Embedded Files
Martial Law
Martial Law
The declaration of martial law in Poland on December 13, 1981, marked an important moment in Cold War history. Though Soviet forces did not directly invade, the Soviet Union was deeply involved behind the scenes in Poland. They applied intense pressure and providing political, economic, and logistical support to the Polish Communist leadership. This section examines how and why martial law was imposed, how Soviet influence shaped these decisions, and what martial law meant for the people of Poland.
Background: Increasing Soviet Pressure
Background: Increasing Soviet Pressure
Soviet leaders repeatedly pressed Polish authorities to act decisively. Initially, they emphasized “balanced administrative measures,” but as Solidarity grew in strength, Soviet patience wore thin. By late 1980, discussions among Soviet and Warsaw Pact officials openly discussed the possibility of martial law. The Soyuz-80 military exercise plan had called for Soviet, East German, and Czechoslovakian troops to be ready to cross into Poland, surround major cities, and suppress unrest if necessary. Preparations placed Warsaw Pact forces on high alert.
Behind the scenes, a Soviet working group, including officials from the CPSU, KGB, Foreign Ministry, and General Staff, began developing detailed plans to weaken and ultimately destroy Solidarity. Their February 1981 "Program of Consolidation of Socialism in Poland" outlined steps like purging revisionists from the Party, crushing political opposition, collectivizing rural areas, and restructuring Poland's economy to align even closer with Moscow.
Solidarność marked the beginning of the end for Soviet-style Communism.
General Jaruzelski announces the martial Law on December 13, 1981
Soviet Influence on Jaruzelski’s Rise
Soviet Influence on Jaruzelski’s Rise
As tensions escalated, it became clear that General Wojciech Jaruzelski was the figure the Soviets preferred to lead the suppression efforts. Reports from Konstantin Rusakov noted that Jaruzelski was more willing than his predecessor, Stanisław Kania, to take a tough stance against Solidarity.
The Soviets pressured Kania to step down and supported Jaruzelski’s rise to power. In October 1981, Jaruzelski assumed the roles of First Secretary of the Polish United Workers' Party, Prime Minister, and Minister of Defense, consolidating critical authority in one individual. The Soviet Union applied direct political pressure, invoked ideological loyalty, and offered economic incentives by promising critical energy supplies and food aid to secure Jaruzelski’s cooperation.
Marshal Viktor Kulikov and other Soviet officials frequently traveled to Warsaw to oversee military preparations. Even as Jaruzelski hesitated making the call, fearing national backlash and civil war, Soviet threats of "fraternal assistance" (i.e., intervention) were very much still present.
This New York Times article gives further into the western perspective of the Soviet Union’s reactions to Solidarity. It also provides insight into how the Soviet Union attempted to project itself and its justification for its Polish relations to the Western world. The article says that Tass claimed "those who were provoking conflicts . . . were trying to achieve the subversive aims of these anti-socialist elements." The article reveals that the Soviet Union was attempting to gain sympathy, pitting Solidarity's leaders as politically-minded troublemakers. However, the article critically draws connections between the USSR's handling of Solidarity and the revolutions in Czechoslovakia and Hungary, confirming the Western disapproval that partially dissuaded direct military action from the Kremlin.
Michael Binyon. “Russians say political instigators now controlling Solidarity,” The New York Times (New York City, United States), March 28, 1981, Keston Center Archives.
The Implementation of Martial Law
The Implementation of Martial Law
By late 1981, both the Polish leadership under General Wojciech Jaruzelski and the Soviet leadership concluded that the declaration of martial law was not just probable—it was inevitable. Facing increasing pressure from Moscow, internal unrest heightened by Solidarity, and a weakening economy, Jaruzelski and his advisors prepared to take decisive action. On the night of December 12, 1981, Polish military and security forces launched a coordinated and wide-ranging operation across the country. Thousands of Solidarity activists, intellectuals, and political dissidents were arrested in raids that took place before dawn. These raids neutralized much of the organized opposition. By 6:00 a.m. on December 13, General Jaruzelski appeared on national radio and television to announce that martial law had been imposed. He claimed it was a necessary act to “save the nation from collapse” and prevent civil war. Tanks began to roll into the streets. Modes of communication were cut. Daily life in Poland transformed overnight into a dismal landscape dominated by soldiers and repression.
Although martial law was publicly presented as a “Polish solution,” Soviet influence and support were critical in enabling and sustaining the crackdown. Politically, Leonid Brezhnev congratulated Jaruzelski almost immediately. He portrayed martial law as a responsible choice to protect socialism in Poland. The Soviet leadership coordinated media messaging in Pravda and Izvestia across the Communist world. They framed the events as necessary to defend the "socialist brotherhood" against Western-sympathetic or even supported counterrevolutionaries.
ZOMO squads with police batons preparing to disperse and beat protesters. The sarcastic caption reads "outstretched hands of understanding" or "outstretched hands for agreement", with batons ironically symbolizing hands. [above]
The former PZPR headquarters in Gdańsk (right). ZOMO machine-gunned demonstrators from the rooftop [below]
The Impact on Polish Society
The Impact on Polish Society
The immediate consequences of martial law for the Polish people were devastating. Mass arrests went through the country, as over 10,000 activists, including nearly all of Solidarity’s leadership, were detained without formal charges or trials. Many were held in isolated internment camps under extremely harsh conditions. They were cut off from their families and denied legal support. Curfews and travel restrictions were enforced nationwide. This meant civilians were forbidden from leaving their homes after dark, and domestic travel required special permits. Border crossings were tightly prohibited, thus effectively trapping the population inside a military state.
Simultaneously, the regime harshly restricted freedom of expression. All independent newspapers, radio stations, and television programs were shut down or brought under strict state control. Censorship was omnipresent. The possession of underground literature or other publications would most often result in imprisonment. Yet, despite these oppressive measures, underground media networks conducted secret publishing operations known as "samizdat." This samizdat preserved the ideals of Solidarity and allowed for citizens to access broadcasts of uncensored news.
The military presence on the streets and in towns was both overwhelming and symbolic. Tanks and armored vehicles traveled city centers, and soldiers carrying automatic weapons became a regular sight in neighborhoods across the country. The psychological effect was profound. Martial law created an atmosphere of fear and distrust. For ordinary Polish people who were already struggling with severe shortages of food and other basic goods, the new conditions made life almost unbearable. Yet, resistance did not disappear. Many Poles joined underground networks. Their engagement in passive resistance effectively kept the spirit of opposition alive. They fostered a growing resentment toward both the already unpopular Polish regime and the ever-oppressive Soviet Union.
Conclusion
Conclusion
While martial law in Poland was officially declared by Polish authorities, it was importantly supported by Soviet resources so that it would achieve Soviet goals. Moscow may have avoided direct military invasion, but it orchestrated events to achieve its goal of stopping Solidarity without exposing itself to further global condemnation or economic hardship that would come with military engagement. However, the repression of Solidarity through martial law only stalled the inevitable. Far from completely putting down opposition, martial law deepened public anger. Through the underground resistance it fostered, the ultimate collapse of Communist rule not only in Poland but throughout Eastern Europe was made possible.
Sources
Sources
Andrzej Paczkowski and Andrzej Werblan, "'On the Decision to Introduce Martial Law in Poland in 1981': Two Historians Report to the Commission on Constitutional Oversight of the Sejm of the Republic of Poland," in Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars's Cold War International History Project, (1997): 1-58. https://www.wilsoncenter.org/sites/default/files/media/documents/publication/WP21.pdf
Andrzej Paczkowski and Inessa S. Yazhborovskaya, “THE SOVIETS AND THE POLISH CRISIS: THE ROAD TO MARTIAL LAW, 1980–1981.” In White Spots—Black Spots: Difficult Matters in Polish-Russian Relations, 1918–2008, edited by ADAM DANIEL ROTFELD and ANATOLY V. TORKUNOV, (2015): 431-466. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt166grd4.14.
Page updated
Google Sites
Report abuse