Published Papers
🎗️Historical Differences in Female-Owned Manufacturing Establishments: The United States, 1850--1880 with Richard Hornbeck, Martin Rotemberg, Anders Humlum (NBER Working Paper) (AEA Papers & Proceedings, 2025)
Related media coverage:
Podcast by Marketplace NPR
YouTube Video by Chicago Booth Review
Blogpost at Chicago Booth Review
🎗️The Interaction of Real and Financial Markets in the Global Economy: What Role Does China Play? (2019), Handbook of Global Financial Markets Transformations, Dependence, and Risk Spillovers, with Sumru Altug and Cem Cakmakli
Working Papers
🎗️(Revise & Re-submit, Research Policy) Mapping International Technological Trajectories: Evidence from Multiple Patent Offices over Four Centuries with John Van Reenen, Antonin Bergeaud
(CEPR) (CEP-LSE) (NBER) (VoxEU Piece)
We introduce a methodology to measure cross-country trends in innovation capability - "technological trajectories'' and implement this on a rich new patent dataset from 1836 to 2016. Intuitively, trajectories are revealed by a country's sustained increases in patenting across multiple jurisdictions. We first describe the data patterns, showing the relative decline of the UK, the rise of the US and Germany, and then Japan and China. We then econometrically estimate trajectories on (i) the post-1902 period for France, Germany, Japan, the UK and US, and (ii) the post-1960 period for a wider sample of 40 countries. Our trajectories are strongly positively correlated with TFP growth, and also (but less strongly) with the growth of labour productivity and capital intensity. We show that trajectories are predicted by several country attributes such as R&D, human capital, and defence spending.
🎗️(Accepted, Social Science History) Quantifying Patenting by Women in the U.S., 1845-1924 with Mike Andrews and Enrico Berkes
Patents do not report inventors' gender, requiring researchers to infer the gender of inventors. To conduct these inferences, researchers must make several choices. We show how these researcher choices can affect conclusions about the role of women inventors in the U.S. from 1845 to 1924. More specifically, we compare two automated methods to determine inventor gender for the universe of U.S. patents: inferring gender from inventors' first names and linking inventors to census data. These methods paint similar pictures about aggregate patterns of patenting by women, but often give different predictions about the gender of particular inventors. Both automated methods identify a larger number of patents by women inventors than have previously been identified in the literature. Using the gender inferred by these two methods, we study how the characteristics of patents and inventors differ by gender.
🎗️(Reject and Re-submit, Research Policy) AI-Skilled Labor, Intangible Capital and Firm Productivity: Evidence from the TensorFlow Shock with Suleyman Faruk Gozen and Yusuf Ozkara
This paper studies how the complementarity between intangible capital and AI-skilled workers shapes firm-level productivity. We exploit the 2015 release of Google TensorFlow as a plausibly exogenous shock to AI effectiveness. Using a difference-in-differences framework with value-added labor productivity and total factor productivity, we show that firms with a higher AI-worker share increase their productivity. The gains rise with firm size and intangible capital, and the effect is concentrated in the upper part of the productivity distribution. This evidence indicates that the complementarity between intangible capital and AI-skilled labor widens productivity dispersion. We also provide TensorFlow-specific evidence using job postings and worker profiles from Revelio Labs proprietary data.
🌟 (Under Review) Property Rights and Innovation Dynamism: The Role of Women Inventors by Ruveyda Nur Gozen (SSRN)
Related media coverage:
To what extent do inclusive institutions explain innovations? This paper examines the Married Women’s Property Acts, which granted US women independent property rights during the nineteenth century. Using the universe of patents and a staggered-adoption design, I show that the reforms led to a substantial increase in women’s patenting, with effects peaking about a decade after enactment. A back-of-the-envelope calculation suggests that these laws account for at least one-third of women’s nineteenth-century innovations. Women’s inventions contributed to the volume of innovations without displacing men and their innovations were equally novel. I further implement triple-difference analysis with men and a neighbor-county border design; both confirming the women-specific reform effects. Mechanism analyses indicate that the Acts strengthened incentives and relaxed marital constraints: the likelihood of observing married women inventors -- including those with children -- rises after the reform. An establishment-level TFP analysis suggests productivity gains among women-owned establishments, offering suggestive evidence on the implications for the welfare effects of property rights.
🌟 Business Dynamism and Innovation: Evidence from a Novel 19th Century Microdata with Antonin Bergeaud, and Suleyman Gozen
We construct a novel establishment-level dataset combining the nineteenth-century U.S. Census of Manufactures (1850–1880) with patent records from CUSP to examine how innovation shaped firm performance in early industrial America. Patenting establishments were substantially larger than comparable non-patenters across all dimensions—employment, capital, output, and output per worker—with premia further amplified among firms that produced breakthrough inventions. Estimating establishment-level production functions using a Levinsohn-Petrin approach, we find that patenting is associated with higher revenue total factor productivity (TFPR) while leaving markups unchanged on average. Breakthrough innovations, however, are associated with gains on both margins, with a size decomposition revealing the strongest amplification among the largest establishments — consistent with superstar dynamics — yet small breakthrough innovators also capture meaningful gains, suggesting the returns to invention were not exclusive to large firms.
🌟 Board Characteristics and AI Adoption (Most Recent Version here) with Suleyman Gozen and Sezer Yasar
We study the relationship between corporate board characteristics and firm-level artificial intelligence (AI) adoption. Linking BoardEx director data to Compustat for U.S. public firms, we first create a AI Board Index based on board members' breadth of experience in technology firms and technicality of their roles. Preliminary results suggest that firms whose directors score higher on this index adopt substantially more AI than their industry-year peers. We find that the more experience board members have at distinct technology firms and at leading technology firms, the more likely the firm is to adopt AI. We also find that firms with higher sales growth, greater R&D investment, and higher liquidity adopt more AI. Studying the roles of CEOs and boards separately, AI adoption is most likely when both board members and the CEO have stronger networks with technology firms. The results are robust to excluding the technology sector and to controlling for board and firm characteristics, industry-by-year fixed effects, and firm fixed effects. Finally, we use the deaths of board members as a quasi-random shock to board composition and find that the unexpected death of a more technical director while in office slows down the firm's AI adoption.
🌟 Brexit and the Falling Innovation Dynamism with Ralf Martin, Esther Bøler, and Maxwell Read
We study the effects of Brexit on innovation and international innovation collaborations in the UK. Our key finding is that overall innovation in the UK has declined and patent collaborations with the European Union fell significantly with Brexit. We find similar effects for research projects funded by the EU. Firms involved in collaborative innovation with scientists in the EU see a larger decline in patenting activity compared with other firms. We suggest that our results show a lower-bound estimate of the impact of Brexit on innovation in the UK, and that barriers to innovation could have more serious negative implications for UK economic outcomes in the long run.