Suite 6
D major BWV 1012
Editor's Notes
D major BWV 1012
Editor's Notes
Bar 31, 1st bass note:
All editions except Yokoyama's give G, following AMB, but it is in fact G-sharp, as we can see in Kellner's copy (note that the first bar shown, bar 30, is in alto clef) .
AMB forgot to write the sharp sign.
Probably she couldn't recognize that it was an accidental sign
Source C:
Source D:
Sources C and D differ from Sources A and B. Curiously, all four manuscripts give different readings.
The reading in Source [G] (the hypothetical common exemplar of Sources C and D) was probably A , but I don't know why Source D added an F-sharp below the A.
We can imagine that the scribe of Source [G] was dissatisfied with the reading found in AMB Yes, he was right. Below I show the last three bars of the three sources, omitting all rests and anticipations.
I suggest playing them on an organ, or using a positive-organ sound on an electronic keyboard. Or listen to the audio file below.
It is easy to hear that the extended G in the bass in AMB is too long, sounds unnatural, and creates a muddy texture.
The reading in Source [G] is simple and natural.
But Kellener is the most beutiful and rich in harmony.
It corresponds to preceding chromatic progression of bass (bar 28 - 29).
I don't know why Paris first edition (1824) is same as AMB.
Bar 8, 4th note:
Most editions show e according to Anna Magdalena Bach (AMB) (and Sources C and D).
But it is probably a mistake because the 7th chord of next bar requires c-sharp as a preparation of suspension. Only Bach Gesellschaft Ausgabe (BGA/1879) take c-sharp according to Kellner.
Kellner:
BGA (but the chord of next bar is a mistake since Paris first edition):
I show you the harmony reduction for easy understanding.
A similar example from the Allemande of the 6th Suite (bar 6, 2nd and 3rd beats).