ABOUT
Philosophy of Science of Decision Making is an online research seminar run by Dr James Grayot of the Mind, Language, and Action Group (MLAG) of the University of Porto, Institute of Philosophy.
The aim of the seminar is to bring together philosophers of science and decision researchers across the cognitive, behavioral, and social sciences to discuss new and evolving trends in the study of human and non-human decision making. This includes phenomena such as reasoning and deliberation, preference formation, learning and optimization methods, tool use and decision-enhancing (and -disrupting) technologies, irrational and aberrant choice, addiction, self control and commitment strategies.
The seminar series does not privilege any particular philosophical or scientific perspective; rather, it seeks to provide a wide and welcoming platform for both speakers and attendees representing diverse fields, targets of study, and modes and methodologies of analysis, to share their ideas and research in progress.
If you are interested to attend a seminar and/or become a regular participant in the series, please email me at james.grayot@gmail.com with the subject line "PhilSciDec". Video conference links will be sent only to those who register with me by email prior to each seminar.
INVITED SPEAKERS
SEMINAR SCHEDULE
September 12, 2025
DON ROSS
Title: “Integrating the economics of networks with quantitative sociology”
Keywords: Agency, network models, influence propagation, information flow, game theory, utility functions
Abstract: One way of framing the general problem of unifying economic and sociological models is that economists assume agency, often to strongly idealised and empirically unrealistic degrees, while sociologists often idealise agency away. This long-observed barrier to unification is arguably too abstract to matter much (except to philosophers). When we focus specifically on network models, we see this difference again, but along with it a complementary duality that gives rise to a truly urgent scientific problem. The latest wave of sociological modelling of complex contagions (e.g., Centola 2018) has discovered, on theoretical and empirical grounds, that non-epistemic influence propagates most efficiently via clustered strong ties in peripheral sub-networks, rather than via week ties from hubs. Meanwhile, in game-theoretic models of networks, the more traditionally understood efficiency properties – formerly agreed on between sociologists and economists – endure. We can understand this as indicating fundamentally different dynamics separating influence propagation from information flow. This gives rise to a classic form of scientific conundrum. Most social change phenomena involve propagation of both influence and information. Thus outputs of network activation are net products of forces pushing in opposite directions, with structures that promote influence impeding information flow and vice-versa. Empirical adequacy thus depend on factorising theory that we don’t yet have. Here the traditional barrier to integration of sociology and economics emerges as a real practical problem: the sociological network models involve no agency, while the economic models assume immovable agency based on fixed utility functions. In this talk, I describe a new technical methodology for (i) incorporating agency into models of influence propagation, and (ii) allowing utility functions to shift under influence, while (iii) preserving the power of established game-theoretic solution concepts.
September 26, 2025
ARMIN SCHULZ
Title: “Agency: The Case for an Eliminative Pluralism "
Keywords: Agency, scientific pluralism, eliminativism, economics and biology, conceptual analysis
Abstract: Concepts of agency are invoked in explanations, models, theories, and predictions in many different sciences, from evolutionary biology to computer science and economics. In order to understand and assess the work in these sciences, therefore, it is crucial to understand these appeals to “agency.” To make progress in this, this paper makes the case for three interrelated conclusions. First, the best way to understand the question about the nature of agency is as an account that lays out defensible scientific uses of the concept of agency—not a purely metaphysical-philosophical account, or a purely interpretationist account. Second, the paper seeks to show that there is not one right answer about what an agent is—that is, we should be eliminativists about the general concept of agency. Third, though, it also shows that this should not be conflated with the view that anything goes as far as agency is concerned: in specific scientific contexts, such as economics and biology, there are more and less defensible views of agency in that context. That is, we should be scientific pluralists about agency.
October 10,2025
CAMILLA COLOMBO
Title: "Choice automation as choice deferral: rationality and autonomy"
Keywords: Choice automation, choice deferral, decisional enhancement, cognitive offloading, intrinsic value of choice, autonomy
October 24, 2025
MAGDA OSMAN
Title: “Judged unconscious manipulation and free choice are not neatly associated, at least not when we look at folk beliefs”
Keywords: Free choice, unconscious, causal attributions, agency, identity
November 7, 2025
ALIYA RUMANA
Title: "Rationality's role in rational analysis"
Keywords: Rational analysis, rationality, model calibration, data accommodation, overfitting
November 21, 2025
JOSÉ L. BERMÚDEZ
Title: “On the rationality of framing”
Keywords: Framing, rationality, frame-sensitive reasoning, ultraintensionality
December 5, 2025
CONRAD HEILMANN
Title: “Intrapersonal conflict resolved”
Keywords: Intrapersonal choice, weakness of will, choice over time, temporal discounting
December 19, 2025
ANGELICA KAUFMANN
Title: “Commitment in non-human animals”
Keywords: Commitment, choice, non-human animals, comparative ethology
January 9, 2026
WIM DE NEYS
Title: "The smart System 1: Advances in dual process theorizing"
Keywords: Dual process theory, System 1, System 2, intuitive vs. deliberate thought, system interaction
January 23, 2026
MALVINA ONGARO
Title: “Sustainable approaches for the effective management of natural risks”
Keywords: Risk management, uncertainty, natural hazards, cost-benefit analysis, multi-criteria analysis
February 6, 2026
MAGDALENA MALECKA
Title: “Heterodox economics and decision theory”
Keywords: (coming soon)
February 20, 2026
LUKAS BECK
Title: "Dispositions, representations, and social norms"
Keywords: Preferences, social norms, representation, explanation
March 6, 2026
ENRICO PETRACCA
Title: “Four shades of embodied rationality”
Keywords: Embodied rationality, ecological rationality, embodied cognition, extended cognition
March 20, 2026
MATTEO COLOMBO
Title: "Inference and association in (neuro)cognitive systems"
Keywords: Inference, association, response hypothesis, basal cognition, ecological rationality, neurocognitive systems
IN-PERSON WORKSHOP / PUBLICATIONS (2026)
Coming soon...
CONTACT
James Grayot, PhD
james.grayot (at) gmail (dot) com
Postdoctoral Research Fellow
Mind, Language and Action Group (MLAG)
Institute of Philosophy
Faculty of Letters of the University of Porto