TA-14 Admissible Execution Integrity Governance was created and architected by Greggory Don Butler.

TA-14 is an authorship-bound governance architecture. Its definitions, structure, execution model, and governing principles originate from a single architectural source and are maintained as a coherent, internally consistent system.

This page establishes authorship clarity, origin, attribution standards, and authority boundaries for all public, technical, legal, compliance, audit-facing, and organizational references to TA-14.

As TA-14 enters external environments—including AI governance, EU AI Act readiness, financial systems, insurance execution, environmental systems, compliance structures, and audit contexts—it is essential that its authorship and architectural integrity remain precise.

TA-14 is not a collective framework, an industry consortium output, or an evolving committee standard.

TA-14 is a defined architecture.

Origin of the Architecture

TA-14 was developed to address a structural failure present across modern systems:

consequential actions are routinely executed before the supporting evidence is preserved, validated, continuous, and admissible at the moment of execution

This failure appears across domains:

financial transactions
insurance claims and denials
AI-assisted decisions
automated approvals and restrictions
compliance submissions
environmental and building systems
organizational workflows
regulated decision systems

In many of these systems, governance occurs after the fact:

through logs
through audit trails
through retrospective review
through explanation
through reconstruction
through dispute resolution

TA-14 was architected to reverse this pattern.

It establishes that execution must not become consequential unless it is grounded in admissible evidence at commit-time.

This shift—from retrospective justification to pre-execution admissibility—is the foundation of TA-14.

What “Created and Architected” Means

The statement that TA-14 was “created and architected” by Greggory Don Butler is not a general attribution.

It has specific meaning.

TA-14 is not:

a compilation of existing frameworks
a derivative of audit standards
an extension of compliance checklists
a variation of AI governance models
a rebranding of logging or monitoring systems

TA-14 defines an integrated execution model composed of interdependent components, including:

record-first governance
append-only evidence structures
time-sequenced continuity
admissibility determination
action-specific evidence binding
non-bypassable commit-time enforcement boundaries
deterministic execution outcomes (ALLOW / BLOCK / ESCALATE)
traceable linkage between evidence, action, boundary, and outcome

These elements are not independent ideas.

They form a unified architecture.

The meaning of each component depends on its relationship to the others.

Removing, substituting, or redefining components changes the architecture.

For this reason, TA-14 must be referenced as a defined system, not as a collection of interchangeable concepts.

Authorship Boundary

TA-14 is:

created by Greggory Don Butler
architected by Greggory Don Butler
defined under a single authorship

TA-14 is not:

co-created
co-developed
jointly authored
owned by multiple parties
open for reinterpretation under third-party authorship

Unless explicitly stated in writing, no organization, authority, firm, or individual may claim:

co-authorship
co-development
shared origin
joint ownership
derivative authorship

External parties may study, reference, and apply TA-14 concepts.

They may not represent TA-14 as something they created or co-created.

Architectural Authority

Architectural authority refers to who defines the structure, meaning, and constraints of the system.

For TA-14:

the architectural authority resides with the original author

This includes authority over:

core definitions
execution sequence
admissibility conditions
boundary requirements
implementation principles
permitted interpretations
representation boundaries

External implementations, applications, or interpretations must not override or redefine the architecture.

TA-14 may inform systems.

It is not redefined by them.

Relationship to External Organizations

TA-14 is independent.

It is not affiliated with, certified by, endorsed by, partnered with, licensed by, or co-developed with any external organization unless explicitly stated in writing.

This includes, but is not limited to:

TÜV AUSTRIA
regulatory authorities
audit bodies
consulting firms
standards organizations
certification entities
technology vendors
legal organizations

TA-14 may be referenced in:

audit contexts
regulatory discussions
compliance frameworks
AI governance structures
financial systems
insurance processes
environmental systems

However, such references do not create:

certification
endorsement
approval
partnership
affiliation
representation

TA-14 remains an independent architecture.

Permitted Attribution

All professional, technical, audit-facing, or public references to TA-14 should include clear authorship attribution.

Preferred attribution:

“TA-14, created and architected by Greggory Don Butler…”

Alternative acceptable forms:

“TA-14 architecture by Greggory Don Butler”
“TA-14 (Greggory Don Butler)”

Attribution should not be removed in contexts where TA-14 is being relied upon, cited, or presented as part of a methodology, framework, or system description.

Attribution ensures:

clarity of origin
consistency of interpretation
preservation of architectural meaning

Representation Boundary

External parties may:

study TA-14
reference TA-14
apply TA-14 concepts
design systems informed by TA-14
discuss TA-14 in technical or governance contexts

External parties may not:

represent TA-14 as their own framework
present themselves as official TA-14 authorities
certify systems or organizations “under TA-14”
imply endorsement, partnership, or affiliation
rebrand TA-14 under another name
modify core definitions while retaining the name TA-14

If a system is influenced by TA-14, it should be described as:

“informed by TA-14”
“aligned with TA-14 principles”
“designed using TA-14 as a reference architecture”

It should not be described as:

“a TA-14 system”
“TA-14 certified”
“TA-14 compliant”

unless a formal, explicit framework for such designation is defined by the author.

Why Authorship Matters in TA-14

TA-14 defines conditions under which actions are allowed to become consequential.

It is not merely descriptive.

It is normative.

It establishes:

what must be true before execution
what constitutes admissible evidence
how systems must enforce boundaries
when execution is permitted or denied

If authorship is unclear:

definitions may drift
terms may be reinterpreted
boundaries may weaken
implementation may diverge
external claims may become inaccurate
legal ambiguity may arise

TA-14’s effectiveness depends on precision.

Precision depends on consistent definition.

Consistent definition depends on clear authorship.

Protection Against Misrepresentation

Because TA-14 operates in high-consequence domains, misrepresentation creates risk.

Misrepresentation may include:

claiming certification where none exists
implying endorsement by authorities
stating co-development with external organizations
presenting TA-14 as a compliance guarantee
rebranding TA-14 under a different framework name
reducing TA-14 to logging, audit, or AI explainability

When misrepresentation occurs, it should be corrected clearly.

A standard correction may state:

“TA-14 is an execution integrity architecture created and architected by Greggory Don Butler. It may be referenced as an informing governance architecture. This reference does not imply certification, partnership, endorsement, licensing, approval, co-development, co-authorship, or formal affiliation.”

Correction is not optional.

It preserves the integrity of the architecture and protects those relying on it.

TA-14 as an Informing Architecture

TA-14 may be used to inform:

system design
execution governance
audit-readiness thinking
AI oversight structures
financial execution controls
insurance execution logic
environmental integrity systems
compliance interpretation

In these contexts, TA-14 provides:

a record-first model
a framework for admissible evidence
a structure for commit-time enforcement
a discipline for execution boundaries

However, TA-14 does not transfer authority.

It informs.

It does not certify.

It guides.

It does not approve.

It defines structure.

It does not replace judgment.

Closing Statement

TA-14 is an authorship-bound execution integrity architecture.

It defines what must be true before a consequential action is allowed to occur.

It may be studied, referenced, and applied.

It must be attributed accurately.

It must not be re-authored, redefined, or misrepresented.

Authorship clarity preserves the architecture.

Architectural integrity preserves execution.

Execution integrity protects people, systems, institutions, and outcomes.

That boundary must remain intact.