A qualitative (e.g., sex, race, class) or quantitative variable... that affects the direction and/or strength of a relation between an independent or predictor variable and a dependent or criterion variable... A basic moderator effect can be presented as an interaction between a focal independent variable and a factor (the moderator) that specifies the appropriate conditions for its operation... Moderator variables are typically introduced when there is an unexpectedly weak or inconsistent relation between a predictor and a criterion variable (Baron & Kenny, 1986).
Y = a + b.X + c.M
Y = a + (b + d.M).X + c.M
Y = a + b.X + c.M + d(X.M)
Should I hypothesize the form of the interactions in advance?
YES, not only should the existence of an interaction effect be predicted, but also its form. In particular, whether a moderator increases or decreases the association between two other variables should be specified as part of the a priori hypothesis (Dawson, 2014)
H1: The positive relationship between satisfaction and loyalty will be stronger when perceived image is high.
H2: The positive relationship between satisfaction and loyalty would be stronger for male compared to female.
H1: Body Mass Index (BMI) moderates the relationship between exercise and weight loss, such that for those with a low BMI, the effect is negative (i.e., you gain weight muscle mass), and for those with a high BMI, the effect is positive (i.e., exercising leads to weight loss).
i = interaction model; m = main effect model
0.02 Small
0.15 Medium
0.35 Large
“Even a small interaction effect can be meaningful under extreme conditions, if the resulting beta changes are meaningful, then it is important to take these conditions into account” (Chin, Marcolin & Newsted, 2003; p. 211).
The relationship between satisfaction and customer loyalty is stronger when Image is low…
Look at the gradient!
However, it is not entirely clear how it differs. If you get a positive coefficient, the positive coefficient of the interaction term suggests that it becomes more positive as Image increases; however, the size and precise nature of this effect is not easy to difine from examination of the coefficients alone, and becomes even more so when one or more of the coefficients are negative, or the standard deviations of X (IV) and Z (Moderator) are very different (Dawson, 2013).
An important consideration about categorical moderators is that they should only be used when the variable was originally measured as categories.
Continuous variables should never be converted to categorical variables for the purpose of testing interactions. Doing so reduces the statistical power of the test, making it more difficult to detect significant effects (Stone-Romero and Anderson 1994; Cohen et al. 2003), as well as throwing up theoretical questions about why particular dividing points should be used (Dawson, 2013).
Interaction plot for the categorical data moderator. Click here to download.
Interaction plot for the continuous data moderator. Click here to download.
Sharma, S., Durand, R. M., & Gur-Arie, O. (1981). ‘‘Identification and analysis of moderator variables’’. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 291 -300.
Dawson, J. F. (2013). Moderation in Management Research: What, Why, When, and How. Journal of Business and Psychology, DOI 10.1007/s10869-013-9308-7.