I am a philosopher who studies science. So I am a philosopher of science. That could mean that I am good at neither science nor philosophy. I hope the above assertion is wrong. But I have been wrong more than once. 

I am particularly interested in how thought experiments and experiments work in science. I also like studying the history of science. My preference is for empirically informed philosophical analysis to speculation. The attempt is to find the demon, if any, in the details. For the details of my research, check my publications.