TA-14 External Use, Reference Boundaries, and Public Citation Rules

Core purpose

This page tells outside parties exactly how they may reference TA-14 without misrepresenting it.

It should come after the rebuttal page because once people understand how to defend TA-14, they also need to know the rules for citing it.

Page body

TA-14 Admissible Execution Integrity Governance may be studied, cited, and referenced as an informing governance architecture for proof-bound execution, append-only evidence, admissibility, and non-bypassable commit-time boundaries.

However, any public reference to TA-14 must preserve authorship, scope, and institutional boundaries.

TA-14 was created and architected by Greggory Don Butler. A public reference to TA-14 does not create certification, endorsement, partnership, licensing, approval, co-development, co-authorship, representation, agency, or affiliation.

TA-14 is not a badge, credential, compliance product, legal opinion, audit certification, software platform, AI model, or monitoring service.

It is an execution integrity architecture.

Its purpose is to define what must be true before a consequential action is allowed to become binding.

Permitted reference

A public reference may say:

“TA-14, created and architected by Greggory Don Butler, is referenced as an informing governance architecture for proof-bound execution, append-only evidence, admissibility, and non-bypassable commit-time boundaries.”

A technical reference may say:

“TA-14 defines a record-first execution model in which consequential actions are bound to admissible evidence at commit-time before execution is allowed.”

A shorter reference may say:

“TA-14 informs proof-bound execution governance through append-only evidence, admissibility, and non-bypassable commit-time enforcement.”

Prohibited reference

TA-14 must not be described as:

certifying a person, company, tool, audit, or system

endorsing a service or methodology

partnered with an outside organization

co-developed or co-created with another party

approved by TÜV AUSTRIA or any certification authority

a legal compliance guarantee

an EU AI Act certification mechanism

a GDPR approval mechanism

a software product

a consulting service owned by a third party

a framework that anyone may rebrand as their own

a substitute for legal, regulatory, engineering, or audit judgment

Required boundary language

Where TA-14 is cited in proposals, articles, websites, client materials, audit-readiness documents, or public posts, the reference should include a boundary statement:

“This reference does not imply certification, partnership, endorsement, licensing, approval, co-development, co-authorship, or formal affiliation.”

Why this boundary matters

TA-14 is designed to protect execution integrity.

If TA-14 itself is referenced inaccurately, the architecture is weakened at the point of public use.

Precision is not cosmetic.

Precision preserves authorship.

Precision preserves legal clarity.

Precision prevents false reliance.

Precision protects organizations attempting to cite TA-14 correctly.

Precision protects the people affected by consequential systems.

Closing statement

TA-14 may be referenced.

TA-14 may be studied.

TA-14 may inform governance, compliance, audit-readiness, AI oversight, financial execution, insurance execution, environmental integrity, and other consequence-bearing systems.

But TA-14 must not be converted into a claim of certification, affiliation, endorsement, or authority that has not been formally granted.

TA-14 is an informing governance architecture.

That boundary must remain intact.