Teaching Materials

Immunology Lecture Slides 

Here’s a Plus/Delta summary of the feedback shared by students for this lecture, based on both quantitative ratings and written comments:

Pluses (What went well)

• Strong technical merit and clarity — most students rated “Very Good” or “Good” across all four categories.

• Excellent knowledge and command of material; students consistently noted Pablo “knew what he was talking about.”

• Structured and organized slides — praised for logical flow and professional presentation.

• Engaging delivery — appreciated his responsiveness to questions and real-world examples.

• Slides transitions and visuals were appreciated for being detailed and informative.

Deltas (What could improve)

• Pacing — several noted the lecture felt too fast, especially for note-takers.

• Interactivity — students requested more engagement (e.g., fill-in-the-blanks, polls, or class questions).

• Visual guidance — suggestions to annotate slides, highlight key points, or use a laser pointer.

• Complex visuals — diagrams were “scary” or dense; some requested step-by-step breakdowns.

• Clarify priorities — clearer indication of what’s examinable vs. enrichment content.

• Conciseness — some slides could be more concise to improve readability and focus on listening.

• Confidence and pacing balance — a few mentioned brief pauses or slower transitions would help comprehension.

Next steps:

Based on this feedback, I will continue to create a learning environment that is both rigorous and accessible, using clear structure and purposeful engagement. However, I will make sure to incorporate more deliberate pacing, highlight essential concepts, and add interactive elements to support deeper understanding, specially in difficult topics such as Immunology and Design of Implantable Biomaterials.