I decided to run for the SREC because I want to be a voice that truly represents our district at the statewide level, not just at the precinct or county level. As a precinct and county‑level activist, I’ve seen how important it is that county chairs are heard and supported, not left behind or overlooked in the bigger conversation. Serving on the SREC gives me a direct seat at the table to make sure our district’s priorities are raised, our county chairs don’t go without, and pragmatic conservative principles are actively defended in policy and platform decisions. 

I see the SREC as both a grassroots watchdog and a support arm for leadership, but I lean toward the watchdog role because the district and precinct activists are ultimately the foundation of the party. I fit in as someone who will support leadership when it aligns with conservative principles and strong grassroots engagement, but will also hold them accountable when decisions risk sidelining county chairs, volunteers, or our district’s priorities. My goal is to make sure the SREC amplifies the grassroots, not just smooths the way for top‑down decisions. 

I’m running first and foremost to help the party win elections, but I believe the best way to do that is to hold leadership accountable and advance a clear conservative policy agenda. I want to make sure our strategies actually reflect the priorities of the district and our county chairs, not just the preferences of a small group at the top. So I see my role as using the SREC to strengthen the party’s effectiveness at the ballot box while also making sure our platform and leadership decisions stay grounded in principled, grassroots conservatism. 

My track record in grassroots organizing includes working at the precinct and county level: running voter‑contact efforts, helping with conventions and rallies, and supporting volunteer‑driven campaigns on the ground. That experience has taught me how important it is to listen to county chairs, precinct officers, and everyday activists, and to make their voices heard in the decision‑making process. If elected to the SREC, I’ll bring that same hands‑on, district‑focused approach to the statewide level—making sure our district’s priorities are represented, our county chairs don’t go without, and the party’s strategy stays rooted in the grassroots rather than insulated at the top.

If elected, I plan to support activists and volunteers in our Senate District by making sure they are heard, equipped, and never left behind by the party apparatus. I’ll maintain regular communication with county chairs, precinct chairs, and grassroots leaders so their concerns and ideas are represented at the SREC level, and I’ll push for practical tools—training, resources, and clear messaging—that help them turn out votes and grow their precincts. My goal is to be a bridge between the district and the state party so that everyday activists feel seen, respected, and empowered, not just used as manpower for the next election. 

We need consistent, clear messaging that explains conservative principles in everyday language, matches what voters see on the ground, and avoids constant infighting noise. That has to be paired with more disciplined outreach: training precincts and volunteers so they can talk confidently about our platform, not just repeat slogans. At the same time, we need internal discipline to keep the party focused on winning elections and supporting our county chairs, instead of getting bogged down in performative battles that push away ordinary Republicans. 

I think the SREC has sometimes prioritized internal politics and culture‑war gestures over clear, practical priorities that help activists win elections and counties function effectively. In recent years, it has at times appeared disconnected from the daily realities of precinct and county chairs, which can make the SREC feel more like a reactive convention body than a steady, district‑focused leadership team.

If elected, I would push to change that by making the SREC more transparent, more accessible, and more consistently aligned with what precincts and county chairs actually need—clear communication, realistic policy goals, and support that shows up between conventions, not just during them. I’d also encourage the SREC to focus on a shorter list of core priorities so that our decisions translate into real legislative and organizational impact, not just resolutions that get filed away.

I believe the SREC should be as transparent as practically possible with both delegates and the public when it comes to votes, finances, and minutes. Routine votes, adopted resolutions, and key policy decisions should be clearly recorded and posted in a timely way so that delegates and county chairs can see how their representatives are voting and what direction the party is taking.

Financial records and major expenditures should also be disclosed in a clear, digestible format—not hidden behind committees or jargon—so activists can trust that party funds are being used to support precincts, elections, and district‑level work, not internal projects that lack accountability. At the same time, basic operational details like meeting minutes should be published promptly so people can follow what’s happening between conventions and hold the SREC accountable between election cycles

I think the SREC has sometimes drifted too far into internal power‑play and culture‑war symbolism, at the expense of clear, practical support for county chairs, precincts, and everyday activists. In recent years, certain uses of censure and platform language have come across as more about intra‑party punishment than about building a winning, unified party, which can alienate both voters and volunteers.

If elected, I would push to change that by focusing the SREC on a shorter, more disciplined set of priorities—secure elections, strong border policy, fiscal conservatism, and school choice—while scaling back or softening the most inflammatory language that mainly serves to divide Republicans. I’d also advocate for more transparency, regular communication with county chairs, and tangible help for precinct‑level organizing, so the SREC becomes a body that strengthens the grassroots rather than distracting from it.

I can realistically commit a substantial amount of time and energy to SREC duties while still maintaining my work and family responsibilities because I’m used to juggling demanding schedules as an entrepreneur and political organizer. I structure my time around priority blocks—hours set aside for meetings, travel, correspondence, and district coordination—and I protect my family and core work obligations by planning those in advance and sticking to them.

If elected, I would treat SREC service as a serious commitment, not a side project: attending meetings consistently, responding promptly to county chairs and activists, and preparing thoughtfully for votes and platform work, but I would also be upfront about my limits and communicate clearly if any scheduling conflicts arise. My goal is to be a reliable, present SREC member without letting precinct‑level work, my business, or my family fall through the cracks.

During my term on the SREC, my specific goals are:

• To help activate at least one new precinct chair per county in our district who is currently without one, and keep in touch with them quarterly.

• To organize or facilitate at least two district‑wide training sessions per year—on topics like door‑to‑door canvassing, voter registration, and campaign rules—open to county chairs, precinct officers, and volunteers.

• To publish a clear, regular district update—such as a brief email or newsletter—before and after each major SREC meeting, so county chairs and activists know what happened and how it affects them.

These goals are designed to strengthen our grassroots, support our county chairs, and make sure the SREC is actually serving the district, not just conducting internal business out of sight.

A good SREC member is someone who listens to the district, stays grounded in the grassroots, and can balance strong convictions with real‑world practicality. They show up consistently, know their county chairs by name, defend the party platform without getting lost in internal drama, and make decisions that actually help precincts win elections rather than just satisfy internal factions.

I measure up because I already work at the precinct and county level, I’ve been involved in conventions and organizing, and I’m running for the SREC specifically to amplify our district’s voice and make sure county chairs don’t go without. I bring hands‑on experience, a clear focus on principles and voter‑contact, and a willingness to speak up when the party is off track—while still respecting the will of the committee once a decision is made.

If given the chance to represent our district on the SREC, I will be a voice for the grassroots, not just for the convention floor. I’ll stand with county chairs, support precinct organizers, and vote for decisions that help Republicans win elections while staying true to our conservative principles. On that basis, I ask for your support, your vote, and the opportunity to serve the party at the SREC level.