with Lennart Ziegler
Discussion paper (January 2023)
submitted
Despite changing gender norms, few fathers decide to take parental leave after the birth of a child, and when they do, their leave spells are substantially shorter compared to mothers. This study examines how paternal leave-taking is affected by two key features of leave policies: flexibility in leave duration and financial incentives. To disentangle their impact, we exploit recent changes to the Austrian parental leave system, which initially offered flat monthly benefits for 36 months after childbirth. The first reform added considerably shorter leave options; the second reform introduced income-dependent benefits, increasing net income replacement rates to 80 percent. Using a regression discontinuity design based on eligibility cutoff dates, we find that both reforms had a strong impact on leave take-up of fathers. The availability of shorter leave options increased leave-taking by 23 percent, while the introduction of income-dependent benefits raised take-up by another 13 percent relative to pre-reform means. Despite these increases, the share of leave taken by fathers relative to mothers remained similar. Comparing the impact of the two reforms across different income groups, we conclude that higher flexibility is more effective than stronger financial compensation in raising the number of leave-taking fathers.
with Andrea Cintolesi and Mario Pagliero
We investigate the earnings returns to obtaining a license to practice law by leveraging discontinuities at the bar exam. Law graduates who became lawyers after barely passing the bar exam earned 20,000 euros (50%) more in annual wages than they would have in a career outside the legal profession. These returns are not attributable to monopoly rents created by entry barriers. Instead, they represent a compensating differential for the higher risk associated with the legal profession, relative to safer alternative occupations for law graduates.