicating forgery.
(4) FORGED DOCUMENT - "JUDGMENT OF ASSOCIATE JUDGE OSBORNE annulling adjudication," dated 13 December 2016, (Sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 4 January 2017)
* The signature on the document, dated 13 December 2016, is a computer-generated image, pasted on the document. There is NO practice in the High Court of New Zealand to put an digital image on the original court document. It is forgery per se.
(5) EXPERT OPINION - "Analysis of signatures for detection of forgery, dated 6 May 2016," Andrew Straw, US lawyer and notary public
(6) Memorandum of Grant Slevin, Senior Investigating Solicitor, Insolvency and Trustee Service, Minister of Business, Innovation and employment, dated 12 December 2016, stating: "...counsel submits the hearing scheduled for 15 December should be vacated and a date in January 2017 allocated for a determination on the papers, or if the need arises, a case management conference by way of telephone conference."
(7) Email of Grant Slevin, dated 23 December 2016, stating: "If what you say is true you have committed an offence under s 433(f) Insolvency Act 2006 by leaving New Zealand without the Assignee’s consent. A person who commits this offence is liable on summary conviction to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 12 months or a fine not exceeding $5,000, or both."
Your continuous silence on this matter must be considered as aiding and abetting.
Your immediate action on this matter is very much expected.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
What should Governor General of New Zealand do on the "undisputed state-sponsored organised crimes of New Zealand? (5 February 2022)
Dear Governor General
I like you to read what Professor Cass R. Sunstein of Harvard Law School wrote in his latest book "This is not normal: The politics of everyday expectations" (2021):
"If people are surrounded by conduct that is morally abominable, or seeing a lot of it, they will not disapprove of, and may even be fine with, conduct that is morally bad (but not abominable). That is the power of the normal: our moral judgments are often a product of what else we see, and when what we see is very, very bad, we might not disapprove of the bad, or even the very bad. We might see it as fine, or even as good." (p. 21)
The fact is that New Zealand has the very insidious culture of impunity: (1) national courts are non-existent or unable to function [all New Zealand Courts, from the District Court to the Supreme Court of New Zealand, are being used the means and covers for organised crimes], and (2) national authorities have been unwilling or unable to carry out a genuine investigation [the clandestine publicly funded criminal operations are made possible and continued to be viable in New Zealand because of the protection, support, and concealment provided by the law enforcement and regulatory agencies of New Zealand Government].
It is the time for your to act.
There is no disputed from anyone on this matter, there is no controversy for you to get involved.
For more information on this matter, please go to my website:
https://sites.google.com/site/tatsuhikokoyama/home
Your action on this matter is very much expected.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
What should the opposition do on the "undisputed state-sponsored organised crimes of New Zealand?
4 February 2022
Mr Christopher Luxon MP
Leader of the oppostion
New Zealand Parliament
cc: Professor Cass R. Sunstein, Harvard Law School; Rt Hon Jacinda Ardern, Prime Minister; Hon Grant Robertson, Deputy Prime Minister; and others
Dear Mr Luxon
I like you to read what Professor Cass R. Sunstein of Harvard Law School wrote in his latest book "This is not normal: The politics of everyday expectations" (2021):
"If people are surrounded by conduct that is morally abominable, or seeing a lot of it, they will not disapprove of, and may even be fine with, conduct that is morally bad (but not abominable). That is the power of the normal: our moral judgments are often a product of what else we see, and when what we see is very, very bad, we might not disapprove of the bad, or even the very bad. We might see it as fine, or even as good." (p. 21)
We must accept the undisputed fact, and that should be beyond politics.
New Zealand has the very insidious culture of impunity: (1) national courts are non-existent or unable to function [all New Zealand Courts, from the District Court to the Supreme Court of New Zealand, are being used the means and covers for organised crimes], and (2) national authorities have been unwilling or unable to carry out a genuine investigation [the clandestine publicly funded criminal operations are made possible and continued to be viable in New Zealand because of the protection, support, and concealment provided by the law enforcement and regulatory agencies of New Zealand Government].
It is the time to act.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
Time for the international community to act on the "undisputed" state-sponsored organised crimes of New Zealand
4 February 2022
Dear Sir/Madam
It is the time for the international community to act on the "undisputed" state-sponsored organised crimes of New Zealand.
The current status of New Zealand is LEGAL BLACKHOLE.
The "undisputed" fact shows that all New Zealand Courts, from the District Court to the Supreme Court of New Zealand, are being used as the means and covers to commit all kinds of crimes in violation of the laws of New Zealand and international law.
https://sites.google.com/view/tatsuhiko-koyama/confirmed-false-court-documents-of-new-zealand
Attached, please find some of the evidence of the systemic organised crimes, committed in New Zealand.
You must see them to find out for yourself the interconnectedness of the collusive clandestine criminal operations of New Zealand.
New Zealand has the very insidious culture of impunity: (1) national courts are non-existent or unable to function [all New Zealand Courts, from the District Court to the Supreme Court of New Zealand, are being used the means and covers for organised crimes], and (2) national authorities have been unwilling or unable to carry out a genuine investigation [the clandestine publicly funded criminal operations are made possible and continued to be viable in New Zealand because of the protection, support, and concealment provided by the law enforcement and regulatory agencies of New Zealand Government].
No one disputes this fact, and there is no political controversy on this matter.
It is the time for the international community to act.
New Zealand requires international intervention and oversight on the Judiciary and other public institutions.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
We must put pressure on the Prime Minister on the systemic organised crimes committed in New Zealand Courts
3 February 2022
Mr Christopher Luxon MP
Leader of the opposition
cc: Ms Nicola Willis, National Party list MP in Wellington; Dominionpost; Rt Hon Jacinda Ardern
Dear Mr Luxon
What is the prerequisite for a leader?
Is Rt Hon Jacinda Ardern, Prime Minister of New Zealand, up to the task of leading the nation?
If you think yes, then, perhaps, you can remain silent on this matter. DONE.
If you think you can do a much better job than the current prime minister, then, you must act.
The fact is undisputed, and New Zealand has very serious problems.
You must act on the systemic organised crimes committed in public institutions of New Zealand; the organised criminal syndicates are subverting the law and using state power for their illicit ends in the secrecy of the Court and Government of New Zealand.
Can you raise your voice on the undisputed fact?
Yours sincerely
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
We must put pressure on the Prime Minister on the systemic organised crimes committed in New Zealand Courts
3 February 2022
Crown Solicitors
cc: Rt Hon Jacinda Ardern, Prime Minister; Hon Poto Williams, Police Minister and Minister Responsible for Serious Fraud Office; Serious Fraud Office; Supreme Court; Wellington High Court; and others
Dear Sirs
You as Crown Solicitors must act on the undisputed organised crimes, committed in New Zealand Courts.
It is totally undisputed that the systemic organised crimes were committed in all New Zealand Courts from the District Court to the Supreme Court of New Zealand).
https://sites.google.com/view/tatsuhiko-koyama/confirmed-false-court-documents-of-new-zealand
You must put pressure on the Prime Minister, so that she will take leadership and make sure that this matter be properly investigated by the relevant law enforcement agencies of New Zealand Government, rather than continuing to suppress the state-sponsored organised crimes.
Now, please take a look at some of the evidences of the organised crimes, committed in Wellington High Court (please see the attached email of Mr Matthew McCallum, Private Secretary (Serious Fraud Office), dated 19 October 2021, "Undisputed systemic organised crimes of fraud in New Zealand Courts require investigation."
The systemic nature of the organised crimes indicates that New Zealand has the culture of impunity.
Two elements, indicative of the culture of impunity, are (1) national courts are non-existent or unable to function [all New Zealand Courts, from the District Court to the Supreme Court of New Zealand, are being used the means and covers for organised crimes]; (2) national authorities have been unwilling or unable to carry out a genuine investigation [the clandestine publicly funded criminal operations are made possible and continued to be viable in New Zealand because of the protection, support, and concealment provided by the law enforcement and regulatory agencies of New Zealand Government].
The collusive, and interconnected nature of the organised crimes in public institutions clearly indicates that the clandestine criminal operations in public institutions have existed for a very long time; they are very much entrenched and widespread in New Zealand.
Your urgent action on this matter is very much expected.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
We must put pressure on the Prime Minister on the systemic organised crimes committed in New Zealand Courts
3 February 2022
Auckland High Court
cc: Rt Hon Jacinda Ardern, Prime Minister of New Zealand; Transparency International, New Zealand Media
Dear Sir/Madam
We must unite and fight against the organised criminal syndicates which are using New Zealand Courts as the means and covers for their crimes.
This matter requires our united effort as the criminal syndicates are united to subvert the law, committing all kinds of crimes with impunity, being protected, supported, and concealed by the law enforcement and regulatory of the government.
We must put pressure on the Prime Minister to deal with the systemic corruption and organised crimes, committed in New Zealand Courts.
The fact is undisputed, and the clandestine publicly funded criminal operations in the secrecy of the Court and Government have no place in New Zealand.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
We must put pressure on the Prime Minister on the systemic organised crimes committed in New Zealand Courts
2 February 2022
Auckland District Law Society
cc: New Zealand Law Society Auckland Branch; Hon David Parker, Attorney General; Hon Kris Faafoi, Minister of Justice; Mayor Phil Goff, Mayor of Auckland; Hon Jan Tinetti, Minister of Internal Affairs; and otheres
Dear Sir/Madam
We must unite and fight against the organised criminal syndicates which are using New Zealand Courts as the means and covers for their crimes.
This matter requires our united effort as the criminal syndicates are united to subvert the law, committing all kinds of crimes with impunity, being protected, supported, and concealed by the law enforcement and regulatory of the government.
We must put pressure on the Prime Minister to deal with the systemic corruption and organised crimes, committed in New Zealand Courts.
The fact is undisputed, and the clandestine publicly funded criminal operations in the secrecy of the Court and Government have no place in New Zealand.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
We must put pressure on the Prime Minister on the systemic organised crimes committed in New Zealand Courts
2 February 2022
Mr Aaron Hawkins
Dunedin Mayor
cc: New Zealand Law Society Otago Branch; Hon Dr David Clark, MP for Dunedin; Ms Ingrid Leary, MP for Taieri; Rachel Brooking, list MP based in Dunedin; Hon Michael Woodhouse, list MP based in Dunedin
Dear Mayor
The crimes are committed in the Court, and these crimes are state-sponsored organised crimes, due to the protection, support, and concealment provided the law enforcement and regulatory agencies of New Zealand Government.
We must fight; we must put pressure on the Prime Minister to deal with it, rather than letting her suppress the clandestine criminal operations of New Zealand, done in the secrecy of the Court and Government.
We must not allow New Zealand Courts to be used as the means and covers for the organised crimes to commit all kinds of crimes with impunity.
The fact is undisputed, and the evidence is published for anyone to see.
https://sites.google.com/view/tatsuhiko-koyama/confirmed-false-court-documents-of-new-zealand
We must unite, because the organised criminal syndicates are totally united to subvert the law and commit crimes in the secrecy of the Court and Government.
The Prime Minister will not act on this matter, unless she is pressured to do by us, which include all those who are residents of the city of Dunedin.
This matter requires your immediate attention and action.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
You must witness the systemic organised crimes committed in Christchurch High Court
1 February 2022
Rt Hon Jacinda Ardern
Prime Minister
Dear Prime Minister
You must personally witness the evidence of the systemic organised crimes of forgery and using false documents, committed in Christchurch High Court.
(1) FORGED DOCUMENT - “JUDGMENT OF ASSOCIATE JUDGE OSBORNE as to substituted service of Bankruptcy Notice,” dated 18 September 2015, (sent by Dunedin High Court on 1 October 2015)
* The signature on the document, dated 18 September 2015, is a computer-generated image, pasted on the document. There is NO practice in the High Court of New Zealand to put an digital image on the original court document. It is forgery per se.
(2) FORGED DOCUMENT - Handwritten minute of Associate Judge Osborne, dated 26 January 2016, (sent by Rebecca Fahey, Civil Caseflow Manager, Christchurch High Court, on 18 February 2016)
(3) FORGED DOCUMENT - “JUDGMENT OF ASSOCIATE JUDGE OSBORNE upon review of Deputy Registrar’s decision,” dated 1 March 2016, (sent by Keroli Smith, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 1 March 2016)
* There are two distinctly different signatures, clearly indicating forgery.
(4) FORGED DOCUMENT - "JUDGMENT OF ASSOCIATE JUDGE OSBORNE annulling adjudication," dated 13 December 2016, (Sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 4 January 2017)
* The signature on the document, dated 13 December 2016, is a computer-generated image, pasted on the document. There is NO practice in the High Court of New Zealand to put an digital image on the original court document. It is forgery per se.
(5) EXPERT OPINION - "Analysis of signatures for detection of forgery, dated 6 May 2016," Andrew Straw, US lawyer and notary public
(6) Email of Grant Slevin, Senior Investigating Solicitor, Insolvency and Trustee Service, Minister of Business, Innovation and employment, dated 23 December 2015, stating: "If what you say is true you have committed an offence under s 433(f) Insolvency Act 2006 by leaving New Zealand without the Assignee’s consent. A person who commits this offence is liable on summary conviction to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 12 months or a fine not exceeding $5,000, or both."
It is your duty as Prime Minister of New Zealand to ensure that this matter be investigated thoroughly.
The problem in New Zealand is extremely severe; all New Zealand Courts, without any exception, are used as the means and covers for organised crimes.
This matter must be a serious concern for you as Prime Minister of New Zealand.
If you are interested, plesae go to the following website for more information:
CONFIRMED BANKRUPTCY FRAUD IN NEW ZEALAND
https://sites.google.com/view/tatsuhiko-koyama/confirmed-bankruptcy-fraud-in-new-zealand
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
Systemic organised crimes, committed in Christchurch High Court, using the name of Justice Mander for fraud
31 January 2022
Mr Christopher Luxon MP
Leader of the National Party
cc: Rt Hon Jacinda Ardern, Prime Minister; Hon Grant Robertson, Deputy Prime Minister; Hon Marama Daivdson, co-leader of Green Party; Hon James Shaw, co-leader of Green Party
Dear Mr Luxon
The undisputed fact must be accepted and acted on by the leader of the opposition especially when the matter is very serious: systemic corruption and organised crimes, committed in the secrecy of the Court and Government, clandestine publicly funded criminal operations in public institutions, using the state power for illicit ends, in violation of the laws of New Zealand.
You must act, even unilaterally if Rt Hon Jacinda Ardern, Prime Minister of New Zealand, is willing to suppress the state-sponsored organised crimes of New Zealand.
You must contact Justice Mander of the High Court and notify him about the systemic organised crimes, committed in Christchurch High Court, using his name for fraud, in violation of the Crimes Act 1961.
Your leadership as the leader of the opposition is very much expected.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
Systemic organised crimes, committed in Christchurch High Court, using the name of Justice Mander for fraud
31 January 2022
Hon Gerry Brownlee
National Party List MP in Christchurch
cc: Hon Poto Williams, MP for Christchurch East; Ms Sarah Pallett, MP for Ilam; Dr Duncan Webb MP, MP for Christchurch Central; Christchurch High Court
Dear Hon Gerry Brownlee
Please take a look at some of many false, forged court documents, issued by Christchurch High Court, using the name of Justice Mander for fraud.
It is better that you witness the evidence of the systemic organised crimes, committed in Christchurch High Court.
These crimes were committed when the National party was in the government, and you were a senior member of the National Party in the cabinet at that time.
In New Zealand, it is normalised to use the Court as the means and covers to commit all kinds of crimes with impunity; the clandestine publicly funded organised crimes are made possible because of the protection, support, and concealment provided by the law enforcement and regulatory agencies of New Zealand Government.
https://sites.google.com/view/tatsuhiko-koyama/confirmed-false-court-documents-of-new-zealand
The fact is undisputed, so it is not politically controversial for you to get involved on this matter.
You must contact Justice Mander and notify that his name has been used for the systemic organised crimes, committed in Christchurch High Court.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
FALSE, FORGED DOCUMENTS ISSUED BY CHRISTCHURCH HIGH COURT
(1) FALSE DOCUMENT - “MINUTE OF MANDER J,” dated 26 February 2015, (sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 27 February 2015)
(2) FALSE DOCUMENT - Signed, “MINUTE OF MANDER J,” dated 26 February 2015, (sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 24 August 2015)
(3) FALSE DOCUMENT - Handwritten minute of Mander J, dated 27 February 2015, (retrieved from the official court file found in Dunedin High Court on 19 February 2016)
(4) FALSE DOCUMENT - “MINUTE OF MANDER J,” dated 5 March 2015, (sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 5 March 2015)
(5) FALSE DOCUMENT - Signed, “MINUTE OF MANDER J,” dated 5 March 2015, (sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 13 March 2015)
(6) FALSE DOCUMENT - Unless order of Mander J, dated 12 March 2015, (sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 12 March 2015)
(7) FALSE DOCUMENT - Handwritten minute of Mander J, dated 12 March 2015, (sent by sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 13 March 2015)
(8) FALSE DOCUMENT - Signed, “MINUTE OF MANDER J,” dated 13 March 2015, (sent by sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 13 March 2015)
* There is NO signed minute of Mander J, dated 13 March 2015, in the official court file.
(9) FALSE DOCUMENT - “MINUTE OF MANDER J,” dated 13 March 2015, (sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 16 March 2015)
(10) FALSE DOCUMENT - “MINUTE OF MANDER J,” dated 17 March 2015, (sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 17 March 2015)
(11) FALSE DOCUMENT - Signed, “MINUTE OF MANDER J,” dated 17 March 2015, (sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 17 March 2015)
* There is NO signed minute of Mander J, dated 17 March 2015, in the official court file.
(12) FALSE DOCUMENT - Email of Mander J, dated 20 March 2015 (at 12:11 pm), (sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 10 August 2015)
“Friday, 20 March 2015 12:11 p.m.”
"Amelia, I record a brief note of my decision. I don’t think I can wait any longer for the respondent’s response in order to give the appellants’ time to comply with the order.
The appellants’ application for an extension is declined.
The appellants cite Rule 12.7(1) HCRs as providing a time requirement for service, however this rule concerns summary judgment applications and does not apply for the present situation.
The appellants appeal remains extant notwithstanding the operation of the unless order.
I also note for completeness that a hearing of the respondent’s application was attempted to convened however the appellants declined to make themselves available despite repeated efforts by the registry. The matter was dealt with by way of memorandum.
The appellants have still not provided reasons for their non-compliance.
Mander J"
(13) FALSE DOCUMENT - Email of Mander J, dated 20 March 2015 (at 12:18 pm), (sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 12 August 2015)
“Friday, 20 March 2015 12:18:41 p.m.”
“Amelia,
Our emails passed. I have read the respondent’s submissions. My ruling stands and may be notified to the parties without modification.
Many thanks
Mander J”
(14) FALSE DOCUMENT - Order of Mander J, dated 20 March 2015 (at 12:26 pm), (sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 20 March 2015)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Nicholson, Amelia" <Amelia.Nicholson@justice.govt.nz>
Date: Thursday, 19 March 2015 at 2:13 PM
To: Tatsuhiko Koyama <tatsuhiko.koyama@gmail.com>
Cc: "Henaghan, Misha" <Misha.Henaghan@dlapf.com>, "Macdonald, Grant" <grant.macdonald@dlapiper.co.nz>, "Thom, Sacha" <sacha.thom@dlapiper.co.nz>
Subject: RE: Appellant's submissions - Koyama v Southern Response (CIV-2014-412-0202)
Dear Tatsuhiko,
Many thanks for your email. All our Christchurch Judges are in Wellington today and Friday attending a conference but as the Unless Order is for close of business tomorrow I will forward this application and any other relevant documents on to the Honourable Justice Mander to deal with as soon as he has the opportunity.
If counsel for the respondent wishes to reply to this application could they please let me know as soon as possible.
Kind regards,
Amelia
From: "Nicholson, Amelia" <Amelia.Nicholson@justice.govt.nz>
Date: Friday, 20 March 2015 at 8:26 AM
To: "tatsuhiko.koyama@gmail.com" <tatsuhiko.koyama@gmail.com>, "Macdonald, Grant" <grant.macdonald@dlapiper.co.nz>, "Henaghan, Misha" <misha.henaghan@dlapiper.co.nz>, "Thom, Sacha" <sacha.thom@dlapiper.co.nz>
Subject: CIV-2014-412-000202 - Koyama v Southern Response Earthquake Services Limited
Dear Counsel and Mr and Ms Koyama,
Following the receipt of the appellants application for an extension of the unless order and the respondents memorandum in reply, the Honourable Justice Mander has minuted the above named matter as follows:
"The appellants' application for an extension is declined.
The appellants cite Rule 12.7(1) HCRs as providing a time requirement for service, however this rule concerns summary judgment applications and does not apply to the present situation.
The appellants appeal remains extant notwithstanding the operation of the unless order.
I also note for completeness that a hearing of the respondent's application was attempted to be convened however the appellants declined to make themselves available despite repeated efforts by the Registry. The matter was dealt with by way of memorandum.
The appellants have still not provided reasons for their non-compliance.”
Kind regards,
Amelia
Amelia Nicholson
Deputy Registrar | Christchurch High Court
DDI: +64 3 962 4273 | Ext 54273
www.courtsofnz.govt.nz
From: "Nicholson, Amelia" <Amelia.Nicholson@justice.govt.nz>
Date: Monday, 10 August 2015 at 10:23 AM
To: Tatsuhiko Koyama <tatsuhiko.koyama@gmail.com>
Subject: RE: Request for a copy of the handwritten minute of Mander J, dated 20 March 2015
Dear Mr Koyama,
I do not have a hand written copy of this minute as the Honourable Justice Mander was in Auckland for a conference. This minute was given to me by way of email which I have attached a copy of now.
Kind regards,
Amelia
* Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, was involved with Grant Macdonald, Misha Henaghan, and Sacha Thom of DLA Piper New Zealand in the confirmed insurance fraud, causing loss by deception, forgery, using false document for pecuniary advantage, in violation of the Crimes Act 1961.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(15) FALSE DOCUMENT - “JUDGMENT OF MANDER J,” dated 23 March 2015, (sent by Rebecca Fahey, Civil Caseflow Manager, Christchurch High Court, on 23 March 2015, on the same day when a telephone case management conference was held and before the scheduled hearing on 5 April 2015)
(16) FALSE DOCUMENT - Signed, “JUDGMENT OF MANDER J,” dated 23 March 2015, (sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 24 March 2015)
(17) FALSE DOCUMENT - “JUDGMENT OF MANDER J,’ dated 26 May 2015, (sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 26 May 2015)
(18) FALSE DOCUMENT - Signed, “JUDGMENT OF MANDER J,’ dated 26 May 2015, (sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 5 August 2015)
* There is NO signed judgement of Mander J, dated 26 May 2015, in the official court file.
(19) FALSE DOCUMENT - Minute of Mander J, date 5 June 2016, (sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 5 June 2015)
(20) FALSE DOCUMENT - Handwritten minute of Mander J, dated 5 June 2015, (sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 14 July 2015)
(21) FALSE DOCUMENT - “Order for Costs,” dated 12 June 2015, (sent by Grant Macdonald on or around 15 July 2015) - THIS DOCUMENT WAS SENT "AFTER" THE CASE WAS APPEALED TO THE COURT OF APPEAL, where the continuous stream of false, forged documents were made and used for fraud in the Court, conspiring to defeat justice, in violation of the Crimes Act 1961.
Hon Gerry Brownlee must answer on the undisputed systemic organise crimes committed when he was a senior member of the government
30 January 2022
Rt Hon Jacinda Ardern
Prime Minister
cc: Hon Grant Robertson, Deputy Prime Minister; Hon Marama Daivdson, co-leader of Green Party; Hon James Shaw, co-leader of Green Party
Dear Prime Minister
I received an email from the office of Hon Gerry Brownlee, stating, “Gerry Brownlee is unable to assist as it is before the Court” on the matter relating to the police file (211217/2851).
I asked the staff who sent the email, “Does it mean that Judge Farish of Christchurch District Court knows about the fact that her name has been used by Gavin Hillary repeatedly?”
There was no answer.
Silence must not be allowed; worse, obstructing the course of justice is a crime; and MP should not be part of the organised crimes.
Hon Gerry Brownlee must answer questions regarding the police file 211217/2851 - fraudulent use of the name of Judge Farish of Christchurch District Court, and other organised crimes, committed in New Zealand Courts, especially in Christchurch, when the National party was controlling the government.
For your information, I published the evidence of organised crimes, committed in New Zealand Courts, and many of the fraudulent documents were issued by the High Court in Christchurch.
https://sites.google.com/view/tatsuhiko-koyama/confirmed-false-court-documents-of-new-zealand
On 19 October 2021, I received an email from the office of Hon Poto Williams, Minister responsible for the Serious Fraud Office, on the undisputed systemic organised crimes of fraud committed in New Zealand Courts, attached.
The fact is undisputed on the systemic organised crimes, which have been protected, supported, and concealed by the law enforcement and regulatory agencies of New Zealand Government.
This matter requires your immediate action, so that we will know the extent of knowledge on the systemic organised crimes, committed in the secrecy of the Court and Government, when Hon Gerry Brownlee was a senior member of the government.
This matter obviously requires inquiry by the Labour-Green government.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
CRI-2020-009-4772 New Zealand Transport Authority -v- Autorent Limited, Hanna and Hillary
28 January 2022
Hon Michael Wood
Minister of Transport
Cc: Dr Duncan Webb, MP for Christchurch Central
Dear Transport Minister
Today, I received an email from the office of Hon Gerry Brownlee, attached below, stating, “Gerry Brownlee is unable to assist as it is before the Courts.”
There was no answer to my question of “Does it mean that Judge Farish of Christchurch District Court knows about the fact that her name has been used by Gavin Hillary repeatedly?”
So, I asked Dr Duncan Webb, MP for Christchurch Central, to notify Judge Jane Farish of Christchurch District Court that her name was used several times by Gavin Hillary who apparently lives in the electorate, and there was police investigation on this matter (police file 211217/2851).
For your information, on 14 December 2021, I received an email from Mr Tom Peoples, your secretary, stating, "I regard to prior our correspondence – I was of the impression that you had meant to say that matter was before the Court. Can you confirm this is the case?"
I request you to make an enquiry on this matter and provide me with the information on CRI-2020-009-4772 New Zealand Transport Authority -v- Autorent Limited, Hanna and Hillary.
Does this criminal proceeding actually exist?
This matter requires your immediate action.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
Police corruption - Judge Farish of Christchurch District Court must be contacted immediately
28 January 2022
Dr Duncan Webb
MP for Christchurch Central
cc: Hon Gerry Brownlee, National Party List MP in Christchurch
Dear Dr Webb
This is an urgent matter.
You must contact Judge Jane Farish of Christchurch District Court immediately.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
Omission of a particular police email on the response from the police
28 January 2022
Inspector Jimi McGrogan
Police Professional Conduct
New Zealand Police
cc: Mr Andrew Coster, Commissioner of police; Hon Poto Williams, Police Minister; Hon Mark Mitchell, National party spokesperson for police; Hon Kris Faafoi, Minister of Justice; Ministry of Justice; Christchurch District Court; Independent Police Conduct Authority; and others
Dear Inspector McGrogan
I noticed that you omitted a particular file, the email of the police, dated 18 December 2021, which I sent to the police commissioner on 27 January 2022 along with other four files.
This particular police email, dated 18 December 2021, attached, states:
=============================================================
Subject: Online Report OR-271099N / File Reference number 211217/2851
Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2021 21:46:21 +0000
From: Online Reporting Team <OnlineReportingTeam@police.govt.nz>
To: 'tatsuhiko.koyama@gmail.com' <tatsuhiko.koyama@gmail.com>
Kia ora,
Further to your Online Report OR-271099N.
I have looked into previous reports you have made regarding the summons document you were served with and how you believed it had been forged. I can confirm from the previous reports that the summons document is in fact authentic. If you do not wish to answer the summons it is completely up to you but please note that there may be consequences such as a fine or warrant issued if you do not answer the summons.
In regards to the matter with Mr HILLARY still contacting you, this will be looked at and a decision made as to whether this report will be sent to the local police district involved for investigation an follow up.
Ngā mihi,
105 Online Reporting Team
New Zealand Police Digital Centre
E OnlineReportingTeam@police.govt.nz
=============================================================
Is there any reason for you to omit this particular piece of information in your response?
For your information, on 28 December 2021, Gavin Hillary sent me his email, attached:
=============================================================
Subject: Re: CRI-2020-009-4772 New Zealand Transport Authority -v- Autorent Limited, Hanna and Hillary
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2021 16:21:38 +1300 (NZDT)
From: Gavin Hillary <gavinhillary@xtra.co.nz>
To: Tatsuhiko Koyama <tatsuhiko.koyama@gmail.com>
CC: christchurch.dc@justice.govt.nz, dunedin.dc@justice.govt.nz, contactus@justice.govt.nz
Dear Mr. Koyama, (and others)
Thank you for your email, however, I do have concerns about your honesty, (You were served at your residence on the 5th of November 2020, you and your wife invited me into your home after you had been served and you met my daughter) motivation, (You asked the police to tell me not to contact you or face a potential Criminal Harassment Order) and your mental health. (You know the penalties for ignoring a summons and given your qualifications, you will know how the process works and how to ensure that it is legitimate if you had genuine concerns that it may not be)
You can only guess what evidence you will be asked to confirm or deny and I would suggest that your guess would be wrong. You will be under oath and required to tell the truth, it is a witness summons, you have not been charged with anything so I am at a loss as to what your motivation is with this email, the email to Chris Faafoi, and to others.
For the record, I am only contacting you because you emailed me. I am not interested in an entrapment attempt given that you have contacted the police at least twice to date. If you wish to contact me, feel free, you have my contact details. You do not need to copy your email to all and sundry.
Trust you had a merry Christmas and will have an even better new year.
Kind regards,
Gavin Hillary
=============================================================
Gavin Hillary was told by Dunedin Police not to contact me nor come to the premises that I lived (Gavin Hillary ignored the police warning repeatedly).
Gavin Hillary told me and staff at Dunedin District Court that he was acting on behalf of Judge Jane Farish of Christchurch District Court, including serving the summons and scheduling hearings, because he was given authorisation by the judge to so.
The police, by sending the email, dated 18 December 2021, not only covered up the crimes of Gavin Hillary but also aided and abetted the crimes.
Later, on 28 December 2021, Gavin Hillary, emboldened by the police cover-up and assistance, further committed the crime by sending me his email, dated 28 December 2021, threatening and ordering to give evidence in the Court.
In my email to you, dated 27 January 2022, attached, I wrote:
=============================================================
Without actually investigating on the formal complaint, including contacting Judge Farish whose name was repeatedly used by Gavin Hillary, must be considered as police misconduct.
Furthermore, covering up the crime of Gavin Hillary by the police officers must be considered as aiding and abetting the crime.
It is the time for the police to actually investigate the complaint and contact Judge Farish of Christchurch District Court whose name has been used by Gavin Hillary repeatedly.
=============================================================
Gavin Hillary committed very serious crimes, using the false, forged court document and repeatedly using the Court for his fraud, in violation of the Crimes Act 1961.
The police must actually investigate the complaint and contact Judge Jane Farish of Christchurch District Court as part of the police investigation.
It is expected that you will identify the name of the police officer who sent the email on 18 December 2021, rather than covering it up.
This matter requires your utmost urgency.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
Police File 211217/2851: Police must actually contact Judge Jane Farish of Christchurch District Court
27 January 2022
Hon Kris Faafoi
Minister of Justice
cc: Hon Paul Goldsmith, National party spokesperson for justice; Hon Gerry Brownlee, National party list MP in Christchurch; Dr Duncan Webb, MP for Christchurch Central; Dr David Clark, MP for Dunedin; Ingrid Leary, MP for Taieri; Rachel Brooking, Labour party list MP in Dunedin; Hon Michael Woodhouse, list MP in Dunedin; Mayor Aaron Hawkins of the city of Dunedin
Dear Justice Minister
I am an enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand.
YOU MUST CONTACT JUDGE FARISH IMMEDIATELY.
It is imperative that you act, due to the crimes committed by Gavin Hillary who repeatedly used the name of Judge Jane Farish of Christchurch District Court for fraud, in violation of the Crimes Act 1961.
You, Justice Minister, must not be in complicit in the crimes, committed in the Court and the fraudulent use of the name of judge.
Your immediate action on this matter is very much expected.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
Police File 211217/2851: Police must actually contact Judge Jane Farish of Christchurch District Court
27 January 2022
Inspector Jimi McGrogan
Police Professional Conduct
New Zealand Police
cc: Mr Andrew Coster, Commissioner of police; Hon Poto Williams, Police Minister; Hon Mark Mitchell, National party spokesperson for police; and others
Dear Inspector McGrogan
Thank you very much for your very prompt response on my complaint that I lodged with Mr Andrew Coster, Police Commissioner, today.
Attached, please find a copy of the false, forged document used Gavin Hillary, and a copy of his email, dated 12 November 2020, the evidence of his fraudulent use of the name of Judge Jane Farish of Christchurch District Court.
We must accept, if we were to have any confidence in the police investigation, the police officer in charge of investigating on the complaint must have contacted Judge Jane Farish of Christchurch District Court during the police investigation.
Without actually investigating on the formal complaint, including contacting Judge Farish whose name was repeatedly used by Gavin Hillary, must be considered as police misconduct.
Furthermore, covering up the crime of Gavin Hillary by the police officers must be considered as aiding and abetting the crime.
It is the time for the police to actually investigate the complaint and contact Judge Farish of Christchurch District Court whose name has been used by Gavin Hillary repeatedly.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
On 27/01/22 3:32 pm, Integrity and Conduct wrote:
Kia ora Mr Koyama,
Thank you for your email. Police has previously assessed your complaint and will be taking no further action. This has already been conveyed to you by Detective Senior Sergeant Colin Baillie. As you know, the actions of Police were reviewed by the Independent Police Conduct Authority (IPCA) and there was no evidence of Police misconduct or neglect of duty. This decision was notified to you by the IPCA in December. Police will not be investigating further.
Regards,
Inspector Jimi McGrogan
Police Professional Conduct
New Zealand Police | PNHQ
From: Tatsuhiko Koyama
Sent: Thursday, 27 January 2022 8:02 AM
To: COSTER, Andrew
Subject: Systemic corruption in the Court and Police of New Zealand must be investigated
27 January 2022
Mr Andrew Coster
Commissioner of police
cc: Hon Poto Williams, Police Minister; Hon Mark Mitchell, National party spokesperson for police
Dear Police Commissioner
I am an enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand.
Attached below, please find a copy of my email to Rt Hon Jacinda Ardern, Prime Minister, regarding the systemic corruption in the Court and Police, which must be investigated by the law enforcement.
It is the time for the poice to actually investigate the complaint (Police File 211217/2851), rather than continuing to cover up the crimes, committed by Gavin Hillary.
Gavin Hillary used the name of Judge Jane Farish of Christchurch District Court for fraud and has no intention of stopping his crimes
It is the custom of the police to aid and abet organised crimes in New Zealand Courts as all New Zealand Courts are the means and covers for the clandestine publicly funded organised crimes.
Perhaps, Gavin Hillary knows this and feels embolden to commit crimes, using the Court for fraud, believing that his crimes will never be investigated and covered up by the police.
Systemic corruption prevails in the place where culture of impunity exists, and the secrecy in the Court and Government of New Zealand provides the fertile ground for the organised criminal syndicates to commit all kinds of crimes, due the protection, support, and concealment provided by the law enforcement and regulatory agencies of New Zealand Government.
The fact is undisputed, and the evidence is published for anyone to see.
https://sites.google.com/view/tatsuhiko-koyama/confirmed-false-court-documents-of-new-zealand
Your leadership as Police Commissioner is very much expected, and it is my wish that Police Minister will ensure that you do what it is expected of you and what is right for New Zealand.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
Systemic corruption in the Court and Police of New Zealand must be investigated
24 January 2022
Rt Hon Jacinda Ardern
Prime Minister
cc: Mr Christopher Luxon, leader of the opposition; and others
Dear Prime Minister
You must take leadership in fighting against the systemic corruption in the Court and Police of New Zealand.
New Zealand has extremely serious problems of systemic corruption and organised crimes in public institutions, including all New Zealand Courts without any exception, due to the protection, support, and concealment by the law enforcement and regulatory agencies of New Zealand Government.
https://sites.google.com/view/tatsuhiko-koyama/confirmed-false-court-documents-of-new-zealand
The organised criminal syndicates are flagrantly using the state power and public institutions to commit all kinds of crimes with impunity.
New Zealand must stop clandestine publicly funded organised crimes and start investigating the state-sponsored organised crimes.
You can start with the case of Gavin Hillary and his illicit use of the name of Judge Jane Farish and court document for fraud and the cover-ups by New Zealand Police and Independent Police Conduct Authority on the crimes.
Certain criminals are empowered to commit all kinds of crimes, due to the state protection and sponsorship of clandestine organised crimes, allowing state power to be used for criminal purposes in New Zealand.
New Zealand must warn the international community on this matter and seek intervention from the international community so that proper oversight will be placed on the public institutions of New Zealand.
I have no doubt that you see this situation in New Zealand as very serious.
Your leadership on this matter is very much expected.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
From: Tatsuhiko Koyama
Subject: Police and IPCA cover-ups of the crimes, committed by Gavin Hillary (Police File 211217/2851)
Date: 23 January 2022 at 6:48:23 AM NZDT
To: "poto.williams@parliament.govt.nz" <poto.williams@parliament.govt.nz>, "poto.williams.mp@parliament.govt.nz" <poto.williams.mp@parliament.govt.nz>, P.Williams@ministers.govt.nz, Police <Police.portfolio@parliament.govt.nz>
Cc: mark.mitchellmp@parliament.govt.nz
23 January 2022
Hon Poto Williams
Police Minister
cc: Hon Mark Mitchell, spokesperson for police
Dear Police Minister
I was contacted by the Police on the matter of Gavin Hillary (Police File 211217/2851) who is committing fraud, using the name of Judge Jane Farish of Christchurch District Court and documents, in violation of the Crimes Act 1961.
Gavin Hillary was empowered to continue to commit crimes, due to the cover-ups, provided by New Zealand Police and Independent Police Conduct Authority (please see my email to you, dated 20 December 2021, attached).
This matter requires you to act due to the prevailing corruption in the police and statutory oversight on the police.
Your action on this matter is expected.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
Subject: Police File 211217/2851 - Assistance on the police investigation requested
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2022 09:12:57 +1300
From: Tatsuhiko Koyama
To: duncan.webb@parliament.govt.nz <duncan.webb@parliament.govt.nz>, chchcentral@parliament.govt.nz <chchcentral@parliament.govt.nz>
CC: gerry.browneleemp@parliament.govt.nz, gerrybrownlee.office@parliament.govt.nz
23 January 2022
Dr Duncan Webb
MP for Christchurch Central
cc: Hon Gerry Brownlee, National Party List MP in Christchurch
Dear Dr Webb
This morning, I received the attached email from the police on the matter of of Police File 211217/2851.
Obviously, the police are investigating this matter, and your assistance on the police investigation is expected.
This matter should be your great concern, as the crimes were committed in Christchurch, and the name of Judge Jane Farish of Christchurch District Court was used in the crimes.
For your information, today, I sent the attached email to Hon Michael Wood, requesting his assistance on the police investigation, also.
This matter requires your immediate attention and urgent action.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] Police File 211217/2851 - Gavin Hillary - Information requested on the police investigation
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2022 18:50:38 +0000
From: Online Reporting Team <OnlineReportingTeam@police.govt.nz>
To: Tatsuhiko Koyama
Kia ora,
Thank you for your email, this information has been added onto the report.
Ngā mihi,
105 Online Reporting Team
New Zealand Police Digital Centre
E OnlineReportingTeam@police.govt.nz
Police File 211217/2851 - CRI-2020-009-4772 New Zealand Transport Authority -v- Autorent Limited, Hanna and Hillary
23 January 2022
Hon Michael Wood
Minister of Transport
Dear Transport Minister
I received emails from New Zealand Police, regarding the police file (211217/2851). for which I filed a formal complaint against Gavin Hillary who is committing crimes of fraud, using the name of Judge Jane Farish of Christchurch District Court and documents, in violation of the Crimes Act 1961.
For your information, on 14 December 2021, I received the attached email from Mr Tom Peoples, your secretary, stating, "I regard to prior our correspondence – I was of the impression that you had meant to say that matter was before the Court. Can you confirm this is the case?"
Please read the email of Gavin Hillary that I received on 18 January 2022, attached below.
At this time, I request you and Ministry of Transport to provide the police with the information on CRI-2020-009-4772 New Zealand Transport Authority -v- Autorent Limited, Hanna and Hillary.
Does this criminal proceeding actually exist?
If not, obviously, Gavin Hillary forged a document for fraud (please see the forged document and his communication on the fraud, attached).
This matter requires your immediate urgency.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
Subject: Re: CRI-2020-009-4772 New Zealand Transport Authority -v- Autorent Limited, Hanna and Hillary
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2022 16:59:50 +1300 (NZDT)
From: Gavin Hillary <gavinhillary@xtra.co.nz>
To: Tatsuhiko Koyama
Dear Mr. Koyama,
We have an adjournment, so nothing happening at this stage, I will let you know when we have a new date.
Cheers,
Gavin
On 28/12/2021 15:30 Gavin Hillary <gavinhillary@xtra.co.nz> wrote:
Dear Mr. Koyama,
Thank you for your email, however I do have concerns about your honesty, (You were served at your residence on the 5th of November 2020, you and your wife invited me into your home after you had been served and you met my daughter) motivation, (You asked the police to tell me not to contact you or face a potential Criminal Harrassment Order) and your mental health. (You know the penalties for ignoring a summons and given your qualifications, you will know how the process works and how to ensure that it is legitimate if you had genuine concerns that it may not be)
You can only guess what evidence you will be asked to confirm or deny and I would suggest that your guess would be wrong. You will be under oath and required to tell the truth, it is a witness summons, you have not been charged with anything so I am at a loss as to what your motivation is with this email, the email to Chris Faafoi and to others.
For the record, I am only contacting you because you emailed me. I am not interested in an entrapement attempt given that you have contacted the police at least twice to date. If you wish to contact me, feel free, you have my contact details. You do not need to copy your email to all and sundry.
Trust you had a merry Christmas and will have an even better new year.
Kind regards,
Gavin Hillary
On 19/12/2021 11:22 Tatsuhiko Koyama wrote:
Mr Gavin Hillary
Defendant in the case of CRI-2020-009-4772
cc: Christchurch District Court, Dunedin District Court, Ministry of Justice
Dear Mr Hillary
I require confirmation that the Court (Judge Farish of Christchurch District Court) actually issued a summons for me to appear in Dunedin District Court on 19 January 2022 in the case of CRI-2020-009-4772.
For your information, I was not served any summons to appear by the Court, except your email, dated 29 November 2021, attached.
I understand that the presiding judge is Judge Farish of Christchurch District Court in this case.
Could you ensure that Judge Farish of Christchurch District Court actually issue a signed summons for me to appear on 19 January 2022?
You must understand my concerns on this matter, as none of the Courts, Christchurch District Court nor Dunedin District Court, has confirmed this matter.
Unless I hear from Judge Farish of Christchurch District Court on this matter, I will disregard this matter and not to appear the Court on 19 January 2022.
It is important that you contact Christchurch District Court and make sure that Judge Farish issue her signed summons for me to appear in the case on 19 January 2022.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama
On 29/11/2021 11:07 am, Gavin Hillary wrote:
Dear Mr. Koyama
Please be advised that the case will now be heard from the 17th of January and your evidence will be heard vis AVL from instruction suite 2 at the Dunedin District Court on 19 January at 2 pm. I will be in contact closer to the time.
Kind regards,
Gavin Hillary
Police and IPCA cover-ups of the crimes, committed by Gavin Hillary (Police File 211217/2851)
23 January 2022
Hon Poto Williams
Police Minister
cc: Hon Mark Mitchell, spokesperson for police
Dear Police Minister
I was contacted by the Police on the matter of Gavin Hillary (Police File 211217/2851) who is committing fraud, using the name of Judge Jane Farish of Christchurch District Court and documents, in violation of the Crimes Act 1961.
Gavin Hillary was empowered to continue to commit crimes, due to the cover-ups, provided by New Zealand Police and Independent Police Conduct Authority (please see my email to you, dated 20 December 2021, attached).
This matter requires you to act due to the prevailing corruption in the police and statutory oversight on the police.
Your action on this matter is expected.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
Police File 211217/2851 - Gavin Hillary - Information requested on the police investigation
23 January 2022
Dr Duncan Webb
MP for Christchurch Central
Dear Dr Webb
On 21 January 2022, I was contacted by New Zealand Police on the matter of Police File 211217/2851, for which I lodged a formal complaint against Gavin Hillary, a resident of Christchurch, for committing fraud, in violation of the Crimes Act 1961.
I understand that Gavin Hillary lives in your electorate, and he has contacted your office.
I believe that your staff dealt with Gavin Hillary, and your staff may be able to help the police on the investigation.
Could you ask your staff who dealt with Gavin Hillary to provide information on him to the police?
I believe that he is a danger to the community as he continues to commit fraud, using the Court and the name of the judge [Judge Jane Farish of Christchurch District Court], for some illicit purposes.
Your understanding and cooperation on this matter is very much expected.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
New Zealand Police及びIndependent Police Conduct Authorityの隠蔽工作
在ニュージーランド日本国大使館御中
何時もお世話になっております。
ダニーデン在住の小山です。
添付をメールを本日在クライストチャーチ領事事務所に送りました。
特に、New Zealand Police及びIndependent Police Conduct Authorityが隠蔽工作について日本政府の対応が期待されます。
それでは、よろしくお願いします。
小山龍彦
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
クライストチャーチ在住のGavin Hillaryに関するNew Zealand Policeの対応
在クライストチャーチ領事事務所御中
何時もお世話になっております。
ダニーデン在住の小山です。
さて、本日、クライストチャーチ在住のGavin Hillaryに関してNew Zealand Policeの対応がありましたので報告させて頂きます。
添付の電子メールがNew Zealand Policeから送られてきました。
可能性として本件に関して刑事捜査をすることが決まったようです。
ところで、本件についてNew Zealand Police及びIndependent Police Conduct Authorityが隠蔽工作を行っておりますので、最後までこの件が実際に刑事捜査されるかどうかは分かりません。
これらの組織の隠蔽工作についてはニュージーランドの警察大臣であるHon Poto Williams（クライストチャーチの国会議員）に去年の１２月２０日に連絡しております（添付のメールをご参照下さい）。
本件について日本政府の対応が期待されます。
それでは、報告まで。
小山龍彦
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
クライストチャーチ在住のGavin Hillaryに対する注意の喚起
在クライストチャーチ領事事務所御中
何時もお世話になっております。
ダニーデン在住の小山です。
さて、今回はクライストチャーチ在住のGavin Hillaryに関するメールを送らせて頂きます。
Gavin Hillaryはクライストチャーチ在住の男で、Christchurch District Courtの判事のJudge Jane Farishの名前を悪用して、さらには法廷を悪用して犯罪を行っております。
Gavin Hillaryは過去に日本人の女性（Emiko Itagaki）と結婚していたようですが、婚姻関係は解消され、離婚の際はかなり大きな問題を起し、自分の弁護士を解任し、さらには彼の離婚した妻の弁護士に対して多額な損害賠償請求訴訟をしております。
https://www.pressreader.com/new-zealand/sunday-star-times/20070708/281668250567045
彼の行為は間違いなく犯罪なのですが、ニュージーランドの警察が刑事捜査をせず、彼は逮捕されない（さらには法廷や裁判官の名前を使った詐欺は警察がカバーする）という悪習を知っており、彼はこのような詐欺が社会では許さていると考えているようで、このような犯罪行為を止める気はないようです。
私はこの件についてダニーデンの市長、カウンシルのメンバーに連絡し、警察にプレッシャーをかけるようにお願いしました。
法廷や裁判官の名前を使った詐欺は非常に重大な犯罪です。
彼の手口としてはニュージーランド在住の日本人を狙うようです。
私はこの件についてインターネットで情報を提供し、注意を喚起しております。
とにかく、Gavin Hillaryは危険な人物と思われ、クライストチャーチの日本人が被害に遭わないように注意の喚起が必要と思われます。
それでは、よろしくお願いします。
小山龍彦
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
Fraud in the Court - Minister of Justice must act!
21 January 2022
Hon Kris Faafoi
Minister of Justice
cc: Hon Paul Goldsmith, National party spokesperson for justice; Ministry of Justice; Christchurch District Court
Dear Justice Minister
Fraud in the Court is proved conclusively several times, and you must act.
You must personally contact Judge Jane Farish of Christchurch District Court and assist the police on the criminal investigation (Police File 211217/2851).
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
New Zealand Law Society contacted on assistance on the police investigation on the fraud in the Court
Subject: Police File 211217/2851 - assistance on police investigation is requested
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2022 08:56:49 +1300
From: Tatsuhiko Koyama
To: inquiries@lawsociety.org.nz
21 January 2022
New Zealand Law Society
Dear Sir/Madam
Attached, please find two copies of my emails to Mactodd lawyers and Corban Revell lawyers, requesting assistance on the police investigation on the crimes of fraud in the Court, using the name of Judge Jane Farish of Christchurch District Court for fraud in violation of the Crimes Act 1961.
It is my wish that you ensure that lawyers in the firms assist the police on the criminal investigation.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama
Subject: Police File 211217/2851 - Gavin Hillary
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2022 08:31:52 +1300
From: Tatsuhiko Koyama
To: info@corbanrevell.co.nz
CC: FMCTWP@police.govt.nz, southernfmc@police.govt.nz, OnlineReportingTeam@police.govt.nz
21 January 2022
Corban Revell lawyers
Dear Sir/Madam
I read "Multimillion-dollar claim denied."
https://www.pressreader.com/new-zealand/sunday-star-times/20070708/281668250567045
I understand that your firm was sued by Gavin Hillary because your firm provided legal representation to his ex-wife (Emiko Itagaki) in the past.
The evidence is very clear; Gavin Hillary is committing crimes, and he has no intention of stopping it.
It is my wish that you contact the police and provide information on Gavin Hillary, which may assist police investigation on the crimes.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama
From: Tatsuhiko Koyama
Sent: Thursday, 20 January 2022 10:20 pm
To: queenstown@mactodd.co.nz
Cc: FMCTWP@police.govt.nz; southernfmc@police.govt.nz; OnlineReportingTeam@police.govt.nz
Subject: Police File 211217/2851 - Seeking information on Gavin Hillary, your former client who is committing fraud in the Court
20 January 2022
Mactodd lawyers
Dear Sir/Madam
I read "Multimillion-dollar claim denied."
https://www.pressreader.com/new-zealand/sunday-star-times/20070708/281668250567045
I understand that your firm represented Gavin Hillary in the past.
Now, it is confirmed several times that Gavin Hillary is using the name of Judge Farish of Christchurch District Court for fraud and using the Court for fraud.
This matter has the police file number of 211217/2851.
For your information, on 17 July 2019, Gavin Hillary was told by the police not to contact me nor come to the premises where I lived.
He ignored the police warning.
On 5 November 2020, he suddently came to my home, uninvited, and served me with “SUMMONS TO WITNESS,” dated 2 November 2020 (he told me that this summons was issued by Judge Jane Farish of Christchurch District Court [at the request of the prosecutor]).
It has been confirmed several times that Judge Farish was not involved in the summons; it is a fraud, committed by Gavin Hillary.
I filed a formal complaint with the police on this matter, but Gavin Hillary keeps on contacting me, committing fraud, as you can see from the attached emails.
This matter requires your assistance as you may know about Gavin Hillary and his proclivity to commit crimes with apparent impunity.
It is my wish that you contact the police and provide information on Gavin Hillary.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama
Subject: Police File 211217/2851 - Further information on the police file
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2022 17:37:03 +1300
From: Tatsuhiko Koyama
To: FMCTWP@police.govt.nz, southernfmc@police.govt.nz, OnlineReportingTeam@police.govt.nz, Police <Police.portfolio@parliament.govt.nz>
CC: k.faafoi@ministers.govt.nz, christchurch.dc@justice.govt.nz, dunedin.dc@justice.govt.nz, contactus@justice.govt.nz, paul.goldsmith@parliament.govt.nz
18 January 2022
New Zealand Police
cc: Hon Kris Faafoi, Minister of Justice; Christchurch District Court; Dunedin District Court; Ministry of Justice; Hon Paul Goldsmith, National party spokesperson for justice
Dear Sir
I provide further information on Gavin Hillary who is using false documents and using the name of Judge Farish of Christchurch District Court for fraud in violation of the Crimes Act 1961.
Today, I received the attached email Gavin Hillary.
The police must actually investigate this matter and contact Judge Farish of Christchurch District Court as her name has been used several occasions by Gavin Hillary.
As the evidence clearly suggests, Gavin Hillary will not stop on his own unless the police charge him for his continuous violation of the Crimes Act 1961.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama
From: Gavin Hillary <gavinhillary@xtra.co.nz>
Subject: Re: CRI-2020-009-4772 New Zealand Transport Authority -v- Autorent Limited, Hanna and Hillary
Date: 18 January 2022 at 4:59:50 PM NZDT
To: Tatsuhiko Koyama
Dear Mr. Koyama,
We have an adjournment, so nothing happening at this stage, I will let you know when we have a new date.
Cheers,
Gavin
On 28/12/2021 15:30 Gavin Hillary <gavinhillary@xtra.co.nz> wrote:
Dear Mr. Koyama,
Thank you for your email, however I do have concerns about your honesty, (You were served at your residence on the 5th of November 2020, you and your wife invited me into your home after you had been served and you met my daughter) motivation, (You asked the police to tell me not to contact you or face a potential Criminal Harrassment Order) and your mental health. (You know the penalties for ignoring a summons and given your qualifications, you will know how the process works and how to ensure that it is legitimate if you had genuine concerns that it may not be)
You can only guess what evidence you will be asked to confirm or deny and I would suggest that your guess would be wrong. You will be under oath and required to tell the truth, it is a witness summons, you have not been charged with anything so I am at a loss as to what your motivation is with this email, the email to Chris Faafoi and to others.
For the record, I am only contacting you because you emailed me. I am not interested in an entrapement attempt given that you have contacted the police at least twice to date. If you wish to contact me, feel free, you have my contact details. You do not need to copy your email to all and sundry.
Trust you had a merry Christmas and will have an even better new year.
Kind regards,
Gavin Hillary
On 19/12/2021 11:22 Tatsuhiko Koyama wrote:
Mr Gavin Hillary
Defendant in the case of CRI-2020-009-4772
cc: Christchurch District Court, Dunedin District Court, Ministry of Justice
Dear Mr Hillary
I require confirmation that the Court (Judge Farish of Christchurch District Court) actually issued a summons for me to appear in Dunedin District Court on 19 January 2022 in the case of CRI-2020-009-4772.
For your information, I was not served any summons to appear by the Court, except your email, dated 29 November 2021, attached.
I understand that the presiding judge is Judge Farish of Christchurch District Court in this case.
Could you ensure that Judge Farish of Christchurch District Court actually issue a signed summons for me to appear on 19 January 2022?
You must understand my concerns on this matter, as none of the Courts, Christchurch District Court nor Dunedin District Court, has confirmed this matter.
Unless I hear from Judge Farish of Christchurch District Court on this matter, I will disregard this matter and not to appear the Court on 19 January 2022.
It is important that you contact Christchurch District Court and make sure that Judge Farish issue her signed summons for me to appear in the case on 19 January 2022.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama
On 29/11/2021 11:07 am, Gavin Hillary wrote:
Dear Mr. Koyama
Please be advised that the case will now be heard from the 17th of January and your evidence will be heard vis AVL from instruction suite 2 at the Dunedin District Court on 19 January at 2 pm. I will be in contact closer to the time.
Kind regards,
Gavin Hillary
Dunedin City must rise up and fight against the systemic organised crimes committed in the Court, including Dunedin High / District Court
From: Tatsuhiko Koyama
Subject: Dunedin City must rise up and fight against the systemic organised crimes committed in the Court, including Dunedin High / District Court
Date: 19 January 2022 at 12:13:53 PM NZDT
To: christine.garey@dcc.govt.nz, Sophie.barker@dcc.govt.nz, david.benson-pope@dcc.govt.nz, rachel.elder@dcc.govt.nz, doug.hall@dcc.govt.nz, carmen.houlahan@dcc.govt.nz, marie.laufiso@dcc.govt.nz, mike.lord@dcc.govt.nz, jim.omalley@dcc.govt.nz, jules.radich@dcc.govt.nz, chris.staynes@dcc.govt.nz, lee@vandervision.co.nz, steve.walker@dcc.govt.nz, andrew.whiley@dcc.govt.nz, mayor@dcc.govt.nz
19 January 2022
Dunedin City Council
Dear members of Dunedin City Council
I am an enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand.
The fact is undisputed, and the systemic organised crimes, committed in New Zealand Courts, including Dunedin High / District Court, are completely substantiated and the evidence is published in the internet.
https://sites.google.com/view/tatsuhiko-koyama/confirmed-false-court-documents-of-new-zealand
The endemic nature of the corruption in public institutions exists, due to the state sponsorship of organised crimes, protected, supported, and concealed by the law enforcement and regulatory agencies of the government.
All New Zealand Courts exist as the means and covers for the organised criminal syndicates to commit all kinds of crimes with impunity, in violation of the laws of New Zealand.
Without pressure from you, the systemic organised crimes in public institutions of New Zealand will continue in the secrecy of the Court and Government, uninvestigated by the law enforcement and regulatory agencies of the government as part of the clandestine publicly funded organised crimes of New Zealand.
You must act, especially there is no dispute from anyone on the systemic corruption in public institutions of New Zealand.
Your courage and collective effort to end the state-sponsored organised crimes are very much expected as the members of Dunedin City Council when the crimes are committed in Dunedin.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
Pressure the police to actually investigate the crimes, committed in Dunedin by Gavin Hillary of Christchurch, and the crime of aiding and abetting by several police officers
19 January 2022
Mayor Hawkins
Dunedin City Council
cc: Hon David Clark, MP for Dunedin; Ingrid Leary, MP for Taieri; Rachel Brooking, list MP based in Dunedin; Hon Michael Woodhouse, list MP based in Dunedin; Hon Poto Williams, Police Minister; Hon Mark Mitchell, National party spokesperson for police; and others
Dear Mayor
I am a resident and rate-payer of the city of Dunedin.
Attached, please find a copy of my email to New Zealand Police on the crimes, committed in Dunedin by Gavin Hillary of Christchurch, which are totally substantiated repeatedly.
What is unfortunate in New Zealand is that these totally substantiated crimes will never be investigated by New Zealand Police, and the culture of impunity will be maintained due to the entrenched and widespread corruption in New Zealand Courts which are the means and covers for all sorts of crimes, which are covered up by the law enforcement and regulatory agencies of New Zealand Government.
https://sites.google.com/view/tatsuhiko-koyama/confirmed-false-court-documents-of-new-zealand
This matter will be never be investigated by any journalist in New Zealand Media, unless you and politicians move to expose the systemic corruption in public institutions of New Zealand.
This matter simply shows how entrenched and widespread the corruption is in the Judiciary and law enforcement of New Zealand, which must be a serious concern for anyone who lives in New Zealand.
When the fact is undisputed on the systemic organised crimes, which includes the crimes, committed by Gavin Hillary and the crime of aiding and abetting committed by several police officer of New Zealand Police, it is the time for you and politicians to act, so that the police minister will be pressure to act on the totally substantiated crimes which no one disputes.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
Police File 211217/2851 - Further information on the police file (18 January 2022)
From: Tatsuhiko Koyama
Subject: Police File 211217/2851 - Further information on the police file
Date: 18 January 2022 at 5:37:03 PM NZDT
To: FMCTWP@police.govt.nz, southernfmc@police.govt.nz, OnlineReportingTeam@police.govt.nz, Police <Police.portfolio@parliament.govt.nz>
Cc: k.faafoi@ministers.govt.nz, christchurch.dc@justice.govt.nz, dunedin.dc@justice.govt.nz, contactus@justice.govt.nz, paul.goldsmith@parliament.govt.nz
18 January 2022
New Zealand Police
cc: Hon Kris Faafoi, Minister of Justice; Christchurch District Court; Dunedin District Court; Ministry of Justice; Hon Paul Goldsmith, National party spokesperson for justice
Dear Sir
I provide further information on Gavin Hillary who is using false documents and using the name of Judge Farish of Christchurch District Court for fraud in violation of the Crimes Act 1961.
Today, I received the attached email Gavin Hillary.
The police must actually investigate this matter and contact Judge Farish of Christchurch District Court as her name has been used several occasions by Gavin Hillary.
As the evidence clearly suggests, Gavin Hillary will not stop on his own unless the police charge him for his continuous violation of the Crimes Act 1961.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
From: Gavin Hillary <gavinhillary@xtra.co.nz>
Subject: Re: CRI-2020-009-4772 New Zealand Transport Authority -v- Autorent Limited, Hanna and Hillary
Date: 18 January 2022 at 4:59:50 PM NZDT
To: Tatsuhiko Koyama
Dear Mr. Koyama,
We have an adjournment, so nothing happening at this stage, I will let you know when we have a new date.
Cheers,
Gavin
On 28/12/2021 15:30 Gavin Hillary <gavinhillary@xtra.co.nz> wrote:
Dear Mr. Koyama,
Thank you for your email, however I do have concerns about your honesty, (You were served at your residence on the 5th of November 2020, you and your wife invited me into your home after you had been served and you met my daughter) motivation, (You asked the police to tell me not to contact you or face a potential Criminal Harrassment Order) and your mental health. (You know the penalties for ignoring a summons and given your qualifications, you will know how the process works and how to ensure that it is legitimate if you had genuine concerns that it may not be)
You can only guess what evidence you will be asked to confirm or deny and I would suggest that your guess would be wrong. You will be under oath and required to tell the truth, it is a witness summons, you have not been charged with anything so I am at a loss as to what your motivation is with this email, the email to Chris Faafoi and to others.
For the record, I am only contacting you because you emailed me. I am not interested in an entrapement attempt given that you have contacted the police at least twice to date. If you wish to contact me, feel free, you have my contact details. You do not need to copy your email to all and sundry.
Trust you had a merry Christmas and will have an even better new year.
Kind regards,
Gavin Hillary
On 19/12/2021 11:22 Tatsuhiko Koyama wrote:
Mr Gavin Hillary
Defendant in the case of CRI-2020-009-4772
cc: Christchurch District Court, Dunedin District Court, Ministry of Justice
Dear Mr Hillary
I require confirmation that the Court (Judge Farish of Christchurch District Court) actually issued a summons for me to appear in Dunedin District Court on 19 January 2022 in the case of CRI-2020-009-4772.
For your information, I was not served any summons to appear by the Court, except your email, dated 29 November 2021, attached.
I understand that the presiding judge is Judge Farish of Christchurch District Court in this case.
Could you ensure that Judge Farish of Christchurch District Court actually issue a signed summons for me to appear on 19 January 2022?
You must understand my concerns on this matter, as none of the Courts, Christchurch District Court nor Dunedin District Court, has confirmed this matter.
Unless I hear from Judge Farish of Christchurch District Court on this matter, I will disregard this matter and not to appear the Court on 19 January 2022.
It is important that you contact Christchurch District Court and make sure that Judge Farish issue her signed summons for me to appear in the case on 19 January 2022.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama
On 29/11/2021 11:07 am, Gavin Hillary wrote:
Dear Mr. Koyama
Please be advised that the case will now be heard from the 17th of January and your evidence will be heard vis AVL from instruction suite 2 at the Dunedin District Court on 19 January at 2 pm. I will be in contact closer to the time.
Kind regards,
Gavin Hillary
The time to act on the completely verified state-sponsored organised crimes of New Zealand
17 January 2022
Mr Christopher Luxon MP
Leader of the opposition
Dear Mr Luxon
Leadership is not delegation, and you must act when the time arises.
The fact is undisputed, and the systemic corruption and organised crimes, committed in public institutions, including all New Zealand Courts, are totally and completely verified (and the evidence is in the public domain and anyone can see the commission of the organised crimes and systemic corruption in public institutions of New Zealand).
https://sites.google.com/view/tatsuhiko-koyama/confirmed-false-court-documents-of-new-zealand
It is the time for you to say: ENOUGH!
It is the time for you to make yourself known for your leadership.
No one will dispute the fact, except no one is willing to take the risk of combating the entrenched, widespread corruption in public institutions of New Zealand, and the judiciary which is flagrantly violating the law by providing all New Zealand Courts as the means and covers for the clandestine publicly funded organised crimes.
What you will do today will make a big difference in the future of New Zealand as a nation, and you have the chance to make the nation better by ending the state-sponsored organised crimes of New Zealand.
If you have any question on this matter, please feel contact me.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
The time to act on the completely verified state-sponsored organised crimes of New Zealand
13 January 2022
To Whom It May Concern:
I am an enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand.
IT IS THE FACT, undisputed and completely verified.
New Zealand sponsors organised crimes, and clandestine publicly funded organised crimes are committed in its public institutions in the secrecy of the Court and Government, in violation of the laws of New Zealand and various international treaties for which the state of New Zealand is a signatory.
Numerous evidence is published in the internet for you to witness the atrocity of the state power being used to commit all kinds of crimes with impunity, protected, supported, and concealed by the law enforcement and regulatory agencies of New Zealand.
The international community has the duty to act against the rogue state which is using state power for clandestine criminal operations.
Without the intervention by the international community, New Zealand will keep on committing all kinds of crimes with impunity in violation of the law.
The conscience of the international community must not allow New Zealand to continue its clandestine publicly funded organised crimes, using its state power for illicit purposes in violation of the law.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
STOP THE CRIME!
Police File 211217/2851 - Gavin Hillary - Police must contact Judge Farish of Christchurch District Court immediately
31 December 2021
Hon Poto Williams
Police Minister
Dear Police Minister
I write in relation to the Police File (211217/2851), relating to the crimes committed by Gavin Hillary who apparently lives in the city of Christchurch.
The police must contact Judge Farish of Christchurch District Court immediately for the serious crimes of forgery and using false documents, using her name, in violation of the Crimes Act 1961.
For your information, on 29 December 2021, I sent the attached email to Hon Michael Wood, Transport Minister, regarding this matter.
Fraud in the Court, including forgery, using false documents, is an extremely serious crime, and the police must act on the serious crime.
I trust that you ensure that the police will act on this matter immediately, before Gavin Hillary commits another crime.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
CRI-2020-009-4772 New Zealand Transport Authority -v- Autorent Limited, Hanna and Hillary
29 December 2021
Hon Michael Wood
Minister of Transport
Dear Transport Minister
I write in relation to CRI-2020-009-4772 New Zealand Transport Authority -v- Autorent Limited, Hanna and Hillary.
Attached, please find a document, purportedly a summons issued by Judge Farish of Christchurch District Court, “at the request of the prosecutor [Ministry of Landtransport].”
Gavin Hillary, one of the defendants in the case, keeps contacting me, using the document which was supposedly issued on behalf to the Ministry of Landtransport.
Gavin Hillary was told by Dunedin Police not to contact me nor come to my house in July 2019, after repeatedly calling me unilaterally and contacting Dunedin Police to come to my house (the evidence was submitted to the Police (Police File 211217/2851)).
This matter requires you to act immediately as Gavin Hillary keeps on committing crimes, and he has no intention of stopping it.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
Police File 211217/2851 - Contact Judge Farish of Christchurch District Court immediately
29 December 2021
Hon Kris Faafoi
Minister of Justice
cc: Hon Paul Goldsmith, justice spokesperson, National Party
Dear Justice Minister
Crimes are being committed, and you must act on the police file (211217/2851).
The name of Judge Farish of Christchurch District Court has been used several times by Gavin Hillary who is apparently charged with violation of the Land Transport Act 1998.
Gavin Hillary has no intention of stopping committing further crimes and keeps on contacting me using false documents although Dunedin Police told him not to contact me nor come to my house.
You must contact Judge Farish of Christchurch District Court and assist the Police on this matter.
This matter requires your immediate attention and action.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
CRI-2020-009-4772 New Zealand Transport Authority -v- Autorent Limited, Hanna and Hillary
29 December 2021
Hon Michael Wood
Minister of Transport
Dear Transport Minister
I write in relation to CRI-2020-009-4772 New Zealand Transport Authority -v- Autorent Limited, Hanna and Hillary.
Attached, please find a document, purportedly a summons issued by Judge Farish of Christchurch District Court, “at the request of the prosecutor [Ministry of Landtransport].”
Gavin Hillary, one of the defendants in the case, keeps contacting me, using the document which was supposedly issued on behalf to the Ministry of Landtransport.
Gavin Hillary was told by Dunedin Police not to contact me nor come to my house in July 2019, after repeatedly calling me unilaterally and contacting Dunedin Police to come to my house (the evidence was submitted to the Police (Police File 211217/2851)).
This matter requires you to act immediately as Gavin Hillary keeps on committing crimes, and he has no intention of stopping it.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
Police File 211217/2851 - Further information on the police file (28 December 2021)
New Zealand Police
Dear Sir
Gavin Hillary contacted me again today.
Please see the attached email, the second email from Gavin Hillary today.
This matter requires police investigation as Gavin Hillary keeps on ignoring the police warning not to contact me.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
From: Gavin Hillary <gavinhillary@xtra.co.nz>
Subject: Re: CRI-2020-009-4772 New Zealand Transport Authority -v- Autorent Limited, Hanna and Hillary
Date: 28 December 2021 at 4:21:38 PM NZDT
To: Tatsuhiko Koyama
Cc: christchurch.dc@justice.govt.nz, dunedin.dc@justice.govt.nz, contactus@justice.govt.nz
Dear Mr. Koyama, (and others)
Thank you for your email, however, I do have concerns about your honesty, (You were served at your residence on the 5th of November 2020, you and your wife invited me into your home after you had been served and you met my daughter) motivation, (You asked the police to tell me not to contact you or face a potential Criminal Harassment Order) and your mental health. (You know the penalties for ignoring a summons and given your qualifications, you will know how the process works and how to ensure that it is legitimate if you had genuine concerns that it may not be)
You can only guess what evidence you will be asked to confirm or deny and I would suggest that your guess would be wrong. You will be under oath and required to tell the truth, it is a witness summons, you have not been charged with anything so I am at a loss as to what your motivation is with this email, the email to Chris Faafoi, and to others.
For the record, I am only contacting you because you emailed me. I am not interested in an entrapment attempt given that you have contacted the police at least twice to date. If you wish to contact me, feel free, you have my contact details. You do not need to copy your email to all and sundry.
Trust you had a merry Christmas and will have an even better new year.
Kind regards,
Gavin Hillary
On 19/12/2021 11:22 Tatsuhiko Koyama wrote:
Mr Gavin Hillary
Defendant in the case of CRI-2020-009-4772
cc: Christchurch District Court, Dunedin District Court, Ministry of Justice
Dear Mr Hillary
I require confirmation that the Court (Judge Farish of Christchurch District Court) actually issued a summons for me to appear in Dunedin District Court on 19 January 2022 in the case of CRI-2020-009-4772.
For your information, I was not served any summons to appear by the Court, except your email, dated 29 November 2021, attached.
I understand that the presiding judge is Judge Farish of Christchurch District Court in this case.
Could you ensure that Judge Farish of Christchurch District Court actually issue a signed summons for me to appear on 19 January 2022?
You must understand my concerns on this matter, as none of the Courts, Christchurch District Court nor Dunedin District Court, has confirmed this matter.
Unless I hear from Judge Farish of Christchurch District Court on this matter, I will disregard this matter and not to appear the Court on 19 January 2022.
It is important that you contact Christchurch District Court and make sure that Judge Farish issue her signed summons for me to appear in the case on 19 January 2022.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama
On 29/11/2021 11:07 am, Gavin Hillary wrote:
Dear Mr. Koyama
Please be advised that the case will now be heard from the 17th of January and your evidence will be heard vis AVL from instruction suite 2 at the Dunedin District Court on 19 January at 2 pm. I will be in contact closer to the time.
Kind regards,
Gavin Hillary
Police File 211217/2851 (28 December 2021)
New Zealand Police
cc: Christchurch District Court; Dunedin District Court; Ministry of Justice; Hon Hon Kris Faafoi, minister of justice
Dear Sir
Today (28 December 2021), I received the attached email from Gavin Hillary, without any confirmation from Judge Farish of Christchurch District Court, which I asked him to do in my email, dated 19 December 2021, attached below.
I understand that the Police will contact Judge Farish of Christchurch District Court on this matter as part of the police investigation (Police File 211217/2851).
Unless it is confirmed by Judge Farish, I will continue to ignore any email from Gavin Hillary, who was warned by Dunedin Police not to contact me and keeps ignoring the police warning.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
From: Gavin Hillary <gavinhillary@xtra.co.nz>
Subject: Re: CRI-2020-009-4772 New Zealand Transport Authority -v- Autorent Limited, Hanna and Hillary
Date: 28 December 2021 at 3:30:52 PM NZDT
To: Tatsuhiko Koyama
Dear Mr. Koyama,
Thank you for your email, however I do have concerns about your honesty, (You were served at your residence on the 5th of November 2020, you and your wife invited me into your home after you had been served and you met my daughter) motivation, (You asked the police to tell me not to contact you or face a potential Criminal Harrassment Order) and your mental health. (You know the penalties for ignoring a summons and given your qualifications, you will know how the process works and how to ensure that it is legitimate if you had genuine concerns that it may not be)
You can only guess what evidence you will be asked to confirm or deny and I would suggest that your guess would be wrong. You will be under oath and required to tell the truth, it is a witness summons, you have not been charged with anything so I am at a loss as to what your motivation is with this email, the email to Chris Faafoi and to others.
For the record, I am only contacting you because you emailed me. I am not interested in an entrapement attempt given that you have contacted the police at least twice to date. If you wish to contact me, feel free, you have my contact details. You do not need to copy your email to all and sundry.
Trust you had a merry Christmas and will have an even better new year.
Kind regards,
Gavin Hillary
On 19/12/2021 11:22 Tatsuhiko Koyama <tatsuhiko.koyama@gmail.com> wrote:
Mr Gavin Hillary
Defendant in the case of CRI-2020-009-4772
cc: Christchurch District Court, Dunedin District Court, Ministry of Justice
Dear Mr Hillary
I require confirmation that the Court (Judge Farish of Christchurch District Court) actually issued a summons for me to appear in Dunedin District Court on 19 January 2022 in the case of CRI-2020-009-4772.
For your information, I was not served any summons to appear by the Court, except your email, dated 29 November 2021, attached.
I understand that the presiding judge is Judge Farish of Christchurch District Court in this case.
Could you ensure that Judge Farish of Christchurch District Court actually issue a signed summons for me to appear on 19 January 2022?
You must understand my concerns on this matter, as none of the Courts, Christchurch District Court nor Dunedin District Court, has confirmed this matter.
Unless I hear from Judge Farish of Christchurch District Court on this matter, I will disregard this matter and not to appear the Court on 19 January 2022.
It is important that you contact Christchurch District Court and make sure that Judge Farish issue her signed summons for me to appear in the case on 19 January 2022.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama
On 29/11/2021 11:07 am, Gavin Hillary wrote:
Dear Mr. Koyama
Please be advised that the case will now be heard from the 17th of January and your evidence will be heard vis AVL from instruction suite 2 at the Dunedin District Court on 19 January at 2 pm. I will be in contact closer to the time.
Kind regards,
Gavin Hillary
Police File Number 201123/4183 - Gavin HILLARY - CRI-2020-009-004772 (21 December 2021)
Kia ora Tatsuhiko
On behalf of the Minister of Police, Hon Poto Williams I acknowledge your email of 1 December 2021, concerning a Police case.
The investigation and prosecution of offences are the responsibility of the Commissioner of Police, as stated in part in Section 16 of the Policing Act 2008. The Commissioner must act independently of any Ministers of the Crown in discharging this responsibility.
This ensures that operational matters within police remain free of any political influence or interference.
Your correspondence to the Minister has therefore been transferred to Police National Headquarters, for consideration by Police.
Ngā mihi,
Office of Hon Poto Williams
Minister for Building and Construction | Minister of Police
Associate Minister for Children | Associate Minister of Housing (Public Housing)
Website: www.Beehive,govt.nz
Private Bag 18041, Parliament Buildings, Wellington 6160, New Zealand
Authorised by Hon Poto Williams, Parliament Buildings, Wellington
Evidence of police corruption and cover-up of the systemic organised crimes in the Court
20 December 2021
Hon Poto Williams
Police Minister
cc: Hon Mark Mitchell, Police spokesperson of the National Party; and others
Dear Police Minister
I am an enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand.
Attached, please find the evidence of police corruption and cover-up of the systemic organised crimes in the Court.
The systemic corruption and clandestine organised crimes in public institutions, including all New Zealand Courts, are totally substantiated, without any dispute, except the continuing cover-up by New Zealand Police, and further cover-up by Independent Police Conduct Authority.
This matter requires your leadership as Police Minister of New Zealand to tackle the endemic and entrenched corruption and organised crimes, committed in public institutions of New Zealand.
The fact is undisputed, and it is the time for you to act on this matter.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
Dunedin City must act on the undisputed crimes committed in the city of Dunedin
20 December 2021
Mayor Hawkins
Dunedin City Council
cc: Hon David Clark, MP for Dunedin; Ingrid Leary, MP for Taieri; Rachel Brooking, list MP based in Dunedin; Hon Michael Woodhouse, list MP based in Dunedin
Dear Mayor
I am a resident and rate-payer of the city of Dunedin.
Dunedin city must act on the totally substantiated, undisputed systemic corruption and organised crimes, committed in all New Zealand Courts and other public institutions, which are completely and comprehensively covered up by the law enforcement and regulatory agencies of New Zealand Government.
This matter requires all cities and people in New Zealand to unite and fight; there should not be any place for the clandestine publicly funded organised crimes, committed in public institutions, in the secrecy of the Court and Government, to continue in violation of the laws of New Zealand.
It must start out from somewhere, as Rt Hon Jacinda Ardern, Prime Minister of New Zealand, will not act on the fact, without being prompted by the cities and people of New Zealand.
The fact is undisputed, and it is the time for you to act.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
CRI-2020-009-4772 and Police File 211217/2851 - official investigation requested at Ministry of Justice
20 December 2021
Rt Hon Jacinda Ardern
Prime Minister
cc: Mr Christopher Luxon, leader of the opposition; Independent Police Conduct Authority; Serious Fraud Office
Dear Prime Minister
I am an enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand.
You must act on the totally verified and without any dispute on the systemic organised crimes, committed in all New Zealand Courts and other public institutions of New Zealand.
You must not allow the secrecy of the Court and Government to be used for the clandestine publicly funded organised crimes in violation of the laws of New Zealand.
The law is clear.
The Crimes Act 1961
66 Parties to offences
(1) Every one is a party to and guilty of an offence who—
(a) actually commits the offence; or
(b) does or omits an act for the purpose of aiding any person to commit the offence; or
(c) abets any person in the commission of the offence; or
(d) incites, counsels, or procures any person to commit the offence.
(2) Where 2 or more persons form a common intention to prosecute any unlawful purpose, and to assist each other therein, each of them is a party to every offence committed by any one of them in the prosecution of the common purpose if the commission of that offence was known to be a probable consequence of the prosecution of the common purpose.
116 Conspiring to defeat justice
Every one is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 7 years who conspires to obstruct, prevent, pervert, or defeat the course of justice in New Zealand or the course of justice in an overseas jurisdiction.
219 Theft or stealing
(1) Theft or stealing is the act of,—
(a) dishonestly and without claim of right, taking any property with intent to deprive any owner permanently of that property or of any interest in that property; or
(b) dishonestly and without claim of right, using or dealing with any property with intent to deprive any owner permanently of that property or of any interest in that property after obtaining possession of, or control over, the property in whatever manner.
234 Robbery
(1) Robbery is theft accompanied by violence or threats of violence, to any person or property, used to extort the property stolen or to prevent or overcome resistance to its being stolen.
(2) Every one who commits robbery is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 10 years.
240 Obtaining by deception or causing loss by deception
(1) Every one is guilty of obtaining by deception or causing loss by deception who, by any deception and without claim of right,—
(a) obtains ownership or possession of, or control over, any property, or any privilege, service, pecuniary advantage, benefit, or valuable consideration, directly or indirectly; or
(b) in incurring any debt or liability, obtains credit; or
(c) induces or causes any other person to deliver over, execute, make, accept, endorse, destroy, or alter any document or thing capable of being used to derive a pecuniary advantage; or
(d) causes loss to any other person.
(1A) Every person is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 3 years who, without reasonable excuse, sells, transfers, or otherwise makes available any document or thing capable of being used to derive a pecuniary advantage knowing that, by deception and without claim of right, the document or thing was, or was caused to be, delivered, executed, made, accepted, endorsed, or altered.
(2) In this section, deception means—
(a) a false representation, whether oral, documentary, or by conduct, where the person making the representation intends to deceive any other person and—
(i) knows that it is false in a material particular; or
(ii) is reckless as to whether it is false in a material particular; or
(b) an omission to disclose a material particular, with intent to deceive any person, in circumstances where there is a duty to disclose it; or
(c) a fraudulent device, trick, or stratagem used with intent to deceive any person.
256 Forgery
(1) Every one is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 10 years who makes a false document with the intention of using it to obtain any property, privilege, service, pecuniary advantage, benefit, or valuable consideration.
257 Using forged documents
(1) Every one is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 10 years who, knowing a document to be forged,—
(a) uses the document to obtain any property, privilege, service, pecuniary advantage, benefit, or valuable consideration; or
(b) uses, deals with, or acts upon the document as if it were genuine; or
(c) causes any other person to use, deal with, or act upon it as if it were genuine.
http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1961/0043/latest/DLM327382.html
You must act on the fact that fraud in the Court is very much normalised in New Zealand; this serious situation is made possible by the government policy of continuing police-up of the organised crimes in public institutions, including all New Zealand Courts.
The systematic nature of organised crimes in public institutions is a hallmark of the state-sponsored organised crimes of New Zealand.
This matter requires you, as Prime Minister of New Zealand, to take personal leadership in combating the widespread, systemic corruption in the Court, law enforcement, and regulatory agencies of New Zealand Government.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
International community must unite and fight against the undisputed clandestine publicly funded organised crimes of New Zealand
18 December 2021
To Whom It May Concern:
We have very serious problems; the undisputed fact shows that New Zealand is sponsoring clandestine organised crimes in violation of the international law.
It is the time for the international community to say to New Zealand that it is not acceptable to the international community for New Zealand to provide its territory as the safe haven for the organised criminal syndicates to operate clandestine publicly funded organised crimes, protected, supported and concealed by the Court and Government.
The prevalent and entrenched nature of the systemic corruption in public institutions and systemic organised crimes, committed in public institutions, including all New Zealand Courts, clearly shows that the clandestine criminal operations in public institutions is part of the deliberate state policy of New Zealand for a very long time.
New Zealand will never stop the very profitable publicly funded organised crimes and global racketeering on its own, as no organised crimes will ever stop their criminal activities on their own.
That is the reason why the international intervention is necessary.
The fact of clandestine publicly funded organised crimes in public institutions of New Zealand is undisputed, and the evidence is published in the internet for anyone to see.
If we allow publicly funded racketeering as such the clandestine criminal operations in public institutions of New Zealand, the international orders based on the rule of law will be lost forever.
This may lead to anarchy and wars by states for their plundering and stealing as organised crimes use state power for their criminal operations.
The matter is very serious because what you see in New Zealand will undoubtedly spread globally, as clandestine publicly funded global racketeering is very profitable when the state is sponsoring organised crimes; you can make all kinds of money if you use state power for plundering and stealing; New Zealand has shown the world how to run publicly funded racketeering, using the secrecy of the Court and Government with massive public disinformation and propaganda for duplicity and covering up organised crimes in public institutions.
The International community must unite and fight against the undisputed clandestine publicly funded organised crimes of New Zealand
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
From: Tatsuhiko Koyama
Subject: Undisputed total and systemic corruption in New Zealand Courts and confirmed insurance fraud and bankruptcy fraud in New Zealand
Date: 14 December 2021 at 7:44:23 AM NZDT
To: Matthew.McCallum@parliament.govt.nz, P.Williams@ministers.govt.nz, poto.williams@parliament.govt.nz
Cc: enquiries@sfo.govt.nz, christine.meads@sfo.govt.nz, jacinda.ardern@parliament.govt.nz, "j.ardern@ministers.govt.nz" <j.ardern@ministers.govt.nz>, Christopher.Luxon@parliament.govt.nz, sevensharp@tvnz.co.nz, breakfast@tvnz.co.nz, news@newshub.co.nz, guyon.espiner@rnz.co.nz, k.faafoi@ministers.govt.nz, kris.faafoi@parliament.govt.nz, service@americanbar.org
14 December 2021
Hon Poto Williams
Minister Responsible for the Serious Fraud Office
cc: Serious Fraud Office; Rt Hon Jacinda Ardern, Prime Minster; Hon Kris Faafoi, Justice Minister, Mr Christopher Luxon, leader of the opposition; American Bar Association
Dear SFO Minister
I understand that you acknowledged the receipt of my complaint lodged at the Serious Fraud Office on the series of confirmed organised crimes, committed in New Zealand Courts and other public institutions of New Zealand, on 19 October 2021 (see the attached email).
At this time, as you are a MP in Christchurch, I would like to provide information on the systemic organised crimes, committed in Christchurch High Court, in relation to the confirmed insurance fraud, committed by Southern Response and EQC, and subsequent bankruptcy fraud and bank robbery, committed by the various organised crimes, including Southern Response, and New Zealand Law Society
Needless to say, this matter is very serious, and that is the reason why this email is copied to Rt Hon Jacinda Ardern, Prime Minister, and Hon Kris Faafoi, Justice Minister, for the information.
I made sure that Mr Christopher Luxon, the leader of the opposition, become aware of the serious fraud, committed in New Zealand Courts and other public institutions, so that there will be a united effort in Parliament to combat the serious corruption in public institutions of New Zealand.
The fact is undisputed by anyone, and numerous evidence of the systemic organised crimes, committed in New Zealand Courts and public institutions of New Zealand is published in the internet for anyone to see.
When there is no controversy on the serious corruption in public institutions of New Zealand, it is the time for New Zealand to inform the international community on this matter, and start dealing with the very serious problems in the governance of New Zealand, rather than allowing the Courts and other public institutions to be used as the means and covers for the systemic organised crimes, in violation of the laws of New Zealand and several international treaties for which the state of New Zealand is a signatory.
For your information, I attached a document regarding the forgery, committed in various New Zealand Courts, including Christchurch High Court, and it is my wish that you take time to read the document.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
A. FALSE, FORGED DOCUMENTS ISSUED BY CHRISTCHURCH HIGH COURT
FALSE DOCUMENT - “MINUTE OF MANDER J,” dated 26 February 2015, (sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 27 February 2015)
FALSE DOCUMENT - Signed, “MINUTE OF MANDER J,” dated 26 February 2015, (sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 24 August 2015)
FALSE DOCUMENT - Handwritten minute of Mander J, dated 27 February 2015, (retrieved from the official court file found in Dunedin High Court on 19 February 2016)
FALSE DOCUMENT - “MINUTE OF MANDER J,” dated 5 March 2015, (sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 5 March 2015)
FALSE DOCUMENT - Signed, “MINUTE OF MANDER J,” dated 5 March 2015, (sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 13 March 2015)
FALSE DOCUMENT - Unless order of Mander J, dated 12 March 2015, (sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 12 March 2015)
FALSE DOCUMENT - Handwritten minute of Mander J, dated 12 March 2015, (sent by sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 13 March 2015)
FALSE DOCUMENT - Signed, “MINUTE OF MANDER J,” dated 13 March 2015, (sent by sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 13 March 2015)
* There is NO signed minute of Mander J, dated 13 March 2015, in the official court file.
FALSE DOCUMENT - “MINUTE OF MANDER J,” dated 13 March 2015, (sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 16 March 2015)
FALSE DOCUMENT - “MINUTE OF MANDER J,” dated 17 March 2015, (sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 17 March 2015)
FALSE DOCUMENT - Signed, “MINUTE OF MANDER J,” dated 17 March 2015, (sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 17 March 2015)
* There is NO signed minute of Mander J, dated 17 March 2015, in the official court file.
FALSE DOCUMENT - Email of Mander J, dated 20 March 2015 (at 12:11 pm), (sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 10 August 2015)
“Friday, 20 March 2015 12:11 p.m.
"Amelia, I record a brief note of my decision. I don’t think I can wait any longer for the respondent’s response in order to give the appellants’ time to comply with the order.
The appellants’ application for an extension is declined.
The appellants cite Rule 12.7(1) HCRs as providing a time requirement for service, however this rule concerns summary judgment applications and does not apply for the present situation.
The appellants appeal remains extant notwithstanding the operation of the unless order.
I also note for completeness that a hearing of the respondent’s application was attempted to convened however the appellants declined to make themselves available despite repeated efforts by the registry. The matter was dealt with by way of memorandum.
The appellants have still not provided reasons for their non-compliance.
Mander J"
FALSE DOCUMENT - Email of Mander J, dated 20 March 2015 (at 12:18 pm), (sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 12 August 2015)
“Friday, 20 March 2015 12:18:41 p.m.”
“Amelia,
Our emails passed. I have read the respondent’s submissions. My ruling stands and may be notified to the parties without modification.
Many thanks
Mander J”
FALSE DOCUMENT - Order of Mander J, dated 20 March 2015 (at 12:26 pm), (sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 20 March 2015)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Nicholson, Amelia" <Amelia.Nicholson@justice.govt.nz>
Date: Thursday, 19 March 2015 at 2:13 PM
To: Tatsuhiko Koyama <tatsuhiko.koyama@gmail.com>
Cc: "Henaghan, Misha" <Misha.Henaghan@dlapf.com>, "Macdonald, Grant" <grant.macdonald@dlapiper.co.nz>, "Thom, Sacha" <sacha.thom@dlapiper.co.nz>
Subject: RE: Appellant's submissions - Koyama v Southern Response (CIV-2014-412-0202)
Dear Tatsuhiko,
Many thanks for your email. All our Christchurch Judges are in Wellington today and Friday attending a conference but as the Unless Order is for close of business tomorrow I will forward this application and any other relevant documents on to the Honourable Justice Mander to deal with as soon as he has the opportunity.
If counsel for the respondent wishes to reply to this application could they please let me know as soon as possible.
Kind regards,
Amelia
From: "Nicholson, Amelia" <Amelia.Nicholson@justice.govt.nz>
Date: Friday, 20 March 2015 at 8:26 AM
To: "tatsuhiko.koyama@gmail.com" <tatsuhiko.koyama@gmail.com>, "Macdonald, Grant" <grant.macdonald@dlapiper.co.nz>, "Henaghan, Misha" <misha.henaghan@dlapiper.co.nz>, "Thom, Sacha" <sacha.thom@dlapiper.co.nz>
Subject: CIV-2014-412-000202 - Koyama v Southern Response Earthquake Services Limited
Dear Counsel and Mr and Ms Koyama,
Following the receipt of the appellants application for an extension of the unless order and the respondents memorandum in reply, the Honourable Justice Mander has minuted the above named matter as follows:
"The appellants' application for an extension is declined.
The appellants cite Rule 12.7(1) HCRs as providing a time requirement for service, however this rule concerns summary judgment applications and does not apply to the present situation.
The appellants appeal remains extant notwithstanding the operation of the unless order.
I also note for completeness that a hearing of the respondent's application was attempted to be convened however the appellants declined to make themselves available despite repeated efforts by the Registry. The matter was dealt with by way of memorandum.
The appellants have still not provided reasons for their non-compliance.”
Kind regards,
Amelia
Amelia Nicholson
Deputy Registrar | Christchurch High Court
DDI: +64 3 962 4273 | Ext 54273
www.courtsofnz.govt.nz
From: "Nicholson, Amelia" <Amelia.Nicholson@justice.govt.nz>
Date: Monday, 10 August 2015 at 10:23 AM
To: Tatsuhiko Koyama <tatsuhiko.koyama@gmail.com>
Subject: RE: Request for a copy of the handwritten minute of Mander J, dated 20 March 2015
Dear Mr Koyama,
I do not have a hand written copy of this minute as the Honourable Justice Mander was in Auckland for a conference. This minute was given to me by way of email which I have attached a copy of now.
Kind regards,
Amelia
Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, was involved with Grant Macdonald, Misha Henaghan, and Sacha Thom of DLA Piper New Zealand in the confirmed insurance fraud, causing loss by deception, forgery, using false document for pecuniary advantage, in violation of the Crimes Act 1961.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FALSE DOCUMENT - “JUDGMENT OF MANDER J,” dated 23 March 2015, (sent by Rebecca Fahey, Civil Caseflow Manager, Christchurch High Court, on 23 March 2015, on the same day when a telephone case management conference was held and before the scheduled hearing on 5 April 2015)
FALSE DOCUMENT - Signed, “JUDGMENT OF MANDER J,” dated 23 March 2015, (sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 24 March 2015)
FALSE DOCUMENT - “JUDGMENT OF MANDER J,’ dated 26 May 2015, (sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 26 May 2015)
FALSE DOCUMENT - Signed, “JUDGMENT OF MANDER J,’ dated 26 May 2015, (sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 5 August 2015)
* There is NO signed judgement of Mander J, dated 26 May 2015, in the official court file.
FALSE DOCUMENT - Minute of Mander J, date 5 June 2016, (sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 5 June 2015)
FALSE DOCUMENT - Handwritten minute of Mander J, dated 5 June 2015, (sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 14 July 2015)
FALSE DOCUMENT - “Order for Costs,” dated 12 June 2015, (sent by Grant Macdonald on or around 15 July 2015) - THIS DOCUMENT WAS SENT "AFTER" THE CASE WAS APPEALED TO THE COURT OF APPEAL, where the continuous stream of false, forged documents were made and used for fraud in the Court, conspiring to defeat justice, in violation of the Crimes Act 1961.
B. CONFIRMED INSURANCE FRAUD ON CANTERBURY EARTHQUAKE
On 30 November 2020, New Zealand Police issued the Police File number of 201129/4259, on the insurance fraud, committed by Southern Response and EQC, and subsequent fraud in the Court and extortion (later bank robbery), using false documents.
--------------------
1. On or around 27 August 2012, Arrow International, on behalf of Southern Response, issued a full, detailed assessment report (dated 24 February 2012, revised 27 August 2012) on the earthquake damage on the property, located at 15 Bounty Street, Bryndwr, Christchurch, estimating the total amount of the repair of $228,846.55 ($218,519.55 + $10,127.00).
2. On 2 December 2013, I called Emma Brown, Southern Response, regarding the insurance claim, and she talked about alleged paper-based assessment on the claim by EQC, which was more than more than 3 months prior to 12 February 2014 when the settlement recommendation was generated by EQC; this conversation was recorded.
3. On 11 December 2013, I received a letter from Emma Brown, Southern Response, sending me a computer printout sheet, dated 19 August 2013, for their refusal to settle the insurance claim on the property.
4. On 13 February 2014, I received a phone call from EQC in Dunedin, and staff at EQC did not mention any onsite scoping visits by EQC on the property in Christchurch; this conversation was recorded.
5. On 11 August 2014, I received "Response by defendant," dated 22 May 2014, stating, "On 26 August 2013, EQC sent the defendant a batch of reassessed claims which included a file note relating to the plaintiffs' claim," "EQC had completed a further, paper-based, review of the damage to the House on 29 March 2012...(Second EQC Assessment)," during the District Court proceeding (CIV-2014-012-186).
6. On 16 December 2014, I received an email from Sacha Thom, Solicitor, representing Southern Response, stating, "...Southern Response provide copies of:
1. The communication between Southern Response and EQC on 26 August 2013.
2. EQC’s second assessment completed on 29 March 2012.
We attach three documents and note that:
· On 26 August 2013, EQC physically handed to Southern Response these three documents as part of a weekly collection of a batch of documents relating to various claims.
· The first attachment is addressed to Southern Response employee Kate Legg because she was the person at Southern Response who requested the documents from EQC in relation to your claim.
· Southern Response understands that EQC inserted Southern Response’s logo at the top of the document in order to identify which insurer the document needed to be provided to.
· The attached scope of works is the only document relating to EQC’s amended assessment that was provided to Southern Response.
7. On 5 February 2018, I received an email from Leanne Stewart, Senior Investigator, Office of the Ombudsman, stating, "I have made some enquires of EQC regarding your complaint about access to the name of the person who generated the settlement recommendation dated 12 February 2014," "EQC has confirmed that the names of the EQC staff members who had completed assessment reports following onsite scoping visits at the property have been disclosed to you."
--------------------
The facts above clearly establish that Southern Response and EQC committed insurance fraud.
(1) There was NO onsite scoping visits by EQC at the property in Christchurch for the settlement recommendation, dated 12 February 2014, as alleged by EQC, as I was in Dunedin on that day. Furthermore, on 13 February 2014, I actually received a phone call in Dunedin from EQC staff and there was NO mention of the onsite visit in Christchurch on 12 February 2014, a day before.
(2) Southern Response repeatedly stated that the EQC assessment on the property was paper-based (NOT onsite scoping visit as alleged by EQC), and the date of the computer printout was 19 August 2013, which was about 6 months earlier than 12 February 2014 on which the settlement recommendation was supposedly generated by EQC.
(3) EQC cannot provide the name of the staff who did the alleged assessment, dated 12 February 2014.
(4) There is NO evidence that EQC actually conducted any assessment on the property on 29 March 2012; since in or around August 2011, about 7 months prior to March 2011, the handling of the claim was shifted from EQC to AMI Insurance after EQC settled the claim by paying the maximum liability of EQC under the Earthquake Commission Act1993 and was no longer handling the claim on that day.
(5) The full, detailed assessment report, professionally done by Arrow International, on behalf of Southern Response (dated 24 February 2012, revised 27 August 2012), unequivocally establishes the total damage of $228,846.55.
(6) The computer printout sheet, dated 19 August 2013, is a false, forged document which was used for the insurance fraud, committed by Southern Response.
Clearly, the evidence establishes the insurance fraud, committed by Southern Response and EQC.
Police Online Reporting (OR-271099N) - Please provide all the relevant information on the crimes to the Police
18 December 2021
Hon Poto Williams
Police Minister
cc: Hon Mark Mitchell, Police spokesperson of the National Party
Dear Police Minister
Yesterday, this matter was reported to the Police (OR-271099N).
Now, it is required of you to provide all the relevant information to the Police on the undisputed crimes, committed by Gavin Hillary.
For your information, the Crimes Act 1961 states:
256 Forgery
(1) Every one is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 10 years who makes a false document with the intention of using it to obtain any property, privilege, service, pecuniary advantage, benefit, or valuable consideration.
(2) Every one is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 3 years who makes a false document, knowing it to be false, with the intent that it in any way be used or acted upon, whether in New Zealand or elsewhere, as genuine.
257 Using forged documents
(1) Every one is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 10 years who, knowing a document to be forged,—
(a) uses the document to obtain any property, privilege, service, pecuniary advantage, benefit, or valuable consideration; or
(b) uses, deals with, or acts upon the document as if it were genuine; or
(c) causes any other person to use, deal with, or act upon it as if it were genuine.
As Police Minister, you must take leadership to stop criminals using New Zealand Courts for illicit purposes and New Zealand Courts and other public institutions for issuing forged or otherwise false documents in violation of the laws of New Zealand.
New Zealand has very serious problems when the criminal syndicates are totally controlling all New Zealand Courts for committing all kinds of crimes with impunity, protected, supported, and concealed by the law enforcement and regulatory agencies of the government.
See the evidence:
This matter requires your immediate attention and urgent action.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
On 17/12/21 7:06 pm, Police wrote:
Kia ora
On behalf of the Minister of Police, Hon Poto Williams I acknowledge and note your email requesting assistance with a criminal investigation.
As you have been advised previously, the investigation and prosecution of offences are the responsibility of the Commissioner of Police, as stated in part in Section 16 of the Policing Act 2008. The Commissioner must act independently of any Ministers of the Crown in discharging this responsibility.
You can report incidents to Police by calling 105 in a non-emergency, or 111 in an emergency.
If you wish to have your complaint considered outside of Police, you can contact the Independent Police Conduct Authority. Information on how to do this can be found here: https://www.ipca.govt.nz/
Ngā mihi,
Office of Hon Poto Williams
Minister for Building and Construction | Minister of Police
Associate Minister for Children | Associate Minister of Housing (Public Housing)
Website: www.Beehive,govt.nz
Private Bag 18041, Parliament Buildings, Wellington 6160, New Zealand
Authorised by Hon Poto Williams, Parliament Buildings, Wellington
International community must intervene on the undisputed clandestine publicly funded organised crimes of New Zealand
16 December 2021
To Whom It May Concern:
I am an enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand.
New Zealand has very severe problems in the governance, and all New Zealand Courts are used as the means and covers for the clandestine publicly funded organised crimes in violation of the laws of New Zealand and several international treaties for which the state of New Zealand is a signatory.
When the state machinery is used for clandestine organised crimes, and the organised criminal syndicates are flagrantly committing all kinds of crimes with impunity, due to the protection provided the law enforcement and regulatory agencies of the government, it is the time for the international community to intervene on the rogue state.
The fact is undisputed and evidence is published in the internet for anyone to see, it is the time for the international community to act on the rogue state which is sponsoring the clandestine publicly funded organised crimes in the secrecy of the Court and Government.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
Severe oversight problems in the law enforcement of New Zealand
15 December 2021
Rt Hon Jacinda Ardern
Prime Minister of New Zealand
cc: Christopher Luxon MP, leader of the opposition
Dear Prime Minister
I am an enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand.
New Zealand has very severe problems on the oversight, especially regarding the law enforcement and judiciary, as the corruption in the law enforcement and courts is endemic and widespread, a clear indication of capturing of public institutions by the organised criminal syndicates in New Zealand.
New Zealand has allowed and continues to allow its public institutions, including all the Courts, to be used as the means and covers for the organised criminal syndicates to commit all kinds of crimes with impunity, in violation of the laws of New Zealand.
The clandestine publicly funded organised crimes in the secrecy of the Court and Government in violation of the international law must end, and the international community must be informed of the state-sponsored organised crimes of New Zealand.
If you have any doubt on the seriousness of the situation in New Zealand, please take a look at the series of forged documents and using false documents for all kinds of crimes in New Zealand Courts, protected, supported, and concealed by the law enforcement and regulatory agencies of New Zealand Government.
The situation in New Zealand is endemic, and this matter requires the concert efforts among the political parties and MPs in Parliament to tackle the entrenched and widespread corruption in public institutions and clandestine state-sponsored organised crimes of New Zealand.
The fact is undisputed, and it is the time for you to act on this matter.
It is my hope that you will act on this matter soon.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
Totally proven commission of crimes of forgery and using false documents in Christchurch requires police investigation (15 December 2021)
15 December 2021
Hon Poto Williams
Police Minister
cc: Hon Mark Mitchell, Police spokesperson of the National Party
Dear Police Minister
The crimes have been committed, and they are totally proven without anyone disputing the commission of the crimes in Christchurch, your electorate.
Needless to say, covering up the crimes is a crime in violation of the Crimes Act 1961, and you, Police Minister, must step up and do the right thing for New Zealand.
This matter requires your personal leadership on this matter.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
14 December 2021
Hon Michael Wood
Minister of Transport
cc: Independent Police Conduct Authority; Hon Mark Mitchell, Police spokesperson of the National Party; Hon Kris Faafoi, Justice Minister; Ministry of Justice; Christchurch District Court; Dunedin District Court; Colin Baillie, Detective Senior Sergeant, New Zealand Police
Dear Hon Michael Wood
Today, I received an email from Mr Tom Peoples, Private Secretary (Transport), regarding the case of CRI-2020-009-4772 New Zealand Transport Authority -v- Autorent Limited, Hanna and Hillary.
It is clear from the email of Gavin Hillary, dated 29 November 2021, attached below, this matter is before the Court in Christchurch, and there will be a hearing on 19 January 2022.
For your information, I received several false documents or false information, from Gavin Hillary, attached.
Even to this day, there has not been any confirmation nor verification on the summons that he served on me, which was supposedly issued by Judge Farish of Christchurch District Court.
Needless to say, Gavin Hillary committed the crimes of forgery and using false documents in violation of the Crimes Act 1961.
It is my wish that the Ministry of Transport will make sure that the criminal offending of Gavin Hillary be notified to the judge who is in charge of the case.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
On 14/12/21 3:10 pm, Tom Peoples wrote:
Kia ora Tatsuhiko
I regard to prior our correspondence – I was of the impression that you had meant to say that matter was before the Court. Can you confirm this is the case?
Kind regards,
Tom
Tom Peoples | Private Secretary, Support (Transport)
Office of Hon Michael Wood
Minister for Workplace Relations and Safety | Minister of Transport
Private Bag 18041 | Parliament Buildings | Wellington 6160 | New Zealand
National party responded (14 December 2021)
Dear Mr Koyama
I write on behalf of Christopher Luxon, Leader of the Opposition, to thank you and acknowledge receipt of your email.
Christopher, as Leader, relies on his spokesperson colleagues to respond on his behalf to matters relating to their portfolios. I have therefore forwarded your email to National’s Spokesperson for Police, Hon Mark Mitchell for his information.
Kind regards
Elizabeth Neilson
Elizabeth Neilson Correspondence Officer
National Leader’s Office
Email: nlo@parliament.govt.nz
Parliament House | Parliament, Wellington 6160, New Zealand
national.org.nz
From: Tatsuhiko Koyama
Sent: Tuesday, 30 November 2021 5:05 PM
To: Christopher Luxon <Christopher.Luxon@parliament.govt.nz>
Cc: Nicola Willis <Nicola.Willis@parliament.govt.nz>; Rt Hon Jacinda Ardern <Jacinda.Ardern@parliament.govt.nz>; Hon Kelvin Davis <Kelvin.Davis@parliament.govt.nz>
Subject: The time to act on the completely verified state-sponsored organised crimes of New Zealand
30 November 2021
Christopher Luxon MP
Leader of the opposition
cc: Nicola Willis MP, deputy leader of the National Party; Rt Hon Jacinda Ardern, Prime Minister of New Zealand; Hon Kelvin Davis, deputy leader of the Labour Party
Dear Mr Luxon
New Zealand has very serious problems in the governance.
The fact is undisputed and it is the time to act on the completely verified state-sponsored organised crimes of New Zealand.
This matter requires your immediate attention and urgent action.
Yours sincerely
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
Undisputed total and systemic corruption in New Zealand Courts and confirmed insurance fraud and bankruptcy fraud in New Zealand
14 December 2021
Hon Poto Williams
Minister Responsible for the Serious Fraud Office
cc: Serious Fraud Office; Rt Hon Jacinda Ardern, Prime Minster; Hon Kris Faafoi, Justice Minister, Mr Christopher Luxon, leader of the opposition; American Bar Association
Dear SFO Minister
I understand that you acknowledged the receipt of my complaint lodged at the Serious Fraud Office on the series of confirmed organised crimes, committed in New Zealand Courts and other public institutions of New Zealand, on 19 October 2021 (see the attached email).
At this time, as you are a MP in Christchurch, I would like to provide information on the systemic organised crimes, committed in Christchurch High Court, in relation to the confirmed insurance fraud, committed by Southern Response and EQC, and subsequent bankruptcy fraud and bank robbery, committed by the various organised crimes, including Southern Response, and New Zealand Law Society
Needless to say, this matter is very serious, and that is the reason why this email is copied to Rt Hon Jacinda Ardern, Prime Minister, and Hon Kris Faafoi, Justice Minister, for the information.
I made sure that Mr Christopher Luxon, the leader of the opposition, become aware of the serious fraud, committed in New Zealand Courts and other public institutions, so that there will be a united effort in Parliament to combat the serious corruption in public institutions of New Zealand.
The fact is undisputed by anyone, and numerous evidence of the systemic organised crimes, committed in New Zealand Courts and public institutions of New Zealand is published in the internet for anyone to see.
When there is no controversy on the serious corruption in public institutions of New Zealand, it is the time for New Zealand to inform the international community on this matter, and start dealing with the very serious problems in the governance of New Zealand, rather than allowing the Courts and other public institutions to be used as the means and covers for the systemic organised crimes, in violation of the laws of New Zealand and several international treaties for which the state of New Zealand is a signatory.
For your information, I attached a document regarding the forgery, committed in various New Zealand Courts, including Christchurch High Court, and it is my wish that you take time to read the document.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
A. FALSE, FORGED DOCUMENTS ISSUED BY CHRISTCHURCH HIGH COURT
FALSE DOCUMENT - “MINUTE OF MANDER J,” dated 26 February 2015, (sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 27 February 2015)
FALSE DOCUMENT - Signed, “MINUTE OF MANDER J,” dated 26 February 2015, (sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 24 August 2015)
FALSE DOCUMENT - Handwritten minute of Mander J, dated 27 February 2015, (retrieved from the official court file found in Dunedin High Court on 19 February 2016)
FALSE DOCUMENT - “MINUTE OF MANDER J,” dated 5 March 2015, (sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 5 March 2015)
FALSE DOCUMENT - Signed, “MINUTE OF MANDER J,” dated 5 March 2015, (sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 13 March 2015)
FALSE DOCUMENT - Unless order of Mander J, dated 12 March 2015, (sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 12 March 2015)
FALSE DOCUMENT - Handwritten minute of Mander J, dated 12 March 2015, (sent by sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 13 March 2015)
FALSE DOCUMENT - Signed, “MINUTE OF MANDER J,” dated 13 March 2015, (sent by sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 13 March 2015)
* There is NO signed minute of Mander J, dated 13 March 2015, in the official court file.
FALSE DOCUMENT - “MINUTE OF MANDER J,” dated 13 March 2015, (sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 16 March 2015)
FALSE DOCUMENT - “MINUTE OF MANDER J,” dated 17 March 2015, (sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 17 March 2015)
FALSE DOCUMENT - Signed, “MINUTE OF MANDER J,” dated 17 March 2015, (sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 17 March 2015)
* There is NO signed minute of Mander J, dated 17 March 2015, in the official court file.
FALSE DOCUMENT - Email of Mander J, dated 20 March 2015 (at 12:11 pm), (sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 10 August 2015)
“Friday, 20 March 2015 12:11 p.m.”
"Amelia, I record a brief note of my decision. I don’t think I can wait any longer for the respondent’s response in order to give the appellants’ time to comply with the order.
The appellants’ application for an extension is declined.
The appellants cite Rule 12.7(1) HCRs as providing a time requirement for service, however this rule concerns summary judgment applications and does not apply for the present situation.
The appellants appeal remains extant notwithstanding the operation of the unless order.
I also note for completeness that a hearing of the respondent’s application was attempted to convened however the appellants declined to make themselves available despite repeated efforts by the registry. The matter was dealt with by way of memorandum.
The appellants have still not provided reasons for their non-compliance.
Mander J"
FALSE DOCUMENT - Email of Mander J, dated 20 March 2015 (at 12:18 pm), (sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 12 August 2015)
“Friday, 20 March 2015 12:18:41 p.m.”
“Amelia,
Our emails passed. I have read the respondent’s submissions. My ruling stands and may be notified to the parties without modification.
Many thanks
Mander J”
FALSE DOCUMENT - Order of Mander J, dated 20 March 2015 (at 12:26 pm), (sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 20 March 2015)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Nicholson, Amelia" <Amelia.Nicholson@justice.govt.nz>
Date: Thursday, 19 March 2015 at 2:13 PM
To: Tatsuhiko Koyama <tatsuhiko.koyama@gmail.com>
Cc: "Henaghan, Misha" <Misha.Henaghan@dlapf.com>, "Macdonald, Grant" <grant.macdonald@dlapiper.co.nz>, "Thom, Sacha" <sacha.thom@dlapiper.co.nz>
Subject: RE: Appellant's submissions - Koyama v Southern Response (CIV-2014-412-0202)
Dear Tatsuhiko,
Many thanks for your email. All our Christchurch Judges are in Wellington today and Friday attending a conference but as the Unless Order is for close of business tomorrow I will forward this application and any other relevant documents on to the Honourable Justice Mander to deal with as soon as he has the opportunity.
If counsel for the respondent wishes to reply to this application could they please let me know as soon as possible.
Kind regards,
Amelia
From: "Nicholson, Amelia" <Amelia.Nicholson@justice.govt.nz>
Date: Friday, 20 March 2015 at 8:26 AM
To: "tatsuhiko.koyama@gmail.com" <tatsuhiko.koyama@gmail.com>, "Macdonald, Grant" <grant.macdonald@dlapiper.co.nz>, "Henaghan, Misha" <misha.henaghan@dlapiper.co.nz>, "Thom, Sacha" <sacha.thom@dlapiper.co.nz>
Subject: CIV-2014-412-000202 - Koyama v Southern Response Earthquake Services Limited
Dear Counsel and Mr and Ms Koyama,
Following the receipt of the appellants application for an extension of the unless order and the respondents memorandum in reply, the Honourable Justice Mander has minuted the above named matter as follows:
"The appellants' application for an extension is declined.
The appellants cite Rule 12.7(1) HCRs as providing a time requirement for service, however this rule concerns summary judgment applications and does not apply to the present situation.
The appellants appeal remains extant notwithstanding the operation of the unless order.
I also note for completeness that a hearing of the respondent's application was attempted to be convened however the appellants declined to make themselves available despite repeated efforts by the Registry. The matter was dealt with by way of memorandum.
The appellants have still not provided reasons for their non-compliance.”
Kind regards,
Amelia
Amelia Nicholson
Deputy Registrar | Christchurch High Court
DDI: +64 3 962 4273 | Ext 54273
www.courtsofnz.govt.nz
From: "Nicholson, Amelia" <Amelia.Nicholson@justice.govt.nz>
Date: Monday, 10 August 2015 at 10:23 AM
To: Tatsuhiko Koyama <tatsuhiko.koyama@gmail.com>
Subject: RE: Request for a copy of the handwritten minute of Mander J, dated 20 March 2015
Dear Mr Koyama,
I do not have a hand written copy of this minute as the Honourable Justice Mander was in Auckland for a conference. This minute was given to me by way of email which I have attached a copy of now.
Kind regards,
Amelia
Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, was involved with Grant Macdonald, Misha Henaghan, and Sacha Thom of DLA Piper New Zealand in the confirmed insurance fraud, causing loss by deception, forgery, using false document for pecuniary advantage, in violation of the Crimes Act 1961.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FALSE DOCUMENT - “JUDGMENT OF MANDER J,” dated 23 March 2015, (sent by Rebecca Fahey, Civil Caseflow Manager, Christchurch High Court, on 23 March 2015, on the same day when a telephone case management conference was held and before the scheduled hearing on 5 April 2015)
FALSE DOCUMENT - Signed, “JUDGMENT OF MANDER J,” dated 23 March 2015, (sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 24 March 2015)
FALSE DOCUMENT - “JUDGMENT OF MANDER J,’ dated 26 May 2015, (sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 26 May 2015)
FALSE DOCUMENT - Signed, “JUDGMENT OF MANDER J,’ dated 26 May 2015, (sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 5 August 2015)
* There is NO signed judgement of Mander J, dated 26 May 2015, in the official court file.
FALSE DOCUMENT - Minute of Mander J, date 5 June 2016, (sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 5 June 2015)
FALSE DOCUMENT - Handwritten minute of Mander J, dated 5 June 2015, (sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 14 July 2015)
FALSE DOCUMENT - “Order for Costs,” dated 12 June 2015, (sent by Grant Macdonald on or around 15 July 2015) - THIS DOCUMENT WAS SENT "AFTER" THE CASE WAS APPEALED TO THE COURT OF APPEAL, where the continuous stream of false, forged documents were made and used for fraud in the Court, conspiring to defeat justice, in violation of the Crimes Act 1961.
B. CONFIRMED INSURANCE FRAUD ON CANTERBURY EARTHQUAKE
On 30 November 2020, New Zealand Police issued the Police File number of 201129/4259, on the insurance fraud, committed by Southern Response and EQC, and subsequent fraud in the Court and extortion (later bank robbery), using false documents.
--------------------
1. On or around 27 August 2012, Arrow International, on behalf of Southern Response, issued a full, detailed assessment report (dated 24 February 2012, revised 27 August 2012) on the earthquake damage on the property, located at 15 Bounty Street, Bryndwr, Christchurch, estimating the total amount of the repair of $228,846.55 ($218,519.55 + $10,127.00).
2. On 2 December 2013, I called Emma Brown, Southern Response, regarding the insurance claim, and she talked about alleged paper-based assessment on the claim by EQC, which was more than more than 3 months prior to 12 February 2014 when the settlement recommendation was generated by EQC; this conversation was recorded.
3. On 11 December 2013, I received a letter from Emma Brown, Southern Response, sending me a computer printout sheet, dated 19 August 2013, for their refusal to settle the insurance claim on the property.
4. On 13 February 2014, I received a phone call from EQC in Dunedin, and staff at EQC did not mention any onsite scoping visits by EQC on the property in Christchurch; this conversation was recorded.
5. On 11 August 2014, I received "Response by defendant," dated 22 May 2014, stating, "On 26 August 2013, EQC sent the defendant a batch of reassessed claims which included a file note relating to the plaintiffs' claim," "EQC had completed a further, paper-based, review of the damage to the House on 29 March 2012...(Second EQC Assessment)," during the District Court proceeding (CIV-2014-012-186).
6. On 16 December 2014, I received an email from Sacha Thom, Solicitor, representing Southern Response, stating, "...Southern Response provide copies of:
1. The communication between Southern Response and EQC on 26 August 2013.
2. EQC’s second assessment completed on 29 March 2012.
We attach three documents and note that:
· On 26 August 2013, EQC physically handed to Southern Response these three documents as part of a weekly collection of a batch of documents relating to various claims.
· The first attachment is addressed to Southern Response employee Kate Legg because she was the person at Southern Response who requested the documents from EQC in relation to your claim.
· Southern Response understands that EQC inserted Southern Response’s logo at the top of the document in order to identify which insurer the document needed to be provided to.
· The attached scope of works is the only document relating to EQC’s amended assessment that was provided to Southern Response.
7. On 5 February 2018, I received an email from Leanne Stewart, Senior Investigator, Office of the Ombudsman, stating, "I have made some enquires of EQC regarding your complaint about access to the name of the person who generated the settlement recommendation dated 12 February 2014," "EQC has confirmed that the names of the EQC staff members who had completed assessment reports following onsite scoping visits at the property have been disclosed to you."
--------------------
The facts above clearly establish that Southern Response and EQC committed insurance fraud.
(1) There was NO onsite scoping visits by EQC at the property in Christchurch for the settlement recommendation, dated 12 February 2014, as alleged by EQC, as I was in Dunedin on that day. Furthermore, on 13 February 2014, I actually received a phone call in Dunedin from EQC staff and there was NO mention of the onsite visit in Christchurch on 12 February 2014, a day before.
(2) Southern Response repeatedly stated that the EQC assessment on the property was paper-based (NOT onsite scoping visit as alleged by EQC), and the date of the computer printout was 19 August 2013, which was about 6 months earlier than 12 February 2014 on which the settlement recommendation was supposedly generated by EQC.
(3) EQC cannot provide the name of the staff who did the alleged assessment, dated 12 February 2014.
(4) There is NO evidence that EQC actually conducted any assessment on the property on 29 March 2012; since in or around August 2011, about 7 months prior to March 2011, the handling of the claim was shifted from EQC to AMI Insurance after EQC settled the claim by paying the maximum liability of EQC under the Earthquake Commission Act1993 and was no longer handling the claim on that day.
(5) The full, detailed assessment report, professionally done by Arrow International, on behalf of Southern Response (dated 24 February 2012, revised 27 August 2012), unequivocally establishes the total damage of $228,846.55.
(6) The computer printout sheet, dated 19 August 2013, is a false, forged document which was used for the insurance fraud, committed by Southern Response.
Clearly, the evidence establishes the insurance fraud, committed by Southern Response and EQC.
Police corruption in systemic judicial corruption
10 December 2021
Rt Hon Jacinda Ardern
Prime Minister of New Zealand
cc: Christopher Luxon MP, leader of the opposition; and others
Dear Prime Minister
I am an enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand.
Attached, please find the information on police corruption in systemic judicial corruption in New Zealand.
New Zealand has very serious problems in corruption in public institutions as all New Zealand Courts are used as the means and covers for the organised criminal syndicates to commit all kinds of crimes with impunity.
Needless to say that the systemic corruption in New Zealand Courts is being used by all sorts of criminals in New Zealand.
Police protection, support, and concealment of systemic corruption in New Zealand Courts must end, if the rule of law is to be established in New Zealand.
The undisputed evidence of the systemic corruption in New Zealand Courts is published in the internet.
Regarding the confirmed forgery and fraudulent use of court documents on the current complaint, please go to the following URL for more information:
The fact is totally proven without any dispute from anyone.
Furthermore, the undisputed matter of commission of the organised crimes is published in the internet, and many people around the world know about it.
You, Prime Minister of New Zealand, must act on this matter immediately.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
The time to act on the completely verified state-sponsored organised crimes of New Zealand
30 November 2021
Christopher Luxon MP
Leader of the opposition
cc: Nicola Willis MP, deputy leader of the National Party; Rt Hon Jacinda Ardern, Prime Minister of New Zealand; Hon Kelvin Davis, deputy leader of the Labour Party
Dear Mr Luxon
New Zealand has very serious problems in the governance.
The fact is undisputed and it is the time to act on the completely verified state-sponsored organised crimes of New Zealand.
This matter requires your immediate attention and urgent action.
Yours sincerely
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
The international community must act on the undisputed and totally proven state sponsored organised crimes of New Zealand
12 November 2021
To Whom It May Concern:
I am an enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand.
The international community must at on the undisputed and totally proven state sponsored organised crimes of New Zealand.
The international community must not allow New Zealand to continue to fund and protect clandestine criminal operations in public institutions of New Zealand, which include all the Courts of New Zealand without any exception.
The clandestine publicly funded organised crimes in public institutions of New Zealand are totally proved without anyone disputing it.
The evil of this publicly funded criminal enterprise is made possible by the collusive connections which have been established, entrenched, and widespread among lawyers, judges, court registrars, public servants, police officers, and journalists.
Due to the protection, support and concealment by the law enforcement and regulatory agencies of New Zealand, this problem has not been investigated in New Zealand, and the international community needs to step in.
The nature of the state sponsored organised crimes require the international community to intervene.
When the fact is not disputed, it is the time for the international community to act.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
International oversight must be placed on New Zealand Judiciary on the proven systemic corruption in all New Zealand CourtsInternational oversight must be placed on New Zealand Judiciary on the proven systemic corruption in all New Zealand Courts
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2021 08:40:16 +1300
From: Tatsuhiko Koyama <tatsuhiko.koyama@gmail.com>
To: info@apec.org <info@apec.org>, media@apec.org <media@apec.org>, n.mahuta@ministers.govt.nz <n.mahuta@ministers.govt.nz>, enquiries@mfat.govt.nz <enquiries@mfat.govt.nz>, media@mfat.govt.nz <media@mfat.govt.nz>
11 November 2021
To whom it may concern
We have very serious problems in New Zealand where the organised criminal syndicates are using public institutions for their crimes, with impunity, due to the state sponsorship and protection of the clandestine publicly funded organised crimes in New Zealand.
All New Zealand Courts are used as the means and covers for the organised criminal syndicates to commit all kinds of crimes with impunity; this evil is made possible by the law enforcement and regulatory agencies of New Zealand Government which are protecting, supporting and concealing the systemic corruption and the state sponsored organised crimes of New Zealand.
No one disputes this fact, and it is the time for the international community to intervene.
We must not allow New Zealand to continue to sponsor and protect clandestine publicly funded organised crimes in violation of the laws of New Zealand and international treaties for which the state of New Zealand is a signatory.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
American Bar Association responded on the total and systemic corruption of New Zealand Judiciary (29 October 2021)
Dear Tatsuhiko,
Thank you for contacting the American Bar Association.
Your email has been forwarded to the Rule of Law Initiative, and the appropriate staff person will respond to you shortly. Your patience is appreciated.
Visit our website at www.americanbar.org or contact us at www.americanbar.org/contactus. For immediate assistance, please call the ABA Service Center at 800-285-2221 or 312-988-5522 Monday-Friday between 9:00 AM and 6:00 PM ET.
Sincerely,
American Bar Association
321 North Clark Street
Chicago, IL 60654
T: 800-285-2221
F: 312-988-5850
service@americanbar.org
From: Tatsuhiko Koyama <tatsuhiko.koyama@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2021 4:52 PM
To: ABA Member Service <service@americanbar.org>; memberservices@isba.org; mrc@nysba.org; memberservices@dcbar.org
Cc: jacinda.ardern@parliament.govt.nz; j.ardern@ministers.govt.nz; information@dpmc.govt.nz; CTC-TRIBLETTER <ctc-tribletter@chicagotribune.com>
Subject: International oversight must be placed on New Zealand Judiciary on the proven systemic corruption in all New Zealand Courts
28 October 2021
Dear Sir/Madam
I am an enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand.
The fact of systemic organised crimes (clandestine state-sponsored organised crimes) committed in New Zealand Courts is totally proven without any dispute from anyone.
The international community must intervene on New Zealand and its totally corrupt Judiciary and clandestine publicly-funded organised crimes in public institutions of New Zealand (state-sponsored organised crimes).
New Zealand Judiciary definitely requires international oversight as the corruption in New Zealand Courts is endemic and widespread - all New Zealand Courts are used as the means and covers for the organised criminal syndicates to commit all kinds of crimes with impunity; this evil is made possible by the law enforcement and regulatory agencies of New Zealand Government which are protecting, supporting and concealing the systemic corruption and the state-organised crimes of New Zealand.
This matter requires your urgent action.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
Serious fraued office accepted the complaint on the systemic organised crimes committed in New Zealand Courts
(19 October 2021)
Kia ora Tatsuhiko Koyama
On behalf of Hon Poto Williams, Minister Responsible for the Serious Fraud Office (SFO), thank you for your email of 13 October 2021.
You have requested assistance in the form of an SFO investigation into an alleged fraud by the courts.
While the Minister is responsible for the SFO, the Serious Fraud Office Act 1990 requires that the Director act independently of the Minister in relation to their investigations or inquiries. This ensures that operational matters within the SFO remain free of any political influence or interference.
While the Minister is unable to assist you, I understand that the SFO is also in receipt of your complaint. Therefore I am forwarding your correspondence to the SFO for their information.
Ngā mihi nui
Matthew McCallum
Private Secretary (Serious Fraud Office) | Office of Hon Poto Williams
Minister for Building and Construction | Minister of Police | Minister Responsible for the Serious Fraud Office
Associate Minister for Children | Associate Minister of Housing (Public Housing)
Email: matthew.mccallum@parliament.govt.nz Website: www.Beehive,govt.nz
Private Bag 18041, Parliament Buildings, Wellington 6160, New Zealand
From: Tatsuhiko Koyama [mailto:tatsuhiko.koyama@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 13 October 2021 11:04 AM
To: enquiries@sfo.govt.nz; christine.meads@sfo.govt.nz
Cc: Hon Poto Williams <poto.williams@parliament.govt.nz>; P Williams (MIN) <P.Williams@ministers.govt.nz>
Subject: Undisputed systemic organised crimes of fraud in New Zealand Courts require investigation
13 October 2021
Serious Fraud Office
Cc: Hon Poto Williams, minister responsible for SFO
Dear Sir/Madam
I am an enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand.
Attached, please find some of the evidence of the confirmed systemic organised crimes of fraud committed in New Zealand Courts.
The fact is undisputed, and it is about time for the Serious Fraud Office to actually investigate this matter.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
Undisputed systemic organised crimes of fraud in New Zealand Courts require criminal investigation
18 October 2021
Rt Hon Jacinda Ardern
Prime Minister
Dear Prime Minister
I am an enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand.
This email follows my email, dated 29 September 2021, “International intervention is required for the undisputed publicly funded organised crimes committed in public institutions of New Zealand.”
I repeat.
You, Prime Minister of New Zealand, must take leadership on the completely verified systemic organised crimes, committed in public institutions of New Zealand.
The fact is undisputed on the clandestine organised crimes, committed in public institutions of New Zealand.
This matter requires your immediate and urgent action due to the prevalent and entrenched nature of systemic corruption in public institutions of New Zealand.
These publicly funded clandestine organised crimes must be considered as the state sponsored organised crimes of New Zealand, and you must be held accountable for the crimes.
Attached below, please find the evidence of the multiple layers of covering up for the clandestine publicly funded organised crimes committed in public institutions of New Zealand.
The problems of New Zealand are very severe, and all New Zealand Courts are being used as the means and covers for the clandestine publicly funded organised crimes and using state power for illicit ends, protected, supported, and concealed by various agencies of New Zealand Government, in violation of the laws of New Zealand and international law.
https://sites.google.com/view/tatsuhiko-koyama/confirmed-false-court-documents-of-new-zealand
You, Prime Minister of New Zealand, must take leadership on the undisputed fact on the state sponsored organised crimes and seek international intervention on this matter without further delay.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
Undisputed systemic organised crimes of fraud in New Zealand Courts require criminal investigation
From: Tatsuhiko Koyama
Date: 15/10/2021, 12:02 pm
To: "d.clark@ministers.govt.nz" <d.clark@ministers.govt.nz>, "David.Clark@parliament.govt.nz" <David.Clark@parliament.govt.nz>, "dunedin@parliament.govt.nz" <dunedin@parliament.govt.nz>
CC: "taierimp@parliament.govt.nz" <taierimp@parliament.govt.nz>, "rachel.brooking@parliament.govt.nz" <rachel.brooking@parliament.govt.nz>, "michael.woodhouse@parliament.govt.nz" <michael.woodhouse@parliament.govt.nz>, "reception@labour.org.nz" <reception@labour.org.nz>, "hq@national.org.nz" <hq@national.org.nz>, "mayor@dcc.govt.nz" <mayor@dcc.govt.nz>
15 October 2021
Hon Dr David Clark
MP for Dunedin
Dear Hon Dr David Clark
I live in Dunedin.
Attached, please find some of the evidence of the undisputed systemic organised crimes, committed in New Zealand Courts, including Dunedin High Court.
This matter is extremely serious, and there is no dispute on the commission of the organised crimes from anyone.
It is about the time for you to get personally involved on this matter.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
From: Polly Martin
Sent: Thursday, 14 October 2021 1:06 pm
To: Tatsuhiko Koyama
Cc: Mayor
Subject: FW: Undisputed systemic organised crimes of fraud in New Zealand Courts require criminal investigation
Good Afternoon
On behalf of Mayor Hawkins I acknowledge receipt of your email.
Regards
Polly
Polly Martin
Administration Assistant to the Mayor of Dunedin
Kaiāwhina Whakahaere mō te Koromatua o Ōtepoti
P 03 477 4000 | DD 03 474 3889 |E polly.martin@dcc.govt.nz
Dunedin City Council - Kaunihera ā-rohe o Ōtepoti
50 The Octagon, Dunedin Central, Dunedin 9016
PO Box 5045, Dunedin 9054
New Zealand - Aotearoa
Website – pae tukutuku: www.dunedin.govt.nz
From: Tatsuhiko Koyama
Sent: Thursday, 14 October 2021 11:22 a.m.
To: Mayor <mayor@oa.dcc.govt.nz>; CSA Customer Services - DCC address <customer.services@dcc.govt.nz>
Subject: Undisputed systemic organised crimes of fraud in New Zealand Courts require criminal investigation
14 October 2021
Mayor Aaron Hawkins
Dunedin City Council
Dear Mayor
I am a resident of Dunedin City.
Attached, please find the information on the undisputed systemic organised crimes committed in New Zealand.
As no one disputes on the commission of the organised crimes, there is no controversy on this matter.
It is my wish that you put pressure on the Government to investigate this matter immediately.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
From: Tatsuhiko Koyama
Sent: Thursday, 14 October 2021 8:02 am
To: j.tinetti@ministers.govt.nz; jan.tinetti@parliament.govt.nz; info@dia.govt.nz
Subject: Undisputed systemic organised crimes of fraud in New Zealand Courts require investigation
14 October 2021
Hon Jan Tinetti
Minister of Internal Affairs
Dear Hon Tinetti
You must witness the undisputed systemic organised crimes, committed in New Zealand Courts, which are basically used as the means and covers for the organised criminal syndicates to commit all kinds of crimes with impunity.
Attached, please find some of the evidence of the systemic organised crimes, and the fact is totally undisputed.
This matter requires your leadership to investigate, as the corruption is very much widespread and entrenched in public institutions of New Zealand.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
From: Tatsuhiko Koyama
Sent: Wednesday, 13 October 2021 11:32 am
To: enquiries@sfo.govt.nz; christine.meads@sfo.govt.nz
Cc: poto.williams@parliament.govt.nz; p.williams@ministers.govt.nz
Subject: Undisputed systemic organised crimes of fraud in New Zealand Courts require investigation
13 October 2021
Serious Fraud Office
Cc: Hon Poto Williams, minister responsible for SFO
Dear Sir/Madam
I am an enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand.
Attached, please find some of the evidence of the confirmed systemic organised crimes of fraud committed in New Zealand Courts.
The fact is undisputed, and it is about time for the Serious Fraud Office to actually investigate this matter.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
From: Tatsuhiko Koyama
Sent: Monday, 11 October 2021 12:21 pm
To: brian.dickey@mc.co.nz; mnz@raydon.co.nz; robin.bates@rpblaw.co.nz; steve.manning@elvidges.co.nz; jacinda@hamiltonlegal.nz; mary-jane.thomas@prlaw.co.nz; natalie@kfw.co.nz; Steve.Manning@elvidges.co.nz; cec@candmlegal.co.nz
Cc: Police; Moana Fuli; poto.williams@parliament.govt.nz; p.williams@ministers.govt.nz; guyon.espiner@rnz.co.nz
Subject: Undisputed systemic organised crimes in the Court of New Zealand require prosecution
11 October 2021
Crown Solicitors
Cc: Hon Poto Williams, Police Minister; Mr Guyon Espiner, Investigative reporter, In Depth, Radio New Zealand
Dear Sirs
We have very serious problems in New Zealand.
The fact is undisputed on the systemic organised crimes in New Zealand Courts.
Attached, please find some of the evidence of the systemic organised crimes in the Court committed in New Zealand.
All New Zealand Courts, without any exception, are used as the means and covers for the organised criminal syndicates to commit all kind of crimes with impunity in violation of the laws of New Zealand.
https://sites.google.com/view/tatsuhiko-koyama/confirmed-false-court-documents-of-new-zealand
Needless to say, this matter requires criminal prosecution, especially when there is no one disputes on the commission of the organised crimes.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
International intervention is required for the undisputed publicly funded organised crimes committed in public institutions of New Zealand
29 September 2021
Rt Hon Jacinda Ardern
Prime Minister of New Zealand
Cc: Hon Nanaia Mahuta, Minister of Foreign Affairs; Hon Damien O'Connor, Minister for Trade and Export Growth; Hon Kris Faafoi, Minister of Justice; Hon Aupito Su’a William Sio, Minister for Courts; Justice Susan Thomas, Chief High Court Judge; Hon David Parker, Attorney General; and others
Dear Prime Minister
You, Prime Minister of New Zealand, must take leadership on the completely verified systemic organised crimes, committed in public institutions of New Zealand.
The fact is undisputed on the clandestine organised crimes, committed in public institutions of New Zealand.
This matter requires your immediate and urgent action due to the prevalent and entrenched nature of systemic corruption in public institutions of New Zealand.
These publicly funded clandestine organised crimes must be considered as the state sponsored organised crimes of New Zealand, and you must be held accountable for the crimes.
Attached below, please find the evidence of the multiple layers of covering up for the clandestine publicly funded organised crimes committed in public institutions of New Zealand.
The problems of New Zealand are very severe, and all New Zealand Courts are being used as the means and covers for the clandestine publicly funded organised crimes and using state power for illicit ends, protected, supported, and concealed by various agencies of New Zealand Government, in violation of the laws of New Zealand and international law.
https://sites.google.com/view/tatsuhiko-koyama/confirmed-false-court-documents-of-new-zealand
You, Prime Minister of New Zealand, must take leadership on the undisputed fact on the state sponsored organised crimes and seek international intervention on this matter without further delay.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
Subject: 210431 - Your email to the Human Rights Commission
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2021 12:29:28 +1300
From: Hilary Unwin <HilaryU@hrc.co.nz>
To: tatsuhiko.koyama@gmail.com <tatsuhiko.koyama@gmail.com>
29 September 2021
Dear Tatsuhiko
Thank you for your email to Commissioner Paul Hunt dated 17 September 2021, which we take note of. As Commissioner, he remains committed and passionate about advocating for human rights for all.
The UDHR is not a legally binding set of rules, but rather a commitment by the signatories to promote and protect human rights. The UDHR has been incorporated directly into the constitutions of a number of countries, while in others it is reflected in the wording of constitutions. As New Zealand does not have a written constitution, the mechanisms for the protection and promotion of human rights have been established by statute.
Please note that complaints against the police can be directed to the Independent Police Conduct Authority.
Complaints regarding the judiciary can be directed to the Office of the Judicial Conduct Commissioner.
Thank you again for your correspondence.
Yours sincerely
Mōhiohio Tika Tangata me ngā Ratonga Tautoko
Human Rights Information and Support Services
New Zealand Human Rights Commission | Te Kāhui Tika Tangata
t: 0800 496 877
e: infoline@hrc.co.nz
w: www.hrc.co.nz
New Zealand Human Rights Commission must act on the blatant Human Rights violations in New Zealand Courts and the undisputed state sponsored organised crimes of New Zealand
17 September 2021
Mr Paul Hunt
Chief Commissioner
Human Rights Commission
Cc: UN Human Rights Commission; Rt Hon Jacinda Ardern, Prime Minister of New Zealand
Dear Chief Commissioner
I am an enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand.
Attached, please find a copy of my email to Rt Hon Jacinda Ardern, Prime Minister, on the undisputed systemic corruption and organised crimes in New Zealand Courts, protected, supported, and concealed by various agencies and departments of New Zealand Government.
The criminal use of public institutions and illicit use of state power for criminal ends in violation of the laws of New Zealand and international treaties for which the state of New Zealand is a signatory must be considered as blatant Human Rights violations and state-sponsored organised crimes in violation of the international law.
The fact is undisputed, and this matter must be acted by New Zealand Human Rights Commission.
This matter requires your immediate attention and action.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
Fact of the state sponsored organised crimes of New Zealand is UNDISPUTED!
3 September 2021
Rt Hon Jacinda Ardern
Prime Minister of New Zealand
Dear Prime Minister
I am an enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand.
This email follows my email, dated 18 August 2021, “New Zealand must warn the international community and seek international intervention on the completely verified state sponsored organised crimes of New Zealand.”
The fact of the state sponsored organised crimes of New Zealand is UNDISPUTED!
You, Prime Minister of New Zealand, must act on this matter immediately!
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
From: Tatsuhiko Koyama
Sent: Wednesday, 25 August 2021 11:27 am
To: Moana Fuli; poto.williams@parliament.govt.nz; p.williams@ministers.govt.nz; poto.williams.mp@parliament.govt.nz; Police
Cc: k.faafoi@ministers.govt.nz; kris.faafoi@parliament.govt.nz; a.sio@ministers.govt.nz; Aupito.william.sio@parliament.govt.nz; duncan.webb@parliament.govt.nz; taierimp@parliament.govt.nz; rachel.brooking@parliament.govt.nz; Virginia.Andersen@parliament.govt.nz; ginny.andersen@parliament.govt.nz; Vanushi.Walters@parliament.govt.nz; Simon.Bridges@parliament.govt.nz; Emily.Henderson@parliament.govt.nz; Harete.hipango@parliament.govt.nz; Nicole.McKee@parliament.govt.nz; Willow-Jean.Prime@parliament.govt.nz; Arena.Williams@parliament.govt.nz; David.Clark@parliament.govt.nz; southland@lawsociety.org.nz; otago@lawsociety.org.nz; canterbury-westland@lawsociety.org.nz; nelson@lawsociety.org.nz; marlborough@lawsociety.org.nz; wellington@lawsociety.org.nz; manawatu@lawsociety.org.nz; whanganui@lawsociety.org.nz; hawkesbay@lawsociety.org.nz; taranaki@lawsociety.org.nz; gisborne@lawsociety.org.nz; waikatobop@lawsociety.org.nz; auckland@lawsociety.org.nz; reception@adls.org.nz; chenry.barrister@xtra.co.nz; ellist@tonyellis.co.nz; djallanbarrister@gmail.com; allends22@gmail.com; castelinob@lawyer.com; rachitacastelino@icloud.com; akeem@nwm.co.nz; nkaur@adventark.co.nz; mkk16@students.waikato.ac.nz; enerida@adventark.co.nz; sravindra@adventark.co.nz; is58@students.waikato.ac.nz; richas9912@gmail.com; adom.tieku94@gmail.com; vienna@amlaw.co.nz; atinae.castlefinnlaw@gmail.com; olivia@startupqueenstownlakes.com; fcdeliu@gmail.com; andrew@andrewstraw.com
Subject: Evidence of the systemic corruption and organised crimes in the Court of New Zealand
25 August 2021
Hon Poto Williams
Police Minister
Cc: Hon Kris Faafoi, Minister of Justice; Hon Aupito William Sio, Minister for Courts; Justice Committee of Parliament; some other members of MPs; law societies in New Zealand; and lawyers
Dear Police Minister
I am an enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand.
This email follows my email, dated 12 August 2021, “False, forged documents of the High Court of New Zealand require police criminal investigation,” attached.
You, as Police Minister, must be personally involved in the investigation of the systemic corruption and organised crimes, committed in public institutions of New Zealand, including all New Zealand Courts.
Attached, please find another set of evidence, which clearly shows the similarity in the organised crimes, if you compared the evidence with the evidence which I provided in my previous email, dated 12 August 2021.
1. “LEGAL DISCUSSION BEFORE THE HON JUSTICE D COLLINS” - the false transcript of non-existent hearing, using the name of Justice Collins for fraud, dated 20 August 2014
This false document was sent by Michaela Stack, Court Registry Officer, High Court of New Zealand, on 8 September 2014.
It is undisputed by anyone, including Wellington High Court, that there was NO hearing in CIV-2013-485-002343 in Wellington High Court, and there is NO recording of the alleged hearing in Wellington High Court on 20 August 2014. It is impossible to make a transcript of a hearing without having the recording of the hearing.
2. “Judgment dated 14 October 2014” – the false document, extorting $8,955.25
This false document was sent by Paul Collins, Barrister, enclosed in his letter, dated 21 November 2014.
This false document states, “This proceeding was heard on 20 August 2014 at Wellington before the Honourable Justice Collins, who, having heard from Paul Collins, counsel for the first respondent, and Helen Carrad, counsel for the second respondent, gives judgment that...The first respondent is entitled to scale 2B costs in the sum of $7,064.50 and disbursement of $50, set out in Schedule 1; The second respondent is entitled to scale 2B costs in the sum of $1,840.75, set out in Schedule 2.”
3. Letter of Helen Carrad, Crown Counsel, Crown Law, dated 24 December 2014
Helen Carrad, in her letter, dated 24 December 2014, stated, “Following the judgment of Justice Collins [dated 14 October 2014], counsel for the NZLS and counsel for the Attorney-General filed costs schedules in the High Court which set out the costs incurred by each party in accordance with Schedule 3 of the High Court Rues.
This letter clearly negates that Justice Collins made the costs decision on 20 August 2014; furthermore, it clearly negates the costs decision was made on 14 October 2014.
It was confirmed by Wellington High Court that there was NO application for the costs filed by the New Zealand Law Society nor the Crown Law Office in the case of in CIV-2013-485-002343.
4. Letter of the Supreme Court, dated 15 August 2014,
The letter of the Supreme Court, dated 15 August 2014, states, “I acknowledge receipt of the above application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court [SC/2014 – Tatsuhiko KOYAMA v New Zealand Law Society and ANOR], accepted for filing on the 15th of August 2014,” “The applicant must file and serve written submissions, of not more than 10 pages in length, in support of the application. This must be done by – Friday 12th of September 2014,” “The respondents must file and serve written submissions, of not more than 10 pages in length, with 15 working days of receiving the appellant’s submissions.”
This letter clearly indicates that the High Court of New Zealand did not have the jurisdiction to hear the case on 20 August 2014, since the Supreme Court of New Zealand had the jurisdiction to hear the case since 15 August 2014.
5. Letter of Mitch Singh, Associate, Glaister Ennor, dated 28 January 2016, extorting $46,310.48, using various false, forged documents of New Zealand Courts, in the bankruptcy fraud, committed in the High Court of New Zealand (later, resulted in the bank robbery by Ministry of Business, Innovation, and Employment).
The serious nature of the organised crimes in New Zealand is that these organised crimes are committed in public institutions, including all New Zealand Courts, and systematic, and protected, supported, concealed by the law enforcement and regulatory agencies of New Zealand Government.\
The fact is undisputed.
This matter requires you, Police Minister, to contact Justice Collins personally whose name was used in the organised crimes in the High Court of New Zealand, along with various other judges whose names were used in the series of organised crimes committed in New Zealand, in violation of the Crimes Act 1961.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
Time for Australia to intervene on the state sponsored organised crimes of New Zealand
25 August 2021
Law societies in Australia
Cc: Government of Australia; Rt Hon Jacinda Ardern, Prime Minister of New Zealand
Dear Sir/Madam
I am an enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand.
Attached, please find some of the evidence of the systemic organised crimes committed in the Court of New Zealand.
This is a small sample of far larger problems in the governance of New Zealand, and New Zealand is continuing to conceal for the insidious purpose of making the clandestine publicly funded organised crimes (state sponsored organised crimes of New Zealand) viable in the secrecy of the Court and Government of New Zealand, in violation of the international law.
You must read the attached emails and documents and see for yourself what is New Zealand is doing within the secrecy of the Court and Government.
The fact of the systemic organised crimes committed in public institutions of New Zealand is undisputed.
It is the time for Australia to intervene on the state sponsored organised crimes of New Zealand.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
* A copy of this entire email can be found at the following URL:
Evidence of the systemic corruption and organised crimes in the Court of New Zealand
25 August 2021
Hon Poto Williams
Police Minister
Cc: Hon Kris Faafoi, Minister of Justice; Hon Aupito William Sio, Minister for Courts; Justice Committee of Parliament; some other members of MPs; law societies in New Zealand; and lawyers
Dear Police Minister
I am an enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand.
This email follows my email, dated 12 August 2021, “False, forged documents of the High Court of New Zealand require police criminal investigation,” attached.
You, as Police Minister, must be personally involved in the investigation of the systemic corruption and organised crimes, committed in public institutions of New Zealand, including all New Zealand Courts.
Attached, please find another set of evidence, which clearly shows the similarity in the organised crimes, if you compared the evidence with the evidence which I provided in my previous email, dated 12 August 2021.
1. “LEGAL DISCUSSION BEFORE THE HON JUSTICE D COLLINS” - the false transcript of non-existent hearing, using the name of Justice Collins for fraud, dated 20 August 2014
This false document was sent by Michaela Stack, Court Registry Officer, High Court of New Zealand, on 8 September 2014.
It is undisputed by anyone, including Wellington High Court, that there was NO hearing in CIV-2013-485-002343 in Wellington High Court, and there is NO recording of the alleged hearing in Wellington High Court on 20 August 2014. It is impossible to make a transcript of a hearing without having the recording of the hearing.
2. “Judgment dated 14 October 2014” – the false document, extorting $8,955.25
This false document was sent by Paul Collins, Barrister, enclosed in his letter, dated 21 November 2014.
This false document states, “This proceeding was heard on 20 August 2014 at Wellington before the Honourable Justice Collins, who, having heard from Paul Collins, counsel for the first respondent, and Helen Carrad, counsel for the second respondent, gives judgment that...The first respondent is entitled to scale 2B costs in the sum of $7,064.50 and disbursement of $50, set out in Schedule 1; The second respondent is entitled to scale 2B costs in the sum of $1,840.75, set out in Schedule 2.”
3. Letter of Helen Carrad, Crown Counsel, Crown Law, dated 24 December 2014
Helen Carrad, in her letter, dated 24 December 2014, stated, “Following the judgment of Justice Collins [dated 14 October 2014], counsel for the NZLS and counsel for the Attorney-General filed costs schedules in the High Court which set out the costs incurred by each party in accordance with Schedule 3 of the High Court Rues.
This letter clearly negates that Justice Collins made the costs decision on 20 August 2014; furthermore, it clearly negates the costs decision was made on 14 October 2014.
It was confirmed by Wellington High Court that there was NO application for the costs filed by the New Zealand Law Society nor the Crown Law Office in the case of in CIV-2013-485-002343.
4. Letter of the Supreme Court, dated 15 August 2014
The letter of the Supreme Court, dated 15 August 2014, states, “I acknowledge receipt of the above application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court [SC/2014 – Tatsuhiko KOYAMA v New Zealand Law Society and ANOR], accepted for filing on the 15th of August 2014,” “The applicant must file and serve written submissions, of not more than 10 pages in length, in support of the application. This must be done by – Friday 12th of September 2014,” “The respondents must file and serve written submissions, of not more than 10 pages in length, with 15 working days of receiving the appellant’s submissions.”
This letter clearly indicates that the High Court of New Zealand did not have the jurisdiction to hear the case on 20 August 2014, since the Supreme Court of New Zealand had the jurisdiction to hear the case since 15 August 2014.
5. Letter of Mitch Singh, Associate, Glaister Ennor, dated 28 January 2016, extorting $46,310.48, using various false, forged documents of New Zealand Courts, in the bankruptcy fraud, committed in the High Court of New Zealand (later, resulted in the bank robbery by Ministry of Business, Innovation, and Employment)
The serious nature of the organised crimes in New Zealand is that these organised crimes are committed in public institutions, including all New Zealand Courts, and systematic, and protected, supported, concealed by the law enforcement and regulatory agencies of New Zealand Government.
The fact is undisputed.
This matter requires you, Police Minister, to contact Justice Collins personally whose name was used in the organised crimes in the High Court of New Zealand, along with various other judges whose names were used in the series of organised crimes committed in New Zealand, in violation of the Crimes Act 1961.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
* A copy of this entire email can be found at the following URL:
New Zealand must warn the international community and seek international intervention on the completely verified state sponsored organised crimes of New Zealand
18 August 2021
Rt Hon Jacinda Ardern
Prime Minister of New Zealand
Dear Prime Minister
I am an enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand.
This email follows my email, dated 5 August 2021, “Failure to investigate the state sponsored organised crimes of New Zealand requires international intervention.”
You, as Prime Minister of New Zealand, must warn the international community and seek international intervention on the completely verified state sponsored organised crimes of New Zealand, rather than concealing or otherwise suppressing the clandestine publicly funded organised crimes, committed in public institutions of New Zealand.
You must not wait for the international community to act on this matter; you must proactively act on the completely verified state sponsored organised crimes of New Zealand.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
* A copy of this entire email can be found at the following URL:
False, forged documents of the High Court of New Zealand require police criminal investigation
16 August 2021
Ginny Andersen MP
Chairperson Justice Committee
Cc: Justice Committee members, and Hon Dr David Clark, MP for Dunedin
Dear Ginny
I am an enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand.
On 12 August 2021, I received an email from Hon Poto Williams, Police Minister of New Zealand, stating, “On behalf of the Minister of Police, Hon Poto Williams I acknowledge your emails of 30 July, 3 August and 12 August 2021. As has been advised previously, the investigation and prosecution of offences are the responsibility of the Commissioner of Police, as stated in part in Section 16 of the Policing Act 2008. The Commissioner must act independently of any Ministers of the Crown in discharging this responsibility. This ensures that operational matters within police remain free of any political influence or interference. Your correspondence to the Minister will be passed to Police National Headquarters for information. In future if you have concerns which you would like Police to investigate you can report these directly to New Zealand Police here: https://www.police.govt.nz/105support.”
The fact is undisputed; the organised criminal syndicates are flagrantly using all New Zealand Courts as their means and covers to commit all kinds of crimes with impunity, being protected, supported, and concealed by the law enforcement and regulatory agencies of New Zealand Government.
This matter must require immediate attention and action.
If you need more information than what I have provided in this email, including the attached documents, please contact me.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
Subject: False, forged documents of the High Court of New Zealand require police criminal investigation
12 August 2021
Law societies in Australia, Canada, Singapore, and New Zealand
Dear Sirs/Madams
I am an enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand.
Attached, please find the evidence of organised crimes, committed in New Zealand High Court, by several New Zealand lawyers and New Zealand Law Society, the sole and exclusive regulator of the legal profession in New Zealand.
This matter requires international intervention, due to the state sponsorship of clandestine, publicly funded, systematic organised crimes, committed in public institutions of New Zealand, including all New Zealand Courts, which are protected, supported, and concealed by the law enforcement and regulatory agencies of New Zealand Government, in violation of the laws of New Zealand and international treaties for which the state of New Zealand is a signatory.
The fact is undisputed, and many of the evidence are published in the internet.
https://sites.google.com/site/tatsuhikokoyama/forgery-in-new-zealand-courts
For your information, the legal ethics of New Zealand states the following:
Assisting in fraud or crime
2.4 A lawyer must not advise a client to engage in conduct that the lawyer knows to be fraudulent or criminal, nor assist any person in an activity that the lawyer knows is fraudulent or criminal. A lawyer must not knowingly assist in the concealment of fraud or crime.
2.4.1 A lawyer may assist a client in seeking to avoid or minimise any penalty or adverse effects that flow from fraud or crime.
Certificates
2.5 A lawyer must not certify the truth of any matter to any person unless he or she believes on reasonable grounds that the matter certified is true after having taken appropriate steps to ensure the accuracy of the certification.
2.6 If a lawyer subsequently discovers that a certificate given by the lawyer was or has become inaccurate or incomplete to a material extent, the lawyer must immediately take reasonable steps to correct the certificate.
Reporting misconduct
2.8 Subject to the obligation on a lawyer to protect privileged communications, a lawyer who has reasonable grounds to suspect that another lawyer may have engaged in misconduct must make a confidential report to the Law Society at the earliest opportunity.
2.8.1 This rule applies despite the lawyer’s duty to protect confidential non-privileged information.
https://www.legislation.govt.nz/regulation/public/2008/0214/latest/whole.html#DLM1437811
This matter requires the united effort of the international community to confront and deal with New Zealand for its flagrant breach of the international law in its sponsorship of clandestine, publicly funded, systematic organised crimes.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
* A copy of this entire email can be found at the following URL:
Police Minister of New Zealand responds again (12 August 2021)
Kia ora
On behalf of the Minister of Police, Hon Poto Williams I acknowledge your emails of 30 July, 3 August and 12 August 2021.
As has been advised previously, the investigation and prosecution of offences are the responsibility of the Commissioner of Police, as stated in part in Section 16 of the Policing Act 2008. The Commissioner must act independently of any Ministers of the Crown in discharging this responsibility.
This ensures that operational matters within police remain free of any political influence or interference.
Your correspondence to the Minister will be passed to Police National Headquarters for information.
In future if you have concerns which you would like Police to investigate you can report these directly to New Zealand Police here: https://www.police.govt.nz/105support
Ngā mihi,
Office of Hon Poto Williams
Minister for Building and Construction | Minister of Police
Associate Minister for Children | Associate Minister of Housing (Public Housing)
Website: www.Beehive,govt.nz
Private Bag 18041, Parliament Buildings, Wellington 6160, New Zealand
Authorised by Hon Poto Williams, Parliament Buildings, Wellington
* A copy of this entire email can be found at the following URL:
False, forged documents of the High Court of New Zealand require police criminal investigation
12 August 2021
Hon Poto Williams
Police Minister
Cc: Hon Kris Faafoi, Minister of Justice; Hon Aupito William Sio, Minister for Courts; and Members of Parliament of New Zealand
Dear Police Minister
I am an enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand.
This email follows my email, dated 3 August 2021, “Forensic document examination must be done on the forged documents, issued by the High Court of New Zealand,” attached.
Attached, please find another set of false, forged documents, which were used in the organised crimes, committed in New Zealand, in violation of the Crimes Act 1961, requiring police criminal investigation.
1. “LEGAL DISCUSSION BEFORE THE HON JUSTICE CLIFFORD” - the false transcript of non-existent hearing, using the name of Justice Clifford for fraud, dated 16 April 2014
This false document was sent by Michaela Stack, Court Registry Officer, High Court of New Zealand, on 8 September 2014.
It is undisputed by anyone, including Wellington High Court, that there was NO hearing in CIV-2013-485-006873 in Wellington High Court, and there is NO recording of the alleged hearing in Wellington High Court on 16 April 2014. It is impossible to make a transcript of a hearing without having the recording of the hearing.
2. “Judgment Dated 28 May 2014)” – the false document, extorting $11,990.00
This false document was sent by Paul Collins, Barrister, enclosed in his letter, dated 9 June 2014.
This false document states, “This proceeding was heard on 16 April 2014 at Wellington before the Honourable Justice Clifford, who, having heard from Paul Collins...gives judgement...”
3. Email of Paul Collins, dated 3 June 2014, and four documents: (a) letter of Paul Collins, dated 3 June 2014, (b) “Memorandum on behalf of the Respondent Dated: 3rd June 2014”, (c) “Judgment Dated: June 2014”, and (d) “Order of the Court (costs) Dated: June 2014”
Paul Collins submitted the drafts of “Judgement” and “Order of the Court (costs)” on or after 3 June 2014. This fact clearly negates any possibility that Justice Clifford made the costs decision on 16 April 2014.
4. Letter of Mitch Singh, Associate, Glaister Ennor, dated 25 September 2015, and “BANKRUPTCY NOTICE”, dated 21 May 2015, extorting $12,738.00, using the false document, dated 28 May 2014.
These documents, in addition to the previously submitted documents, clearly prove the organised crimes, committed in New Zealand, in violation of the Crimes Act 1961.
You, as Police Minister, must instruct New Zealand Police to contact Justice Clifford whose name was used in the organised crimes in the High Court of New Zealand.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
* A copy of this entire email can be found at the following URL:
Failure to investigate the state sponsored organised crimes of New Zealand requires international intervention
5 August 2021
Rt Hon Jacinda Ardern
Prime Minister of New Zealand
Dear Prime Minister
I am an enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand.
This email follows my email, dated 31 July 2021, “New Zealand must allow the international community to intervene on the state sponsored organised crimes of New Zealand.”
THE UNDISPUTED FACT – New Zealand is sponsoring clandestine publicly funded organised crimes, using or otherwise allowing taxpayer funded public institutions, including all the Courts of New Zealand, as the means and covers for organised criminal activities, in violation of the laws of New Zealand and international treaties for which the state of New Zealand is a signatory.
This matter, due to the gravity of failure by the state of New Zealand to honour and comply with the laws of New Zealand and international treaties, you, as Prime Minister of New Zealand, must allow the international community to intervene.
You must realise that New Zealand where the organised criminal syndicates are flagrantly and openly using state machinery to commit all kinds of crimes with impunity, protected, supported, and concealed by the law enforcement and regulatory agencies of New Zealand, it is not likely that these insidious acts of publicly funded organised crimes will ever be investigated in New Zealand without having the international community intervenes on this matter.
Failure to investigate the state sponsored organised crimes of New Zealand requires international intervention.
This matter requires your immediate attention and urgent action.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
* A copy of this entire email can be found at the following URL:
Forensic document examination must be done on the forged documents, issued by the High Court of New Zealand
3 August 2021
Hon Poto Williams
Police Minister
Cc: Hon Kris Faafoi, Minister of Justice; Hon Aupito William Sio, Minister for Courts; and Members of Parliament of New Zealand
Dear Police Minister
I am an enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand.
Attached, please find several false, forged documents, issued by the High Court of New Zealand, for the commission of organised crimes, in violation of the Crimes Act 1961.
These organised crimes are systematic and involve the New Zealand Law Society, the High Court of New Zealand, the Ministry of Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment, and several lawyers of New Zealand.
There is no dispute whatsoever on the commission of the organised crimes in New Zealand.
This matter requires your personal attention and leadership in the criminal investigation by New Zealand Police.
(1) The document, dated 18 September 2015, was sent by Dunedin High Court on 1 October 2015. It is likely that this false document was created on 1 October 2015. The signature on the document is a digital image pasted on the document, and there is no practice in the High Court of New Zealand to paste a digital image on the original document. It is forgery per se.
(2) The document, dated 22 January 2016, was sent by Rebecca Fahey, Civil Caseflow Manager, Christchurch High Court, on 18 February 2016.
(3) The document, dated 1 March 2016, was sent by Keroli Smith, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 1 March 2016. This document has two different signatures, clearly indicating forgery.
(4) “Analysis of signatures for detection of forgery,” dated 6 May 2016, written by Mr Andrew Straw. This expert opinion on forgery must be read on the forgery committed in the High Court of New Zealand.
(5) The document, dated 13 December 2016, was sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 4 January 2016. The signature of the document is a digital image pasted on the document. It is forgery per se.
(6) The email of Grant Slevin, Senior Investigating Solicitor, Insolvency Trustee Service, Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment, dated 12 December 2016. Grant Slevin wrote, “I would be grateful if you could refer to Associate Judge Osborne and let me know in due course if my appearance on Thursday 15 December is excused.”
(7) The document, dated 12 December 2016, signed by Grant Slevin, states, “If, however, the court is minded to allow Mr Koyama further time to take any step he may wish to, counsel submits the hearing scheduled for 15 December should be vacated and a date in January 2017 allocated for a determination on the paper or, if the need arise, a case management conference by way of telephone conference. Counsel requests that his appearance on 15 December 2016 be excused.”
(8) Grant Slevin in his email, dated 23 December 2016, wrote, “If what you say is true you have committed an offence under s 433(f) Insolvency Act 2006 by leaving New Zealand without the Assignee’s consent. A person who commits this offence is liable on summary conviction to imprisonment for a team not exceeding 12 months or a fine not exceeding $5,000, or both.”
If you require more information on this matter, please feel free to contact me.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
* A copy of this entire email can be found at the following URL:
New Zealand must allow the international community to intervene on the state sponsored organised crimes of New Zealand
30 July 2021
Rt Hon Jacinda Ardern
Prime Minister of New Zealand
Dear Prime Minister
I am an enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand.
This email follows my email, dated 16 July 2021, "New Zealand must seek international intervention on the undisputed clandestine systemic organised crimes in public institutions of New Zealand," attached.
As stated in my email, dated 16 July 2021, "New Zealand is sponsoring the publicly funded, clandestine criminal operations in public institutions, especially allowing the state machinery to be used by the organised criminal syndicates to commit all kinds of crimes with impunity, protected, supported, and concealed by the law enforcement and regulatory agencies of New Zealand Government (state-sponsored organised crimes of New Zealand)."
New Zealand clearly violates the international law by sponsoring the organised crimes, and this fact is undisputed by anyone or any organisation.
You, Prime Minister of New Zealand, must allow the international community to intervene on the state sponsored organised crimes of New Zealand.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
* A copy of this entire email can be found at the following URL:
APEC notified of the state-sponsored organised crimes of New Zealand
16 July 2021
Anti-corruption and transparency group
Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation
Dear Sir/Madam
I am an enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand.
Attached, please find the information on the undisputed evidence of the clandestine publicly funded organised crimes of New Zealand.
The state-sponsored organised crimes of New Zealand have been comprehensively and consistently concealed by the state of New Zealand.
This matter requires international intervention, as there is no dispute whatsoever on the fact.
APEC needs to act on this matter.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
* A copy of this entire email can be found at the following URL:
New Zealand must seek international intervention on the undisputed clandestine systemic organised crimes in public institutions of New Zealand
16 July 2021
Rt Hon Jacinda Ardern
Prime Minister of New Zealand
Cc: Hon Poto Williams, Police Minister of New Zealand; and others
Dear Prime Minister
I am an enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand.
This email follows my latest email, dated 13 July 2021, “International community must intervene on the state-sponsored organised crimes of New Zealand.”
Attached, please find the evidence of New Zealand Police covering up the systemic organised crimes, committed in public institutions of New Zealand.
THE UNDISPUTED FACT - New Zealand is sponsoring the publicly funded, clandestine criminal operations in public institutions, especially allowing the state machinery to be used by the organised criminal syndicates to commit all kinds of crimes with impunity, protected, supported, and concealed by the law enforcement and regulatory agencies of New Zealand Government (state-sponsored organised crimes of New Zealand).
You, Prime Minister of New Zealand, must ensure that (1) the judges whose names were used in the systemic organised crimes be contacted personally as part of the criminal investigation, and (2) the false, forged documents, issued by various New Zealand Courts, be forensically investigated for forgery.
I understand that New Zealand Police can conduct forensic document examination as part of their criminal investigation.
https://www.police.govt.nz/about-us/structure/teams-units/forensics
For your information, the information on the names of the judges and false, forged documents of New Zealand Courts is published in the internet.
https://sites.google.com/site/tatsuhikokoyama/forgery-in-new-zealand-courtsurts
New Zealand is flagrantly violating the international law by allowing the state machinery to be used by the organised criminal syndicates to commit clandestine publicly funded organised crimes with the protection, support and concealment provided the law enforcement and regulatory agencies of New Zealand Government, in violation of the laws of New Zealand and international treaties for which the state of New Zealand is a signatory.
You, Prime Minister of New Zealand, must allow the international community to intervene on the clandestine publicly funded criminal operations in public institutions of New Zealand by the organised criminal syndicates and end the state-sponsored organised crimes of New Zealand with the assistance of the international community.
When the fact is undisputed, it is the time to act.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
* A copy of this entire email can be found at the following URL:
Organised crimes of police cover-ups must be investigated by other agencies of New Zealand Government
13 July 2021
Hon Poto Williams
Police Minister
cc: Rt Hon Jacinda Ardern, Prime Minister; Hon Jan Tinetti, Minister of Internal Affairs; Hon Kris Faafoi, Minister of Justice; Hon Aupito Williams Sio, Minister for Courts
Dear Police Minister
On 9 July 2021, I received your email, regarding the UNDISPUTED systemic organised crimes, committed in New Zealand, attached below.
Attached, please find a copy of the letter of John MacDade, Detective Sergeant, dated 9 July 2021, which I received today (13 July 2021).
For your information, on 5 July 2021, Detective MacDade and a female police officer came to my house in the afternoon, and Mr MacDade took a photo of the website of the fake hearing in Dunedin High Court, which tool place on 3 March 2016, using his smartphone.
Apparently, Detective MacDade listened to the recording of the fake hearing, because he told me on that a judge told me not to recording the hearing at the hearing.
I told him and the female police officer that an imposter acted as the judge in the fake hearing, and that’s why the recording still exists in the internet.
I also mentioned that there were various attempts by the organised crimes to remove the recording from the internet.
Apparently, the police did not investigate on the fake hearing although the police have been provided with the evidence numerous times (Detective Senior Sergeant John Ferguson received a CD which contained the recording of the fake hearing).
At that time, Detective MacDade told me that the police have a document, signed by Mander J, ordering me to pay $9,830.00.
I told him that I had not seen the document, and Detective MacDade has not produced the document to verify the claim.
At that time, both police offers were wearing police uniforms and came to my house in the afternoon.
They refused to enter my house even though they were invited to come into my house,
Today (13 July 2021) in the evening, Detective MacDade came to my house without wearing a police uniform and by himself.
At that time, he told me that he was recording the conversation at the door, and I made an enquiry on the police investigation on the complaint, especially whether the police contacted any of the judges whose names were used the organised crimes, including Mander J, Davidson J, Collins J and others, and he stopped the recording while I was making the enquiry on the police investigation, unilaterally, and left the premises, leaving the letter, dated 9 July 2021, attached.
Needless to say, the police are covering up on the systemic organised crimes committed in New Zealand.
For your information, the undisputed evidence exists and most of them are published in the internet for anyone to see.
https://sites.google.com/site/tatsuhikokoyama/forgery-in-new-zealand-courts
This matter requires investigation by multiple agencies of New Zealand Government, and such investigation requires actually contacting the judges whose names were used in the organised crimes and conducting forensic document examination on the false, forged documents, issued by various New Zealand Courts.
This matter requires your urgent attention and immediate action.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
* A copy of this entire email can be found at the following URL:
* A copy of the letter of Detective MacDade, dated 9 July 2021 can be found at the following URL:
International community must intervene on the state-sponsored organised crimes of New Zealand
13 July 2021
Rt Hon Jacinda Ardern
Prime Minister of New Zealand
Dear Prime Minister
This email follows my email, dated 9 July 2021, "UNDISPUTED SYSTEMIC CORRUPTION of New Zealand Law Society and New Zealand Courts requires international intervention.”
New Zealand must allow international intervention on the undisputed, clandestine, publicly funded, systemic organised crimes of New Zealand.
Due to the nature of the sponsorship of organised crimes in public institutions of New Zealand by the state of New Zealand, this matter requires international intervention.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
* A copy of this entire email can be found at the following URL:
American Bar Association is reviewing the systemic corruption of New Zealand Judiciary (9 July 2021)
Dear Tatsuhiko,
Thank you for contacting the American Bar Association.
Your email has been forwarded to the appropriate department for review.
Visit our website at www.americanbar.org or contact us at www.americanbar.org/contactus. For immediate assistance, please call the ABA Service Center at 800-285-2221 or 312-988-5522 Monday-Friday between 9:00 AM and 6:00 PM ET.
Sincerely,
American Bar Association
321 North Clark Street
Chicago, IL 60654
T: 800-285-2221
F: 312-988-5850
service@americanbar.org
http://www.americanbar.org
* A copy of this entire email can be found at the following URL:
Police Minister of New Zealand responded, again (9 July 2021)
Kia ora Tatsuhiko,
On behalf of the Minister of Police, Hon Poto Williams I acknowledge your email of 9 July 2021, concerning systemic organised crimes committed in New Zealand Courts and for this to be investigated by New Zealand Police.
What you have described is distressing, please be assured that your correspondence has been noted.
The investigation and prosecution of offences are the responsibility of the Commissioner of Police, as stated in part in Section 16 of the Policing Act 2008. The Commissioner must act independently of any Ministers of the Crown in discharging this responsibility.
This ensures that operational matters within police remain free of any political influence or interference.
Your correspondence to the Minister has therefore been transferred to Police National Headquarters, for consideration by Police.
If you wish to have your complaint considered outside of Police, you can contact the Independent Police Conduct Authority. Information on how to do this can be found here: https://www.ipca.govt.nz/
Ngā mihi,
Office of Hon Poto Williams
Minister for Building and Construction | Minister of Police
Associate Minister for Children | Associate Minister of Housing (Public Housing)
Website: www.Beehive,govt.nz
Private Bag 18041, Parliament Buildings, Wellington 6160, New Zealand
Authorised by Hon Poto Williams, Parliament Buildings, Wellington
* A copy of this entire email can be found at the following URL:
New Zealand must actually investigate the systemic organised crimes, committed in New Zealand Courts, rather than covering them up
9 July 2021
Hon Poto Williams
Minister for Police
Dear Police Minister
I am an enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand.
I understand that you referred the systemic organised crimes, committed in New Zealand Courts, to New Zealand Police for investigation.
For your information, this morning, I sent an email to Rt Hon Jacinda Ardern, Prime Minister, “UNDISPUTED SYSTEMIC CORRUPTION of New Zealand Law Society and New Zealand Courts requires international intervention.”
Today, I received an email from Nikki De La Mare, National Complaints Manager, New Zealand Law Society, with her letter, dated 9 July 2021, stating: “we will deal with the Police directly should they contact us for information or evidence.”
What is quite obvious is that the self-regulation of the legal profession is not working and perhaps has never worked in New Zealand.
The New Zealand Law Society, the sole and exclusive regulator of the legal profession, only covers up the systemic organised crimes, committed by the members of the profession, and cooperate with the Police, authority external to the regulator, should the Police actually do the investigation, rather than continuing to coverup the clandestine publicly funded organised crimes in New Zealand Courts.
This matter requires your leadership so this matter is finally actually investigated by New Zealand Police.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
* A copy of this entire email can be found at the following URL:
UNDISPUTED SYSTEMIC CORRUPTION of New Zealand Law Society and New Zealand Courts requires international intervention
9 July 2021
Rt Hon Jacinda Ardern
Prime Minister of New Zealand
Dear Prime Minister
I am an enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand.
This email follows my email, dated 5 July 2021, “New Zealand MUST NOT COVER UP the systemic organised crimes in public institutions of New Zealand.”
Knowing what has been proved without any dispute, seeing the indisputable evidence on the systemic organised crimes and widespread corruption in public institutions of New Zealand, and allowing the organised criminal syndicates (which are controlling the public institutions, including all the Courts of New Zealand) suppress the clandestine publicly funded organised crimes (which are protected, supported, and concealed by law enforcement and regulatory agencies of New Zealand Government) must be considered as the state sponsored organised crimes of New Zealand.
The problems are severe, entrenched, and widespread in New Zealand.
The state machinery is captured and controlled by the organised criminal syndicates which are using public institutions to commit all kinds of crimes with impunity, in violation of the laws of New Zealand and international treaties for which the state of New Zealand is a signatory.
You must personally oversee the investigation on the systemic organised crimes in public institutions of New Zealand and seek international intervention due to the nature of the state sponsorship of organised crimes in New Zealand.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
* A copy of this entire email can be found at the following URL:
UNDISPUTED SYSTEMIC CORRUPTION of New Zealand Law Society and New Zealand Courts requires international intervention
8 July 2021
Law societies in Australia
Cc: New Zealand Law Society, regional branches of New Zealand Law Society, and others
Dear Sir/Madam
I am an enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand.
This matter requires international intervention.
New Zealand has a very serious problem in the governance, especially, of judiciary.
The systemic corruption of New Zealand Law Society, the sole and exclusive regulator of legal profession in New Zealand, and New Zealand Courts, taxpayer-funded public institutions of New Zealand, creates the sire situation in New Zealand where there is no rule of law exists, and the Courts are the means and covers for the organised criminal syndicates to operate their clandestine publicly funded organised crimes in the secrecy of the Court and Government of New Zealand.
As the entire judiciary of New Zealand is captured and controlled by the organised criminal syndicates, there is nothing that anyone can do in New Zealand.
When the fact is undisputed and the problem is uncontroversial; it is the time for the international community to intervene on the very serious deficit in the governance of New Zealand, especially, the regulation of the legal profession and legal system of New Zealand.
Yours sincerely
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
* A copy of this entire email can be found at the following URL:
Evidence of the systemic organised crimes committed by New Zealand lawyers
7 July 2021
Ms Tiana Epati
President, New Zealand Law Society
cc: Hon Kris Faafoi, Minister of Justice; Hon Aupito William Sio, Minister for Courts; Dunedin High Court; Lawyers & Conveyancers Disciplinary Tribunal; Ministry of Justice; and others
Dear Ms Epati
I am an enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand.
This email follows my email, dated 6 July 2021, “Undisputed and indisputable evidence on the systemic organised crimes in Wellington High Court by Paul Collins, representing the New Zealand Law Society.”
At this time, I would like to provide the evidence of systemic organised crimes, committed by various lawyers, in the series of organised crimes, committed in New Zealand Courts.
Please read the attached email to Hon Jan Tinetti, Minister of Internal Affairs, regarding the systemic nature of organised crimes, committed in public institutions of New Zealand.
For the purpose of your investigation on this matter, I attached several documents, the evidence of the organised crimes, for your information.
If you need more information than what I have provided, please feel free to contact me.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
* A copy of this entire email can be found at the following URL:
Evidence of the systemic organised crimes: insurance fraud committed by Southern Response and EQC and bank robbery committed by Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment
7 July 2021
Hon Jan Tinetti
Minister of Internal Affairs
Dear Internal Affairs Minister
This email follows my email, dated 5 July 2021, “Evidence of the systemic organised crimes, using the name of Justice Mander for fraud, attached.
In this email, I would like to explain briefly what happened BEFORE and AFTER I received the series of forged documents, using the name of Justice Mander for fraud from Christchurch High Court.
BEFORE - Insurance fraud committed by Southern Response and EQC
1. On or around 27 August 2012, Arrow International, on behalf of Southern Response, issued a full, detailed assessment report (dated 24 February 2012, revised 27 August 2012) on the earthquake damage, estimating the total amount of the repair of $228,846.55 ($218,519.55 + $10,127.00).
2. On 2 December 2013, I called Emma Brown, Southern Response, regarding the insurance claim, and she talked about alleged paper-based assessment on the claim by EQC, which was more than more than 3 months prior to 12 February 2014 when the settlement recommendation was supposedly generated by EQC; this conversation was recorded.
3. On 11 December 2013, I received a letter from Emma Brown, Southern Response, sending me a computer printout sheet, dated 19 August 2013, for their refusal to settle the insurance claim on the property.
4. On 13 February 2014, I received a phone call from EQC in Dunedin, and staff at EQC did not mention any onsite scoping visits by EQC on the property in Christchurch, which was supposedly taken place a day before on 12 February 2014; this conversation was recorded.
5. On 11 August 2014, I received "Response by defendant," dated 22 May 2014, stating, "On 26 August 2013, EQC sent the defendant a batch of reassessed claims which included a file note relating to the plaintiffs' claim," "EQC had completed a further, paper-based, review of the damage to the House on 29 March 2012...(Second EQC Assessment)," during the District Court proceeding (CIV-2014-012-186).
6. On 16 December 2014, I received an email from Sacha Thom, Solicitor, representing Southern Response, stating, "...Southern Response provide copies of:
1. The communication between Southern Response and EQC on 26 August 2013.
2. EQC’s second assessment completed on 29 March 2012.
We attach three documents and note that:
· On 26 August 2013, EQC physically handed to Southern Response these three documents as part of a weekly collection of a batch of documents relating to various claims.
· The first attachment is addressed to Southern Response employee Kate Legg because she was the person at Southern Response who requested the documents from EQC in relation to your claim.
· Southern Response understands that EQC inserted Southern Response’s logo at the top of the document in order to identify which insurer the document needed to be provided to.
· The attached scope of works is the only document relating to EQC’s amended assessment that was provided to Southern Response.
7. On 5 February 2018, I received an email from Leanne Stewart, Senior Investigator, Office of the Ombudsman, stating, "I have made some enquires of EQC regarding your complaint about access to the name of the person who generated the settlement recommendation dated 12 February 2014," "EQC has confirmed that the names of the EQC staff members who had completed assessment reports following onsite scoping visits at the property have been disclosed to you."
The facts above clearly establish that Southern Response and EQC committed insurance fraud.
a. There was NO onsite scoping visits by EQC at the property in Christchurch for the settlement recommendation, dated 12 February 2014, as alleged by EQC, as I was in Dunedin on that day. Furthermore, on 13 February 2014, I actually received a phone call in Dunedin from EQC staff and there was NO mention of the onsite visit in Christchurch on 12 February 2014, a day before.
b. Southern Response repeatedly stated that the EQC assessment on the property was paper-based (NOT onsite scoping visit as alleged by EQC), and the date of the computer printout was 19 August 2013, which was about 6 months earlier than 12 February 2014 on which the settlement recommendation was supposedly generated by EQC.
c. EQC cannot provide the name of the staff who did the alleged assessment, dated 12 February 2014.
d. There is NO evidence that EQC actually conducted any assessment on the property on 29 March 2012; since in or around August 2011, about 7 months prior to March 2011, the handling of the claim was shifted from EQC to AMI Insurance after EQC settled the claim by paying the maximum liability of EQC under the Earthquake Commission Act1993 and was no longer handling the claim on that day.
e. The full, detailed assessment report, professionally done by Arrow International, on behalf of Southern Response (dated 24 February 2012, revised 27 August 2012), unequivocally establishes the total damage of $228,846.55.
f. The computer printout sheet, dated 19 August 2013, is a false, forged document which was used for the insurance fraud, committed by Southern Response.
The evidence clearly establishes the insurance fraud, committed by Southern Response and EQC.
AFTER - Fraud in the Court and bank robbery by Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment
1. On 4 August 2015, I received a letter, dated 15 July 2015, from Grant Macdonald, Partner, DLA Piper, extorting $7,430.00, using Order for Costs, undated, false document, part of the fraud in the High Court proceeding (CIV-2014-412-202).
2. On 27 April 2016, I received a letter, dated 20 April 2016, from Kate Armstrong, Legal Risk Advisor, Southern Response, clearly indicating the participation of Southern Response in the fraud in the Court and bank robbery.
3. On 26 January 2016, I received a letter, dated 22 January 2016, from Grant Macdonald, Partner, DLA Piper New Zealand, extorting $4,167.97.
4. Southern Response joined with the New Zealand Law Society to commit the organised crimes of bankruptcy fraud in Dunedin High Court and bank robbery, which was aided by Insolvency and Trustee Service, Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment, apparently stealing $9,830.00.
5. There was a fake hearing in Dunedin High Court on 3 March 2016 where an imposter acted as Associate Judge Matthews; this fake hearing was recorded.
6. The organised crimes made several attempts to remove the evidence of the fake hearing, by further making and using false, forged documents, issued by Christchurch High Court.
I received (a) letter of Hayley McKee, Senior Associate, Glaister Ennor, dated 9 March 2016, and (b) false, forged documents, bearing the name of Justice Davidson for fraud, dated 11 & 12 April 2016, from Amelia Nicholson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court.
These documents, dated 11 & 12 April 2016, state the following:
Preliminary response by the Court
[11] The circumstances of the recording of the hearing of 3 March 2016, who made the recording, with what device, and who posted it to the internet, are not determined. It is clear that someone recorded the hearing, and posted it on the internet.
[12] However, the recording should immediately be removed from the internet in any event, should Mr Koyama have that in this power.
[13] Mr Koyama is given the opportunity to respond to the memorandum of counsel dated 9 March 2016. He should respond given that he is said to be in breach of the Court’s order that the hearing not be recorded.
[14] His response may be made by memorandum in the first instance, or otherwise as he considers appropriate by way of a proceeding in this Court. If so, it should be filed within 10 working days of this minute I.e. Wednesday 27 April 2016 at 5.00pm (given ANZAC day).
[15] When Mr Koyama responds, or otherwise 27 April 2016, I will consider the next steps to be taken by the Court.
CONCLUSION
These facts clearly indicate that various public institutions of New Zealand are captured and controlled by the organised criminal syndicates, continuously making the clandestine publicly funded organised crimes viable in New Zealand.
These organised crimes, committed in public institutions of New Zealand must be considered as state-sponsored organised crimes.
This matter requires your urgent attention and immediate action.,
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
* A copy of this entire email can be found at the following URL:
Undisputed and indisputable evidence on the systemic organised crimes in Wellington High Court by Paul Collins, representing the New Zealand Law Society
6 July 2021
Ms Tiana Epati
President, New Zealand Law Society
cc: Hon Kris Faafoi, Minister of Justice; Hon Aupito William Sio, Minister for Courts; Wellington High Court; Lawyers & Conveyancers Disciplinary Tribunal; Ministry of Justice; and others
Dear Ms Epati
I am an enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand.
Attached, please find the evidence on the undisputed and indisputable evidence on the systemic organised crimes, committed in Wellington High Court, by Paul Collins, a lawyer, representing the New Zealand Law Society.
On 13 June 2014, I received a letter from Paul Collins, enclosing the document, “Judgment Dated: 28 May 2014).
This document, dated 28 May 2014, states, “This proceeding was heard on 16 April 2014 at Wellington before the Honourable Justice Clifford who, having heard from Paul Collins…gives judgement:…”The respondent is entitled to scale 2B costs for a half day appeal, in the sum of $11,940.00 and disbursement of $50.00, set out in the schedule.”
(1) This is FALSE because there was NO hearing in the case of CIV-2013-483-006873, and Wellington High Court cannot produce any evidence of having any hearing in the case on 16 April 2014.
(2) This is IMPOSSIBLE since Paul Collins sent the costs application on or after 3 June 2014, more than 1.5 months after the date of hearing of 16 April 2014 (needless to say, Justice Clifford could not make the costs decision on 16 April 2014 without the application being submitted to him).
(3) Several documents, attached to Paul Collins’ email, dated 3 June 2014, clearly negate any possibility that Justice Clifford made the costs decision on 16 April 2014:
a. The letter of Paul Collins, dated 3 June 2014, states, “This letter accompanies following the decision of Clifford J on 28 May 2014….”;
b. The memorandum of Paul Collins, dated 3 June 2014, states, “This memorandum is submitted on behalf of the respondent following the judgment of Clifford J in this proceeding, in [2014] NZHC 1146, on 28 May 2014”; and
c. The draft document, “Order of the Court (costs) Dated: June 2014”, states, “…the Honourable Justice Clifford…upon reading the respondent’s costs memorandum dated 3 June 2014…”
For your information, later, this fraud was followed by the series of fraud in the Court, including the bankruptcy fraud in Dunedin High Court and bank robbery using false, forged documents in violation of the Crimes Act 1961.
This matter requires your urgent attention and immediate action.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
* A copy of this entire email can be found at the following URL:
International community must intervene on the undisputed systemic corruption in public institutions of New Zealand
6 July 2021
Singaporean Government
cc: Law Society of Singapore
Dear Sir/Madam
I am an enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand.
Attached, please find a copy of my email to Australian Government on the undisputed systemic organised crimes committed by New Zealand.
The international community must intervene on any state-sponsored organised crimes, as in the case of New Zealand, there is basically nothing anyone can do on the state-sponsored organised crimes in New Zealand where the organised criminal syndicates are committing all kinds of crimes with impunity, using New Zealand Courts as the means and covers for their organised crimes, protected, supported, and concealed by the law enforcement and regulatory agencies of New Zealand Government.
Now, there is NO dispute, and there is NO controversy on the systemic corrution in public instittuions of New Zealand, where clandestinely publicly funded organised crimes are routinely done in the secrecy of the public offices, including all New Zealand Courts, without any exception.
Needless to say, this matter requires the concerted effort of the international community as New Zealand is leading the way of subverting the international civil orders, rule of law, and international treaties, for which New Zealand appears to endorse without any commiment nor enforcement.
It is my wish that Singaporean Government will put pressure on New Zealand Government to investigate this matter fully and report the finding to the international community, alerting the systemic corruption and organised crimes in public institutions of New Zealand.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
* A copy of this entire email can be found at the following URL:
Australian Government must intervene on the undisputed systemic corruption in public institutions of New Zealand
6 July 2021
Australian Government
Cc: Law societies in Australia
Dear Sir/Madam
I am an enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand.
It is undisputed with indisputable evidence to show that New Zealand is sponsoring organised crimes, and the organised criminal syndicates are using public institutions, including all Courts of New Zealand, as the means and covers for committing all kinds of crimes with impunity, protected, supported, and concealed by the law enforcement and regulatory agencies of New Zealand (please witness some of the evidence of the systemic organised crimes of New Zealand).
This matter has been acknowledged and noted by of Rt Hon Jacinda Ardern, Prime Minister of New Zealand, for the first time (please find a copy of her email, dated 29 June 2021, attached below).
There is no controversy on the systemic corruption of public institutions of New Zealand, including all the Courts of New Zealand, the New Zealand Law Society, the Crown Law Office.
Now is the time for Australian Government to intervene on the undisputed systemic corruption in public institutions of New Zealand
New Zealand will not change the modus operandi of the clandestine publicly funded organised crimes, allowing or otherwise using public institutions, including all the Courts of New Zealand, as the means and covers to commit all kinds of crimes with impunity, in violation of the laws of New Zealand and treaties that the state of New Zealand has signed and ratified.
This matter requires international intervention, as no one in New Zealand can go against the total, systemic corruption of public institutions and state-sponsored organised crimes, protected, supported, and concealed by the law enforcement and regulatory agencies of New Zealand.
It is my wish that the good people of Australia will intervene on this matter.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
* A copy of this entire email can be found at the following URL:
Evidence of the systemic organised crimes, using the name of Justice Mander for fraud
5 July 2021
Hon Jan Tinetti
Minister of Internal Affairs
Dear Internal Affairs Minister
This email follows my email of today, "Undisputed and indisputable evidence on the systemic organised crimes in Wellington High Court."
Attached, please find "Analysis of signatures for detection of forgery," by Mr Andrew Straw, US expert on analysis on forged documents.
For your information, the false, forged documents, analysed by Mr Straw, are published in the internet.
https://sites.google.com/site/tatsuhikokoyama/forgery-in-new-zealand-courts
Regarding the collection of false, forged documents, using the name of Justice Mander for fraud in violation of the Crimes Act 1961, I have listed them below (the URLs for seeing or downloading the false, forged documents):
(1) FALSE DOCUMENT - “MINUTE OF MANDER J,” dated 26 February 2015, (sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 27 February 2015)
(2) FALSE DOCUMENT - Signed, “MINUTE OF MANDER J,” dated 26 February 2015, (sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 24 August 2015)
(3) FALSE DOCUMENT - Handwritten minute of Mander J, dated 27 February 2015, (retrieved from the official court file found in Dunedin High Court on 19 February 2016)
(4) FALSE DOCUMENT - “MINUTE OF MANDER J,” dated 5 March 2015, (sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 5 March 2015)
(5) FALSE DOCUMENT - Signed, “MINUTE OF MANDER J,” dated 5 March 2015, (sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 13 March 2015)
(6) FALSE DOCUMENT - Unless order of Mander J, dated 12 March 2015, (sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 12 March 2015)
(7) FALSE DOCUMENT - Handwritten minute of Mander J, dated 12 March 2015, (sent by sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 13 March 2015)
(8) FALSE DOCUMENT - Signed, “MINUTE OF MANDER J,” dated 13 March 2015, (sent by sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 13 March 2015)
* There is NO signed minute of Mander J, dated 13 March 2015, in the official court file.
(9) FALSE DOCUMENT - “MINUTE OF MANDER J,” dated 13 March 2015, (sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 16 March 2015)
(10) FALSE DOCUMENT - “MINUTE OF MANDER J,” dated 17 March 2015, (sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 17 March 2015)
(11) FALSE DOCUMENT - Signed, “MINUTE OF MANDER J,” dated 17 March 2015, (sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 17 March 2015)
* There is NO signed minute of Mander J, dated 17 March 2015, in the official court file.
(12) FALSE DOCUMENT - Email of Mander J, dated 20 March 2015 (at 12:11 pm), (sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 10 August 2015)
“Friday, 20 March 2015 12:11 p.m.”
"Amelia, I record a brief note of my decision. I don’t think I can wait any longer for the respondent’s response in order to give the appellants’ time to comply with the order.
The appellants’ application for an extension is declined.
The appellants cite Rule 12.7(1) HCRs as providing a time requirement for service, however this rule concerns summary judgment applications and does not apply for the present situation.
The appellants appeal remains extant notwithstanding the operation of the unless order.
I also note for completeness that a hearing of the respondent’s application was attempted to convened however the appellants declined to make themselves available despite repeated efforts by the registry. The matter was dealt with by way of memorandum.
The appellants have still not provided reasons for their non-compliance.
Mander J"
(13) FALSE DOCUMENT - Email of Mander J, dated 20 March 2015 (at 12:18 pm), (sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 12 August 2015)
“Friday, 20 March 2015 12:18:41 p.m.”
“Amelia,
Our emails passed. I have read the respondent’s submissions. My ruling stands and may be notified to the parties without modification.
Many thanks
Mander J”
(14) FALSE DOCUMENT - Order of Mander J, dated 20 March 2015 (at 12:26 pm), (sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 20 March 2015)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Nicholson, Amelia" <Amelia.Nicholson@justice.govt.nz>
Date: Thursday, 19 March 2015 at 2:13 PM
To: Tatsuhiko Koyama <tatsuhiko.koyama@gmail.com>
Cc: "Henaghan, Misha" <Misha.Henaghan@dlapf.com>, "Macdonald, Grant" <grant.macdonald@dlapiper.co.nz>, "Thom, Sacha" <sacha.thom@dlapiper.co.nz>
Subject: RE: Appellant's submissions - Koyama v Southern Response (CIV-2014-412-0202)
Dear Tatsuhiko,
Many thanks for your email. All our Christchurch Judges are in Wellington today and Friday attending a conference but as the Unless Order is for close of business tomorrow I will forward this application and any other relevant documents on to the Honourable Justice Mander to deal with as soon as he has the opportunity.
If counsel for the respondent wishes to reply to this application could they please let me know as soon as possible.
Kind regards,
Amelia
From: "Nicholson, Amelia" <Amelia.Nicholson@justice.govt.nz>
Date: Friday, 20 March 2015 at 8:26 AM
To: "tatsuhiko.koyama@gmail.com" <tatsuhiko.koyama@gmail.com>, "Macdonald, Grant" <grant.macdonald@dlapiper.co.nz>, "Henaghan, Misha" <misha.henaghan@dlapiper.co.nz>, "Thom, Sacha" <sacha.thom@dlapiper.co.nz>
Subject: CIV-2014-412-000202 - Koyama v Southern Response Earthquake Services Limited
Dear Counsel and Mr and Ms Koyama,
Following the receipt of the appellants application for an extension of the unless order and the respondents memorandum in reply, the Honourable Justice Mander has minuted the above named matter as follows:
"The appellants' application for an extension is declined.
The appellants cite Rule 12.7(1) HCRs as providing a time requirement for service, however this rule concerns summary judgment applications and does not apply to the present situation.
The appellants appeal remains extant notwithstanding the operation of the unless order.
I also note for completeness that a hearing of the respondent's application was attempted to be convened however the appellants declined to make themselves available despite repeated efforts by the Registry. The matter was dealt with by way of memorandum.
The appellants have still not provided reasons for their non-compliance.”
Kind regards,
Amelia
Amelia Nicholson
Deputy Registrar | Christchurch High Court
DDI: +64 3 962 4273 | Ext 54273
www.courtsofnz.govt.nz
From: "Nicholson, Amelia" <Amelia.Nicholson@justice.govt.nz>
Date: Monday, 10 August 2015 at 10:23 AM
To: Tatsuhiko Koyama <tatsuhiko.koyama@gmail.com>
Subject: RE: Request for a copy of the handwritten minute of Mander J, dated 20 March 2015
Dear Mr Koyama,
I do not have a hand written copy of this minute as the Honourable Justice Mander was in Auckland for a conference. This minute was given to me by way of email which I have attached a copy of now.
Kind regards,
Amelia
* Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, was involved with Grant Macdonald, Misha Henaghan, and Sacha Thom of DLA Piper New Zealand in the confirmed insurance fraud, causing loss by deception, forgery, using false document for pecuniary advantage, in violation of the Crimes Act 1961.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(15) FALSE DOCUMENT - “JUDGMENT OF MANDER J,” dated 23 March 2015, (sent by Rebecca Fahey, Civil Caseflow Manager, Christchurch High Court, on 23 March 2015, on the same day when a telephone case management conference was held and before the scheduled hearing on 5 April 2015)
(16) FALSE DOCUMENT - Signed, “JUDGMENT OF MANDER J,” dated 23 March 2015, (sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 24 March 2015)
(17) FALSE DOCUMENT - “JUDGMENT OF MANDER J,’ dated 26 May 2015, (sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 26 May 2015)
(18) FALSE DOCUMENT - Signed, “JUDGMENT OF MANDER J,’ dated 26 May 2015, (sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 5 August 2015)
* There is NO signed judgement of Mander J, dated 26 May 2015, in the official court file.
(19) FALSE DOCUMENT - Minute of Mander J, date 5 June 2016, (sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 5 June 2015)
(20) FALSE DOCUMENT - Handwritten minute of Mander J, dated 5 June 2015, (sent by Amelia Nicolson, Deputy Registrar, Christchurch High Court, on 14 July 2015)
Needless to say, Justice Mander would not have issued so many decisions in such a short period of time.
Furthermore, some of the documents cannot be found in the official court files in this case (you cannot find the original documents at all in the official case file).
Due to the significant discrepancy in the signatures in the documents, bearing the name of Justice Mander, the documents, published in the internet, must be forensically analysed by some professionals who are expert in detecting forgery.
Someone from the internal affairs must contact Justice Mander in Christchurch High Court on the systemic organised crimes, using his name for fraud in violation of the Crimes Act 1961.
Yours truly
Tatsuhiko Koyama, BA, JD, PGDipHealSc, MHealSc, DipGrad
Enrolled Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand
* A copy of this entire email can be found at the following URL: